ML18331A491
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| ML18331A491 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/24/2019 |
| From: | Aron Lewin NRC/NRR/DIRS/IRIB |
| To: | |
| Lewin A, 415-2259, NRR/DIRS | |
| References | |
| Download: ML18331A491 (2) | |
Text
Inspection Procedure Assessment Summary and Outline of Proposed Changes Inspection Procedure (IP):
71130.05, Protective Strategy Evaluation and Performance Evaluation Program Inspection Procedure Lead:
Stacy Prasad Date Completed:
10/05/2018 Estimated Hours to Complete Review:
5
- 1. Results and assessment of review of IMC 0308, ROP basis document review Credit is being given for this item because of recent IP effectiveness initiatives associated with the security baseline inspection program assessments (ML17223A279).
- 2. Results and assessment of review of any applicable changes to PIs Credit is being given for this item because of recent IP effectiveness initiatives associated with the security baseline inspection program assessments (ML17223A279).
- 3. Results and assessment of review of any applicable changes to Rules and STSs Credit is being given for this item because of recent IP effectiveness initiatives associated with the security baseline inspection program assessments (ML17223A279).
- 4. Results and assessment of review of recent Operating Experience Credit is being given for this item because of recent IP effectiveness initiatives associated with the security baseline inspection program assessments (ML17223A279).
- 5. Results and assessment of review based on RRPS data Adverse trends or outliers noted: No The Protective Strategy Evaluation and Performance Evaluation Program is a triennial inspection. The Summary of PIM Findings for calendar years (CY) 2013-2017 shows the number of findings identified were 13 in CY 2013, 10 findings in 2014, 6 findings in CY 2015, 14 findings in CY 2016 and 6 findings in CY 2017. Of the 49 findings issued, 47 were identified by the inspector (97%). Of the 49 findings, 45 were Green NCVs, 1 was Green FIN, 1 was a SL IV NOV, 1 was a Green SL IV NOV, and 1 was a White NOV. During the 5 years, the findings per 1,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> was 5.0 and the inspector identified per 1,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> was 3.7. Reported hours show 1,881 hours0.0102 days <br />0.245 hours <br />0.00146 weeks <br />3.352205e-4 months <br /> (5-year average) of the total allotted of 1,932 hours0.0108 days <br />0.259 hours <br />0.00154 weeks <br />3.54626e-4 months <br /> per year. The IP currently has a minimum inspection effort of 70 hours8.101852e-4 days <br />0.0194 hours <br />1.157407e-4 weeks <br />2.6635e-5 months <br /> and a nominal inspection effort of 89 hours0.00103 days <br />0.0247 hours <br />1.471561e-4 weeks <br />3.38645e-5 months <br /> (note: the IPs were revised in CY 2017 to adjust the resource estimate to reflect the nominal number of inspection requirements as the target range for completion rather than the maximum of 100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br />). A review of the average inspection hours for the CY 2013-2017 review identifies 2.55 hours6.365741e-4 days <br />0.0153 hours <br />9.093915e-5 weeks <br />2.09275e-5 months <br /> under the hours allotted per inspection. There were no adverse trends or outliers identified and revisions to the IP are not warranted at this time.
2
- 6. Feedback Forms Credit is being given for this item because of recent IP effectiveness initiatives associated with the security baseline inspection program assessments (ML17223A279).
- 7. Other Considerations Credit is being given for this item because of recent IP effectiveness initiatives associated with the security baseline inspection program assessments (ML17223A279).
- 8. Results of discussions with regions The regions did not identify any adverse trends or outliers with this procedure.
Recommendations NSIR and the regions are in alignment that 71130.05, Protective Strategy Evaluation and Performance Evaluation Program, has adequate resources and revisions are not warranted at this time.