ML20274A094
| ML20274A094 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 02/07/2020 |
| From: | Exelon Generation Co |
| To: | Division of Nuclear Materials Safety I |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19105A101 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20274A094 (11) | |
Text
ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Exam Date: January 27, 2020 1
2 3
Attributes 4
Job Content 5
6 Admin JPMs ADMIN Topic and K/A LOD (1-5)
U/E/S Explanation I/C Cues Critical Scope Overlap Perf.
Key Minutia Job Link Focus Steps (N/B)
Std.
RO Admin 1: Estimate Time to Boil Conduct of Operations G2.1.25 2
E
-change ranges for both calculations - fixed
-clean up task standard - fixed
-make 2a and 3a critical - fixed RO Admin 2: Determine Shutdown Margin Conduct of Operations G2.1.37 2
E
-move cue on page 5-fixed
-page 6 unbold CEA position - fixed
-page 6 clean up words for when SDM is valid until -
fixed RO Admin 3: Print Reading Equipment Control G2.2.41 3
E
-remove TS 3.6.3 from initial conditions - fixed
-add 3 other valves they may add to the isolation step
- fixed
-step 3 add the letter A to the TS - fixed RO Admin 4:
Respond to a Plant Fire Emergency Plan G2.4.27 2
E
-page 4 and 5 clean up words for required people -
fixed SRO Admin 1:
Evaluate Overtime Work Request Conduct of Operations G2.1.5 3
S No comments SRO Admin 2:
Supervisory Review of Shutdown Margin Conduct of Operations G2.1.37 2
S No comments SRO Admin 3: Print Reading and Application of Tech Specs Equipment Control G2.2.41 2
E
-remove TS 3.6.3 from initial conditions - fixed
-add 3 other valves they may add to the isolation step
- fixed SRO Admin 4:
Administrative Requirements for RMS Inoperability Radiation Control G2.3.15 2
E
-clean up set up instructions - fixed
-add cue for giving RP-CA-300-1004 to students if asked - fixed SRO Admin 5:
Perform Shift Emergency Director Functions Emergency Plan G2.4.41 2
E
-change initial conditions to per gm not per cc - fixed 1
Simulator/In-Plant Safety Function and K/A JPMs A. SIM-1: Respond to a CEDS failure 1
A4.03 CRDS E
-Add in range for CEA motion in step I - fixed
-Typo on page 5 note - fixed
ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 mode control (4.0, 3.7)
-add evaluator note for multiple boration success paths - fixed
-add evaluator note for alarms being silenced - fixed B. SIM-2: Verify Validity of CIS Actuation 2
A3.01 Input channels and logic (3.7, 3.9) 2 E
-change cue to respond to all alarms - fixed
-add cue to additional operator monitoring RCP temps
- fixed C. SIM-3: Verify HPSI/LPSI Flow 3
A4.07 ECCS pumps and valves (4.4, 4.4) 3 E
-page 4 and 10 add in nomenclature for 1-SI-656 -
fixed
-page 7 change words for 13 HPSI pump to tripped -
fixed
-page 2 adjust RCS leakrate to 1000 gpm - fixed
-page 2 adjust 1st RCS leakrate to 300 gpm - fixed
-page 6 - add cue to not pursue 12 HPSI pump at this time - fixed D. SIM-4: Attempt to Correct the Abnormal SDC Condition 4P A4.01 Controls and indications for RHR pumps (3.6, 4.4) 3 E
-page 6 add cue for not a common mode failure -
fixed
-page 7 change wording of cue and swap order of cue and step - fixed
-page 8 add cue for ECCS air coolers - fixed
-task standard add words for flow value - fixed E. SIM-5: Align Saltwater Emergency Overboard 4S A4.04 Emergency heat loads (3.5, 3.5) 2 E
-page 8 - make 3 valves critical steps - fixed
-page 6 add a cue for local verification of 1-SW-5149
- fixed F. SIM-6: Pressurizer Vent Valve Testing 5
A4.04 PZR Vent Valve (2.6, 3.1) 2 E
-page 2 fix task standard - fixed, more detail added
-page 2 add parameters to step 6 - fixed
-page 4 make 6.4.3 critical - fixed
-page 6 make 6.4.6.5, 6.4.6.6, and 6.4.6.7 critical -
fixed G. SIM-7: Perform Vital Auxiliaries 6
A4.01 All Breakers (including available switchyard)
(3.3, 3.1) 2 E
-page 2 add OI to the task standard - fixed
-page 4 and 11 clean up initial conditions - fixed
-page 6 unbold the value for MW and KVARS - fixed H. SIM-8: Respond to RCS leakage into Component Cooling System 8
A4.01 CCW indications and controls (3.3, 3.1) 3 E
-clean up task standard to spell out alternate actions taken - fixed
-make step to start the pen room fans not critical -
fixed
-clean up standard for step 10 - fixed I. PLT-1: Align AFW flow control to 1C43 4S 2.1.30 Ability to locate and operate 2
E
-add details for locking device - fixed
-add details for valve manipulation in the locked box -
fixed
ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 components (4.4, 4.4)
J. PLT-2: Operate MCC Load Breakers 6
AA1.10 Power Distribution:
ac and dc (3.7, 3.9) 2 E
-page 4/5 - breakers from OPEN to OFF - fixed
-page 5 - typo AH to AG - fixed
-page 4 - add a cue for electrical safety - fixed K. PLT-3: Respond to a Loss of Instrument Air 8
AA1.04 Emergency air compressor (3.5, 3.4) 2 E
-add page numbers - fixed
-step 4 add gauge number - fixed
-step 5 add HS number - fixed
-step 5d add gauge number - fixed
ES-301 4
Form ES-301-7 Instructions for Completing This Table:
Check or mark any item(s) requiring a comment and explain the issue in the space provided using the guide below.
- 1.
Check each JPM for appropriate administrative topic requirements (COO, EC, Rad, and EP) or safety function requirements and corresponding K/A. Mark in column 1.
(ES-301, D.3 and D.4)
- 2.
Determine the level of difficulty (LOD) using an established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent an inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license that is being tested. Mark in column 2 (Appendix D, C.1.f)
- 3.
In column 3, Attributes, check the appropriate box when an attribute is not met:
The initial conditions and/or initiating cue is clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin. (Appendix C, B.4)
The JPM contains appropriate cues that clearly indicate when they should be provided to the examinee. Cues are objective and not leading. (Appendix C, D.1)
All critical steps (elements) are properly identified.
The scope of the task is not too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
Excessive overlap does not occur with other parts of the operating test or written examination. (ES-301, D.1.a, and ES-301, D.2.a)
The task performance standard clearly describes the expected outcome (i.e., end state). Each performance step identifies a standard for successful completion of the step.
A valid marked up key was provided (e.g., graph interpretation, initialed steps for handouts).
- 4.
For column 4, Job Content, check the appropriate box if the job content flaw does not meet the following elements:
Topics are linked to the job content (e.g., not a disguised task, task required in real job).
The JPM has meaningful performance requirements that will provide a legitimate basis for evaluating the applicant's understanding and ability to safely operate the plant. (ES-301, D.2.c)
- 5.
Based on the reviewers judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)nhancement, or (S)atisfactory? Mark the answer in column 5.
- 6.
In column 6, provide a brief description of any (U)nacceptable or (E)nhancement rating from column 5.
Save initial review comments and detail subsequent comment resolution so that each exam-bound JPM is marked by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form.
ES-301 5
Form ES-301-7 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Scenario: 1 Exam Date: January 27, 2020 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Event Realism/Cred.
Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.
Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1
X S
2 S
3 S
4 X
S 5
X S
6 S
7 X
S 8
X S
Corrections and Edits made:
-make LOOP on a timer for 2 minutes (page 2) - fixed
-make event 5 (ATWS) on a trigger at 84% power - fixed
-make RCS leak 300 gpm - fixed
-cascading TS question for trip of 12 SRW pump - fixed
-rearrange the order of actions for Event 6, 7, and 8 - fixed
ES-301 6
Form ES-301-7 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Scenario: 2 Exam Date: January 27, 2020 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Event Realism/Cred.
Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.
Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1
X S
2 X
S 3
S 4
X S
5 S
6 X
S 7
XX S
8 X
S Corrections and edits made:
-add detail for TRM for charging - fixed
ES-301 7
Form ES-301-7 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Scenario: 3 Exam Date: January 27, 2020 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Event Realism/Cred.
Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.
Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1
S 2
X S
3 S
4 S
5 X
X S
6 X
S 7
X S
Corrections and edits made:
-added may to securing letdown on page 10 - fixed
ES-301 8
Form ES-301-7 Facility: Calvert Cliffs Scenario: 4 Exam Date: January 27, 2020 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Event Realism/Cred.
Required Actions Verifiable actions LOD TS CTs Scen.
Overlap U/E/S Explanation 1
X S
2 X
S 3
S 4
S 5
S 6
X X S
7 S
8 S
Corrections and Edits made:
-remove incorrect tech spec from page 12 - fixed
-added cue to adjust turbine vibrations to reach trip criteria as directed by lead examiner - fixed
-clarify temperature of Tcold for critical task 2 - fixed
-changed timing of event 8 to be 5 minutes after event 7 - fixed
-page 16 0C EDG remove - fixed
-remove #3 critical task - fixed
ES-301 9
Form ES-301-7 Instructions for Completing This Table:
Use this table for each scenario for evaluation.
2 Check this box if the events are not related (e.g., seismic event followed by a pipe rupture) OR if the events do not obey the laws of physics and thermodynamics.
3, 4 In columns 3 and 4, check the box if there is no verifiable or required action, as applicable. Examples of required actions are as follows: (ES-301, D.5f) opening, closing, and throttling valves starting and stopping equipment raising and lowering level, flow, and pressure making decisions and giving directions acknowledging or verifying key alarms and automatic actions (Uncomplicated events that require no operator action beyond this should not be included on the operating test unless they are necessary to set the stage for subsequent events. (Appendix D, B.3).)
5 Check this box if the level of difficulty is not appropriate.
6 Check this box if the event has a TS.
7 Check this box if the event has a critical task (CT). If the same CT covers more than one event, check the event where the CT started only.
8 Check this box if the event overlaps with another event on any of the last two NRC examinations. (Appendix D, C.1.f) 9 Based on the reviewers judgment, is the event as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)nhancement, or (S)atisfactory? Mark the answer in column 9.
10 Record any explanations of the events here.
In the shaded boxes, sum the number of check marks in each column.
In column 1, sum the number of events.
In columns 2-4, record the total number of check marks for each column.
In column 5, based on the reviewer's judgement, place a checkmark only if the scenario's LOD is not appropriate.
In column 6, TS are required to be 2 for each scenario. (ES-301, D.5.d)
In column 7, preidentified CTs should be 2 for each scenario. (Appendix D; ES-301, D.5.d; ES-301-4)
In column 8, record the number of events not used on the two previous NRC initial licensing exams. A scenario is considered unsatisfactory if there is < 2 new events. (ES-301, D.5.b; Appendix D, C.1.f)
In column 9, record whether the scenario as written (U)nacceptable, in need of (E)nhancement, or (S)atisfactory from column 11 of the simulator scenario table.
ES-301 10 Form ES-301-7 Facility: Exam Date:
Scenario 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 11 Event Totals Events Unsat.
TS Total TS Unsat.
% Unsat.
Scenario Elements U/E/S Explanation 1
8 0
2 0
3 0
0 S
2 8
0 3
0 4
0 0
S 3
7 0
2 0
3 0
0 S
4 8
0 2
0 2
0 0
S 5
Removed details about Scenario 5 (SPARE) as this was never ran Instructions for Completing This Table:
Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
1, 3, 5 For each simulator scenario, enter the total number of events (column 1), TS entries/actions (column 3), and CTs (column 5).
This number should match the respective scenario from the event-based scenario tables (the sum from columns 1, 6, and 7, respectively).
2, 4, 6 For each simulator scenario, evaluate each event, TS, and CT as (S)atisfactory, (E)nhance, or (U)nsatisfactory based on the following criteria:
- a.
Events. Each event is described on a Form ES-D-2, including all switch manipulations, pertinent alarms, and verifiable actions. Event actions are balanced between at-the-controls and balance-of-plant applicants during the scenario. All event-related attributes on Form ES-301-4 are met. Enter the total number of unsatisfactory events in column 2.
- b.
TS. A scenario includes at least two TS entries/actions across at least two different events. TS entries and actions are detailed on Form ES-D-2. Enter the total number of unsatisfactory TS entries/actions in column 4. (ES-301, D.5d)
- c.
CT. Check that a scenario includes at least two preidentified CTs. This criterion is a target quantitative attribute, not an absolute minimum requirement. Check that each CT is explicitly bounded on Form ES-D-2 with measurable performance standards (see Appendix D). Enter the total number of unsatisfactory CTs in column 6.
7 In column 7, calculate the percentage of unsatisfactory scenario elements:
8 If the value in column 7 is > 20%, mark the scenario as (U)nsatisfactory in column 8. If column 7 is 20%, annotate with (E)nhancement or (S)atisfactory.
9 In column 9, explain each unsatisfactory event, TS, and CT. Editorial comments can also be added here.
Save initial review comments and detail subsequent comment resolution so that each exam-bound scenario is marked by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form.
2 + 4 + 6 1 + 3 + 5100%
ES-301 11 Form ES-301-7 Site name: Calvert Cliffs Exam Date: January 27, 2020 OPERATING TEST TOTALS Total Total Unsat.
Total Total Unsat.
Explanation Edits Sat.
Admin.
JPMs 9
0 7
9 Sim./In-Plant JPMs 11 0
11 11 Scenarios 5
0 5
5 Op. Test Totals:
25 0
23 25 0
Instructions for Completing This Table:
Update data for this table from quality reviews and totals in the previous tables and then calculate the percentage of total items that are unsatisfactory and give an explanation in the space provided.
- 1.
Enter the total number of items submitted for the operating test in the Total column. For example, if nine administrative JPMs were submitted, enter 9 in the Total items column for administrative JPMs.
For scenarios, enter the total number of simulator scenarios.
- 2.
Enter the total number of (U)nsatisfactory JPMs and scenarios from the two JPMs column 5 and simulator scenarios column 8 in the previous tables. Provide an explanation in the space provided.
- 3.
Enter totals for (E)nhancements needed and (S)atisfactory JPMs and scenarios from the previous tables. This task is for tracking only.
- 4.
Total each column and enter the amounts in the Op. Test Totals row.
- 5.
Calculate the percentage of the operating test that is (U)nsatisfactory (Op. Test Total Unsat.)/(Op. Test Total) and place this value in the bolded % Unsat. cell.
Refer to ES-501, E.3.a, to rate the overall operating test as follows:
- satisfactory, if the Op. Test Total % Unsat. is 20%
- unsatisfactory, if Op. Test Total % Unsat. is > 20%
- 6.
Update this table and the tables above with post-exam changes if the as-administered operating test required content changes, including the following:
- The JPM performance standards were incorrect.
- The administrative JPM tasks/keys were incorrect.
- CTs were incorrect in the scenarios (not including postscenario critical tasks defined in Appendix D).
- The EOP strategy was incorrect in a scenario(s).
- TS entries/actions were determined to be incorrect in a scenario(s).