ML15349A841: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Cc: | {{#Wiki_filter:CHAIRMAN Resource From: Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel @twcny.rr.com > | ||
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource Cc: Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
[External_Sender] Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine if it is safe to continue to operate. And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally, for all U.S. nuclear plants. | |||
[ | Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. | ||
Indian Point 3 Good morning , I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine | www .avast.com 1 | ||
CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Cc: | |||
CHAIRMAN Resource From: Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel @twcny.rr.com > | |||
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource Cc: Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
[External_Sender] Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine if it is safe to continue to operate. And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally, for all U.S. nuclear plants. | |||
[ | Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. | ||
Indian Point 3 Good morning , I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine | www .avast.com 1}} | ||
Revision as of 03:18, 31 October 2019
| ML15349A841 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/15/2015 |
| From: | Tom Gurdziel Public Commenter |
| To: | Stephen Burns NRC/Chairman |
| References | |
| LTR-15-0620 | |
| Download: ML15349A841 (1) | |
Text
CHAIRMAN Resource From: Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel @twcny.rr.com >
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource Cc: Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com
Subject:
[External_Sender] Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine if it is safe to continue to operate. And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally, for all U.S. nuclear plants.
Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www .avast.com 1
CHAIRMAN Resource From: Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel @twcny.rr.com >
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:16 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource Cc: Screnci, Diane; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKI@aol.com
Subject:
[External_Sender] Indian Point 3 Good morning, I think somebody without preconceived bias ought to take a look at the total Indian Point site and determine if it is safe to continue to operate. And, in this most recent case, they had better determine how off site considerations may effect on site safety generally, for all U.S. nuclear plants.
Thank you, Tom Gurdziel This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www .avast.com 1