Regulatory Guide 1.17

Protection of Nuclear Power Plants Against Industrial Sabotage

ML13038A423
Person / Time
Issue date:	06/30/1973
From:	Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
References
RG-1.017
Download: ML13038A423 (5)

w

4-,-'

U..ATOM~IC ;ENERGY CMISIN

AM'I

DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY STANDARDS

REGULATORY GUIDE 1.17 IO0N.OF NUCLEARý POWER PLANTS AGAINST INDUST'RýIAL S/

PROTEC1 I

1, S

I

• .-~

-A

I

44 If

-A. I NTRODUCTION

.bmuary

1

1973'. the 'Atomic Enilergy ihad ýpublishied, i~n the eea

~

r rnendmnents to itsfregulation in :0

OClFR Part.

nRsing of

ýProdukction, and Utihzi~aion:ý.

Prpsd§ 56.5,5c -would requ~ire' ea~ch thrie to peate a nuiclear react'or to::.

Pppopriate protection against industrdallt

'roposed paragr~ph>(c), '-Thysical .Security..

ý,50.34 would re'qwie each apphicaticin for,

[g lic'iese: to include a~physical security pl~rn.

paragrap~h (p) of § ý50.34-wul eýr epsees Who ic have not -subm

.i .iIt .t e .dr a physi.c al in to submit such a plan to the Commissionig~6. 1 ..

al within 60 dqys after the' pubic-aft n.. of'

adments, in effeaiv'eý formi .,Furthermore,.

quires ýthat an applicatio'n for a construiction:

ide the.princia deign cieat estife the. iequirements for Structures systems' ad.

s esse-i~tial .to 'safety. This. regulatory guide ihy~stcal security cnhena, thiat are,'gen~erally for the 'protection of uclear pdover.,plants'

6f inidustrial sabotage, "which~ could; lead.to a.

tihe -health and safiety of the. public Trhe:

,oinnyImittee,&on Reactor Siafciuar'ds.'has been'

ohnceniing thi,.s guide anid.has -oncturred in ý:theý

National Standards Comi

-by the Americar,.Nati1o Board of Standards Rievit

-e

ý

In .addition 'to -the p

!::.ANK NS;1N8.1.*0- the*i d,ýsl N' *8 and is andards In

";it.: g'i

.:,-protec sUTrep tt::i:S

- in:.t, in,.-

iAmbi~

Win co

ý4'

y th co

,' * -.,rnel il -

-:!i:i> ::*!

• .4 ' .:. :'.

- :.:!*i:

C.

in t DI

- .DISCUSS!-=

kcOTmmittlee '-ANS2;;3 of.-the C

ar. *4

1

.i":."

an..::.::

-Nuclear C

rm,.taenrioun caieteth"*:n tested for operability at th"e con

• • ~i:*.:co~ i]i*:*!';!°

i:*ei~c

n l

a o T.F'

ni:i'hat--.t e o t tha n e each, se ven days'.

-

'4

,

-

ncshud. s:ary minsite.'ki 'aikr~iis Sindli~jeskchations andL

Ccom municatiofl eq cmn, shuldm taintrusiond1cath*he anuai

'f t

tshorld'be otester'withya at m

tmumhec annuncaio s~la, n rse onldyuafcter -sthe atop ((4~opetheionng

'of ea~hsch interval dur ins -AIt intrsionF amTins, e*e*gency h.o..-.,a4arms'.4-

• .:...rm Fotheym

'tan oeeheevendays*a e.

..

.

1

, ý,

'

F

".ý

-1 A

p~p i

ed sgn j~

ue slnidnuld ri

4ldift..I

. .

annnito thod be res o

.Safter sfacto:y

-e the beginr,.g df

-.

ah securt94or..,.e.,.

wc F

cmmncatin hae artaken pv~

edwef alrm.F

'indicated b'y GSAInteriii FderafJý'S S~cifidatio'

ragmnsbhid'epoie n

-

.

.,

other

"saf6t:y- requirem.'

ents

-

t6re*duce

' "

W-A-l4Ž A(GALFS)7suc5'esd§f~jrin~d'utriaI sabotage df viyail exen- eas.

eqepne~:

these'.:.atufes:

.u.

V

2.

Equiiiment Testing

.

rettesbe'tee.feli~

a:

'

Seurity-r"""ted

• • top'otectagai-st'

undetected,, nte*i. :

equiment, exept Ar mpair. equipme~nt' performance, -,su idcti oh fiiSp'erabiityA

• .

b

--

.';;:'"

.

..

'* '.

.::!iii~.i ati

Co- ieý. 'may.be..obtained- frorn usins s rvice:centers of.

..

the Gne.alS

ei

-

i Reginal Offi tesoeat

in wn g wa

!. er:v .".. m td

.

t..-

De.ied security:i.mer i*sures, ft prt~t~ndfte. facility W-gain§$t -irfdui Ni]**::[I.:.

.teW* ork;'N.Y1 :3

.Sa~n Fr:*anei~sco, Ca'.

.Los:Afi~geles, :Ca

....

1"h ¢e=;0 nisiin.'.'e

..

Boston 'Mass.

.0-.DeneraCoo.

Ka.satCiijwao.

e -'

epc s

...

.

..

.

"w

...

..

' :;ýaidag ,-

CA-.

M.. :.. : f c :...('3.=. .5ure.

ýC..

....

C:.'.

• .*:

Was.ngion, D.C*Atlanta, Ga.

Stl..Wash;

§'790.

the-:. Commission' s regua Ft1. Worth,-Texak hiao.Il Part,.2.

'V

F

F

'

-F

F"'

F

F'

£

F

F

5 F

'

F

F~

-

F F

F /

~'~

F

'

F

F

-

F

S

'

'F

-

F

F

5 F

F F ~F.

F

-

F

'F

V

.

-

~

F

-F -

/F.

-

F'

F

F

P

-

F'

'1 F 4F~ 'F

-

'44

-

F

F~~FSj FF~

.~

--

F' l'F

jFF.

F1F

F?, F-F

S

-'

95 F

a F"F'

CFFFS~

.

.

. F F. F

{frF

~J

-

F F F

F

F

F

F

F AF

'F'

~

117'~'

FF

,FF~FF

'F"F'.V"

"-.

,* 7 1.

SAFE7YGJE 17 OETON AGAINV;EST INDUSTRIA SABO1TAGE

ro i

noted would f

'individuals in c'er0

- In.. sis nMmorandum, and .Oder. dated ti stal....b"

fiebrua.. r

1*96*7:'4.

• -!:init the Floida Powe idp cft Ligl6t case, the, Commirission aro

4. ihti w

ecalne.nyone attemptn to enterAwh6.'.?I

.exect th'e'stafftoas§iir'eV'

at the rperaingcense. is notknown by sightV

s

.st-age :that,, ainm du:s: ria psecurit aeho dfor tat -area Poced'ureskfo4r

. iea.re.am -poý.ýpided,-byan nappicantito*.ite&

.monfi toringp a oant**nd cogrl'

e

"SY"

against industinl sbotage ii. a -nucle'r..pdwer tepat::and me-ieib ef prsorns-itffiW'.

Thi

~~the" !.plant i.rifmyicde,-.

n plant; This guide. describes a: suitable:. program t

p...t may. inclue id.n..,"-

'

fo. po.t.cting against..industrial sa§botage*

employees, signing in, and"t itdf

4rs,_.

providing:'escorts- fr,..uncleared vid B..: Discussiont and~ challenging the et ry per sons

..-

attemnpting to enter vitalareas.

-

iThe following means canbe employed to

.Precautions

.also4 are rces:sk.y to, s. can be.pempa ee.

to redu "

ce thepi'r.bability and effects of. industrial contr-l' the p ...

u......

sabota*eia

ýY

t"ote*'

,ofzaccess of personnel andIo and

'rr t li pla..i..y,,, it.! .

plantaii*d' plant: site ('2) selection Procedures which* , include," appropriate of, plant oferating .ipersonnel, (3).:monitoring of searching, of packagesý and briefcases 'of plantiiequipmentd .(4) design and arrangment visitbrs:.and either.forbidding ýt of plant'features,.

or requiring. the'i nnspection,,of ý.ehicles-'

other.than tho~seý associated withiýp~lant,

4 I' 1. C;

r

-Ol of Access-'A

program

-for operation are effective means:,,in!

pr..'tec ion'.against. industrial' isbotage controlling the'

6flow .

iof unauth z,

-

inc lu dqes sec*i~ty:. measures. to -'prevent material"to and from the plant.-*

acce- of

.

ahrie pesne tote P erso ns re sp Ionsible", fo physical;'.2<

p"t-se, copt ri:t.altr6 i,:iieactor.uil .ing,

.security atithe

'

.,te;a t o4her6 italbuildingsi.and t*':.uto quipment management levels shOu o

d b

tfd-.

' ' viiri these*: reas. .:*

Cotntir fer6.

i ex:tet sho ld be made icI&i

'fo:

4

.....

"

he.t'by ther the ultim.ate :: espon

,l ht-.....

V.4.'

'%.

....

y emp oype5o oeýpaý't'

ngi

_11itity enles-ot adr of'he"i- ular suryathe plant Cte~stwith` the plan'0 '"

pfant. stf otrco personnel;_:an dsu itndet o- iht&snoreuiy..2 necessary.%:fg

.

measures

-urautor

,.&persons Is neesaytooffi'~

Inadion poers, r'"

4

-';'

.'reduce the opprtunt for abotag The%

needed to asuepoe orInation~.fý-zý.

-,

onrolma be ahieved by eretna betwe~en'the opieratin~ g'nd.'cuna

&

h

.,.'physical b u

The' security m.asure........

approp for

-the facility-and j~y sta' ioning'guards.: at.

em Inr enc cndi:tions- 4;ma'y~

e';

.ecJ-

ý4M

o acce'ss A program fJore significantly, differenit-- fromtoe o

suriveillance 'f the-physical, baie cg.

noxnl'oeration--1eeoe~ii'i~y4"~

.b.

iv-i"g"pa.ftis';;cl*o ed, icuitt'elevisio,'.

importanat tat, s..iii*s ,

0roce' ues b

,"":"

-ori'itrsir "

jani)

wItY assure6 .Ithe

.made-conisistent withrothfpl

'

co:"

°'nt-i*mue e

ci a

pii

.-

riat-

..

,

c

.

in..

,

nessi of the barrier-,

'

for the' plant oi""eg.-,e"'er y

-

scurty'"..'edre.shu',be cohistxi Adeq *

cotrol 6f individu:als withirin"'

sectirl"

poced~ires

"ol :si"n

... the '-ite'alsoi mpo.tantfor withthe emergenc p. an)..

protection- against industiial sabotag

e. Th Thh o

u

'n y

for inutral,

'

conduct fipersons orgrouiipst*hat are not sabotage also may be ;.reduced

by part

,

of' the oper in' sta ff soud e

providing ' locks o'n vsital'eq!iprit;*n.ina.

monitored': wileAey areq aI 'ieplantsite:.

'

determiingthe acceptability'of:'

"sii"

proisi.smeasuresshould itoiifi

equipment Iocks all' relevant saety.

tfor

'detect th'e uatorized 'presence'

considerations 'in addition to

1 7 .1

-

-

. .4

A.

I

-

!i*i -i

4

ýi:

..m.ust be evaluated to assure that overall

4. D. esi

'ýsafety is enihan~ced by, their use.'

Equip

.......

.

."a f

pre-panned course, 6f ýactiom n -the event .of -an actual reasor or '--p"o-tejit~ial r".danger is iprant to of sat controllig ý.access to the plant~.' Pro~cedures'

that c shotuid pb dfoIrdald1 ing**ordlind

-with and.

ýpbtbhtial dangers "-such' asr~bheats;

arran

• al d ;..

.S:

• .. .

.

and" cl yal ý_,Mýr

~

inclding'

provi

.provisions*.

f e

notificatio fothe indeos

ýproperl aiuthonitedsý to assuire, aaeffective:

again phyicl e-urtyprogram requies prote,

-2.

eletio oJ :'eronnl

-It n..iS*.

. ~important,

......

uir~c se. .

A.

.i.r .

0

tha iitily ".managem ent

• let[

ad :

adi Asiain of

'

proftd

..... ..

tai.;.reliable

...

nie

..

t..:irotecrt agaiiste oidsr.ialnv saotg.

angmetinu ar.d

,su

-if-ory' att*etion to the a.n an, sf is egineerting opera

!!!-i6perat.-i..ng important*' '

cthroghou th`,er lifel t

ime m of thplnt.

Tohens

' "*this n

e*mployrni

• standards a"nd C R I

I3;

.

.

.

...

...

..

. ..

..

. I

thractice for eledtif oef aoptntd eguiym a~~tE

w~flb~l~c~d diviiias~an proedurspMensd forti "reviieofemiýpler'oyeeto prfotmne adprt agansaet

-

dstraf

c. oagn izant omf its

'

.irnplent andu.ra superveisor atnecsar'Prsnelon to tead come tncAd demedwicth f

rengardtoplan

-pronne, s

i dout.

te

4shuld60

f'.beT."

design oah'ipid.

.

"t"'s'.

irpendedtriip y entsanydetcion of I C~n unustics, e r.

ei ti..

-- of. c .mplees,*t .. .

proecioýfncd 'agindv ast, indtra Woi ge

-

plan

-'changes

~

~

~

~

~

Man 'ste'tts~f~ciialn and A

p.'

e compoents on-

4er~dimplbasisdurin

-.A

n stf, 'ro gn~hizan s Oul be.

miiat'1 reactorsbiit operation.

etir aginedto0

or, ho~stnasAtatus -

hs AundessryPonne a

(

psin..ap c~dauirn would-help .to..

'i "

..

ti sethat unuto*risehaulngs*'

-i be ostosoasinific~t numtiberof: valves.....

(.....

P

w

.no to, r

i**n d ec i!f.rion o...

penodsof1 tim

'j:,

unsul beairl p?

m

-o

17.2oye, b-

suc Asra-eu rmrgbs I

'AAAAA

~

A

It

-

,rotl)atblllty 'm at age will leald ;;t u-ct releases.,

trial sab otage :,

'above that 'i:

ses, such as pt ndant, co~mp stent with other

)ry Positions hould be provid dures 'should

~d to, rduce ,the

'Vi! "4 VyV*

"

4

.:Ai:~i

• *!:',

1

%,

-

-i

4'V.:*'~

C .

.

.

.

.

h

Idues r r

-y'

pi .

.::

,.* : .

.:.. . .

. :.. ,

4.

-

. -..

'..

badging of employees, sign i n I

out-igunugdin acd herfirmance

,- O-

.

"*f " visitorsd, provid inig-",

escorts fo'r (c"Poceduresj

ý-oearly detectiobn

,,of

4 n:clia engirntie ,nf

'of

.

.--

bha iay

.....

.persons* atemptig:.toA

-..

&p

.. te vithlhreas- drug abuse"

---

-

(g)Procediires, for appr-opriate searching (d.)Trainirig of ?Ipersonne

'With, regard to.

of visitors;

.pl.t.securtyA....:..

-......

• ..

....................

,...

.

S

-

Moheonng o i':a, Equipmnent-Meanis z

" ' ..........

..

au.h*i.

e. d vehi cles gand I

-or -

.

i5 t

.-

be

.h.io

r. he satu ul be

-

.

provided tormoo,

-'seafrhing*

y.ehicles~entenniig sýite

-;

(i rbceduresi associated Wihphysical;VeupetPoeue hudt

4 J

security tb dAeal wkith"e- emergencies 'at

'vlpdadpronltandt

-

-theplait

-identify equipmen

t. that may have been

'i

.-

--

Wihdisrabled Or whose status may..hv (j) Prolcdtiregs, for dedlin

g. wihunegoe

-d.angers sisuciasbonib;tlfeats

6and

"..und-"

gone unauthoriz h

ze- ivave'closed whenfit slfouldbeoen disturbfbancs UIUUU.gFU

M

iiS xo

,

.

I.

i- i:i:ii:iI

"..;:.i.::...authonties. .

"*. ..

kq i m n

'pp .rat desig f:""::*:"a)

....".t. .res*

'* *:

";:

-*.

r(k)*Nocedures: for investigation f ISecU t

-

.

a...

qi p t',

banpgedm eno b

-

~ ~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

f

,-icdnsadfrad scryprvdd

-ad 2lbe, coni3~stent With, -other,,

4'.

.

-

-

~j~f~y iing f th safe'.ty -. requirements'

6 'to' edce t&4£

--

un program;.

o

'ppo~rtunity

' tbfr- successfu i dind~tnial-"'

2.

Sel

-

-

'm1 LAT'i6 mean

....

£*. eec o-- o PersnneT.e -meas. "

.,sabotage.

-2-:"

.

.!.

.

provieaided t. ,asure' a staff

• f.reliablel,*l an.t

"

.".

..

.

,..

- I(a)EsItaishmnenrit.

"of employment*

.prot'ection bf ie'th*faiHib

"

I"a aist7 fustr"al-=j

1 ,a

-

-

.

.itag will, bet _witihi f~K pbi

-ta d 'rd and pra ctices -th 4: po' d sab oIdafrom.. . . . .*>,-

-

for

-e lectio6n

-.f comp:e tient,

..u.

re as prqovided' in ";:§'1-790dof..h.

"",..* i.i.

!. ,.iwell-balanced individuals;",.

'."

Commission'sregulations in

• 10:CFR

Parn

,".,.

i

44

--.,

"eli "nc

• ni'~

i`s

.

"

Pa

.2"."".

"

"'

v .

- .;!-..i!.i:,..i!i"*

-':....

,

.

-

.

• .

.

.. .:

4j,

"4

... .

-...

A

-.

7.3

-1

-

• !%

.4

• .,-.

...

.

.

.-.

.. ..-

-

.

4 ':;*

-

"

.

1

-1 .3

..

..

4

---

,.4 . '

. . .. . , , ,. , .

-. ." .. :* " .* *y .,

. ..

-:.:

-.

t.

-*.

'

-.

-.

• *: .

-.,..'[.':.