ML18057A215: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 02/26/2018 | | issue date = 02/26/2018 | ||
| title = Engineering Inspection Review Public Presentation (2-21-18) | | title = Engineering Inspection Review Public Presentation (2-21-18) | ||
| author name = Isom J | | author name = Isom J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DIRS | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DIRS | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = | | docket = | ||
| license number = | | license number = | ||
| contact person = Isom J | | contact person = Isom J, NRR/DIRS,415-1109 | ||
| document type = Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts, Slides and Viewgraphs | | document type = Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts, Slides and Viewgraphs | ||
| page count = 23 | | page count = 23 | ||
Revision as of 19:50, 17 June 2019
| ML18057A215 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/26/2018 |
| From: | Isom J Division of Inspection and Regional Support |
| To: | |
| Isom J, NRR/DIRS,415-1109 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML18057A215 (23) | |
Text
USNRC Engineering Inspection Review Engineering Inspection ReviewObjectiveDiscuss recommendations of Engineering Inspection Working Group with stakeholders and seek feedback 2
Engineering Inspection Review 3Principal Considerations
-Consider stakeholder input-Increase or maintain effectiveness
-Independent oversight
-Identification of latent conditions
-Increase relevance to current challenges Engineering Inspection ReviewPrincipal Considerations (Cont'd.)
-Increase efficiency
-Eliminate overlap-Capture advantages of holistic inspection of engineering design changes-Knowledge gained from inspection experience
-18+ years-Value of independent inspection
-Credible assessment of plant design 4
Engineering Inspection Review 5Overall Results
-Conduct independent NRC engineering inspections annually
-New suite of engineering inspection procedures
-Holistic, agile, flexible, relevant
-Reduced overlaps and addressed gaps
-Maintain reasonable assurance of safety 6Engineering Inspection ReviewCurrent Engineering Inspections (Triennial Period)DBAI - Team Inspection BI: 312 Hours Resources: 4 Inspectors
/ 2 Contractors Onsite Presence
- 2 WeeksTriennial Fire Protection BI: 240 Hours Resources: 3-4 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 2-3 WeeksDBAI - Programs BI: 192 Hours Resources: 3 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 2 Weeks 50.59 Inspection BI: 92 Hours Resources: 3 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 1 Week Heat Sink Inspection BI: 40 HoursResources: 1-2 InspectorsOnsite Presence
- 1 WeekYear 1Year 2Year 3 Inservice Inspection BI: 30 - 100 Hours Resources: 1-2 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 1-2 Week (s)Inservice Inspection BI: 30 - 100 Hours Resources: 1-2 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 1-2 Week (s) 7Engineering Inspection ReviewProposed Engineering Inspections (Quadrennial Period)
Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection BI: 350 Hours Resources: 5 Inspectors
/ 2 Contractors Onsite Presence
- 2 WeeksYear 1Year 2Year 3 Focused Engineering Inspection
- 1 BI: 210 Hours Resources: 3 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 2 Weeks Focused Engineering Inspection
- 2 BI: 210 Hours Resources: 3 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 2 Weeks Focused Engineering Inspection
- 3 BI: 210 Hours Resources: 3 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 2 WeeksYear 4 Inservice Inspection BI: 30 - 100 HoursResources: 1-2 InspectorsOnsite Presence
- 1-2 Week (s)Inservice Inspection BI: 30 - 100 HoursResources: 1-2 InspectorsOnsite Presence
- 1-2 Week (s)
Engineering Inspection ReviewFuture Engineering Inspections
-Identify if latent design issues are introduced through design changes
-Verify SSCs continue to be capable of performing as designed through a emphasis on more relevant areas (aging, obsolescence, etc.)
-Verify changes do not introduce new or increased frequency of initiating events 8
Engineering Inspection ReviewComprehensive Engineering Team Inspection (CETI)
-Emphasize inspection on changes, operating experience, and aging
-Incorporates elements of modifications, 10CFR50.59, and DBAI inspections
-Team makeup of five inspectors with one or two contractors for two onsite weeks 9
Engineering Inspection ReviewFocused Engineering Inspection (FEI)
-Independent inspection of specific engineering activities
-Areas may be identified with stakeholder input, selected by NRC
-Risk insights and operating experience considered10 Engineering Inspection ReviewFEI (Cont'd)
-Nominally three inspectors for two onsite weeks depending on inspection (focus area dependent)
In-Service Inspection
-Added periodic oversight of 10
-year program implementation
-Continue inspections during outages 11 Engineering Inspection ReviewResource ImplicationsOverall reduction in annualized baseline inspection and associated prep/doc12Current 3 Year CycleProposed 4 Year CycleTotal Number of Inspections7 Inspections6 InspectionsAnnual Onsite Weeks3.66weeks/yr(11 onsite weeks)2.75weeks/yr(11 onsite weeks)AverageInspection Hours per Year293 Hours245 Hours Engineering Inspection ReviewImproved safety inspections
-Annual independent NRC engineering inspections
-New suite of engineering inspection procedures
- Holistic, agile, flexible, relevant
- Reduced overlaps and addressed gaps
-Maintain reasonable assurance of safety13 Engineering Inspection ReviewRecap of EIWG RecommendationsImplement changes to engineering inspections Increased effectivenessIncreased efficiencyIncreased agilityIncreased relevance14 Engineering Inspection ReviewRecap of EIWG Recommendations (Continued)Reduce types of inspections from 6 to 3Increase inspection cycle from 3 years to 4 yearsImplementation Timeline ConsiderationsImmediate?2019?2020?15 Future ConsiderationsLicensee Self Assessments Engineering Inspection ReviewEIWG Recommendations
- Continue dialog on self
-assessments
- Industry develop self
-assessment standard
- Consider implementation of a project demonstration with independent NRC oversight
- Establish criteria for use (e.g., licensee in Column 1 for three consecutive years?)
- Establish limitations on use17 Engineering Inspection ReviewSelf Assessment Standard
-Proposed by industry and reviewed/approved or endorsed by NRC
-Must address
- Independence
- Clarity and Reliability (self
-critical)*Openness*Efficiency18 Engineering Inspection ReviewProject Demonstration
-Using the industry
-developed standard
-NRC to provide oversight
-Select same area as FEI
-Compare self
-assessment results with NRC independent inspection19 Engineering Inspection ReviewChallenges
-Industry development of a self
-assessment standard-NRC guidance for review of self
-assessment
-Findings, transparency, and other issues20 Engineering Inspection ReviewSelf Assessment Considerations21 Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection BI: 350 Hours Resources: 5 Inspectors
/ 2 Contractors Onsite Presence
- 2 WeeksYear 1Year 2Year 3 Focused Engineering Inspection
- 1 BI: 210 Hours Resources: 3 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 2 Weeks Focused Engineering Inspection
- 2 BI: 210 Hours Resources: 3 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 2 Weeks Licensee Self
-AssessmentYear 4 NRC Inspector Oversight BI: TBD Resources: TBD Onsite Presence
- TBD Inservice Inspection BI: 30 - 100 Hours Resources: 1-2 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 1-2 Week (s)Inservice Inspection BI: 30 - 100 Hours Resources: 1-2 Inspectors Onsite Presence
- 1-2 Week (s)
Next Steps/Milestones
-March 14 RIC Session on Engineering Inspection Working Group
-Finalize Engineering Inspection Working Group recommendations (EIWG)
-Develop SECY (DIRS)
-Industry self
-assessment standard engagement (DIRS)
-Project demonstration22Engineering Inspection Review RecapAdditional FeedbackQuestions?