ML13254A049: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:September 11, 2013  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITE D S TATE S
 
                                  NUC LEAR RE GULATOR Y C OMMI S SI ON
                                                    R E G IO N I V
Mr. Oscar A. Limpias, Vice President-Nuclear  
                                              1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD
 
                                        AR L I NGTON , TEXAS 7 601 1- 4511
and Chief Nuclear Officer Nebraska Public Power District  
                                          September 11, 2013
Cooper Nuclear Station  
Mr. Oscar A. Limpias, Vice President-Nuclear
72676 648A Avenue  
and Chief Nuclear Officer
 
Nebraska Public Power District
Brownville, NE 68321  
Cooper Nuclear Station
 
72676 648A Avenue
  SUBJECT: COOPER NUCLEAR STATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000298/2013005) AND REQUEST FOR  
Brownville, NE 68321
INFORMATION  
SUBJECT:         COOPER NUCLEAR STATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION
                (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000298/2013005) AND REQUEST FOR
Dear Mr. Limpias:  
                INFORMATION
From October 21 through 25, 2013, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's
Dear Mr. Limpias:
(NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification inspection at Cooper  
From October 21 through 25, 2013, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions
Nuclear Station, using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.11B, "Licensed Operator  
(NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification inspection at Cooper
Requalification Program.Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive  
Nuclear Station, using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.11B, Licensed Operator
inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your st
Requalification Program. Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive
aff. In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for  
inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your
documents needed for this inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups.
onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for
The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the  
documents needed for this inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups.
inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B  
The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the
of the enclosure) identifies the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group (Section C of this enclosure) identifie
inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B
s the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important  
of the enclosure) identifies the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The
that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of  
third group (Section C of this enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out
additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the  
the inspection and are usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important
inspection.  
that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand  
additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the
that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Jodie Olberding of your licensing  
inspection.
organization. Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of  
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand
examination activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr. Steve Garchow at (817) 200-1426  
that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Jodie Olberding of your licensing
(Steve.Garchow@nrc.gov) or Mr. Duane Strickland at (817) 200-1570  
organization. Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of
(Duane.Strickland@NRC.gov
examination activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material
).  UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IV1600 EAST LAMAR BLVDARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511
requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr. Steve Garchow at (817) 200-1426
O. Limpias - 2 -
(Steve.Garchow@nrc.gov) or Mr. Duane Strickland at (817) 200-1570
(Duane.Strickland@NRC.gov).
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).  Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control
number 3150-0018.  The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control
 
number.  In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
 
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS).  ADAMS
is accessible from the NRC
web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
Sincerely,
  /RA/  Vince Gaddy, Chief
Operations Branch 
Division of Reactor Safety
 
Docket:  50-298 License:  DPR-46
Enclosure:
Inservice Inspection Document Request


cc: Electronic Distribution for Cooper Nuclear Station  
O. Limpias                                  -2-
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
 
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control
number 3150-0018. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control
number.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC
web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
                                                        Sincerely,
                                                        /RA/
                                                        Vince Gaddy, Chief
                                                        Operations Branch
                                                        Division of Reactor Safety
Docket: 50-298
License: DPR-46
Enclosure:
Inservice Inspection Document Request
cc: Electronic Distribution for Cooper Nuclear Station


 
ML13254A049
ADAMS:    No    Yes  SUNSI Review Complete Reviewer Initials: SMG
  Publicly Available  Non-Sensitive
  Non-publicly Available  Sensitive SOE:OB C:OB    SGarchow VGaddy    /RA/ /RA/    9/11/13 9/11/13   
  - 1 - Enclosure BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
FROM: Steve Garchow Senior Operations Engineer, NRC RIV


817-200-1426
ML13254A049
  TO: Scott DeRosier Operator Training Superintendent, Cooper Nuclear Station
ADAMS:  No  Yes SUNSI Review Complete                Reviewer Initials: SMG
402-825-5573
                    Publicly Available                  Non-Sensitive
                    Non-publicly Available              Sensitive
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT OCTOBER 21-25, 2013, LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM INSPECTION (IP 71111.11B)
SOE:OB        C:OB
A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation activities.  These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module
SGarchow      VGaddy
(i.e., 2.02, 2.04, etc).  Requested materials should be sent either electronically or
/RA/          /RA/
hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than June 15, 2012.
9/11/13      9/11/13
* Electronically:   TO: E-mail address 
Steve.Garchow@NRC.Gov
  CC:  Duane.Strickland@NRC.Gov )  * Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV 1600 E. Lamar Blvd Arlington, TX 76011


ATTN: Steve Garchow  
            BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
General Requests:
FROM:          Steve Garchow
* List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)  
                Senior Operations Engineer, NRC RIV
* Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR evaluators identified)  
                817-200-1426
* Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training  
TO:            Scott DeRosier
program up to date  
                Operator Training Superintendent, Cooper Nuclear Station
* List of outstanding LOR program changes  
                402-825-5573
* List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR  
SUBJECT:        INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT OCTOBER 21-25, 2013, LICENSED
program since last BRQ  
                OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM INSPECTION (IP 71111.11B)
* Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator requalification training program  
A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation
* Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes  
  activities. These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module
* Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes  
  (i.e., 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materials should be sent either electronically or
* Licensed operator training schedule for the week of October 21, 2013  
  hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than June 15, 2012.
B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either  
  *    Electronically: TO: E-mail address Steve.Garchow@NRC.Gov
electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on October 21, 2013. Note that it is not  
                        CC: Duane.Strickland@NRC.Gov )
required to make copies of all the materials, but to have them available.  
  *    Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV
 
                        1600 E. Lamar Blvd
  - 2 - 02.02:  Exam Results
                        Arlington, TX 76011
* All results up to the day the team leaves the site. 
                        ATTN: Steve Garchow
02.03:  Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality
  General Requests:
* The current and approved biennial written examination schedule 
        * List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)
* The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite * All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and including the week before the inspection team is onsite
        * Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR
* The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)
            evaluators identified)
02.04:  Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality
        * Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training
* Any changes to the schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given
            program up to date
the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is onsite).
        * List of outstanding LOR program changes
* The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately via telephone at later date) to be given the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is onsite). * Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.
        * List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR
* Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)
            program since last BRQ
* A listing of licensed operator response times for time critical operator actions
        * Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator
02.05:  Licensee Admin of Requal Exams
            requalification training program
* All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
        * Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
* All procedures used to assess operator performance
        * Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes
* All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
        * Licensed operator training schedule for the week of October 21, 2013
* All Procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator
B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection
02.06:  Requalification Examination Security
  activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either
* Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a
  electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on October 21, 2013. Note that it is not
periodic basis
  required to make copies of all the materials, but to have them available.
* Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions (including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a
                                            -1-                                   Enclosure


periodic basis
02.02: Exam Results
* All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations
  * All results up to the day the team leaves the site.
in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations
02.03: Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality
* List of all condition reports since the last biennial requal inspection related to examination security and overlap
  * The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
 
  * The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that
   - 3 -  02.07:  Licensee Remedial Training Program
      have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival
* List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requal exams (includes training provided to operators to enable passing requal exams and training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during previous requal exam cycle) * Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance
      onsite
documentation)  
  * All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and
02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions
      including the week before the inspection team is onsite
* Access to licensed operators' records (operating and staff crews)  
   * The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)
* Access to licensed operators' training attendance records
02.04: Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality
* Access to licensed operators' medical records
  * Any changes to the schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given
* All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses, tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators
      the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is onsite).
* All Procedures and associated documentation that support reactivation of any SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection
  * The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately
02.09:  Simulator Performance
      via telephone at later date) to be given the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is
* Simulator discrepancies (DR's) from October 1, 2011, through October 1, 2013.  This should include all open DR's and DR's that have been closed, including the documentation/justification for closure. 
      onsite).
* Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at the time of acceptance (as available).  
  * Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week
* Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and neutronics models, to the actual plant.
      prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.
* All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs Design differences in the simulator (any documentation on this)  
  * Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)
* Summary list of modifications from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012.  
  * A listing of licensed operator response times for time critical operator actions
* Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due date from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012. 
02.05: Licensee Admin of Requal Exams
* Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to June 1, 2010).
  *   All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
* The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include
  *   All procedures used to assess operator performance
the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results.  For each
  *   All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond
  *  All Procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator
the ANSI standard requirements.
02.06: Requalification Examination Security
* All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and  
  * Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the
the acceptance criteria with results.
      written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a
* All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages, simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.  
      periodic basis
* Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing. 
  * Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the
   - 4 -  * For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results.  For each transient
      operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions
test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the
      (including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a
ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.
      periodic basis
   * All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to
      develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations
      in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations
  * List of all condition reports since the last biennial requal inspection related to
      examination security and overlap
                                        -2-


02.07: Licensee Remedial Training Program
o Transient test 1, Manual Rx trip 
  * List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requal exams (includes
o Transient test 6, Main turbine trip (no reactor trip)  
      training provided to operators to enable passing requal exams and training provided
o  Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV
      to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during previous requal exam
o  Steady State tests for low power
      cycle)
* All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for section 02.05 above.
  * Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance
* Simulator Discrepancy Report
      documentation)
summary list for all open DR's. For closed DR's, summary list for those items closed between June 1, 2010, and June 1, 2012.
02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions
02.10:  Problem Identification and Resolution
  *  Access to licensed operators records (operating and staff crews)
* A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the  
  *  Access to licensed operators training attendance records
control room
  *  Access to licensed operators medical records
* Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance
  *  All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses,
issues * All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room
      tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators
C. Cooper Nuclear Station is required to send the final results summary and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the regional office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison against the
  *   All Procedures and associated documentation that support reactivation of any
Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results for the
      SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection
02.09: Simulator Performance
  * Simulator discrepancies (DRs) from October 1, 2011, through October 1, 2013. This
      should include all open DRs and DRs that have been closed, including the
      documentation/justification for closure.
  * Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at
      the time of acceptance (as available).
  * Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and
      neutronics models, to the actual plant.
  * All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs Design differences in the simulator
      (any documentation on this)
  * Summary list of modifications from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012.
  * Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due
      date from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012.
  * Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to June 1, 2010).
  * The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a
      single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all
      transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include
      the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each
      transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter
      expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond
      the ANSI standard requirements.
  * All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The
      applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other
      means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and
      the acceptance criteria with results.
  * All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the
      room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,
      simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.
  * Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing.
                                        -3-


inspection.
      *  For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be
          electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test
          procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient
          test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert
          review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the
          ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.
          o  Transient test 1, Manual Rx trip
          o  Transient test 6, Main turbine trip (no reactor trip)
          o    Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV
          o    Steady State tests for low power
      *  All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for
          section 02.05 above.
      *  Simulator Discrepancy Report summary list for all open DRs. For closed DRs,
          summary list for those items closed between June 1, 2010, and June 1, 2012.
  02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution
      * A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the
          control room
      * Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance
          issues
      * All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room
C. Cooper Nuclear Station is required to send the final results summary and any
  remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the regional
  office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison against the
  Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results for the
  inspection.
                                            -4-
}}
}}

Revision as of 13:42, 4 November 2019

Notification of Inspection (NRC Inspection Report 05000298/2013005) and Request for Information
ML13254A049
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/11/2013
From: Vincent Gaddy
Division of Reactor Safety IV
To: Limpias O
Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
References
IR-13-005
Download: ML13254A049 (7)


See also: IR 05000298/2013005

Text

UNITE D S TATE S

NUC LEAR RE GULATOR Y C OMMI S SI ON

R E G IO N I V

1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD

AR L I NGTON , TEXAS 7 601 1- 4511

September 11, 2013

Mr. Oscar A. Limpias, Vice President-Nuclear

and Chief Nuclear Officer

Nebraska Public Power District

Cooper Nuclear Station

72676 648A Avenue

Brownville, NE 68321

SUBJECT: COOPER NUCLEAR STATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION

(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000298/2013005) AND REQUEST FOR

INFORMATION

Dear Mr. Limpias:

From October 21 through 25, 2013, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions

(NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification inspection at Cooper

Nuclear Station, using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.11B, Licensed Operator

Requalification Program. Experience has shown that this inspection is a resource intensive

inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your staff. In order to minimize the impact to your

onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for

documents needed for this inspection. These documents have been divided into three groups.

The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies information to be provided prior to the

inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately prepared. The second group (Section B

of the enclosure) identifies the information the inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The

third group (Section C of this enclosure) identifies the items which are necessary to close out

the inspection and are usually sent a few weeks after the team has left the site. It is important

that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of

additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the

inspection.

We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand

that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Ms. Jodie Olberding of your licensing

organization. Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of

examination activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material

requested, please contact the lead inspector Mr. Steve Garchow at (817) 200-1426

(Steve.Garchow@nrc.gov) or Mr. Duane Strickland at (817) 200-1570

(Duane.Strickland@NRC.gov).

O. Limpias -2-

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control

number 3150-0018. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control

number.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC

web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Vince Gaddy, Chief

Operations Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket: 50-298

License: DPR-46

Enclosure:

Inservice Inspection Document Request

cc: Electronic Distribution for Cooper Nuclear Station

ML13254A049

ADAMS: No Yes SUNSI Review Complete Reviewer Initials: SMG

Publicly Available Non-Sensitive

Non-publicly Available Sensitive

SOE:OB C:OB

SGarchow VGaddy

/RA/ /RA/

9/11/13 9/11/13

BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

FROM: Steve Garchow

Senior Operations Engineer, NRC RIV

817-200-1426

TO: Scott DeRosier

Operator Training Superintendent, Cooper Nuclear Station

402-825-5573

SUBJECT: INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT OCTOBER 21-25, 2013, LICENSED

OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM INSPECTION (IP 71111.11B)

A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation

activities. These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module

(i.e., 2.02, 2.04, etc). Requested materials should be sent either electronically or

hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than June 15, 2012.

  • Electronically: TO: E-mail address Steve.Garchow@NRC.Gov

CC: Duane.Strickland@NRC.Gov )

  • Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV

1600 E. Lamar Blvd

Arlington, TX 76011

ATTN: Steve Garchow

General Requests:

  • List of licensed operators (SRO & RO) by crew (operating & staff)
  • Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR

evaluators identified)

  • Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training

program up to date

  • List of outstanding LOR program changes
  • List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR

program since last BRQ

  • Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator

requalification training program

  • Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
  • Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes
  • Licensed operator training schedule for the week of October 21, 2013

B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection

activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either

electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on October 21, 2013. Note that it is not

required to make copies of all the materials, but to have them available.

-1- Enclosure

02.02: Exam Results

  • All results up to the day the team leaves the site.

02.03: Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality

  • The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
  • The current requalification cycle written examination results for both SRO & RO that

have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival

onsite

  • All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and

including the week before the inspection team is onsite

  • The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)

02.04: Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality

  • Any changes to the schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given

the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is onsite).

  • The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately

via telephone at later date) to be given the week of October 21, 2013 (week team is

onsite).

  • Current requalification cycle operating tests (SRO & RO) and results up to the week

prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.

  • Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)

02.05: Licensee Admin of Requal Exams

  • All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
  • All procedures used to assess operator performance
  • All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
  • All Procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator

02.06: Requalification Examination Security

  • Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the

written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a

periodic basis

  • Any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on the

operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions

(including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a

periodic basis

  • All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to

develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations

in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations

  • List of all condition reports since the last biennial requal inspection related to

examination security and overlap

-2-

02.07: Licensee Remedial Training Program

  • List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requal exams (includes

training provided to operators to enable passing requal exams and training provided

to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during previous requal exam

cycle)

  • Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance

documentation)

02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions

  • Access to licensed operators records (operating and staff crews)
  • Access to licensed operators training attendance records
  • Access to licensed operators medical records
  • All Procedures and Program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses,

tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators

  • All Procedures and associated documentation that support reactivation of any

SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection

02.09: Simulator Performance

  • Simulator discrepancies (DRs) from October 1, 2011, through October 1, 2013. This

should include all open DRs and DRs that have been closed, including the

documentation/justification for closure.

  • Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at

the time of acceptance (as available).

  • Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and

neutronics models, to the actual plant.

  • All current model deficiencies, including FSAR vs Design differences in the simulator

(any documentation on this)

  • Summary list of modifications from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012.
  • Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due

date from June 1, 2010, through June 1, 2012.

  • Simulator Differences Lesson plan used in training (current to June 1, 2010).
  • The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a

single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all

transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include

the test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each

transient test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter

expert review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond

the ANSI standard requirements.

  • All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The

applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other

means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and

the acceptance criteria with results.

  • All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the

room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs analysis packages,

simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.

  • Current copy of ANSI 3.5 standard you are committed to for Simulator testing.

-3-

  • For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be

electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test

procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient

test, the reference chart should be included or an equivalent subject matter expert

review versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the

ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.

o Transient test 1, Manual Rx trip

o Transient test 6, Main turbine trip (no reactor trip)

o Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV

o Steady State tests for low power

  • All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for

section 02.05 above.

  • Simulator Discrepancy Report summary list for all open DRs. For closed DRs,

summary list for those items closed between June 1, 2010, and June 1, 2012.

02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution

  • A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the

control room

  • Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance

issues

  • All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room

C. Cooper Nuclear Station is required to send the final results summary and any

remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the regional

office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison against the

Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results for the

inspection.

-4-