Revision as of 10:25, 14 November 2019

Text

Letter Finding 11/5/08 Application for Amendment Acceptable for Review
	ML083500575
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	12/18/2008
From:	Tam P; Plant Licensing Branch III
To:	O'Connor T; Northern States Power Co
	Tam P
References
	TAC MD9990
	Download: ML083500575 (2)
	v • d • e

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 December 18, 2008 Mr. Timothy J. O'Connor Site Vice President Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company 2807 West County Road 75 Monticello, MN 55362-9637

SUBJECT:

MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT -ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF APPLICATION FOR LICENSE AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO EXTENDED POWER UPRATE (TAC NO. MD9990)

Dear Mr. O'Connor:

By letter dated November 5, 2008 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML083230111), Northern States Power Company submitted the SUbject application. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff performed an acceptance review to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an application for amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the application address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed the SUbject application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. Please contact me if you have any questions.

~~v~

Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-263 cc: Distribution via ListServ

December 18, 2008 Mr. Timothy J. O'Connor Site Vice President Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company 2807 West County Road 75 Monticello, MN 55362-9637

SUBJECT:

MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATII\IG PLANT - ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF APPLICATION FOR LICENSE AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO EXTENDED POWER UPRATE (TAC NO. MD9990)

Dear Mr. O'Connor:

By letter dated November 5, 2008 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML083230111), Northern States Power Company submitted the subject application. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff performed an acceptance review to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an application for amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the application address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed the subject application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely, I RAJ Peter S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-263 cc: Distribution via ListServ DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC LPL3-1 r/f RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource RidsNrrPMMonticello Resource RidsNrrLATHarris Resource RidsOGCRp Resource RidsAcrsAcnw MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDirsSbpb RidsRgn3MailCenter Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Accession No'.. ML083500575 OFFICE LPL3-1/PM LPL3-1/LA LPL3-1/BC NAME PTam THarris LJames DATE 12/18/08 12/18/08 12/18/08 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy

v t e Letter Sequence Other
TAC:MD9990, Clarify Application of Setpoint Methodology for LSSS Functions (Approved, Closed)
Initiation Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request Acceptance Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement Administration Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting Questions 16 December 2008 11 February 2009 11 March 2009 12 March 2009 18 March 2009 18 March 2009 19 March 2009 20 March 2009 23 March 2009 29 March 2009 28 March 2009 28 March 2009 6 April 2009 6 April 2009 29 April 2009 26 June 2009 2 July 2009 2 July 2009 14 July 2009 14 July 2009 5 November 2009 16 March 2011 12 September 2011 28 March 2013 17 May 2013 9 July 2013 18 December 2008 18 December 2008 19 March 2009 25 October 2009 15 February 2013 12 March 2013 10 May 2013 24 April 2013 Answers 25 January 2010 13 January 2012 7 March 2013 18 March 2013 21 March 2013 10 April 2013 18 July 2013 18 July 2013 2 August 2013 18 May 2016 19 July 2012 31 January 2013 29 March 2013 10 April 2013 Results Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval Other: L-MT-08-091, Calculation 0801040.301, Steam Dryer Outer Hood Submodel Analysis, L-MT-09-002, Response to NRC Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Branch Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated December 5, 2008, L-MT-09-003, Response to NRC Environmental Branch Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated December 18, 2008, L-MT-09-004, Enclosures 2 - 4: NSPM Response to Containment & Ventilation Branch RAI Numbers 2, 3 and 4 Dated December 18, 2008, L-MT-09-026, Calculation 0000-0081-6958 MNGP-PRNMS-APRM Calc-2008-NP, Rev. 1, Average Power Range Monitor Selected Prnm Licensing Setpoints - EPU Operation (Numac), L-MT-09-027, Extended Power Uprate: Response to Instrumentation and Controls Branch RAI No. 3 Dated April 6, 2009, L-MT-09-044, Extended Power Uprate: Response to NRC Mechanical and Civil Engineering Review Branch (Emcb) Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated March 28, 2009, L-MT-09-049, Drawing C.5-2007, Revision 15, Failure to Scram, L-MT-09-073, Extended Power Uprate: Response to NRC Containment and Ventilation Review Branch (Scvb) Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated July 2, 2009 and July 14, 2009, L-MT-09-083, Extended Power Uprate: Limit Curves Requested by the Mechanical and Civil Review Branch (Emcb) Associated with Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated March 20, 2009, L-MT-09-088, Extended Power Uprate: Revision to Clarify Text in Enclosures 5 and 7 of L-MT-08-052, L-MT-09-097, Extended Power Uprate: Acknowledgement of NRC Review Delay, L-MT-10-025, Extended Power Uprate (Epu): Response to NRC-NSPM February 25, 2010 Conference Call, L-MT-10-072, Extended Power Uprate: Updates to Docketed Information, L-MT-11-044, Uprate (Epu): Update on EPU Commitments, L-MT-12-056, WCAP-17549-NP, Rev. 0, Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer Structural Evaluation for High-Cycle Acoustic Loads Using ACE, L-MT-12-090, Westinghouse, LTR-A&SA-12-8, Rev. 1, Attachment B, Recommendations for Inspections of the Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer, L-MT-12-114, Drawing C.5-2007, Rev. 17, Failure to Scram, L-MT-13-020, Enclosure 1 - Responses to the Gap Analysis, L-MT-13-029, Enclosure 14 to L-MT-13-029 - WCAP-17716-NP, Revision 0, Benchmarking of the Acoustic Circuit Enhanced Revision 2.0 for the Monticello Steam Dryer Replacement Project, L-MT-13-091, WCAP-17716-NP, Revision 1 - Benchmarking of the Acoustic Circuit Enhanced Revision 2.0 for the Monticello Steam Dryer Replacement Project, Enclosure 14, L-MT-13-092, Extended Power Uprate (Epu): Completion of EPU Commitments, Proposed License Conditions and Revised Power Ascension Test Plan, L-MT-15-074, Enclosure 7, WCAP-18604-NP, Revision 0, Monticello EPU Main Steam Line Strain Data Evaluation Report, L-MT-16-017, Revised Commitment to Reconcile Analysis of Bypass Voiding for Transition to Areva Analysis Methodology, L-MT-16-071, Submittal of 2016 Annual Report of Changes in Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Models Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.46, ML083400402, ML083500575, ML083570610, ML083590127, ML090710680, ML090710682, ML090710683, ML091120578, ML091140470, ML091410121, ML091410122, ML091410123, ML091410124, ML091760769, ML092090321, ML092290250, ML092790191, ML092810554, ML093160816, ML093220925, ML093220964, ML093620024, ML100980009, ML101890915, ML102010461... further results
MONTHYEAR2009-01-14 [Table View]

ML083500575: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:25, 14 November 2019

Text

SUBJECT:

Dear Mr. O'Connor:

SUBJECT:

Dear Mr. O'Connor:

Navigation menu

ML083500575: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:25, 14 November 2019

Text

SUBJECT:

Dear Mr. O'Connor:

SUBJECT:

Dear Mr. O'Connor:

Navigation menu

Search