View source for LIC-12-0035, Omaha Public Power District'S Answer to March 12, 2012 Commission Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)

{{Adams
| number = ML12093A115
| issue date = 03/30/2012
| title = Omaha Public Power District'S Answer to March 12, 2012 Commission Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)
| author name = Bannister D
| author affiliation = Omaha Public Power District
| addressee name = 
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR, NRC/Document Control Desk
| docket = 05000285
| license number = 
| contact person = 
| case reference number = EA-12-051, LIC-12-0035
| document type = Letter type:LIC
| page count = 2
| project = 
| stage = Other
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:444 South 16'" Street Mall Omaha, NE 68/02-2247 March 30, 2012 LlC-12-0035 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AnN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

==References:==
: 1. Docket No. 50-285.
: 2. Letter from NRC (E. J. Leeds & M. R. Johnson) to OPPD (D. J.
Bannister), "Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," dated March 12, 2012 (EA 12-051), (NRC-12-0023).

==SUBJECT:==
Omaha Public Power District's Answer to March 12, 2012 Commission Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)
On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC" or "Commission")
issued an immediately effective order in the captioned matter entitled Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Effective Immediately) ("Order") to, inter alia, Omaha Public Power District (OPPD). The Order states that, as a result of the NRC's evaluation of the lessons learned from the accident at Fukushima Dai-ich'i in March 2011, the NRC had decided to direct nuclear power
      !plant licensees and construction permit holders to take certain actions. Specifically, the NRC is requiring additional defense-in-depth measures to address uncertainties associated with protection from beyond-design-basis events . With respect to t'his Order, licensees are specifically directed to provide a reliable means of remotely monitoring "wide-range spent fuel pool levels" to support effective priorWzation of event mitigation and recovery actions in the event of a beyond-design-basis external event. Specific requirements are outlined in Attachment 2 to the Order.
The Order requires submission of an overall integrated plan including a description of how compliance with the requirements described in Attachment 2 will be achieved to the NRC for review by February 28, 2013. In addition, the Order requires submission of an initial status report 60 days following issuance of the final interim staff guidance and at six-month intervals following submittal of an overall integrated plan on February 28, 2013. The Order states that the NRC intends to issue the interim staff guidance containing specific details on implementation of the requirements of this order in AU9ust 2012. Finally, the order requires full implementation of its requirements no later than

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LlC-12-0035 Page 2 two refueling cycles after submittal of the overall integrated plan, or December 31, 2016, whichever comes first.
Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. &sect; 2.202 and the terms specified in the Order, OPPD hereby submits i,ts answer to the Order. OPPD consents to the Order and does not request a hearing. Based on information currently available , OPPD has not identified any circumstances of the type described in Sections IV.B.1 and IV.B.2 of the Order requiring relief at this time. In addition, OPPD has not identified any impediments to compliance with the Order within two refueling cycles after submittal of the integrated plan, or December 31, 2016, whichever is earlier. OPPD will provide further responses as required by Section IV.C in accordance with the specified deadlines. However, given the uncertainties associated with the ultimate scope of required work caused by the unavailability of implementing gu idance until August 2012, and the impact on the ability of OPPD to comply with the specific compliance dead'iine dates based on the probable availability of that guidance, OPPD's future responses may include requests for schedule relief as warranted by subsequent NRC requirements or implementing guidance or the results of engineering analyses not yet performed. Any such request would be submitted in accordance with the relaxation provision in Section IV of the Order.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Bill Hansher at (402) 533-6894. 'No commitments to the NRC are made in this letter.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 30, 2012.
Sincerely,
~~
D. ;J. Bannister Site Vice President and CNO DJB/JKG/mle c:      E. J. Leeds, Director of Office of Nuclear Regulation E. E. Collins, Jr., NRC Regional Administrator, Region IV L. E. Wilkins, NRC Project Manager J. C. Kirkland, NRC Senior Resident Inspector}}