ML13018A189: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Orf, Tracy Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:54 PM To: Bob Tomonto (bob.tomonto@fpl.com)
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                       Orf, Tracy Sent:                       Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:54 PM To:                         Bob Tomonto (bob.tomonto@fpl.com)
Cc: Olga Hanek (olga_hanek@fpl.com)
Cc:                         Olga Hanek (olga_hanek@fpl.com)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 - Acceptance Re view of License Amendment Request No. 212 Regarding Potential Non-Conser vative Action and Surveillance Requirement in Technical Specification 3.5.2 on ECCS Subsystems By letter dated October 30, 2012, Florida Power & Light Company submitted a license amendment request for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory  
Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 - Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request No. 212 Regarding Potential Non-Conservative Action and Surveillance Requirement in Technical Specification 3.5.2 on ECCS Subsystems By letter dated October 30, 2012, Florida Power & Light Company submitted a license amendment request for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie & Turkey Point Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788 1


Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           583 Mail Envelope Properties       (Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov20130116135400)
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in
 
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that
 
impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
 
Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie & Turkey Point
 
Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788
 
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 583   Mail Envelope Properties   (Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov20130116135400)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 - Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request No. 212 Regarding Potential Non-Conservative Action and Surveillance Requirement in Technical Specification 3.5.2 on ECCS Subsystems Sent Date:   1/16/2013 1:54:10 PM Received Date: 1/16/2013 1:54:00 PM From:   Orf, Tracy Created By:   Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov  
Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 - Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request No. 212 Regarding Potential Non-Conservative Action and Surveillance Requirement in Technical Specification 3.5.2 on ECCS Subsystems Sent Date:               1/16/2013 1:54:10 PM Received Date:           1/16/2013 1:54:00 PM From:                   Orf, Tracy Created By:             Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"Olga Hanek (olga_hanek@fpl.com)" <olga_hanek@fpl.com>
Recipients:     "Olga Hanek (olga_hanek@fpl.com)" <olga_hanek@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None "Bob Tomonto (bob.tomonto@fpl.com)" <bob.tomonto@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None "Bob Tomonto (bob.tomonto@fpl.com)" <bob.tomonto@fpl.com>
 
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1721     1/16/2013 1:54:00 PM Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Files                             Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                           1721                     1/16/2013 1:54:00 PM Options Priority:                         Standard Return Notification:             No Reply Requested:                 No Sensitivity:                     Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 16:18, 11 November 2019

Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request No. 212 Regarding Potential Non-Conservative Action and Surveillance Requirement in Technical Specification 3.5.2 on ECCS Subsystems
ML13018A189
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/16/2013
From: Orf T
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Tomonto R
Florida Power & Light Co
References
Download: ML13018A189 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Orf, Tracy Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:54 PM To: Bob Tomonto (bob.tomonto@fpl.com)

Cc: Olga Hanek (olga_hanek@fpl.com)

Subject:

Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 - Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request No. 212 Regarding Potential Non-Conservative Action and Surveillance Requirement in Technical Specification 3.5.2 on ECCS Subsystems By letter dated October 30, 2012, Florida Power & Light Company submitted a license amendment request for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie & Turkey Point Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 583 Mail Envelope Properties (Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov20130116135400)

Subject:

Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 - Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request No. 212 Regarding Potential Non-Conservative Action and Surveillance Requirement in Technical Specification 3.5.2 on ECCS Subsystems Sent Date: 1/16/2013 1:54:10 PM Received Date: 1/16/2013 1:54:00 PM From: Orf, Tracy Created By: Tracy.Orf@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Olga Hanek (olga_hanek@fpl.com)" <olga_hanek@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None "Bob Tomonto (bob.tomonto@fpl.com)" <bob.tomonto@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1721 1/16/2013 1:54:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: