ML20066C003
| ML20066C003 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 11/03/1982 |
| From: | Schroeder C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20066C005 | List: |
| References | |
| 5370N, NUDOCS 8211090304 | |
| Download: ML20066C003 (2) | |
Text
.
g
/'
N Commonwealth Edison
) One First Nationtt Plaza. Chicago. Illinois
/
O O
Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767
} Chicago, Illinois 60690 Novembe r 3, 1982 Mr. A. Schwence r, Chie f Licensing Branch #2 Division o f Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Inservice Inspection Plan NRC Docket No s. 50-373 and 50-374 Re ferences (a):
C.
W.
Schroeder letter to A.
Schwencer dated July 13, 1982.
(b):
C.
W. Schroeder letter to A. Schwencer dated September 20, 1982.
Dear Mr. Schwencer:
Re ference (a) transmitted to you the two volume Inservice Inspection Program, Revision 1, LaSalle County Station Unit 1.
Tha t submittal, and Re ference (b) noted that tabs 36 and 42 were incom-plete, but would be submitted later when the Unit 2 ISI Program was completed.
Enclosed please find:
l 1.
3 copies o f Tabs 36 and 42 f or the Unit 1 ISI Program, l
previously submitted by Reference (a).
l l
2.
3 copies of the two volume Unit 2 ISI program, Rev.
O, l
dated October 29, 1982.
l l
Because LaSalle County Station is a 2 unit plant, and because of the obvious operational importance to have both units' programs based on the same code requirements, Commonwealth Edison has decided to utilize the Winter, 1980 addenda for both units.
Therefore, as explained in Reference (a), the LaSalle County Station Unit 1 Inservice Inpection Program was upgraded to the Winter, 1980, even though it is a newer code than required.
The Unit 2 Inservice l
Inspection Program that is enclosed was also prepared to the Winter, l
1980 code.
- fsmaug, y1 y
Nh PDR I
\\
f
.J A. Schwencer Novembe r 3, 1982 To the best of my knowledge and belief the statements con-tained herein and in the attachment are true and correct.
In some respects these statements are not based on my personal knowledge but upon information furnished by other Commonwealth Edison employees or consultants.
Such information has been reviewed in accordance with Company practice and I believe it to be reliable.
If there are any questions in this matter, please contact this of fice.
Very truly yours, b
n /3/n.
C. W. Schroeder Nuclear Licensing Administrator 1m cc:
NRC Resident In spector 1/0 Enclosure s 5370N k