ML18018A785: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
S-1,S-2,S-3 4. Adequate strength and stiffness with appropriate safety factors shall be provided so that a hazardous release of radioactive material shall not occur. | S-1,S-2,S-3 4. Adequate strength and stiffness with appropriate safety factors shall be provided so that a hazardous release of radioactive material shall not occur. | ||
1.5.1.2 Power Generation Design Criteria, Type PG | 1.5.1.2 Power Generation Design Criteria, Type PG | ||
-1 (Planned Operation) | -1 (Planned Operation) | ||
: 1. The nuclear system shall employ a G eneral Electric boiling water reactor to produce steam for direct use in a turbine generator. | : 1. The nuclear system shall employ a G eneral Electric boiling water reactor to produce steam for direct use in a turbine generator. | ||
: 2. The fuel cladding shall be designed to re tain integrity as a radioactive material barrier for the design power range. | : 2. The fuel cladding shall be designed to re tain integrity as a radioactive material barrier for the design power range. | ||
: 3. The fuel cladding shall be designed to accommodate, without loss of integrity, the pressures generated by the fission gases released from the fuel material throughout the design life of the fuel. | : 3. The fuel cladding shall be designed to accommodate, without loss of integrity, the pressures generated by the fission gases released from the fuel material throughout the design life of the fuel. | ||
: 4. Heat removal systems shall be provided in sufficient capacity and operational adequacy to remove heat generated in the reactor core for the full range of normal operational conditions from plant shutdown to design power. The capacity of such systems shall be adequat e to prevent fuel clad damage. | : 4. Heat removal systems shall be provided in sufficient capacity and operational adequacy to remove heat generated in the reactor core for the full range of normal operational conditions from plant shutdown to design power. The capacity of such systems shall be adequat e to prevent fuel clad damage. | ||
: 5. (Deleted). | : 5. (Deleted). | ||
: 6. It shall be possible to manually control the reactor power level. | : 6. It shall be possible to manually control the reactor power level. | ||
: 7. Control of the nuclear system shall be possible from a single location. | : 7. Control of the nuclear system shall be possible from a single location. | ||
: 8. Nuclear system process controls s hall be arranged to allow the operator to rapidly assess the condition of the nuc lear system and to locate process system malfunctions. | : 8. Nuclear system process controls s hall be arranged to allow the operator to rapidly assess the condition of the nuc lear system and to locate process system malfunctions. | ||
: 9. Fuel handling and storage facilities shall be designed to maintain adequate shielding and cooling for spent fuel. | : 9. Fuel handling and storage facilities shall be designed to maintain adequate shielding and cooling for spent fuel. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
1.5.1.3 Power Generation Design Criteria, Type PG-2 (Abnormal | 1.5.1.3 Power Generation Design Criteria, Type PG-2 (Abnormal | ||
Operational Transients) | Operational Transients) | ||
: 1. The fuel cladding, in conjunction with other plant systems, shall be designed to retain integrity throughout any abnormal operational transient. | : 1. The fuel cladding, in conjunction with other plant systems, shall be designed to retain integrity throughout any abnormal operational transient. | ||
: 2. Heat removal systems shall be provided in sufficient capacity and operational adequacy to remove heat generated in t he reactor core for any abnormal operational transient. The capacity of such systems shall be adequate to prevent fuel clad damage. | : 2. Heat removal systems shall be provided in sufficient capacity and operational adequacy to remove heat generated in t he reactor core for any abnormal operational transient. The capacity of such systems shall be adequate to prevent fuel clad damage. | ||
: 3. Heat removal systems shall be provided to remove decay heat generated in the core under circumstances wherein the normal operational heat removal systems become inoperative. The capacity of such systems shall be adequate to prevent fuel clad damage. | : 3. Heat removal systems shall be provided to remove decay heat generated in the core under circumstances wherein the normal operational heat removal systems become inoperative. The capacity of such systems shall be adequate to prevent fuel clad damage. | ||
: 4. Standby electrical power sources sha ll be provided to allow removal of decay heat under circumstances where normal auxiliary power is not available. | : 4. Standby electrical power sources sha ll be provided to allow removal of decay heat under circumstances where normal auxiliary power is not available. | ||
: 5. Fuel handling and storage facilities shall be designed to prevent inadvertent criticality. | : 5. Fuel handling and storage facilities shall be designed to prevent inadvertent criticality. | ||
1.5.1.4 Nuclear Safety Design Cr iteria, Type S-1 (Planned Operation) | 1.5.1.4 Nuclear Safety Design Cr iteria, Type S-1 (Planned Operation) | ||
: 1. The Plant shall be designed so that fuel failure during planned operation is limited to such an extent that, were the freed fission products released to the environs via the normal discharge paths for radioactive materials, the limits of 10 CFR 20 would not be exceeded. | : 1. The Plant shall be designed so that fuel failure during planned operation is limited to such an extent that, were the freed fission products released to the environs via the normal discharge paths for radioactive materials, the limits of 10 CFR 20 would not be exceeded. | ||
: 2. The reactor core shall be designed so t hat its nuclear charac teristics exhibit no tendency toward a divergent power transient. | : 2. The reactor core shall be designed so t hat its nuclear charac teristics exhibit no tendency toward a divergent power transient. | ||
: 3. The nuclear system shall be so designed that there is no tendency for divergent oscillation of any operating characteristic, considering the interaction of the nuclear system with ot her appropriate plant systems. | : 3. The nuclear system shall be so designed that there is no tendency for divergent oscillation of any operating characteristic, considering the interaction of the nuclear system with ot her appropriate plant systems. | ||
: 4. Gaseous, liquid, and solid waste disposal facilities shall be so designed that the discharge and offsite shipment of radioactive effluents can be made in accordance with applicable regulations. | : 4. Gaseous, liquid, and solid waste disposal facilities shall be so designed that the discharge and offsite shipment of radioactive effluents can be made in accordance with applicable regulations. | ||
BFN-19 1.5-4 5. The design shall provide means by which plant operations personnel can be informed whenever limits on the release of radioactive materi al are exceeded. | BFN-19 1.5-4 5. The design shall provide means by which plant operations personnel can be informed whenever limits on the release of radioactive materi al are exceeded. | ||
: 6. Sufficient indications shall be provi ded to allow determination that the reactor is operating within the envelope of condi tions considered by plant safety analysis. | : 6. Sufficient indications shall be provi ded to allow determination that the reactor is operating within the envelope of condi tions considered by plant safety analysis. | ||
: 7. Radiation shielding shall be provided and access control patterns shall be established to allow a properly trained operating staff to control radiation doses within the limits of applicable regulat ions in any mode of normal plant operation. | : 7. Radiation shielding shall be provided and access control patterns shall be established to allow a properly trained operating staff to control radiation doses within the limits of applicable regulat ions in any mode of normal plant operation. | ||
1.5.1.5 Nuclear Safety Design Criteria , Type S-2 (Abnormal Oper ational Transients) | 1.5.1.5 Nuclear Safety Design Criteria , Type S-2 (Abnormal Oper ational Transients) | ||
: 1. The plant shall be so designed that f uel failure as a result of any abnormal operational transient is limited to such an extent that, were the freed fission products released to the environs via the normal discharge paths for radioactive materials, the limits of 10 CFR 20 would not be exceeded. | : 1. The plant shall be so designed that f uel failure as a result of any abnormal operational transient is limited to such an extent that, were the freed fission products released to the environs via the normal discharge paths for radioactive materials, the limits of 10 CFR 20 would not be exceeded. | ||
: 2. Those portions of the nuclear system which form part of the nuclear system process barrier shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier following abnormal operational transients. | : 2. Those portions of the nuclear system which form part of the nuclear system process barrier shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier following abnormal operational transients. | ||
: 3. Nuclear safety systems shall act to assure that no damage to the nuclear system process barrier results from internal pressures caused by abnormal operational transients. | : 3. Nuclear safety systems shall act to assure that no damage to the nuclear system process barrier results from internal pressures caused by abnormal operational transients. | ||
: 4. Where positive, precise action is immediately required in response to abnormal operational transients, such action shall be automatic and shall require no decision or manipulation of controls by plant operations personnel. | : 4. Where positive, precise action is immediately required in response to abnormal operational transients, such action shall be automatic and shall require no decision or manipulation of controls by plant operations personnel. | ||
: 5. Essential safety actions shall be carried out by equipment of sufficient redundance and independence that no single fa ilure of active components can prevent the required actions. For systems or components to which IEEE-279 is applicable, single failures of pa ssive electrical components will be considered, as well as single failure of active components in recognition of the higher anticipated failure rates of passive electrical components relative to passive mechanical components. | : 5. Essential safety actions shall be carried out by equipment of sufficient redundance and independence that no single fa ilure of active components can prevent the required actions. For systems or components to which IEEE-279 is applicable, single failures of pa ssive electrical components will be considered, as well as single failure of active components in recognition of the higher anticipated failure rates of passive electrical components relative to passive mechanical components. | ||
: 6. The design of nuclear safety systems shall include allowances for environmental phenomena at the site. | : 6. The design of nuclear safety systems shall include allowances for environmental phenomena at the site. | ||
: 7. Provision shall be made for control of active components of nuclear safety systems from the control room. | : 7. Provision shall be made for control of active components of nuclear safety systems from the control room. | ||
BFN-19 1.5-5 8. Nuclear safety systems shall be de signed to permit demonstration of their functional performance requirements. | BFN-19 1.5-5 8. Nuclear safety systems shall be de signed to permit demonstration of their functional performance requirements. | ||
: 9. Standby electrical power sources s hall be provided to allow prompt reactor shutdown and removal of decay heat under circumstances where normal auxiliary power is not available. | : 9. Standby electrical power sources s hall be provided to allow prompt reactor shutdown and removal of decay heat under circumstances where normal auxiliary power is not available. | ||
: 10. Standby electrical power sources shall have sufficient capacity to power all nuclear safety systems requiring electrical power. | : 10. Standby electrical power sources shall have sufficient capacity to power all nuclear safety systems requiring electrical power. | ||
1.5.1.6 Nuclear Safety Desi gn Criteria, Type S-3 (Accidents) | 1.5.1.6 Nuclear Safety Desi gn Criteria, Type S-3 (Accidents) | ||
: 1. Those portions of the nuclear system which form part of the nuclear system process barrier shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier following accidents. For accident s in which one breach in the nuclear system process barrier is postulated, su ch breach shall not cause additional breaches in the nuclear system process barrier. | : 1. Those portions of the nuclear system which form part of the nuclear system process barrier shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier following accidents. For accident s in which one breach in the nuclear system process barrier is postulated, su ch breach shall not cause additional breaches in the nuclear system process barrier. | ||
: 2. Engineered safeguards shall act to assure that no damage to the nuclear system process barrier results from internal pressures caused by an accident. | : 2. Engineered safeguards shall act to assure that no damage to the nuclear system process barrier results from internal pressures caused by an accident. | ||
: 3. Where positive, precise action is immediately required in response to accidents, such action shall be automatic and shall require no decision or manipulation of controls by plant operations personnel. | : 3. Where positive, precise action is immediately required in response to accidents, such action shall be automatic and shall require no decision or manipulation of controls by plant operations personnel. | ||
: 4. Essential safety actions shall be carried out by equipment of sufficient redundance and independence that no single fa ilure of active components can prevent the required actions. For systems or components to which IEEE-279 is applicable, single failures of pa ssive electrical components will be considered, as well as single failure of active components in recognition of the higher anticipated failure rates of passive electrical components relative to passive mechanical components. | : 4. Essential safety actions shall be carried out by equipment of sufficient redundance and independence that no single fa ilure of active components can prevent the required actions. For systems or components to which IEEE-279 is applicable, single failures of pa ssive electrical components will be considered, as well as single failure of active components in recognition of the higher anticipated failure rates of passive electrical components relative to passive mechanical components. | ||
: 5. Features of the plant which are e ssential to the mitigation of accident consequences shall be designed so that they can be fabricated and erected to quality standards which reflect the impor tance of the safety action to be performed. | : 5. Features of the plant which are e ssential to the mitigation of accident consequences shall be designed so that they can be fabricated and erected to quality standards which reflect the impor tance of the safety action to be performed. | ||
: 6. The design of engineered safeguards shall include allowances for environmental phenomena at the site. | : 6. The design of engineered safeguards shall include allowances for environmental phenomena at the site. | ||
: 7. Provision shall be made for control of active components of engineered safeguards from the control room. | : 7. Provision shall be made for control of active components of engineered safeguards from the control room. | ||
BFN-19 1.5-6 8. Engineered safeguards shall be desi gned to permit demonstration of their functional performance requirements. | BFN-19 1.5-6 8. Engineered safeguards shall be desi gned to permit demonstration of their functional performance requirements. | ||
: 9. A primary containment shall be provi ded that completely encloses the reactor vessel. 10. The primary containment shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier during and following accident s that release radioactive material into the primary c ontainment volume. | : 9. A primary containment shall be provi ded that completely encloses the reactor vessel. 10. The primary containment shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier during and following accident s that release radioactive material into the primary c ontainment volume. | ||
: 11. It shall be possible to test primary c ontainment integrity and leak tightness at periodic intervals. | : 11. It shall be possible to test primary c ontainment integrity and leak tightness at periodic intervals. | ||
: 12. A secondary containment shall be provided that completely encloses both the primary containment and fuel storage areas. | : 12. A secondary containment shall be provided that completely encloses both the primary containment and fuel storage areas. | ||
: 13. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier under the same conditions that r equire the primary containment to act as a radioactive material barrier. | : 13. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier under the same conditions that r equire the primary containment to act as a radioactive material barrier. | ||
: 14. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier, if required, wh enever the primary contai nment is open for expected operational purposes. | : 14. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier, if required, wh enever the primary contai nment is open for expected operational purposes. | ||
: 15. The primary and secondary contai nments, in conjunction with other engineered safeguards, shall act to prevent the radiological effects of accidents resulting in the release of r adioactive material to the containment volumes from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations. | : 15. The primary and secondary contai nments, in conjunction with other engineered safeguards, shall act to prevent the radiological effects of accidents resulting in the release of r adioactive material to the containment volumes from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations. | ||
: 16. Provisions shall be ma de for the removal of energy from within the primary containment as necessary to maintain the integrity of th e containment system following accidents that release energy to the primary containment. | : 16. Provisions shall be ma de for the removal of energy from within the primary containment as necessary to maintain the integrity of th e containment system following accidents that release energy to the primary containment. | ||
: 17. Piping that penetrates t he primary containment st ructure, and which could serve as a path for the uncontrolled rel ease of radioactive material to the environs, shall be automatically is olated whenever such uncontrolled radioactive material release is threatened. | : 17. Piping that penetrates t he primary containment st ructure, and which could serve as a path for the uncontrolled rel ease of radioactive material to the environs, shall be automatically is olated whenever such uncontrolled radioactive material release is threatened. | ||
Such isolation shall be effected in time to prevent radiological effects from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations. | Such isolation shall be effected in time to prevent radiological effects from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations. | ||
: 18. Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be provided to prevent excessive fuel clad temperatures as a result of a loss-of-coolant accident. | : 18. Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be provided to prevent excessive fuel clad temperatures as a result of a loss-of-coolant accident. | ||
BFN-19 1.5-7 19. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall provide for continuity of core cooling over the complete range of postulated break sizes in the nuclear system process barrier. | BFN-19 1.5-7 19. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall provide for continuity of core cooling over the complete range of postulated break sizes in the nuclear system process barrier. | ||
: 20. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be diverse, reliable and redundant. | : 20. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be diverse, reliable and redundant. | ||
: 21. Operation of the Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be initiated automatically when required, regardless of the availability of offs ite power supplies and the normal generating syst em of the plant. | : 21. Operation of the Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be initiated automatically when required, regardless of the availability of offs ite power supplies and the normal generating syst em of the plant. | ||
: 22. Standby electrical power sources shall have sufficient capacity to power all engineered safeguards requi ring electrical power. | : 22. Standby electrical power sources shall have sufficient capacity to power all engineered safeguards requi ring electrical power. | ||
: 23. The control room shall be shielded against radiation so that occupancy under accident conditions is possible. | : 23. The control room shall be shielded against radiation so that occupancy under accident conditions is possible. | ||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
In the system-by-system presentation of criteria, only the most restrictive of any related criteria are stated fo r a system. Where the most restrictive criterion is one which is classified as a power generati on consideration in Table 1.4-2B, less BFN-19 1.5-8 restrictive, but more important, safety criteria may be hidden (not stated) in the system-by-system presentation. | In the system-by-system presentation of criteria, only the most restrictive of any related criteria are stated fo r a system. Where the most restrictive criterion is one which is classified as a power generati on consideration in Table 1.4-2B, less BFN-19 1.5-8 restrictive, but more important, safety criteria may be hidden (not stated) in the system-by-system presentation. | ||
1.5.2.1 Gener al Criteria | 1.5.2.1 Gener al Criteria | ||
: 1. The plant shall be designed so that it c an be fabricated, erec ted, and operated to produce electric power in a safe and reliable manner. The plant design shall be in accordance with applicable codes and regulations. | : 1. The plant shall be designed so that it c an be fabricated, erec ted, and operated to produce electric power in a safe and reliable manner. The plant design shall be in accordance with applicable codes and regulations. | ||
: 2. The plant shall be designed in such a way that the release of radioactive materials to the environment is limited, so that the limits and guideline values of applicable regulations pertaining to t he release of radioactive materials are not exceeded. | : 2. The plant shall be designed in such a way that the release of radioactive materials to the environment is limited, so that the limits and guideline values of applicable regulations pertaining to t he release of radioactive materials are not exceeded. | ||
1.5.2.2 Nuclear System Criteria | 1.5.2.2 Nuclear System Criteria | ||
: 1. The nuclear system shall employ a G eneral Electric boiling water reactor to produce steam for direct use in a turbine-generator. | : 1. The nuclear system shall employ a G eneral Electric boiling water reactor to produce steam for direct use in a turbine-generator. | ||
: 2. The fuel cladding shall be designed to re tain integrity as a radioactive material barrier for the design power range and for any abnormal operational transient. | : 2. The fuel cladding shall be designed to re tain integrity as a radioactive material barrier for the design power range and for any abnormal operational transient. | ||
: 3. Those portions of the nuclear system which form part of the nuclear system process barrier shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier following abnormal operational tr ansients and accidents. For accidents in which one breach in the nuclear system process barrier is postulated, such breach shall not cause additional breac hes in the nuclear system process barrier. 4. The fuel cladding shall be designed to accommodate, without loss of integrity, the pressures generated by the fission gases released from the fuel material throughout the design life of the fuel. | : 3. Those portions of the nuclear system which form part of the nuclear system process barrier shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier following abnormal operational tr ansients and accidents. For accidents in which one breach in the nuclear system process barrier is postulated, such breach shall not cause additional breac hes in the nuclear system process barrier. 4. The fuel cladding shall be designed to accommodate, without loss of integrity, the pressures generated by the fission gases released from the fuel material throughout the design life of the fuel. | ||
: 5. Heat removal systems shall be provided in sufficient capacity and operational adequacy to remove heat generated in the reactor core for the full range of normal operational conditions from plant shutdown to design power, and for any abnormal operational transient. The capacity of such systems shall be | : 5. Heat removal systems shall be provided in sufficient capacity and operational adequacy to remove heat generated in the reactor core for the full range of normal operational conditions from plant shutdown to design power, and for any abnormal operational transient. The capacity of such systems shall be | ||
adequate to prevent fuel clad damage. | adequate to prevent fuel clad damage. | ||
: 6. Heat removal systems shall be prov ided to remove decay heat generated in the core under circumstances wherein the normal operational heat removal systems become inoperative. The capacity of such systems shall be adequate to prevent fuel clad damage. | : 6. Heat removal systems shall be prov ided to remove decay heat generated in the core under circumstances wherein the normal operational heat removal systems become inoperative. The capacity of such systems shall be adequate to prevent fuel clad damage. | ||
BFN-19 1.5-9 7. The reactor core and reactivity control system shall be designed so that control rod action shall be capable of bringing t he core subcritical and maintaining it so, even with the rod of highest reactivi ty worth fully withdrawn and unavailable for insertion. | BFN-19 1.5-9 7. The reactor core and reactivity control system shall be designed so that control rod action shall be capable of bringing t he core subcritical and maintaining it so, even with the rod of highest reactivi ty worth fully withdrawn and unavailable for insertion. | ||
: 8. The nuclear system shall be so designed that there is no tendency for divergent oscillation of any operating characteristic, considering the interaction of the nuclear system with ot her appropriate plant systems. | : 8. The nuclear system shall be so designed that there is no tendency for divergent oscillation of any operating characteristic, considering the interaction of the nuclear system with ot her appropriate plant systems. | ||
: 9. The reactor core shall be so designed that its nuclear characteristics exhibit no tendency toward a divergent power transient. | : 9. The reactor core shall be so designed that its nuclear characteristics exhibit no tendency toward a divergent power transient. | ||
1.5.2.3 Power Conversion Systems Criteria | 1.5.2.3 Power Conversion Systems Criteria | ||
: 1. Appropriate power conversion systems s hall be provided to efficiently convert the heat energy of the steam produced in the reactor vessel to mechanical energy for turning a generator to produce electrical power. | : 1. Appropriate power conversion systems s hall be provided to efficiently convert the heat energy of the steam produced in the reactor vessel to mechanical energy for turning a generator to produce electrical power. | ||
: 2. Means shall be provided for furnis hing makeup (feedwater) to the reactor vessel to allow continued operation. | : 2. Means shall be provided for furnis hing makeup (feedwater) to the reactor vessel to allow continued operation. | ||
1.5.2.4 Electrical Po wer Systems Criteria | 1.5.2.4 Electrical Po wer Systems Criteria | ||
: 1. A generator capable of efficiently producing electric power shall be provided. | : 1. A generator capable of efficiently producing electric power shall be provided. | ||
: 2. Electrical power for protection syst ems and engineered sa feguards shall be available from two offsite sources so that no single failure in the facility can result in loss of offsite power. | : 2. Electrical power for protection syst ems and engineered sa feguards shall be available from two offsite sources so that no single failure in the facility can result in loss of offsite power. | ||
1.5.2.5 Radioactive Wa ste Disposal Criteria | 1.5.2.5 Radioactive Wa ste Disposal Criteria | ||
: 1. Gaseous, liquid, and solid waste disposal facilities shall be designed so that the discharge and offsite shipment of radioactive effluents can be made in accordance with applicable regulations. | : 1. Gaseous, liquid, and solid waste disposal facilities shall be designed so that the discharge and offsite shipment of radioactive effluents can be made in accordance with applicable regulations. | ||
: 2. The design shall provide means by which plant operations personnel can be informed whenever operational limits on the release of radioactive material are exceeded. | : 2. The design shall provide means by which plant operations personnel can be informed whenever operational limits on the release of radioactive material are exceeded. | ||
1.5.2.6 Nuclear Safety Systems and Engineered Safeguards Criteria 1.5.2.6.1 General | 1.5.2.6 Nuclear Safety Systems and Engineered Safeguards Criteria 1.5.2.6.1 General | ||
: 1. Nuclear safety systems shall act in response to abnormal operational transients to limit fuel damage such that, were the freed fission products BFN-19 1.5-10 released to the environs via the no rmal discharge paths for radioactive material, the limits of 10 CFR 20 would not be exceeded. | : 1. Nuclear safety systems shall act in response to abnormal operational transients to limit fuel damage such that, were the freed fission products BFN-19 1.5-10 released to the environs via the no rmal discharge paths for radioactive material, the limits of 10 CFR 20 would not be exceeded. | ||
: 2. Nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards shall act to assure that no damage to the nuclear system process barri er results from internal pressures caused by abnormal operational transients or accidents. | : 2. Nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards shall act to assure that no damage to the nuclear system process barri er results from internal pressures caused by abnormal operational transients or accidents. | ||
: 3. Where positive, precise action is immediately required in response to accidents, such action shall be automatic and shall require no decision or manipulation of controls by plant operations personnel. | : 3. Where positive, precise action is immediately required in response to accidents, such action shall be automatic and shall require no decision or manipulation of controls by plant operations personnel. | ||
: 4. Essential safety actions shall be carried out by equipment of sufficient redundance and independence that no single fa ilure of active components can prevent the required actions. For systems or components to which IEEE-279 is applicable, single failures of pa ssive electrical components will be considered, as well as single failure of active components in recognition of the higher anticipated failure rates of passive electrical components relative to passive mechanical components. | : 4. Essential safety actions shall be carried out by equipment of sufficient redundance and independence that no single fa ilure of active components can prevent the required actions. For systems or components to which IEEE-279 is applicable, single failures of pa ssive electrical components will be considered, as well as single failure of active components in recognition of the higher anticipated failure rates of passive electrical components relative to passive mechanical components. | ||
: 5. Features of the plant which are e ssential to the mitigation of accident consequences shall be designed so that they can be fabricated and erected to quality standards which reflect the importance of the safety function to be performed. | : 5. Features of the plant which are e ssential to the mitigation of accident consequences shall be designed so that they can be fabricated and erected to quality standards which reflect the importance of the safety function to be performed. | ||
: 6. The design of nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards shall include allowances for environmental phenomena at the site (e.g., weather extremes and proximity to other high energy syst ems). Furthermore, electrical equipment in these systems shall be c apable of performing their safety function as required under environmental conditions associated with all normal, abnormal, and plant accident operation. | : 6. The design of nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards shall include allowances for environmental phenomena at the site (e.g., weather extremes and proximity to other high energy syst ems). Furthermore, electrical equipment in these systems shall be c apable of performing their safety function as required under environmental conditions associated with all normal, abnormal, and plant accident operation. | ||
: 7. Provision shall be made for control of active components of nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards from the control room. | : 7. Provision shall be made for control of active components of nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards from the control room. | ||
: 8. Nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards shall be designed to permit demonstration of their func tional performance requirements. | : 8. Nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards shall be designed to permit demonstration of their func tional performance requirements. | ||
1.5.2.6.2 Containment and Isolation Criteria | 1.5.2.6.2 Containment and Isolation Criteria | ||
: 1. A primary containment s hall be provided that completely encloses the reactor vessel. 2. The primary containment shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier during and following accident s that release radioactive material into the primary c ontainment volume. | : 1. A primary containment s hall be provided that completely encloses the reactor vessel. 2. The primary containment shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier during and following accident s that release radioactive material into the primary c ontainment volume. | ||
BFN-19 1.5-11 3. It shall be possible to test primary c ontainment integrity and leak tightness at periodic intervals. | BFN-19 1.5-11 3. It shall be possible to test primary c ontainment integrity and leak tightness at periodic intervals. | ||
: 4. A secondary containment shall be provided that completely encloses both the primary containment and fuel storage areas. | : 4. A secondary containment shall be provided that completely encloses both the primary containment and fuel storage areas. | ||
: 5. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier under the same conditions that r equire the primary containment to act as a radioactive material barrier. | : 5. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier under the same conditions that r equire the primary containment to act as a radioactive material barrier. | ||
: 6. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier, if required, wh enever the primary containment is open for expected operational purposes. | : 6. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier, if required, wh enever the primary containment is open for expected operational purposes. | ||
: 7. The primary and secondary contai nments, in conjunction with other engineered safeguards, shall act to prevent the radiological effects of accidents resulting in the release of r adioactive material to the containment volumes from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations. | : 7. The primary and secondary contai nments, in conjunction with other engineered safeguards, shall act to prevent the radiological effects of accidents resulting in the release of r adioactive material to the containment volumes from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations. | ||
: 8. Provisions shall be ma de for the removal of energy from within the primary containment as necessary to maintain the integrity of th e containment system following accidents that release energy to the primary containment. | : 8. Provisions shall be ma de for the removal of energy from within the primary containment as necessary to maintain the integrity of th e containment system following accidents that release energy to the primary containment. | ||
: 9. Piping that penetrates the primary containment struct ure, and could serve as a path for the uncontrolled rel ease of radioactive material to the environs, shall be automatically isolated whenever such uncontrolled radioactive material release is threatened. Such isolation shall be effected in time to prevent radiological effects from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations. | : 9. Piping that penetrates the primary containment struct ure, and could serve as a path for the uncontrolled rel ease of radioactive material to the environs, shall be automatically isolated whenever such uncontrolled radioactive material release is threatened. Such isolation shall be effected in time to prevent radiological effects from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations. | ||
1.5.2.6.3 Core Stand by Cooling Criteria | 1.5.2.6.3 Core Stand by Cooling Criteria | ||
: 1. Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be provided to prevent excessive fuel clad temperatures as a result of a loss-of-coolant accident. | : 1. Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be provided to prevent excessive fuel clad temperatures as a result of a loss-of-coolant accident. | ||
: 2. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall provide for continuity of core cooling over the complete range of postulated break sizes in the nuclear system process barrier. | : 2. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall provide for continuity of core cooling over the complete range of postulated break sizes in the nuclear system process barrier. | ||
: 3. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be diverse, reliable, and redundant. | : 3. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be diverse, reliable, and redundant. | ||
: 4. Operation of the Core Standby Cooli ng systems shall be initiated automatically when required, regardless of the availability of offs ite power supplies and the normal generating syst em of the plant. | : 4. Operation of the Core Standby Cooli ng systems shall be initiated automatically when required, regardless of the availability of offs ite power supplies and the normal generating syst em of the plant. | ||
BFN-19 1.5-12 1.5.2.6.4 Standby Power Criteria | BFN-19 1.5-12 1.5.2.6.4 Standby Power Criteria | ||
: 1. Standby electrical power sources sha ll be provided to allow prompt reactor shutdown and removal of decay heat under circumstances where normal auxiliary power is not available. | : 1. Standby electrical power sources sha ll be provided to allow prompt reactor shutdown and removal of decay heat under circumstances where normal auxiliary power is not available. | ||
: 2. Standby electrical power sources shall have sufficient capacity to power all engineered safeguards requi ring electrical power. | : 2. Standby electrical power sources shall have sufficient capacity to power all engineered safeguards requi ring electrical power. | ||
1.5.2.7 Reactivity Control Criteria | 1.5.2.7 Reactivity Control Criteria | ||
: 1. Backup reactor shutdown capability shall be provided independent of normal reactivity control provisions. This backup system shall have the capability to shut down the reactor from any operat ing condition, and subsequently to maintain the shutdown condition. | : 1. Backup reactor shutdown capability shall be provided independent of normal reactivity control provisions. This backup system shall have the capability to shut down the reactor from any operat ing condition, and subsequently to maintain the shutdown condition. | ||
: 2. In the event that the control room is inaccessible, it shall be possible to bring the reactor from power range operati on to cold shutdown (Mode 4) by manipulation of the local controls and equipment which are available outside the control room. | : 2. In the event that the control room is inaccessible, it shall be possible to bring the reactor from power range operati on to cold shutdown (Mode 4) by manipulation of the local controls and equipment which are available outside the control room. | ||
1.5.2.8 Process Cont rol Systems Criteria 1.5.2.8.1 Nuclear System Process Control Criteria | 1.5.2.8 Process Cont rol Systems Criteria 1.5.2.8.1 Nuclear System Process Control Criteria | ||
: 1. It shall be possible to manually control the reactor power level. | : 1. It shall be possible to manually control the reactor power level. | ||
: 2. Control of the nuclear system shall be possible from a single location. | : 2. Control of the nuclear system shall be possible from a single location. | ||
: 3. Nuclear system process controls s hall be arranged to allow the operator to rapidly assess the condition of the nuc lear system and to locate process system malfunctions. | : 3. Nuclear system process controls s hall be arranged to allow the operator to rapidly assess the condition of the nuc lear system and to locate process system malfunctions. | ||
: 4. Interlocks or other automatic equipm ent shall be provided as a backup to procedural controls to avoid conditions requiring the actuation of nuclear safety systems or engineer ed safeguards. | : 4. Interlocks or other automatic equipm ent shall be provided as a backup to procedural controls to avoid conditions requiring the actuation of nuclear safety systems or engineer ed safeguards. | ||
| Line 181: | Line 181: | ||
1.5.2.8.3 Electrical Power S ystems Process Control Criteria Controls shall be provided in the electrical power systems to protect against faults and to increase the reliability of incoming and outgoing power. | 1.5.2.8.3 Electrical Power S ystems Process Control Criteria Controls shall be provided in the electrical power systems to protect against faults and to increase the reliability of incoming and outgoing power. | ||
BFN-19 1.5-13 1.5.2.9 Auxiliary Systems Criteria | BFN-19 1.5-13 1.5.2.9 Auxiliary Systems Criteria | ||
: 1. Fuel handling and storage facilities shall be designed to prev ent criticality and to maintain adequate shielding and cooling for spent fuel. | : 1. Fuel handling and storage facilities shall be designed to prev ent criticality and to maintain adequate shielding and cooling for spent fuel. | ||
: 2. Means shall be provided to remove heat from process systems that is generated through operation of the plant. | : 2. Means shall be provided to remove heat from process systems that is generated through operation of the plant. | ||
: 3. Fire detection and protection systems capable of protecting the plant against all types of fires shall be provided. | : 3. Fire detection and protection systems capable of protecting the plant against all types of fires shall be provided. | ||
: 4. Means shall be provided to adequately heat, ventilate, and air-condition plant buildings for personnel comfor t and equipment protection. | : 4. Means shall be provided to adequately heat, ventilate, and air-condition plant buildings for personnel comfor t and equipment protection. | ||
: 5. Means shall be provided to furnish other auxiliary services as required for safe and efficient operation of the plant. | : 5. Means shall be provided to furnish other auxiliary services as required for safe and efficient operation of the plant. | ||
1.5.2.10 Shielding and Access Control Criteria | 1.5.2.10 Shielding and Access Control Criteria | ||
: 1. Radiation shielding shall be provided and access control patterns shall be established to allow a properly trained operating staff to control radiation doses within the limits of applicable regulat ions in any mode of normal plant operation. | : 1. Radiation shielding shall be provided and access control patterns shall be established to allow a properly trained operating staff to control radiation doses within the limits of applicable regulat ions in any mode of normal plant operation. | ||
: 2. The control room shall be shielded against radiation so that occupancy under accident conditions is possible. | : 2. The control room shall be shielded against radiation so that occupancy under accident conditions is possible. | ||
Revision as of 02:04, 26 April 2019
Text
BFN-19 1.5-1 1.5 PRINCIPAL DESIGN CRITERIA There are two ways of consider ing principal design criteria. One way is to consider the criteria on a system-by-system (or system group) basis. The second way is to consider criteria classification-by-classifi cation as given in Tables 1.4-2 A and B.
In the classification-by-classification appr oach, the criteria must be stated in sufficient detail to allow placement of each criterion into one classification category.
Thus, there may be closely related criteria pertaining to any given system in each classification category. This is a natural outgrowth of the functional (unacceptable result) approach to classification. The act ual design of a system must reflect all of the criteria that pertain to it; thus, the less restrictive (but more important) criteria pertaining to the system in the classifi cation approach will be masked by the more restrictive (and less important) criteria.
Safety analysis requires the in formation gained in the classi fication-by-classification approach to criteria, but system descripti on is more easily understood through the system-by-system method. Both approaches to criteria are given in this section; both are useful.
1.5.1 Principal
Design Criteria Classification-By-Classification
The principal architectural and engineering cr iteria for the design and construction of the plant are summarized below. The criteria are grouped according to the classification plan given in Tables 1.4-2 A and B. Some of the more general criteria are so broad that they are applicable, at least in part, to more than one classification.
In these very general cases, all of the affected classifications are indicated. Specific design bases and design features are detaile d in other sections of this report.
Criteria pertaining to operation of the plant are given in Appendix G.
1.5.1.1 Gener al Criteria Applicable Classifications Criteria PG-1,S-1,S-2,S-3 1. The plant shall be designed so that it can be fabricated, erected, and operated to produce electric power in a safe and reliable manner. The plant design shall be in accordance with applicable codes and regulations.
S-1,S-2,S-3 2. The plant shall be designed in such a way that the release of radioactive materials to the environment
is limited so that the limits and guid eline values of BFN-19 1.5-2 applicable regulations pertaining to the release of radioactive materials are not exceeded.
S-1,S-2,S-3,S-4 3. The reactor core and reactivity control system shall be designed so that control rod action shall be capable of bringing the core subcritical and maintaining it so, even with the rod of highest reactivity worth fully withdrawn and unavailable for
insertion.
S-1,S-2,S-3 4. Adequate strength and stiffness with appropriate safety factors shall be provided so that a hazardous release of radioactive material shall not occur.
1.5.1.2 Power Generation Design Criteria, Type PG
-1 (Planned Operation)
- 1. The nuclear system shall employ a G eneral Electric boiling water reactor to produce steam for direct use in a turbine generator.
- 2. The fuel cladding shall be designed to re tain integrity as a radioactive material barrier for the design power range.
- 3. The fuel cladding shall be designed to accommodate, without loss of integrity, the pressures generated by the fission gases released from the fuel material throughout the design life of the fuel.
- 4. Heat removal systems shall be provided in sufficient capacity and operational adequacy to remove heat generated in the reactor core for the full range of normal operational conditions from plant shutdown to design power. The capacity of such systems shall be adequat e to prevent fuel clad damage.
- 5. (Deleted).
- 6. It shall be possible to manually control the reactor power level.
- 7. Control of the nuclear system shall be possible from a single location.
- 8. Nuclear system process controls s hall be arranged to allow the operator to rapidly assess the condition of the nuc lear system and to locate process system malfunctions.
- 9. Fuel handling and storage facilities shall be designed to maintain adequate shielding and cooling for spent fuel.
BFN-19 1.5-3 10. Interlocks or other automatic equipm ent shall be provided as a backup to procedural controls to av oid conditions requiring t he functioning of nuclear safety systems or engineered safeguards.
1.5.1.3 Power Generation Design Criteria, Type PG-2 (Abnormal
Operational Transients)
- 1. The fuel cladding, in conjunction with other plant systems, shall be designed to retain integrity throughout any abnormal operational transient.
- 2. Heat removal systems shall be provided in sufficient capacity and operational adequacy to remove heat generated in t he reactor core for any abnormal operational transient. The capacity of such systems shall be adequate to prevent fuel clad damage.
- 3. Heat removal systems shall be provided to remove decay heat generated in the core under circumstances wherein the normal operational heat removal systems become inoperative. The capacity of such systems shall be adequate to prevent fuel clad damage.
- 4. Standby electrical power sources sha ll be provided to allow removal of decay heat under circumstances where normal auxiliary power is not available.
- 5. Fuel handling and storage facilities shall be designed to prevent inadvertent criticality.
1.5.1.4 Nuclear Safety Design Cr iteria, Type S-1 (Planned Operation)
- 1. The Plant shall be designed so that fuel failure during planned operation is limited to such an extent that, were the freed fission products released to the environs via the normal discharge paths for radioactive materials, the limits of 10 CFR 20 would not be exceeded.
- 2. The reactor core shall be designed so t hat its nuclear charac teristics exhibit no tendency toward a divergent power transient.
- 3. The nuclear system shall be so designed that there is no tendency for divergent oscillation of any operating characteristic, considering the interaction of the nuclear system with ot her appropriate plant systems.
- 4. Gaseous, liquid, and solid waste disposal facilities shall be so designed that the discharge and offsite shipment of radioactive effluents can be made in accordance with applicable regulations.
BFN-19 1.5-4 5. The design shall provide means by which plant operations personnel can be informed whenever limits on the release of radioactive materi al are exceeded.
- 6. Sufficient indications shall be provi ded to allow determination that the reactor is operating within the envelope of condi tions considered by plant safety analysis.
- 7. Radiation shielding shall be provided and access control patterns shall be established to allow a properly trained operating staff to control radiation doses within the limits of applicable regulat ions in any mode of normal plant operation.
1.5.1.5 Nuclear Safety Design Criteria , Type S-2 (Abnormal Oper ational Transients)
- 1. The plant shall be so designed that f uel failure as a result of any abnormal operational transient is limited to such an extent that, were the freed fission products released to the environs via the normal discharge paths for radioactive materials, the limits of 10 CFR 20 would not be exceeded.
- 2. Those portions of the nuclear system which form part of the nuclear system process barrier shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier following abnormal operational transients.
- 3. Nuclear safety systems shall act to assure that no damage to the nuclear system process barrier results from internal pressures caused by abnormal operational transients.
- 4. Where positive, precise action is immediately required in response to abnormal operational transients, such action shall be automatic and shall require no decision or manipulation of controls by plant operations personnel.
- 5. Essential safety actions shall be carried out by equipment of sufficient redundance and independence that no single fa ilure of active components can prevent the required actions. For systems or components to which IEEE-279 is applicable, single failures of pa ssive electrical components will be considered, as well as single failure of active components in recognition of the higher anticipated failure rates of passive electrical components relative to passive mechanical components.
- 6. The design of nuclear safety systems shall include allowances for environmental phenomena at the site.
- 7. Provision shall be made for control of active components of nuclear safety systems from the control room.
BFN-19 1.5-5 8. Nuclear safety systems shall be de signed to permit demonstration of their functional performance requirements.
- 9. Standby electrical power sources s hall be provided to allow prompt reactor shutdown and removal of decay heat under circumstances where normal auxiliary power is not available.
- 10. Standby electrical power sources shall have sufficient capacity to power all nuclear safety systems requiring electrical power.
1.5.1.6 Nuclear Safety Desi gn Criteria, Type S-3 (Accidents)
- 1. Those portions of the nuclear system which form part of the nuclear system process barrier shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier following accidents. For accident s in which one breach in the nuclear system process barrier is postulated, su ch breach shall not cause additional breaches in the nuclear system process barrier.
- 2. Engineered safeguards shall act to assure that no damage to the nuclear system process barrier results from internal pressures caused by an accident.
- 3. Where positive, precise action is immediately required in response to accidents, such action shall be automatic and shall require no decision or manipulation of controls by plant operations personnel.
- 4. Essential safety actions shall be carried out by equipment of sufficient redundance and independence that no single fa ilure of active components can prevent the required actions. For systems or components to which IEEE-279 is applicable, single failures of pa ssive electrical components will be considered, as well as single failure of active components in recognition of the higher anticipated failure rates of passive electrical components relative to passive mechanical components.
- 5. Features of the plant which are e ssential to the mitigation of accident consequences shall be designed so that they can be fabricated and erected to quality standards which reflect the impor tance of the safety action to be performed.
- 6. The design of engineered safeguards shall include allowances for environmental phenomena at the site.
- 7. Provision shall be made for control of active components of engineered safeguards from the control room.
BFN-19 1.5-6 8. Engineered safeguards shall be desi gned to permit demonstration of their functional performance requirements.
- 9. A primary containment shall be provi ded that completely encloses the reactor vessel. 10. The primary containment shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier during and following accident s that release radioactive material into the primary c ontainment volume.
- 11. It shall be possible to test primary c ontainment integrity and leak tightness at periodic intervals.
- 12. A secondary containment shall be provided that completely encloses both the primary containment and fuel storage areas.
- 13. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier under the same conditions that r equire the primary containment to act as a radioactive material barrier.
- 14. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier, if required, wh enever the primary contai nment is open for expected operational purposes.
- 15. The primary and secondary contai nments, in conjunction with other engineered safeguards, shall act to prevent the radiological effects of accidents resulting in the release of r adioactive material to the containment volumes from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations.
- 16. Provisions shall be ma de for the removal of energy from within the primary containment as necessary to maintain the integrity of th e containment system following accidents that release energy to the primary containment.
- 17. Piping that penetrates t he primary containment st ructure, and which could serve as a path for the uncontrolled rel ease of radioactive material to the environs, shall be automatically is olated whenever such uncontrolled radioactive material release is threatened.
Such isolation shall be effected in time to prevent radiological effects from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations.
- 18. Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be provided to prevent excessive fuel clad temperatures as a result of a loss-of-coolant accident.
BFN-19 1.5-7 19. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall provide for continuity of core cooling over the complete range of postulated break sizes in the nuclear system process barrier.
- 20. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be diverse, reliable and redundant.
- 21. Operation of the Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be initiated automatically when required, regardless of the availability of offs ite power supplies and the normal generating syst em of the plant.
- 22. Standby electrical power sources shall have sufficient capacity to power all engineered safeguards requi ring electrical power.
- 23. The control room shall be shielded against radiation so that occupancy under accident conditions is possible.
1.5.1.7 Nuclear Safety Design Criteria, Type S-4 (Special Event In the event that the control room becomes inaccessible, it shall be possible to bring the reactor from power range operation to cold shutdown (Mode 4) by manipulation of the local controls and equipment which ar e available outside t he control room.
1.5.1.8 Nuclear Safety Design Criteria, Type S-5 (Special Event)
Backup reactor shutdown capability shall be provided independent of normal reactivity control provisions. This ba ckup system shall have the capability to shut down the reactor from any normal operating condition, and subsequently to maintain the shutdown condition.
1.5.2 Principal
Design Cr iteria, System-By-System The principal architectural and engineering cr iteria for design are summarized below on a system-by-system or system group basis. The system-by-system presentation facilitates the understanding of the actual design of any one system, but significant distinctions in the importance to safety of different criteria pertaining to a system cannot be made clear, as they are in the classification-by-classification pres entation. To make consistent judgments regarding plant safety , the classification-by- classification approach to criteria must be used.
In the system-by-system presentation of criteria, only the most restrictive of any related criteria are stated fo r a system. Where the most restrictive criterion is one which is classified as a power generati on consideration in Table 1.4-2B, less BFN-19 1.5-8 restrictive, but more important, safety criteria may be hidden (not stated) in the system-by-system presentation.
1.5.2.1 Gener al Criteria
- 1. The plant shall be designed so that it c an be fabricated, erec ted, and operated to produce electric power in a safe and reliable manner. The plant design shall be in accordance with applicable codes and regulations.
- 2. The plant shall be designed in such a way that the release of radioactive materials to the environment is limited, so that the limits and guideline values of applicable regulations pertaining to t he release of radioactive materials are not exceeded.
1.5.2.2 Nuclear System Criteria
- 1. The nuclear system shall employ a G eneral Electric boiling water reactor to produce steam for direct use in a turbine-generator.
- 2. The fuel cladding shall be designed to re tain integrity as a radioactive material barrier for the design power range and for any abnormal operational transient.
- 3. Those portions of the nuclear system which form part of the nuclear system process barrier shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier following abnormal operational tr ansients and accidents. For accidents in which one breach in the nuclear system process barrier is postulated, such breach shall not cause additional breac hes in the nuclear system process barrier. 4. The fuel cladding shall be designed to accommodate, without loss of integrity, the pressures generated by the fission gases released from the fuel material throughout the design life of the fuel.
- 5. Heat removal systems shall be provided in sufficient capacity and operational adequacy to remove heat generated in the reactor core for the full range of normal operational conditions from plant shutdown to design power, and for any abnormal operational transient. The capacity of such systems shall be
adequate to prevent fuel clad damage.
- 6. Heat removal systems shall be prov ided to remove decay heat generated in the core under circumstances wherein the normal operational heat removal systems become inoperative. The capacity of such systems shall be adequate to prevent fuel clad damage.
BFN-19 1.5-9 7. The reactor core and reactivity control system shall be designed so that control rod action shall be capable of bringing t he core subcritical and maintaining it so, even with the rod of highest reactivi ty worth fully withdrawn and unavailable for insertion.
- 8. The nuclear system shall be so designed that there is no tendency for divergent oscillation of any operating characteristic, considering the interaction of the nuclear system with ot her appropriate plant systems.
- 9. The reactor core shall be so designed that its nuclear characteristics exhibit no tendency toward a divergent power transient.
1.5.2.3 Power Conversion Systems Criteria
- 1. Appropriate power conversion systems s hall be provided to efficiently convert the heat energy of the steam produced in the reactor vessel to mechanical energy for turning a generator to produce electrical power.
- 2. Means shall be provided for furnis hing makeup (feedwater) to the reactor vessel to allow continued operation.
1.5.2.4 Electrical Po wer Systems Criteria
- 1. A generator capable of efficiently producing electric power shall be provided.
- 2. Electrical power for protection syst ems and engineered sa feguards shall be available from two offsite sources so that no single failure in the facility can result in loss of offsite power.
1.5.2.5 Radioactive Wa ste Disposal Criteria
- 1. Gaseous, liquid, and solid waste disposal facilities shall be designed so that the discharge and offsite shipment of radioactive effluents can be made in accordance with applicable regulations.
- 2. The design shall provide means by which plant operations personnel can be informed whenever operational limits on the release of radioactive material are exceeded.
1.5.2.6 Nuclear Safety Systems and Engineered Safeguards Criteria 1.5.2.6.1 General
- 1. Nuclear safety systems shall act in response to abnormal operational transients to limit fuel damage such that, were the freed fission products BFN-19 1.5-10 released to the environs via the no rmal discharge paths for radioactive material, the limits of 10 CFR 20 would not be exceeded.
- 2. Nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards shall act to assure that no damage to the nuclear system process barri er results from internal pressures caused by abnormal operational transients or accidents.
- 3. Where positive, precise action is immediately required in response to accidents, such action shall be automatic and shall require no decision or manipulation of controls by plant operations personnel.
- 4. Essential safety actions shall be carried out by equipment of sufficient redundance and independence that no single fa ilure of active components can prevent the required actions. For systems or components to which IEEE-279 is applicable, single failures of pa ssive electrical components will be considered, as well as single failure of active components in recognition of the higher anticipated failure rates of passive electrical components relative to passive mechanical components.
- 5. Features of the plant which are e ssential to the mitigation of accident consequences shall be designed so that they can be fabricated and erected to quality standards which reflect the importance of the safety function to be performed.
- 6. The design of nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards shall include allowances for environmental phenomena at the site (e.g., weather extremes and proximity to other high energy syst ems). Furthermore, electrical equipment in these systems shall be c apable of performing their safety function as required under environmental conditions associated with all normal, abnormal, and plant accident operation.
- 7. Provision shall be made for control of active components of nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards from the control room.
- 8. Nuclear safety systems and engineered safeguards shall be designed to permit demonstration of their func tional performance requirements.
1.5.2.6.2 Containment and Isolation Criteria
- 1. A primary containment s hall be provided that completely encloses the reactor vessel. 2. The primary containment shall be designed to retain integrity as a radioactive material barrier during and following accident s that release radioactive material into the primary c ontainment volume.
BFN-19 1.5-11 3. It shall be possible to test primary c ontainment integrity and leak tightness at periodic intervals.
- 4. A secondary containment shall be provided that completely encloses both the primary containment and fuel storage areas.
- 5. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier under the same conditions that r equire the primary containment to act as a radioactive material barrier.
- 6. The secondary containment shall be designed to act as a radioactive material barrier, if required, wh enever the primary containment is open for expected operational purposes.
- 7. The primary and secondary contai nments, in conjunction with other engineered safeguards, shall act to prevent the radiological effects of accidents resulting in the release of r adioactive material to the containment volumes from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations.
- 8. Provisions shall be ma de for the removal of energy from within the primary containment as necessary to maintain the integrity of th e containment system following accidents that release energy to the primary containment.
- 9. Piping that penetrates the primary containment struct ure, and could serve as a path for the uncontrolled rel ease of radioactive material to the environs, shall be automatically isolated whenever such uncontrolled radioactive material release is threatened. Such isolation shall be effected in time to prevent radiological effects from exceeding the guideline values of applicable regulations.
1.5.2.6.3 Core Stand by Cooling Criteria
- 1. Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be provided to prevent excessive fuel clad temperatures as a result of a loss-of-coolant accident.
- 2. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall provide for continuity of core cooling over the complete range of postulated break sizes in the nuclear system process barrier.
- 3. The Core Standby Cooling Systems shall be diverse, reliable, and redundant.
- 4. Operation of the Core Standby Cooli ng systems shall be initiated automatically when required, regardless of the availability of offs ite power supplies and the normal generating syst em of the plant.
BFN-19 1.5-12 1.5.2.6.4 Standby Power Criteria
- 1. Standby electrical power sources sha ll be provided to allow prompt reactor shutdown and removal of decay heat under circumstances where normal auxiliary power is not available.
- 2. Standby electrical power sources shall have sufficient capacity to power all engineered safeguards requi ring electrical power.
1.5.2.7 Reactivity Control Criteria
- 1. Backup reactor shutdown capability shall be provided independent of normal reactivity control provisions. This backup system shall have the capability to shut down the reactor from any operat ing condition, and subsequently to maintain the shutdown condition.
- 2. In the event that the control room is inaccessible, it shall be possible to bring the reactor from power range operati on to cold shutdown (Mode 4) by manipulation of the local controls and equipment which are available outside the control room.
1.5.2.8 Process Cont rol Systems Criteria 1.5.2.8.1 Nuclear System Process Control Criteria
- 1. It shall be possible to manually control the reactor power level.
- 2. Control of the nuclear system shall be possible from a single location.
- 3. Nuclear system process controls s hall be arranged to allow the operator to rapidly assess the condition of the nuc lear system and to locate process system malfunctions.
- 4. Interlocks or other automatic equipm ent shall be provided as a backup to procedural controls to avoid conditions requiring the actuation of nuclear safety systems or engineer ed safeguards.
1.5.2.8.2 Deleted
1.5.2.8.3 Electrical Power S ystems Process Control Criteria Controls shall be provided in the electrical power systems to protect against faults and to increase the reliability of incoming and outgoing power.
BFN-19 1.5-13 1.5.2.9 Auxiliary Systems Criteria
- 1. Fuel handling and storage facilities shall be designed to prev ent criticality and to maintain adequate shielding and cooling for spent fuel.
- 2. Means shall be provided to remove heat from process systems that is generated through operation of the plant.
- 3. Fire detection and protection systems capable of protecting the plant against all types of fires shall be provided.
- 4. Means shall be provided to adequately heat, ventilate, and air-condition plant buildings for personnel comfor t and equipment protection.
- 5. Means shall be provided to furnish other auxiliary services as required for safe and efficient operation of the plant.
1.5.2.10 Shielding and Access Control Criteria
- 1. Radiation shielding shall be provided and access control patterns shall be established to allow a properly trained operating staff to control radiation doses within the limits of applicable regulat ions in any mode of normal plant operation.
- 2. The control room shall be shielded against radiation so that occupancy under accident conditions is possible.
1.5.2.11 Structural Loading Criteria
Adequate strength and stiffness, with appropriate safety factors, shall be provided so that a hazardous release of radioactive ma terial shall not occur. Details of implementation are given in Chapter 12 and Appendix C.