IR 05000528/2017007: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML17096A762 | | number = ML17096A762 | ||
| issue date = 04/06/2017 | | issue date = 04/06/2017 | ||
| title = | | title = NRC Evaluations of Changes, Tests, and Experiments Baseline Inspection Report 05000528/2017007; 05000529/2017007; and 05000530/2017007 | ||
| author name = Farnholtz T R | | author name = Farnholtz T R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/EB-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/EB-1 | ||
Revision as of 02:49, 28 January 2019
| ML17096A762 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde |
| Issue date: | 04/06/2017 |
| From: | Thomas Farnholtz Region 4 Engineering Branch 1 |
| To: | Bement R S Arizona Public Service Co |
| References | |
| IR 2017007 | |
| Download: ML17096A762 (18) | |
Text
April 6, 2017
Mr. Robert Executive Vice President Nuclear/
Chief Nuclear Officer
Arizona Public Service Company P.O. Box 52034, MS 7602 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034
SUBJECT: PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 - NRC EVALUATIONS OF CHANGES, TESTS, AND EXPERIMENTS BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT 05000528/2017007; 05000529/2017007; AND 05000530/2017007
Dear Mr. Bement:
On March 3, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 and discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. J. Cadogan, Senior Vice President of Nuclear Operations, and other members of your staff. Inspectors documented the results of this inspection in the enclosed inspection report.
NRC inspectors documented one finding of very low safety significance (Green) in this report. This finding involved a violation of NRC requirement s. The NRC is treating this violation as a non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy.
If you contest the violation or significance of the NCV, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC resident inspector at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Managem ent System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,/RA/ Thomas R. Farnholtz, Chief Engineering Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-528, 50-529, 50-530 License Nos. NPF-41, NPF-51, NPF-74
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000528/2017007 05000529/2017007, and 05000530/2017007
w/Attachment:
Supplemental Information
cc: Electronic Distribution for Palo Verde
ML17096A762 SUNSI Review: ADAMS: Non-Publicly Available Non-Sensitive Keyword: By: TFarnholtz Yes No Publicly Available Sensitive NRC-002 OFFICE SRI:EB2 C:EB1 C:PBD NAME JDrake TFarnholtz GMiller SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ DATE 3/21/17 4/6/17 3/21/17 Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV Docket: 05000528, 05000529; 05000530 License: NPF-41, NPF-51, NPF-74 Report: 05000528/2017007
- 05000529/2017007; and 05000530/2017007 Licensee
- Arizona Public Service Company Facility: Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Location: 5801 South Wintersburg Road Tonopah, AZ 85354 Dates: February 27 through March 3, 2017 Inspectors: J. Drake, Senior Reactor Inspector Lead J. Watkins, Reactor Inspector C. Smith, Reactor Inspector W. Cullum, Reactor Inspector Approved By: Thomas R. Farnholtz Chief, Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety
2
SUMMARY
IR 05000528/2017007, 05000529/2017007, and 05000530/2017007; Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; Evaluations of Changes, Tests, and Experiments.
This report covers a one-week announced baseline inspection on evaluations of changes, tests, and experiments. The inspection was conducted by Region IV based engineering inspectors.
One finding was identified by the inspectors. The finding was considered a non-cited violation of NRC regulations.
The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (i.e., greater than Green, or Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, "Significance Determination Process" (SDP). Cross-cutting aspects were determined using Inspection Manual Chapter 0310, "Aspects Within the Cross-Cutting Areas." Violations of NRC requirements are dispositioned in accordance with the NRC's Enforcement Policy, dated July 9, 2013. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 5, dated February 2014.
A. NRC-Identified Findings
and Self-Revealed Findings
Cornerstone: Mitigating Systems
- Green.
The team identified a Green non-cited violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, "Design Control," which states, in part, "Measures shall be established to assure that applicable regulatory requirements and the design basis, as defined in
§ 50.2 and as specified in the license application, for those structures, systems, and components to which this appendix applies are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions." Specifically, from August 11, 1982, to March 3, 2017, the licensee did not analyze dynamic pipe whip effects of a main feedwater line for a high-energy line break of a shutdown cooling line. In response to this issue, the licensee performed immediate and prompt operability evaluations and determined that the piping systems remained operable and could withstand the effects of a high-energy line break. This finding was entered into the licensee's corrective action program as Condition Report CR-17-02815.
The team determined that the failure to perform an adequate analysis for shutdown cooling and feedwater lines for high-energy line break pipe whip effects was a performance deficiency. This finding was more-than-minor because it was associated with the design control attribute of the Mitigating Systems cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences.
Specifically, the failure to analyze the main feedwater piping for high-energy line break effects called the operability of the piping system into question. In accordance with Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix A, "The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power," dated June 19, 2012, Exhibit 2, "Mitigating Systems Screening Questions," the issue screened as having very low safety significance (Green) because it was a design or qualification deficiency that did not represent a loss of operability or functionality; did not represent an actual loss of safety function of the system or train; did not result in the loss of one or more trains of non-technical specification equipment; and did not screen as potentially risk significant due to seismic, flooding, or severe weather. The team determined that this finding did not have a cross-cutting aspect because the most significant contributor to the performance deficiency did not reflect current licensee performance. Specifically, the licensee performed the calculation in 1982 and revised it in 1991; therefore, the performance deficiency occurred outside of the nominal three-year period for "present performance."
(Section 4OA2.1)
B. Licensee-Identified Violations
No findings of more-than-minor significance were identified.
4
REPORT DETAILS
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, Barrier Integrity, and Emergency Preparedness
1R17 Evaluations of Changes, Tests, and Experiments
.1 Evaluations of Changes, Tests, and Experiments
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed 13 evaluations performed pursuant to Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Section 59, to determine whether the evaluations were adequate and that prior NRC approval was obtained as appropriate. The inspectors also reviewed 21 screenings, where licensee personnel had determined that a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation was not necessary. The inspectors reviewed these documents to determine
if:
- the changes, tests, and experiments performed were evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 and that sufficient documentation existed to confirm that a license amendment was not required;
- the safety issue requiring the change, tests, and experiment was resolved;
- the licensee conclusions for evaluations of changes, tests, and experiments were correct and consistent with 10 CFR 50.59; and
- the design and licensing basis documentation was updated to reflect the change.
The inspectors used, in part, Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 96-07, "Guidelines for 10 CFR 50.59 Implementation," Revision 1, to determine acceptability of the completed evaluations and screenings. The NEI document was endorsed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.187, "Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 50.59, Changes, Tests, and Experiments," dated November 2000. The list of evaluations, screenings, and/or applicability determinations reviewed by the inspectors is included as an attachment to this report.
This inspection constituted 13 samples of evaluations and 21 samples of screenings as defined in IP 71111.17-04.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution
.1 Review of Corrective Action Program Documents
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed 10 corrective action program documents that identified or were related to the 10 CFR 50.59 program. The inspectors reviewed these documents to evaluate the effectiveness of corrective actions related to permanent plant modifications and evaluations of changes, tests, and experiments. In addition, corrective action documents written on issues identified during the inspection were reviewed to verify adequate problem identification and incorporation of the problems into the corrective action system. The list of specific corrective action documents that were sampled and reviewed by the inspectors are listed in the attachment to this report.
b. Findings
Failure to analyze shutdown cooling and feedwater lines for high-energy line break pipe whip effects
Introduction.
The team identified a Green non-cited violation of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, "Design Control," for the licensee's failure to translate regulatory requirements and the design basis into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. Specifically, the licensee failed to analyze the dynamic pipe whip effects between the main feedwater and shutdown
cooling lines.
Description.
The licensee's updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR) states that the design basis for high-energy line breaks complies with Branch Technical Position (BTP) 3-1. Specifically, UFSAR, Section 3.6.2.1.3.C, states, in part, "a whipping pipe is considered insufficient to rupture an impacted pipe of equal or larger nominal pipe size and equal or heavier wall thickness." BTP 3-1 states, in part, that "protection from pipe whip is not required if the internal energy level associated with the whipping pipe can be demonstrated to be insufficient to impair the safety function of any SSC to an unacceptable level-.the energy level in a whipping pipe may be considered insufficient to rupture an impacted pipe of equal or larger nominal pipe size and equal or heavier wall thickness."
Calculation 13-MC-ZZ-0633 analyzes high-energy line breaks for various piping systems.Section I analyzes the effects of a high-energy line break in the 16 inch, schedule 160, stainless steel shutdown cooling line on the 24 inch, schedule 80, carbon steel main feedwater line.Section I concludes that whipping pipe protection is not
needed because the main feedwater line will not be damaged or impaired by the failure of the shutdown cooling line.
The impacted main feedwater line has a larger diameter than the shutdown cooling line; however, the main feedwater line is thinner (i.e., not equal or heavier wall thickness)than the shutdown cooling line; therefore, the design method used to exclude pipe whip protection for the main feedwater line is not in accordance with the design and licensing basis.
Analysis.
The team determined that the failure to perform an adequate analysis for shutdown cooling and feedwater lines for high-energy line break pipe whip effects was a performance deficiency. This finding was more-than-minor because it was associated with the design control attribute of the Mitigating Systems cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences.
Specifically, the failure to analyze the main feedwater piping for high-energy line break effects called the operability of the piping system into question. In accordance with Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix A, "The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power," dated June 19, 2012, Exhibit 2, "Mitigating Systems Screening Questions," the issue screened as having very low safety significance (Green) because it was a design or qualification deficiency that did not represent a loss of operability or functionality; did not represent an actual loss of safety function of the system or train; did not result in the loss of one or more trains of non-technical specification equipment; and did not screen as potentially risk significant due to seismic, flooding, or severe weather. The team determined that this finding did not have a cross-cutting aspect because the most significant contributor to the performance deficiency did not reflect current licensee performance. Specifically, the licensee performed the calculation in 1982 and revised it in 1991; therefore, the performance deficiency occurred outside of the nominal three-year period for "present performance."
Enforcement.
The team identified a Green non-cited violation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion III, "Design Control," which states, in part, "Measures shall be established to assure that applicable regulatory requirements and the design basis, as defined in § 50.2 and as specified in the license application, for those structures, systems, and components to which this appendix applies are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions." Contrary to the above, from August 11, 1982, to March 3, 2017, the licensee did not establish measures to assure that applicable regulatory requirements and the design basis for a system, structure, and component to which this appendix applies are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. Specifically, the licensee did not analyze dynamic pipe whip effects of a main feedwater line for a high-energy line break of a shutdown cooling line. In response to this issue, the licensee performed immediate and prompt operability evaluations and determined that the piping systems remained operable and could withstand the effects of a high-energy line break. This finding was entered into the licensee's corrective action program as Condition Report CR-17-02815. Because this finding was of very low safety significance and was entered into the licensee's corrective action program, this violation is being treated as a non-cited violation, consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the NRC Enforcement Policy:
NCV 05000528/2017007-01; 05000529/2017007-01; 05000530/2017007-01: "Failure to Analyze Shutdown Cooling and Feedwater Lines for High-Energy Line Break Pipe Whip Effects."
4OA6 Meetings
Exit Meeting Summary
On March 3, 2017, the inspectors presented the preliminary inspection results to Mr. J. Cadogan, Senior Vice President of Nuclear Operations, and other members of the licensee's staff. The licensee acknowledged the results as presented. While some proprietary information was reviewed during this inspection, no proprietary information was included in this report.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- J. Cadogan, Senior Vice President of Nuclear Operations
- M. Lacal, Senior Vice President of Regulatory and Oversight
- B. Rash, Vice President, Engineering
- R. Carbonneau, Director, Nuclear Assurance
- B. Berles, Director, Nuclear Fuel Management
- G. Andrews, Director, Regulatory Affairs
- P. Paramithar, Director, Project Engineering
- M. McGhee, Department Leader, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs
- M. Radspinner, Department Leader, System Engineering
- D. Elkinton, Section Leader, Compliance
- P. Han, Senior Engineer
- R. Chu, Engineer
- N. Aaroncooke, Engineer
- R. Doyle, Engineer
NRC Personnel
- C. Peabody, Senior Resident Inspector
- D. Reinert, Resident Inspector
- D. You, Resident Inspector
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, DISCUSSED, AND UPDATED
Opened and Closed
- 05000528/2017007-01 NCV Failure to Analyze Shutdown Cooling and Feedwater Lines for High-Energy Line Break Pipe Whip Effects (Section 4OA2)
- 05000529/2017007-01 NCV Failure to Analyze Shutdown Cooling and Feedwater Lines for High-Energy Line Break Pipe Whip Effects (Section 4OA2)
- 05000530/2017007-01 NCV Failure to Analyze Shutdown Cooling and Feedwater Lines for High-Energy Line Break Pipe Whip Effects (Section 4OA2)
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
The following is a list of documents reviewed during the inspection.
- Inclusion on this list does not imply that the NRC inspectors reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather, that selected sections of portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection effort.
- Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report.
- CFR 50.59 Screenings Number Description or Title Revision
- S-05-0228 Remove Blowers and Add Air Conditioning Units and Fans to Switchgear Enclosures
- S-09-0300 DMWO
- S-12-0004 Replace Anti-Reverse Rotation Speedswitch and Protective relays
- S-12-0054 Procedure 40OP-9SI02 Change That Aligns the High Pressure Safety Injection (HPSI) Systems tor Boration of the Cold-Leg Injection Flow Paths
- S-13-0115
- DEC 00397 1 S-13-0140 Supporting Analysis for Unit 3 BMI 1
- S-13-0164 Add New Isolation Control Circuits Related to the Backup Pressurizer Heaters, Air Handling Unit (AHU) M-HJB-Z03
and Valves
- CHB-UV-505,
- CHB-UV-515,
- SSB-UV-203,
- CHN-UV-501 and
- CHE-HV-536 These Circuits Are of the Remote Shutdown System
- S-14-0023 Installation of Electrical Equipment Necessary to Support the Requirements of NRC Order
- S-14-0044 DMWO
- 4498668 Replace Obsolete Analog Temperature Indicator with Digital
- S-14-0064 Installation of Secondary 600 V Power Cables and Fiber Optic (FO) Cables Which Will Provide Power and Communications to the
- Emergency Equipment Storage Facility (EESF) for FLEX Equipment
- 4540569 Installs Pressure Instrumentation 0 S-14-0091 PO
- EDC 2014-00575 0
- 10
- CFR 50.59 Screenings Number Description or Title Revision
- S-14-0092 Install Manual Transfer Switches In-Line With the Existing Non-Class 1E 4.16 kV Power (NB) System That Provides Offsite Power to the Class 1-E 4.16 KV Power (PB) System
- S-14-0100 LDCR 14-F039 2
- S-14-0104 Replacement Of The Athena 2000 Or 2200 Series Analog Temperature Controller(S)
- S-14-0117 Large Normal Chiller Control Panel Replacement 3 S-15-0002 13-MC-HF-0200 0
- S-15-0013 Emergency Diesel Generator Crankcase Breather Vent Piping 0 S-15-0024 Alternate source of Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Injection Water 0 S-15-0037 Provide Temporary Power to the ultrasonic Flow Indicating Transmitter (3JSINFIT0300) That Measures Flow to the Refueling Water Tank From HPSI, LPSI or CS Pumps
- S-15-0049 Plant Multiplexer Server Upgrade 0
- S-15-0065 Update Procedure for Train A HPSI Injection and Miscellaneous SI Valves - Cycle - Inservice Test
- S-15-0075
- EDC 2016-00016 1
- S-15-0051 DMWO
- 4196876 - Change the Alarm Setpoint of 2 Ex-Core Monitoring System Startup Channels From 2000 CPS to
- 10,000 Cps
- S-15-0084 Install Fuses, Relays, and Control Switch to Provide the Capability to Properly Isolate the Lube Oil and Seal Oil Emergency Pumps from a Postulated Appendix R Fire Induced Fault that Occurs in the Control Room Circuitry
- S-15-0087 PROC 40AO-9ZZ17 R021 Charging Sequence Equipment Operations, Inadvertent
- PPS-ESFAS Actuations
- S-15-0116
- NA-1635 Open Phase Detection System 0
- S-16-0007 Study 13-MS-A152 R0 & 15-F018 Max Design - Qual Temp Comps Fuel Bldg
- S-16-0049 DTP_FLOW_ERROR 1MOD8 REL 1
- 10
- CFR 50.59 Screenings Number Description or Title Revision
- S-16-0090 Upgrade Cathodic Protection (Qh) Sys With New Rectifier Remote Monitoring and Control
- 10
- CFR 50.59 Evaluations Number Description or Title Revision
- E-14-0002 Replace the Inverters of the Class 1E Vital Instruments AC Power (PN) System
- E-14-0003 Excitation Replacement Electrical 1
- ENG-DMWO
- 3094267 Emergency Diesel Generator Crankcase Breather Vent Piping 0
- E-14-0005 Calculation 13-MC-ZZ-0633 / 13-MC-ZZ- 0594 /
- LDCR 2014-F051
- E-15-0001
- DEC-00494 R1 accepts as-is original alloy 600 nozzle remnant BMI
- E-15-0002 The Digital Asset Protection Systems (DAPS is a Centralized Monitoring and Cyber Security Response Architecture for Process Systems
- E-15-0003 73TI-9CH08 Charging Pump Suction Pres Data Collect 0 E-15-0004 Calculation 13-JC-SF-0202, Procedure 40OP-9SF01 1
- E-15-0005 TMWO
- 4712119 Disposition 0
- E-16-0001 Study 13-MS-A151 0
- E-16-0002 Add New 525kV Transmission Line Delaney to Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS) Switchyard
- E-16-0003 13-JC-HP-0200, Widen Containment Hydrogen Monitoring Indication Tolerances
- E-16-0006 Engineering Study 13-MS-A154 0
Condition Reports
(Issued) 17-02694 17-02717 17-02734 17-02805 17-02839 17-02815 17-02847 17-02860
- 17-02864 17-02926 17-02932
Condition Reports
(Reviewed) 15-00418 15-03878 15-04292 15-04400
- PVAR 2988861
- CRDR 4520395
- 16-15738 16-07160
- 16-19427 16-19752
Calculations
- Number Description or Title Revision 13-NC-CH-0314 Allowable Post-LOCA Back Leakage to RWT 5 13-MC-SI-0215 HPSI System Performance Evaluation and Surveillance Requirements Basis Calculation
- 13-MS-A154 Tornado-Borne Missile Impact Analyses for Unprotected Components
- 13-MS-A152 Study for the Design Temperature Validation of Components Located in the Fuel Building
- LTR-SCC-14-
- 010 DTP Flow Error 1MOD08 0 13-MC-HF-0200 Fuel Building Normal HVAC System 3
- EDC 2016-00016 Fuel Building Transient Analysis 1 13-MC-ZZ-633 Consolidation of Jet Impingement/Pipe Whip Calculations 13
Procedures
- Number Description or Title Revision 01DP-0AP12 Condition Reporting Process 23 01DP-0CC01 Design Control Process 18 81DP-0EE10 Design Change Process 42
- 87DP-0MC06 Material Engineering Evaluation 29 93DP-0LC07
- CFR 50.59 and 72.48 Screenings and Evaluations
- 26/27 93DP-0LC07-
- 10
- CFR 50.59 and 72.48 Administrative Guideline
- 40OP-9CH03 Reactor Coolant Pu mp Seal Injection System
- Charging Pump Suction Pressure Data Collection
Procedures
- Number Description or Title Revision 73ST-9XI53
- Cycle Revision - Inservice Test
- Cycle - Inservice Test
- Recovery from Shutdown Cooling to Normal Operating Lineup 95 40OP-9SF01
- Control Element Drive Mechanism Control System (CEDMCS) Operation
Drawings
- Number Description or Title Revision 01-M-SIP-001 Safety Injection and Shutdown Cooling System 55 01-E-PHA-003 Single Line Diagram 480V Class 1E Power /system Motor Control Center 1E-PHA-M33
- 01-E-PBA-001 Single Line Diagram 4.16 KV Class 1E Power System Switchgear 1E-PBA-S03
- 03-P-DGF-703 Diesel Generator Building ISO 1 01-M-DGP-001 P&I Diagram Control Air Diesel Generator System Sht. 1 58
- 01-M-DGP-001 P&I Diagram Air Intake and Exhaust Diesel Generator System Sht. 2
- 01-M-HDP-001 P&I Diagram HVAC Diesel Generator Building 10 01-M-SIP-001 P&I Diagram Safety Injection and Shutdown Cooling System 55 01-P-ZYA-024 Refueling Water Tank Piping Plan 1 01-P-SGF-119 Containment Building Isometric Main Steam and Main Feedwater
- 01-P-SIF-105 Containment Building Isometric Safety Injection System Shutdown Cooling Lines
Miscellaneous
- Number Description or Title Revision /
- Date
- Nuclear Assurance Department (NAD) Audit Plan and Report 2015-005 Design Control December 21, 2015
- Nuclear Assurance Department (NAD) Audit Plan and
- Report 2016-005 Technical Specifications and Administrative Controls July 29, /2016 SWMS
- SA 4598219 SSA (Simple Self-Assessment) of 1R18 Eng. Modifications January 23, 2015 SWMS 15-06151-003 3R18 SSA of Eng. Modifications September
- 30, 2015 SWMS 16-02116-002 2R19 SSA of Eng. Modifications March 9, 2016 SWMS 16-13475-002 1R19 SSA of Eng. Modifications August 30, 2016
- 18A
- EE 4270732 Debris in 2B EW Heat Exchanger
- EE 4595004 Evaluate the Reliability of the Unit 2 A Charging Pump Under Reduced Suction Pressure Conditions
- EE 4679551 Evaluation of Disabling Low Pressure Suction Trip of Charging Pump 2A
- EE 4667405 Evaluation of 73TI-9CH08
- CMWO
- 4745019 V126 Work with New Fingerplate Instructions
- CMWO
- 4341442 V316 Work with Inadequate Fingerplate Instruction
- 00734-1 Pentair T-Series Mid-Size Model T-53 Outdoor Air Conditioner Vendor Manual