Revision as of 05:38, 4 April 2019

Text

Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review
	ML13074A038
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	03/12/2013
From:	Beltz T A; Plant Licensing Branch III
To:	Fields J S; Northern States Power Co
References
	TAC MD9990
	Download: ML13074A038 (3)
	v • d • e

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Beltz, Terry Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:12 AM To: Fields, John S.

Cc: gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com; McConnell, Ma tthew; Mathew, Roy; Carlson, Robert

Subject:

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Reques ts for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Ext ended Power Uprate Review (TAC No. MD9990)

Attachments:

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information Regarding the EPU Gap Analysis Review (EEEB).docx

Dear Mr. Fields:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff in the Electrical Engineering Branch of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation is currently supporting the review of the Extended Power Uprate (EPU) license amendment request for the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. The staff has reviewed your supplemental response associated with the EPU Gap Analysis and determined that additional information is required to complete its review. Draft requests for additional information (RAI) are attached.

You may accept these draft RAIs as a formal Requests for Additional Information and respond to the questions by April 12, 2013. Alternatively, you may request to discuss the contents of the RAIs with the NRC staff in a conference call, including any change to the proposed response date.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Sincerely, Terry A. Beltz, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-3049 Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 628 Mail Envelope Properties (7E9EA9BB82325E46B07B0F04F99B40D87C560368BF)

Subject:

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review (TAC No. MD9990) Sent Date: 3/12/2013 6:12:08 AM Received Date: 3/12/2013 6:12:00 AM From: Beltz, Terry Created By: Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov Recipients: "gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com" <gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com> Tracking Status: None "McConnell, Matthew" <Matthew.McConnell@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Mathew, Roy" <Roy.Mathew@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Carlson, Robert" <Robert.Carlson@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Fields, John S." <John.Fields@xenuclear.com> Tracking Status: None

Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1126 3/12/2013 6:12:00 AM Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information Regarding the EPU Gap Analysis Review (EEEB).docx 16819 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH EXTENDED POWER UPRATE REVIEW NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY - MINNESOTA (NSPM)

MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-263

1) Please explain what is meant by "Equipment Qualification Program Reconstitution."

2) Please provide the normal and accident levels for radiation, temperature, pressure, submergence, chemical spray effects, and humidity for all areas in which environmentally qualified equipment is installed in tabular form showing the Pre-EPU and EPU conditions, as well as the qualified values of EQ equipment in those areas.

3) Please modify Figures 27-1 and 27-2 to include the profile of the qualification level of EQ equipment to show that the EQ equipment will remain bounding under EPU conditions.

4) In response to Item 27, NSPM states the following:

"As indicated above the full EQ analysis is now completed with only minor exceptions." Please identify the "minor exceptions" and provide a discussion on each exception for its acceptability. 5) Provide the worst-case Design Basis loading under EPU conditions for the Class 1E station batteries and the capacity ratings for the Class 1E station batteries.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 | number = ML13074A038
 | issue date = 03/12/2013
-| title = Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant - Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review
+| title = Requests for Additional Information (Electrical Engineering Branch) in Support of the Extended Power Uprate Review
 | author name = Beltz T A
 | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1

v t e Letter Sequence RAI
TAC:MD9990, Clarify Application of Setpoint Methodology for LSSS Functions (Approved, Closed)
Initiation Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request Acceptance Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement Administration Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance, Withholding Request Acceptance Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting Questions 16 December 2008 11 February 2009 11 March 2009 12 March 2009 18 March 2009 18 March 2009 19 March 2009 20 March 2009 23 March 2009 29 March 2009 28 March 2009 28 March 2009 6 April 2009 6 April 2009 29 April 2009 26 June 2009 2 July 2009 2 July 2009 14 July 2009 14 July 2009 5 November 2009 16 March 2011 12 September 2011 28 March 2013 17 May 2013 9 July 2013 18 December 2008 18 December 2008 19 March 2009 25 October 2009 15 February 2013 12 March 2013 10 May 2013 24 April 2013 Answers 25 January 2010 13 January 2012 7 March 2013 18 March 2013 21 March 2013 10 April 2013 18 July 2013 18 July 2013 2 August 2013 18 May 2016 19 July 2012 31 January 2013 29 March 2013 10 April 2013 Results Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval Other: L-MT-08-091, Calculation 0801040.301, Steam Dryer Outer Hood Submodel Analysis, L-MT-09-002, Response to NRC Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Branch Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated December 5, 2008, L-MT-09-003, Response to NRC Environmental Branch Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated December 18, 2008, L-MT-09-004, Enclosures 2 - 4: NSPM Response to Containment & Ventilation Branch RAI Numbers 2, 3 and 4 Dated December 18, 2008, L-MT-09-026, Calculation 0000-0081-6958 MNGP-PRNMS-APRM Calc-2008-NP, Rev. 1, Average Power Range Monitor Selected Prnm Licensing Setpoints - EPU Operation (Numac), L-MT-09-027, Extended Power Uprate: Response to Instrumentation and Controls Branch RAI No. 3 Dated April 6, 2009, L-MT-09-044, Extended Power Uprate: Response to NRC Mechanical and Civil Engineering Review Branch (Emcb) Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated March 28, 2009, L-MT-09-049, Drawing C.5-2007, Revision 15, Failure to Scram, L-MT-09-073, Extended Power Uprate: Response to NRC Containment and Ventilation Review Branch (Scvb) Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated July 2, 2009 and July 14, 2009, L-MT-09-083, Extended Power Uprate: Limit Curves Requested by the Mechanical and Civil Review Branch (Emcb) Associated with Requests for Additional Information (Rais) Dated March 20, 2009, L-MT-09-088, Extended Power Uprate: Revision to Clarify Text in Enclosures 5 and 7 of L-MT-08-052, L-MT-09-097, Extended Power Uprate: Acknowledgement of NRC Review Delay, L-MT-10-025, Extended Power Uprate (Epu): Response to NRC-NSPM February 25, 2010 Conference Call, L-MT-10-072, Extended Power Uprate: Updates to Docketed Information, L-MT-11-044, Uprate (Epu): Update on EPU Commitments, L-MT-12-056, WCAP-17549-NP, Rev. 0, Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer Structural Evaluation for High-Cycle Acoustic Loads Using ACE, L-MT-12-090, Westinghouse, LTR-A&SA-12-8, Rev. 1, Attachment B, Recommendations for Inspections of the Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer, L-MT-12-114, Drawing C.5-2007, Rev. 17, Failure to Scram, L-MT-13-020, Enclosure 1 - Responses to the Gap Analysis, L-MT-13-029, Enclosure 14 to L-MT-13-029 - WCAP-17716-NP, Revision 0, Benchmarking of the Acoustic Circuit Enhanced Revision 2.0 for the Monticello Steam Dryer Replacement Project, L-MT-13-091, WCAP-17716-NP, Revision 1 - Benchmarking of the Acoustic Circuit Enhanced Revision 2.0 for the Monticello Steam Dryer Replacement Project, Enclosure 14, L-MT-13-092, Extended Power Uprate (Epu): Completion of EPU Commitments, Proposed License Conditions and Revised Power Ascension Test Plan, L-MT-15-074, Enclosure 7, WCAP-18604-NP, Revision 0, Monticello EPU Main Steam Line Strain Data Evaluation Report, L-MT-16-017, Revised Commitment to Reconcile Analysis of Bypass Voiding for Transition to Areva Analysis Methodology, L-MT-16-071, Submittal of 2016 Annual Report of Changes in Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Models Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.46, ML083400402, ML083500575, ML083570610, ML083590127, ML090710680, ML090710682, ML090710683, ML091120578, ML091140470, ML091410121, ML091410122, ML091410123, ML091410124, ML091760769, ML092090321, ML092290250, ML092790191, ML092810554, ML093160816, ML093220925, ML093220964, ML093620024, ML100980009, ML101890915, ML102010461... further results
MONTHYEAR2009-01-14 [Table View]

ML13074A038: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:38, 4 April 2019

Text

Subject:

Dear Mr. Fields:

Subject:

Navigation menu

ML13074A038: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:38, 4 April 2019

Text

Subject:

Dear Mr. Fields:

Subject:

Navigation menu

Search