ML100640080: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 03/05/2010 | | issue date = 03/05/2010 | ||
| title = Acceptance for Review of 2/2/10 Vogtle Application | | title = Acceptance for Review of 2/2/10 Vogtle Application | ||
| author name = Martin R | | author name = Martin R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Revision as of 11:56, 11 July 2019
| ML100640080 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 03/05/2010 |
| From: | Martin R Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
| Martin, R E, NRR/DORL/LPLII-1, 301-415-1 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML100640080 (1) | |
Text
From: Martin, Robert Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 9:02 AM To: internet: njstring@southernco.com Cc: Boyle, Patrick
Subject:
Acceptance for Review of 2/02/10 Vogtle Application By letter dated February 2, 2010, (ML100340033), SNC submitted a request to revise the Technical Specifications (TS), Appendix A to Facility Operating License Numbers NPF-68 and NPF-81 for the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 1 and 2, respectively. The changes would add Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.3.1.15 to VEGP TS Table 3.3.1-1, "Reactor Trip System Instrumentation," Function 3, "Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate." SR 3.3.1.15 requires verification that the RTS RESPONSE TIME is within limits every 18 months on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS. Function 3 is the Power Range Neutron Flux High Positive Rate Trip (PFRT) function. This change is being proposed based on a reanalysis of the Rod Cluster Control Assembly Bank Withdrawal at Power event. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this application. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the SNC's request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Bob Martin LPL2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No(s): 50-424, 50-425 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()
Subject:
Acceptance for Review of 2/02/10 Vogtle Application
Sent Date: 3/5/2010 8:55:34 AM Received Date: 3/5/2010 9:01:00 AM From: Martin, Robert Created By: Robert.Martin@nrc.gov
Recipients: NJSTRING@southernco.com (internet: njstring@southernco.com) Tracking Status: None Patrick.Boyle@nrc.gov (Boyle, Patrick) Tracking Status: None
Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time
MESSAGE 9492 3/5/2010
Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False
Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: