ML19077A387
| ML19077A387 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 03/18/2019 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | NRC/NRO/DLSE/LB4 |
| References | |
| Download: ML19077A387 (3) | |
Text
1 Vogtle PEmails From:
Habib, Donald Sent:
Monday, March 18, 2019 4:37 PM To:
Agee, Stephanie Y.; tgpetrak@southernco.com Cc:
Vogtle PEmails; Welch, Christopher
Subject:
UIN ICN comment status sheet ITAAC Index 145 (March 21 Public Meeting)
Attachments:
UIN ICN comment status sheet March 14 2019.pdf Tom - Attached is the UIN/ICN Comment I indicated to you on the phone.
Stephanie - The staff is interested in discussing this item on the public teleconference this week.
Thanks Don Habib U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of New Reactors Project Manager NRO/DLSE, Licensing Branch 2 O-8D13 301-415-1035
Hearing Identifier:
Vogtle_COL_Docs_Public Email Number:
432 Mail Envelope Properties (SN4PR0901MB21755B29D066EE32DE01B3AC97470)
Subject:
UIN ICN comment status sheet ITAAC Index 145 (March 21 Public Meeting)
Sent Date:
3/18/2019 4:37:12 PM Received Date:
3/18/2019 4:37:17 PM From:
Habib, Donald Created By:
Donald.Habib@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Vogtle PEmails" <Vogtle.PEmails@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Welch, Christopher" <Christopher.Welch@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Agee, Stephanie Y." <SYAGEE@southernco.com>
Tracking Status: None "tgpetrak@southernco.com" <tgpetrak@southernco.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
SN4PR0901MB2175.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 365 3/18/2019 4:37:17 PM UIN ICN comment status sheet March 14 2019.pdf 85586 Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
1 VOGTLE ICN/UIN ISSUES TRACKING SHEET Date ITEM #
ICN UIN TOPIC ITAAC INDEX #
ISSUE Licensee Comment 3/14/19 1
UIN Testing method 145 V3/V4 Please describe the proposed testing plan and how it satisfies the ITAAC requirement to verify the flow path from the PCCWST to the SFP and the PCCAWST to the SFP and PCCWST. What is the basis to not perform the testing in the as-built configuration?