ML17100A611: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Gary D Miller (Generation - 6)
{{#Wiki_filter:From:             Gary D Miller (Generation - 6)
To: Cotton, Karen Cc: Candee Lovett (Generation - 3)
To:               Cotton, Karen Cc:               Candee Lovett (Generation - 3)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Minor comment re: NRC's Safety Evaluation for the Surry Unit 2 4th Interval Limited Exam Relief Requests Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 5:13:23 PM Hey Karen, We have reviewed the NRC letter dated 2/17/17 that provided the NRC's Safety Evaluation for the Surry Unit 2 4 th Interval Limited Exam Relief Requests and did not identify any technical concerns or issues. However, we did note a few administrative discrepancies in the last paragraph of Section 4.0, Conclusion, that I wanted to provide for your information.
[External_Sender] Minor comment re: NRCs Safety Evaluation for the Surry Unit 2 4th Interval Limited Exam Relief Requests Date:             Tuesday, February 28, 2017 5:13:23 PM Hey Karen, We have reviewed the NRC letter dated 2/17/17 that provided the NRCs Safety Evaluation for the Surry Unit 2 4th Interval Limited Exam Relief Requests and did not identify any technical concerns or issues. However, we did note a few administrative discrepancies in the last paragraph of Section 4.0, Conclusion, that I wanted to provide for your information. The identified discrepancies are highlighted below, as well as the correction noted in blue and contained in brackets to the right of the highlighted text. While these discrepancies occurred in the Conclusion section of the SE, the correct information was included and discussed in the specific relief requests contained within in the body of the letter.
The identified discrepancies are highlighted below, as well as the correction noted in blue and contained in brackets to the right of
 
the highlighted text.
While these discrepancies occurred in the Conclusion section of the SE, the correct information was included and discussed in the specific relief requests contained within in the body of the letter.


==4.0 CONCLUSION==
==4.0 CONCLUSION==


As set forth above, the staff determined that granting relief pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)
As set forth above, the staff determined that granting relief pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)
(i) is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property, or the common defense and security, and
(i) is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property, or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest given due consideration to the burden upon the licensee that could result if the requirements were imposed on the facility. Furthermore, the staff concludes that the licensee's examinations were performed to the extent possible and provide reasonable assurance of the structural integrity of the subject pressurizer welds and nozzle inside radius, and piping integral welded attachments at Surry, Unit 2. Accordingly, the staff concludes that the licensee has adequately addressed all of the regulatory requirements set forth in 1 O CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i). Therefore, the NRC staff grants the following relief requests for the fourth ten-year ISI interval of Surry, Unit 2, which commenced May 10, 2004, and ended, as extended, on May 9, 2015.
 
LMT-R01 Category R-A, Class 1 Stainless Steel Pipe Risk Informed Welds LMT-SS01 Category C-F-1 , Class 1 Stainless Steel Pipe Welds {Should be Class 2, not Class 1}
is otherwise in the public interest given due consideration to the burden upon the licensee that could result if the requirements were imposed on the facility. Furthermore, the staff
LMT-CS01 Category C-F-2 , Class 1 Carbon Steel Pipe Welds { Should be Class 2, not Class 1}
 
LMT-P01 Category C-F-1 and R-A Preservice Pipe Welds LMT-C01 Category 8-8, Pressurizer Shell to Head Section {Should be Category B-B}
concludes that the licensee's examinations were performed to the extent possible and provide reasonable assurance of the structural integrity of the subject pressurizer welds and nozzle inside radius, and piping integral welded attachments at Surry, Unit 2. Accordingly, the staff concludes that the licensee has adequately addressed all of the regulatory requirements set forth in 1 O CFR
LMT-C02 Category 8-D, Pressurizer Nozzle Inner Radius Section {Should be Category B-D}
 
LMT-C03 Category C-C, Main Steam lntegral Attachment H001-1
50.55a(g)(6)(i). Therefore, the NRC staff grants the following relief requests for the fourth ten-year ISI interval of Surry, Unit 2, which commenced May 10, 2004, and ended, as extended, on
 
May 9, 2015.
LMT-R01 Category R-A, Class 1 Stainless Steel Pipe Risk Informed Welds LMT-SS01 Category C-F-1 , Class 1 Stainless Steel Pipe Welds
{Should be Class 2, not Class 1}
LMT-CS01 Category C-F-2 , Class 1 Carbon Steel Pipe Welds
{ Should be Class 2, not Class 1}
LMT-P01 Category C-F-1 and R-A Preservice Pipe Welds


LMT-C01 Category 8-8 , Pressurizer Shell to Head Section
LMT-C04 Category C-C, Main Steam Integral Attachment H001-2 Dont hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
{Should be Category B-B}
LMT-C02 Category 8-D , Pressurizer Nozzle Inner Radius Section
{Should be Category B-D}
LMT-C03 Category C-C, Main Steam lntegral Attachment H001-1 LMT-C04 Category C-C, Main Steam Integral Attachment H001-2 Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Gary D. Miller, P.E.
Gary D. Miller, P.E.
Consulting Engineer
Consulting Engineer Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
 
(804) 273-2771 or tie-line 8-730-2771 fax (804) 273-3715 gary.d.miller@dom.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.}}
Nuclear Regulatory Affairs
 
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
 
(804) 273-2771 or
 
tie-line 8-730-2771
 
fax (804) 273-3715 gary.d.miller@dom.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional
 
express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the
 
individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the
 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this
 
information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
 
transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the
 
message in error, and delete it. Thank you.}}

Revision as of 04:45, 30 October 2019

Email - Minor Comment NRCs Safety Evaluation for the Surry Unit 2 4th Interval Limited Exam Relief Requests
ML17100A611
Person / Time
Site: Surry Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/2017
From: Geoffrey Miller
Dominion Resources Services
To: Cotton K
Plant Licensing Branch II
Cotton K, NRR/DORL/LPLII-1, 415-1438
References
Download: ML17100A611 (2)


Text

From: Gary D Miller (Generation - 6)

To: Cotton, Karen Cc: Candee Lovett (Generation - 3)

Subject:

[External_Sender] Minor comment re: NRCs Safety Evaluation for the Surry Unit 2 4th Interval Limited Exam Relief Requests Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 5:13:23 PM Hey Karen, We have reviewed the NRC letter dated 2/17/17 that provided the NRCs Safety Evaluation for the Surry Unit 2 4th Interval Limited Exam Relief Requests and did not identify any technical concerns or issues. However, we did note a few administrative discrepancies in the last paragraph of Section 4.0, Conclusion, that I wanted to provide for your information. The identified discrepancies are highlighted below, as well as the correction noted in blue and contained in brackets to the right of the highlighted text. While these discrepancies occurred in the Conclusion section of the SE, the correct information was included and discussed in the specific relief requests contained within in the body of the letter.

4.0 CONCLUSION

As set forth above, the staff determined that granting relief pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)

(i) is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property, or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest given due consideration to the burden upon the licensee that could result if the requirements were imposed on the facility. Furthermore, the staff concludes that the licensee's examinations were performed to the extent possible and provide reasonable assurance of the structural integrity of the subject pressurizer welds and nozzle inside radius, and piping integral welded attachments at Surry, Unit 2. Accordingly, the staff concludes that the licensee has adequately addressed all of the regulatory requirements set forth in 1 O CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(i). Therefore, the NRC staff grants the following relief requests for the fourth ten-year ISI interval of Surry, Unit 2, which commenced May 10, 2004, and ended, as extended, on May 9, 2015.

LMT-R01 Category R-A, Class 1 Stainless Steel Pipe Risk Informed Welds LMT-SS01 Category C-F-1 , Class 1 Stainless Steel Pipe Welds {Should be Class 2, not Class 1}

LMT-CS01 Category C-F-2 , Class 1 Carbon Steel Pipe Welds { Should be Class 2, not Class 1}

LMT-P01 Category C-F-1 and R-A Preservice Pipe Welds LMT-C01 Category 8-8, Pressurizer Shell to Head Section {Should be Category B-B}

LMT-C02 Category 8-D, Pressurizer Nozzle Inner Radius Section {Should be Category B-D}

LMT-C03 Category C-C, Main Steam lntegral Attachment H001-1

LMT-C04 Category C-C, Main Steam Integral Attachment H001-2 Dont hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Gary D. Miller, P.E.

Consulting Engineer Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Dominion Resources Services, Inc.

(804) 273-2771 or tie-line 8-730-2771 fax (804) 273-3715 gary.d.miller@dom.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information which may be legally confidential and or privileged and does not in any case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto which binds the sender without an additional express written confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.