ML24263A040

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Seating Chart, Post Exam Analysis, Applicant Questions
ML24263A040
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/19/2023
From: Thomas Setzer
NRC/RGN-I/DORS/OB
To: Magri M
NextEra Energy Seabrook
References
EPID L-2023-OLL-0043, SBK-L-23061
Download: ML24263A040 (1)


Text

Note: All tables verified to be more than 3 feet apart.

FRONT OF ROOM Empty Proctor (facing back of room)

Empty Ryan Bickford RO Empty Empty Empty Empty Jason Cadwallader RO

Questions asked by Students during exam administration:

Q14 Asked if he should consider the cascading effects of the loss of a Circulating Water Pump. I told him to answer the question stem which asks in response to this malfunction directly.

Q16 Asked if part (2) of A and B could be considered the same thing. I told him that they are unique.

EXAM ITEM ANALYSIS (Page 1 of 2)

TR-AA-230-1000-F09 Exam ID# __2023 NRC Retake Exam_______

Date Evaluation Instrument Administered: __7/18/23_______

Number of Trainees Evaluated: __2___________

Section A - Any question receiving greater than 30% failure rate N/A List each question receiving greater than 30% failure rate.

Question Number Question Failure Rate (%)

Review Conclusion*

Corrective Action 1

100 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

3 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

7 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

11 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

13 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

14 100 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

26 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

45 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

50 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

52 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

54 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

55 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

59 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

61 100 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

68 50 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

69 100 G.

NA Question is valid. No wording issues or insufficient training for tested learning objective.

  • Review Conclusion A. Insufficient training for the learning objective tested B. Learning objectives not adequately covered in the lesson plan C. Poorly worded or invalid learning objective D. Poorly worded or invalid test item or answer E. Incorrect answer in the exam key

EXAM ITEM ANALYSIS (Page 2 of 2)

TR-AA-230-1000-F09 F. More than one correct answer G. Question acceptable H. Other (state reason in table or on additional sheet)

Section B - Greater than 25% overall exam failure N/A Conclusion Summary Corrective Action Review performed by: ___Mark Martellotta_________________ Date: _7/19/23___

Approved by: _________Mike Magri ___________________ Date: __7/19/23__

Training Supervision