ML18302A208

Documentation of the Completion of Required Actions Taken in Response to the Lesson Learned from the Fukushima Dai-iChi Accident

ML18302A208
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	10/11/2019
From:	Robert Bernardo Beyond-Design-Basis Management Branch
To:	Bologna R FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Bernado R
References
Download: ML18302A208 (29)

Text

Mr. Richard D. Bologna Site Vice President UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 11, 2019 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station Mail Stop A-BV-SSB P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Shippingport, PA 15077

SUBJECT:

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-DOCUMENTATION OF THE COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIONS TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO THE LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT

Dear Mr. Bologna:

The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge and document that actions required by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in orders issued following the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station have been completed for Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (Beaver Valley). ln addition, this letter acknowledges and documents that FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC, the licensee) has provided the information requested in the NRC's March 12, 2012, request for information under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.54(f), related to the lessons learned from that accident. Completing these actions and providing the requested information, in conjunction with the regulatory activities associated with the Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events (MBDBE) rulemaking, implements the safety enhancements mandated by the NRG based on the lessons learned from the accident. Relevant NRC, industry, and licensee documents are listed in the reference tables provided in the enclosure to this letter. The NRG will provide oversight of these safety enhancements through the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP).

BACKGROUND In response to the events in Japan resulting from the Great TOhoku Earthquake and subsequent tsunami on March 11, 2011, the NRG took immediate action to confirm the safety of U.S.

nuclear power plants:

On March 18, 2011, the NRG issued Information Notice 2011-05, 'TOhoku-Taiheiyou-Oki Earthquake Effects on Japanese Nuclear Power Plants" (Reference 1.1 ). The information notice was issued to inform U.S. operating power reactor licensees and applicants of the effects from the earthquake and tsunami. Recipients were expected to review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate.

Suggestions contained in an information notice are not NRG requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response was required.

On March 23, 2011, the NRG issued Temporary Instruction (Tl) 2515/183, "Followup to the Fukushima Daiichi Fuel Damage EvenC The purpose of Tl 2515/183 was to provide NRC inspectors with guidance on confirming the reliability of licensees' strategies intended to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent fuel pool cooling capabilities following events that may exceed the design basis for a plant. The results of the inspection for each licensee were documented in an inspection report (Reference 1.2).

On March 23, 2011, the Commission provided staff requirements memorandum (SRM)

COMGBJ-11-0002, "NRC Actions Following the Events in Japan." The tasking memorandum directed the Executive Director for Operations to establish a senior level agency task force, referred to as the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF), to conduct a methodical and systematic review of the NRG processes and regulations to determine whether the agency should make additional improvements to the regulatory system and make recommendations to the Commission within 90 days for its policy direction (Reference 1.3).

On April 29, 2011, the NRG issued Tl 2515/184, "Availability and Readiness Inspection of Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMGs)." The purpose of Tl 2515/184 was to inspect the readiness of nuclear power plant operators to implement SAMGs. The results of the inspection were summarized and provided to the NTTF, as well as documented in a 2011 quarterly integrated inspection report for each licensee (Reference 1.4).

On May 11, 2011, the NRC issued Bulletin (BL) 2011-01, 'Mitigating Strategies.'

BL 2011-01 required licensees to provide a comprehensive verification of their compliance with the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(hh)(2), as well as provide information associated with the licensee's mitigation strategies under that section. In 10 CFR 50.54(hh)(2), it states, in part: "Each licensee shall develop and implement guidance and strategies intended to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent fuel pool cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with loss of large areas of the plant due to explosions or fire.... " BL 2011-01 required a written response from each licensee (Reference 1.5).

On July 21, 2011, the NRC staff provided the NTTF report, "Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident" to the Commission in SECY-11-0093, "Near-Term Report and Recommendations for Agency Actions Following the Events in Japan" (Reference 1.6).

On October 3, 2011, the staff prioritized the NTTF recommendations into three tiers in SECY-11-0137, "Prioritization of Recommended Actions To Be Taken in Response to Fukushima Lessons Learned." The Commission approved the staff's prioritization, with comment, in the SRM to SECY-11-0137 (Reference 1.7).

A complete discussion of the prioritization of the recommendations from the NTTF report, additional issues that were addressed subsequent to the NTTF report, and the disposition of the issues that were prioritized as Tier 2 or Tier 3 is provided in SECY-17-0016, "Status of Implementation of Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great TOhoku Earthquake and Subsequent Tsunami" (Reference 12.10). A listing of the previous Commission status reports, which were provided semiannually, can be found in Table 12 in the enclosure to this letter.

The NRC undertook the following regulatory activities to address the majority of the Tier 1 recommendations:

On March 12, 2012, the NRC issued Orders EA-12-049, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events,"

EA-12-050, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents," and EA-12-051, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," and a request for information under 10 CFR 50.54(f) (hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter) to licensees (References 1.8, 1.9, 1.10, and 1.11, respectively).

On June 6, 2013, the NRC issued Order EA-13-109, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation under Severe Accident Conditions" (Reference 1.12), which superseded Order EA-12-050, replacing its requirements with modified requirements.

In addition to the three orders and the 50.54(f) letter, the NRC completed rulemaking, 10 CFR 50.155, "Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events", that made generically applicable the requirements of EA-12-049 and EA-12-051. The draft final rule and supporting documentation were provided to the Commission for approval in SECY-16-0142, "Draft Final Rule-Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events (RIN 3150-AJ49r (Reference 1.13). The MBDBE rulemaking effort consolidated several of the recommendations from the NTTF report.

On January 24, 2019, the Commission, via SRM-M190124A (Reference 1.14), approved the final MBDBE rule, with edits. The final rule approved by the Commission contains provisions that make generically applicable the requirements imposed by Orders EA-12-049 and EA-12-051 and supporting requirements for training and documentation of changes.

The Commission's direction in the SRM makes it clear that the NRC will continue to follow a site-specific approach to resolve the interaction between the hazard reevaluation and mitigation strategies using information gathered in the 50.54(f) letter process. The NRC staff made conforming changes to the final rule package (Reference 1.15) as directed by the Commission, which included changes to two regulatory guides (References 1.16 and 1.17).

The final rule was published in the Federal Register on August 9, 2019 (84 FR 39684), with an effective implementation date of September 9, 2019.

Subsequent to Commission approval of the final MBDBE rule, the staff engaged with stakeholders to pursue the expeditious closure of the remaining post-Fukushima 50.54(f) letter responses on a timeframe commensurate with each item's safety significance.

In a draft discussion paper (Reference 1.18) used to support a Category 3 public meeting held on February 28, 2019 (Reference 1.19), the NRC staff outlined the process to be used to review the reevaluated hazard and mitigation strategies assessment (MSA) information provided by licensees considering the differences between the draft final MBDBE rule and the approved final MBDBE rule. Subsequently, the NRC staff provided a screening letter (also called a "binning" letter) for both seismic and flooding hazard reevaluations (References 5.22 and 6.26), which categorized sites based on available information and the status of any commitments made in prior reports and assessments. The process is discussed in greater detail in the "Hazard Reevaluation" and "Mitigation Strategies Assessment" sections of the discussion which follows.

This letter acknowledges and documents that the actions required by the NRG in response to the orders, as well as the information provided in response to the March 12, 2012, 50.54(f) letter, have been completed for Beaver Valley. However, the staff is not determining whether the licensee complies with the final MBDBE rule. Oversight of compliance with the final MBDBE rule at Beaver Valley will be conducted through the ROP.

DISCUSSION Mitigation Strategies Order Order EA-12-049, which applies to Beaver Valley, requires licensees to implement a three-phase approach for mitigation of beyond-design-basis external events (BDBEEs). It requires licensees to develop, implement, and maintain guidance and strategies to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent fuel pool (SFP) cooling capabilities in the event of a BDBEE that results in a simultaneous loss of all alternating current (ac) power and loss of normal access to the ultimate heat sink (LUHS). Phases 1 and 2 of the order use onsite equipment, while Phase 3 requires obtaining sufficient offsite resources to sustain those functions indefinitely.

In August 2012, the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) issued Revision O of industry guidance document NEI 12-06, "Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide,"

as guidance to comply with the order. The NRG endorsed the guidance in Revision O of Japan Lessons-Learned Project Directorate (JLD) interim staff guidance (ISG) document JLD-ISG-2012-01, "Compliance with Order EA-12-049, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events".

Subsequently, in December 2015, NEI issued Revision 2 of NEI 12-06 and the NRG endorsed that guidance in Revision 1 of JLD-ISG-2012-01 (Reference 2.1 ). Licensees were required to provide an overall integrated plan (OIP) to describe how they would comply with the order, along with status reports every 6 months until compliance was achieved (Reference 2.2). The NRC staff provided an interim staff evaluation (ISE) related to the OIP (Reference 2.3). The NRC concluded in the ISE that the licensee provided sufficient information to determine that the~e is reasonable assurance that the plan, when properly implemented, including satisfactory resolution of the open and confirmatory items, would meet the requirements of Order EA-12-049 at Beaver Valley. The NRG staff also conducted a regulatory audit of the licensee's strategies and issued a report which documented the results of the audit activities (Reference 2.4). Upon reaching compliance with the order requirements, the licensee submitted a compliance letter and a final integrated plan (FIP) to the NRC (Reference 2.5). The FIP describes how the licensee is complying with the order at Beaver Valley.

The NRC staff completed a safety evaluation (SE) of the licensee's FlP (Reference 2.6). The SE informed the licensee that its integrated plan, if implemented as described, provided a reasonable path for compliance with Order EA-12-049 at Beaver Valley. The staff then evaluated the implementation of the plans through inspection, using Tl 2515/191, "Implementation of Mitigation Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Orders and Emergency Preparedness Communications/Staffing/Multi-Unit Dose Assessment Plans." An inspection report was issued to document the results of the Tl 2515/191 inspection (Reference 2.7). The NRG will oversee implementation of the mitigation strategies requirements under the final MBDBE rule requirements through the ROP.

Phase 3 of Order EA-12-049 required licensees to obtain sufficient offsite resources to sustain the required functions indefinitely. There are two redundant National Strategic Alliance for

FLEX Emergency Response (SAFER) Response Centers (NSRGs), one located in Memphis, Tennessee, and the other in Phoenix, Arizona, which have the procedures and plans in place to maintain and deliver the equipment needed for Phase 3 from either NSRC to any participating U.S. nuclear power plant when requested (Reference 2.8). The NRC staff evaluated and inspected the NSRCs and the SAFER program, plans, and procedures (References 2.9 and 2.10). Subsequently, SAFER provided two addenda to document the treatment of equipment withdrawn from the NSRCs (Reference 2.11 ). The NRC reviewed the addenda and documented its conclusion in an updated staff assessment (Reference 2.12). The NRG concluded that licensees may reference the SAFER program and implement their SAFER response plans to meet the Phase 3 requirements of the order. The licensee's FIP (Reference 2.5) includes the plans for utilizing the NSRC equipment at Beaver Valley. In its SE (Reference 2.6), the NRC staff concluded that the licensee has developed guidance that, if implemented appropriately, should allow utilization of offsite resources following a BDBEE consistent with NEI 12-06 guidance and should adequately address the requirements of the order.

Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Order Order EA-12-051, which applies to Beaver Valley, required licensees to install reliable SFP level instrumentation with a primary channel and a backup channel, independent of each other, and with the capability to be powered independent of the plant's power distribution systems. The NEI issued NEI 12-02, "Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, 'To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation,"' as guidance to be used by licensees to comply with the order. The NRG endorsed this guidance in JLD-ISG-2012-03, "Compliance with Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool lnstrumentationn (Reference 3.1 ). Licensees were required to provide an OIP to describe how they would comply with the order, along with status reports every 6 months until compliance was achieved (Reference 3.2). The NRC issued an ISE, providing feedback on the OIP (Reference 3.3). The NRC staff conducted a regulatory audit of the licensee's strategies and issued a report that documented the results of the audit activities (Reference 3.4). Upon reaching compliance with the order requirements, the licensee submitted a compliance letter to the NRC (Reference 3.5), describing how the licensee complied with the order at Beaver Valley.

The NRC staff completed an SE of the actions taken by the licensee in response to the order (Reference 3.6). The SE informed the licensee that its integrated plan, if implemented as described, provided a reasonable path for compliance with Order EA-12-051 at Beaver Valley.

The staff then evaluated the implementation of the plan through inspection, using Tl 2515/191.

An inspection report was issued to document the results of the Tl 2515/191 inspection (Reference 3.7). The NRC will oversee implementation of the SFP instrumentation requirements under the final MBDBE rule requirements.

Reliable Hardened Containment Vent Order Order EA-13-109 (Reference 1.12) is only applicable to operating boiling-waterreactors (BWRs) with Mark I and Mark II containments. Because the reactors at Beaver Valley are pressurized water reactors with large, dry, ambient-pressure containments, this order is not applicable to Beaver Valley.

Request for Information Under 10 CFR 50.54(f)

The 50.54(f) letter requested operating power reactor licensees to:

reevaluate the seismic and flooding hazard at their sites using present-day NRG requirements and guidance, and identify actions that are planned to address plant-specific vulnerabilities associated with the reevaluated seismic and flooding hazard; perform seismic and flooding walkdowns to verify compliance with the current licensing basis; verify the adequacy of current strategies and maintenance plans; and identify degraded, nonconforming, or unanalyzed conditions related to seismic and flooding protection; and provide an assessment of their current emergency communications and staffing capabilities to determine if any enhancements are needed to respond to a large-scale natural emergency event that results in an extended loss of ac power to all reactors at the site, and/or impeded access to the site.

In COMSECY-14-0037, "Integration of Mitigating Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events and the Reevaluat[i]on of Flooding Hazards" (Reference 6.13), the NRC staff described issues related to the implementation of Order EA-12-049 and the related MBDBE rutemaking, and the completion of flooding reevaluations and assessments. In the SRM to COMSECY-14-0037 (Reference 6.14), the Commission approved the staffs recommendation to ensure that licensees of operating nuclear power plants address the reevaluated hazard within their mitigation strategies for BDBEE. The SRM also directed the NRC staff to provide a plan for achieving closure of the flooding hazard assessments to the Commission for review and approval. The NRC staff provided this plan in COMSECY-15-0019, "Closure Plan for the Reevaluation of Flooding Hazards for Operating Nuclear Power Plants" (Reference 6.16), which the Commission approved in the SRM to COMSECY-15-0019 (Reference 6.17).

Hazard Reevaluations (Enclosures 1 and 2 of the 50.54(f) letter)

Each licensee followed a similar two-phase process to respond to the hazard reevaluations requested by the 50.54(f) letter. In Phase 1, licensees submitted hazard reevaluation reports using NRG-endorsed, industry-developed guidance. The guidance specified that a licensee should determine if interim protection measures were needed while a longer-term evaluation of the impacts of the hazard was completed. The NRC staff reviewed the reevaluated hazard information. Using the reevaluated hazard information and a graded approach, the NRC identified the need for, and prioritization and scope of, plant-specific assessments. For those plants that were required to perform a flooding integrated assessment or a seismic probabilistic risk assessment (SPRA), Phase 2 decisionmaking (as described in a letter dated September 16, 2016 (Reference 5.17)) would determine whether additional plant-specific regulatory actions were necessary. In addition, as discussed in COMSECY-15-0019, most licensees performed an MSA to demonstrate that the licensee had adequately addressed the reevaluated hazards within their mitigation strategies developed for BDBEEs.

ln a draft discussion paper (Reference 1.18) used to support a Category 3 public meeting held on February 28, 2019 (Reference 1.19), the NRC staff outlined the process to be used to review the reevaluated hazard and MSA information provided by licensees considering the differences between the draft final MBDBE rule and the approved final MBDBE rule. The purpose of these

reviews is to ensure that the conclusions in the various staff assessments continue to support a determination that no further regulatory actions are needed.

As stated in the discussion paper, the NRC subsequently issued a seismic screening letter (Reference 5.22) and a flooding screening letter (Reference 6.25), also called "binning" letters, to all operating power reactor licensees. The purpose of the binning letters is to categorize sites based on available information and the status of any commitments made in prior reports and assessments. Beaver Valley was binned as a Category 1 site for both seismic and flooding.

Category 1 includes sites where no additional information or regulatory action is required. This category includes sites, such as Beaver Valley, where the licensee has previously demonstrated that existing seismic capacity or effective flood protection will address the unbounded reevaluated hazards.

Seismic Hazard Reevaluation (Enclosure 1 of the 50.54(f) letter) of the 50.54(f) letter requested each operating power reactor licensee to complete a reevaluation of the seismic hazard that could affect their sites using updated seismic hazard information and present-day regulatory guidance and methodologies to develop a ground motion response spectrum (GMRS). The licensee was asked to compare their results to the safe-shutdown earthquake (SSE) ground motion and then report to the NRC in a seismic hazard screening report. To provide a uniform and acceptable industry response, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) developed a technical report, EPRI 1025287, "Screening, Prioritization and Implementation Details (SPID) for the Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic," and the NRC endorsed the guidance in a letter dated February 15, 2013 (Reference 5.1 ). From November 2012 to May 2014, the NRG and the industry provided guidance for the performance of the reevaluated hazard reviews (References 5.2-5. 7). The licensee provided a seismic hazard screening report for Beaver Valley (Reference 5.8). In response to NRC requests for additional information, the licensee provided a supplement to the seismic hazard screening report (Reference 5.8).

If the new GMRS was not bound by the current design basis (CDB) SSE, Enclosure 1 of the 50.54(f) letter requested more detailed evaluations of the impact from the hazard. Also, the licensee was asked to evaluate whether interim protection measures were needed while the more detailed evaluation was completed. By letter dated May 7, 2013, the NRC endorsed industry-developed guidance, a proposed path forward, and schedules, which were provided in a letter from NEI dated April 9, 2013. Attachment 1 of the NEI letter contains EPRI report 300200704, "Augmented Approach for the Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic," to provide the guidance needed to perform an evaluation of any needed interim protective measures (Reference 5.3). This expedited seismic evaluation process (ESEP) is a screening, evaluation, and equipment modification process performed by licensees to provide additional seismic margin and expedite plant safety enhancements for certain core cooling and containment components while the more detailed and comprehensive plant seismic risk evaluations are being performed. Because an ESEP was required for Beaver Valley (see References 5.10 and 5.11 ), the licensee submitted an ESEP report. The NRC staff completed a technical review of the ESEP report and documented its review in a response letter (Reference 5.13).

By letter dated May 9, 2014 (Reference 5.10), the NRC informed licensees of the initial screening and prioritization results based on a review of the licensees' seismic hazard screening reports. The NRC updated the screening and prioritization in a letter dated October 3, 2014 (Reference 5.11 ). The NRC provided the final determination of required

seismic evaluations in a letter dated October 27, 2015 (Reference 5.18). These evaluations could consist of an SPRA (Reference 5.1, SPID, Section 6.1.1 ), limited scope evaluations (High Frequency (Reference 5.14) and/or SFP (Reference 5.15)), or a relay chatter evaluation

{Reference 5.4 ). If an SPRA was required, then additional Phase 2 regulatory decision making was required (References 5.16 and 5.17).

The NRG staff completed and documented its review of the licensee's reevaluated seismic hazard in a staff assessment (Reference 5.9). In order to complete its response to the 50.54(f) letter, the licensee submitted an SFP evaluation and an SPRA report for Beaver Valley (Reference 5.19). An audit was performed for each submittal (Reference 5.20). The audit results are documented in the applicable staff assessments (Reference 5.21 ). The NRG reviewed the SFP evaluation submittal and confirmed that Beaver Valley met the criteria of the SFP Evaluation Guidance Report (Reference 5.21 ). The NRC reviewed the SPRA report, as documented in Reference 5.21, using the regulatory review guidance provided in Reference 5.17. The staff's review concluded that the SPRA was of sufficient technical adequacy to support Phase 2 regulatory decisionmaking and that Beaver Valley responded appropriately to Enclosure 1, item (8) of the 50.54(f) letter (Reference 5.21 ). Based on the results and risk insights of the SPRA report, the NRG staff concluded that no further response or regulatory actions are required related to the seismic hazard reevaluation activities requested by of the 50.54(1) letter.

Because the staff's reviews were completed prior to when the final MBDBE rule was approved, the NRG staff, using the process discussed in the seismic binning letter (Reference 5.22),

re-visited these conclusions considering the final approved MBDBE rule. The staff confirmed that the conclusions in the various staff assessments continue to support a determination that no further regulatory actions are required for Beaver Valley.

The NRG staff reviewed the information provided and, as documented in the staff assessments (References 5.9 and 5.21 ), concluded that the licensee provided sufficient information in response to Enclosure 1 of the 50.54(f) letter. The staff acknowledges that all seismic hazard reevaluation activities requested by Enclosure 1 of the 50.54(f) letter have been completed for Beaver Valley. No further information related to the reevaluated seismic hazard is required.

Flooding Hazard Reevaluation (Enclosure 2 of the 50.54(f) letter) of the 50.54(f) letter requested each operating power reactor licensee to complete a reevaluation of applicable flood-causing mechanisms at their site using updated flooding hazard information and present-day regulatory guidance and methodologies. Licensees were asked to compare their results to the COB for protection and mitigation from external flood events. The NRC developed guidance to conduct the reevaluations (References 6.1 through 6.6). The licensee submitted a flood hazard reevaluation report (FHRR) for Beaver Valley (Reference 6.7) to the NRG as requested by the 50.54(f) letter. Interim actions needed to protect against the reevaluated flood hazard were specified in the FHRR. The NRC inspected the interim actions using Tl 2515/190, "Inspection of Licensee's Proposed Interim Actions as a Result of the Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Flooding Evaluation" and documented the results in a quarterly integrated inspection report (Reference 6.9). A regulatory audit to support the review of the FHRR was performed. The audit results are documented in the FHRR staff assessment (Reference 6.8). The NRC staff reviewed the FHRR and provided an interim hazard letter (Reference 6.10) to provide feedback on the staff's review of the flooding hazard reevaluations.

The interim hazard letter was used by the licensee to complete the flood hazard MSA and other

flood hazard evaluations. Separately, the NRC staff documented the technical bases for its conclusions in the interim hazard letters by issuing a staff assessment (Reference 6.11 ).

In COMSECY-14-0037 (Reference 6.13), the NRC staff requested Commission direction to more clearly define the relationship between Order EA-12-049, the related MBDBE rulemaking, and the flood hazard reevaluations and assessments. Because the NRC was reevaluating its approach to the flooding evaluations, the NRC provided an extension of the due dates for any integrated assessments in a letter dated November 21, 2014 (Reference 6.12). In the SRM to COMSECY-14-0037 (Reference 6.14), the Commission approved the staff's recommendation that licensees of operating nuclear power plants need to address the reevaluated flooding hazard within their mitigation strategies. The Commission also directed the NRC staff to provide a plan for achieving closure of the flooding portion of NTIF Recommendation 2.1 to the Commission for its review and approval. On May 26, 2015, the NRC deferred, until further notice, the date for submitting the integrated assessment reports (Reference 6.15). On June 30, 2015, the NRC staff provided a plan to the Commission in COMSECY-15-0019 (Reference 6.16). On July 28, 2015, the Commission approved the plan in the SRM to COMSECY-15-0019 (Reference 6.17). On September 29, 2015, the NRG issued a letter to licensees to describe the graded approach to the flood hazard reevaluations approved by the Commission (Reference 6.18).

The COMSECY-15-0019 action plan required the NRC staff to develop a graded approach to identify the need for, and prioritization and scope of, plant-specific integrated assessments and evaluation of plant-specific regulatory actions. The NRC staff's graded approach enabled a site with hazard exceedance above its CDS to demonstrate the site's ability to cope with the reevaluated hazard through appropriate protection or mitigation measures which are timely, effective, and reasonable. Integrated assessments were focused on sites with the greatest potential for additional safety enhancements. New guidance for performing the integrated assessments and focused evaluations was developed for this graded approach. The guidance also provided schedule information for submission of any required integrated assessment. On July 18, 2016, the staff issued JLD-ISG-2016-01, "Guidance for Activities Related to Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, Flooding Hazard Reevaluation, Focused Evaluation and Integrated Assessment" (Reference 6.19). The ISG provided the guidance for Phase 1 flooding assessments, as described in COMSECY-15-0019, and endorsed industry guidance provided in NEI 16-05, "External Flooding Integrated Assessment Guidelines" (Reference 6.19). If an integrated assessment was necessary, then Phase 2 regulatory decisionmaking was required (References 6.23 and 6.24).

As noted in the interim hazard response letter (Reference 6.10), the local intense precipitation (LIP) and probable maximum flood concurrent with wind wave action flood-causing mechanisms were not bound by the CDS. Therefore, additional assessments of these flood-causing mechanisms were required. The NRC staff used a graded approach to determine if this site would need to perform an integrated assessment for the reevaluated flooding hazard, or if a focused evaluation would suffice. Based on the graded approach, Beaver Valley completed a focused evaluation (Reference 6.20) to ensure appropriate actions were identified and taken to protect the plant from the reevaluated flood hazard. The NRC staff conducted a regulatory audit (Reference 6.22), completed its review of the focused evaluation (Reference 6.20), and concluded in the staff assessment (Reference 6.21) that the licensee provided sufficient information in response to the 50.54(f) letter. Audit results were summarized in the staff assessment. No further regulatory actions are required related to the flood hazard reevaluations.

Because the staff's reviews were completed prior to when the final MBDBE rule was approved, the NRG staff, using the process discussed in the flooding binning letter (Reference 6.25),

re-visited these conclusions considering the final approved MBDBE rule. The staff confirmed that the conclusions in the various staff assessments continue to support a determination that no further regulatory requirements are required for Beaver Valley.

The NRG staff reviewed the information provided by the licensee and has concluded that sufficient information was provided to be responsive to Enclosure 2 of the 50.54(f) letter. The staff acknowledges that all flooding hazard reevaluation activities requested by Enclosure 2 of the 50.54(f) letter have been completed for Beaver Valley. No further information related to the reevaluated flood hazard is required.

Mitigating Strategies Assessment In addition to the closure plan for NTIF Recommendation 2.1, the action plan approved by the Commission in the SRM to COMSECY-15-0019 (Reference 7.4) identified the staff efforts to ensure licensees would address the reevaluated hazard information in their mitigation strategies. Proposed requirements related to the MSA were included in the draft final MBDBE rule but were removed as a requirement from the final approved rule language. The Commission's direction in SRM-M190124A (Reference 1.14) makes clear that the NRC will continue to follow a site-specific approach to resolve the interactions between the hazard reevaluation and mitigation strategies using information gathered in the 50.54(f) letter process.

In a draft discussion paper (Reference 1.18) used to support a Category 3 public meeting held on February 28, 2019 (Reference 1.19), the NRC staff outlined the process to be used to review the reevaluated hazard and MSA information provided by licensees considering the differences between the draft final MBDBE rule and the approved final MBDBE rule. Subsequently, the NRC staff provided a screening letter (also called a "binning" letter) for both seismic and flooding information (References 5.22 and 6.25), which categorized sites based on available information and the status of any commitments made in prior reports and assessments. The majority of MSAs had been submitted and evaluated by the staff prior to the issuance of the binning letters. For the MSA reviews that had not yet been completed, or MSAs that had not yet been submitted, the staff would evaluate the hazard impacts on the mitigation strategies, as appropriate, as part of its review of SPRA reports, flooding FEs, and/or flooding IAs.

The objective of the MSA is to determine whether the mitigation strategies developed for Order EA-12-049 can still be implemented given the reevaluated hazard levels. If it was determined that the mitigation strategies could not be implemented for the reevaluated hazard levels, the MSA could provide other options such as performing additional evaluations, modifying existing mitigating strategies, or developing alternate mitigating strategies or targeted hazard mitigating strategies to address the reevaluated hazard levels. In Revision 1 to JLD-ISG-2012-01, the NRG endorsed industry-developed guidance contained in Appendices G and Hof NEI 12-06 for completing the MSAs (Reference 7.5). In Revision 2 to JLD-ISG-2012-01, the NRC endorsed the industry-developed guidance of NEI 12-06, Revision 4 (Reference 7.5). Revision 4 of NEI 12-06, among other changes, provides additional guidance in Section H.4.5 for the performance of seismic MSAs for plants with reevaluated seismic hazard information that includes a GMRS that has spectral ordinates greater than twice the plant's SSE anywhere in the frequency range of 1 to 10 hertz. Beaver Valley used the guidance in Section H.4.5 to complete the seismic MSA.

The licensee completed both a flood hazard MSA (Reference 7.6) and a seismic hazard MSA (Reference 7.8) for Beaver Valley. The NRC performed a regulatory audit for the both MSAs (Reference 7.1 O) and the audit results are documented in the applicable staff assessments.

The NRC staff reviewed the MSA submittals and issued staff assessments (References 7.7 and 7.9) documenting its review. The NRC staff concluded that the licensee has demonstrated that the mitigation strategies appropriately address the reevaluated hazard conditions. As discussed in the seismic and flooding binning letters (References 5.22 and 6.26), the staff re-visited this conclusion considering the final approved MBDBE rule. The staff confirmed that the conclusions in the MSA staff assessments continue to support a determination that no further regulatory actions are required.

Walkdowns (Enclosures 3 and 4 of the 50.54(f) letter)

Enclosures 3 and 4 of the 50.54(f) letter requested that licensees perform plant walkdowns to verify compliance with the current licensing basis as it pertains to seismic and flood protection.

By letter dated May 31, 2012 (Reference 8.2), the NRC endorsed industry-developed guidance contained in Technical Report EPRI 1025286, "Seismic Walkdown Guidance" (Reference 8.1),

for the performance of the seismic walkdowns. By letter dated May 31, 2012 (Reference 9.2),

the NRC endorsed industry-developed guidance contained in NEI 12-07, uGuidelines for Performing Verification Walkdowns of Plant Flood Protection Features" (Reference 9.1 ), for performance of the flooding walkdowns. The licensee provided a report for both the seismic and flooding walkdowns at Beaver Valley (References 8.3 and 9.3). The NRC performed onsite inspections per Tl 2515/188, "Inspection of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns," and Tl 2515/187, "Inspection of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Flooding Walkdowns," and documented the inspection results in a quarterly integrated inspection report (References 8.4 and 9.4). The NRC staff issued staff assessments for both the seismic and flooding walkdowns (References 8.6 and 9.5). Because there were inaccessible items identified during the initial licensee seismic walkdowns, the licensee submitted a seismic walkdown report addendum after accessing the areas (Reference 8.5). The NRC documented its review of the walkdown report addendum in the staff assessment (Reference 8.6).

The NRC staff reviewed the information provided by the licensee and determined that sufficient information was provided to be responsive to Enclosures 3 and 4 of the 50.54(f) letter. The staff acknowledges that all seismic and flooding walkdown activities requested by the 50.54(f) letter have been completed for Beaver Valley.

Communications and Staffing (Enclosure 5 of the 50.54(f) letter) of the 50.54(f) letter requested licensees to assess their means to power equipment needed to communicate onsite and offsite during a prolonged station blackout event and to identify and implement enhancements to ensure that communications can be maintained during such an event. Also, licensees were requested to assess the staffing required to fill all necessary positions to respond to a multiunit event with impeded access to the site, or to an extended loss of all ac power for single unit sites. Licensees were requested to submit a written response to the information requests within 90 days, or provide a response within 60 days and describe an alternative course of action and estimated completion dates. The licensee proposed an alternative course of action and schedule for Beaver Valley (Reference 10.2),

which included a 90-day partial response (Reference 10.3). The NRC acknowledged the schedule changes in a letter dated July 26, 2012 (Reference 10.4).

By letter dated May 15, 2012, the NRC endorsed industry-developed guidance contained in NEI 12-01, "Guideline for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities" (Reference 10.1 ), for the performance of the communications and staffing assessments. The licensee provided the communications assessment and implementation schedule for Beaver Valley (Reference 10.5), and the NRC completed a staff assessment of the licensee's communications assessment (Reference 10.6).

Licensees responded to the staffing portion of the 50.54(f) letter in two phases to account for the implementation of mitigation strategies. Phase 1 staffing assessments were based on the existing station blackout coping strategies with an assumption of all reactors at the site being affected concurrently. The Phase 1 staffing assessment is required for multiunit sites and was completed for Beaver Valley (Reference 10. 7). In Phase 2, all licensees assessed the staffing necessary to carry out the mitigation strategies (Reference 10.9). The NRC staff issued staffing assessment response letters (References 10.8 and 10.1 O) for each submittal. The NRC performed an onsite inspection using Tl 2515/191 to verify that the emergency communications and staffing plans at Beaver Valley have been implemented as described by the licensee (Reference 10.11 ).

The draft final MBDBE rule, as submitted to the Commission, would have made generically applicable the staffing and communications requirements to support the mitigation strategies.

Proposed Regulatory Guide 1.228 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16218A236) was expected to endorse, with clarifications, NEI 12-01, NEI 13-06, "Enhancements to Emergency Response Capabilities for Beyond-Design-Basis Events and Severe Accidents" (Reference 11.17), and NEI 14-01, "Emergency Response Procedures and Guidelines for Beyond-Design-Basis Events and Severe Accidents" (Reference 11. 7), to provide acceptable methods for implementing the draft final MBDBE rule requirements, if approved. The final rule's language was revised to remove these requirements that had previously been addressed at the regulatory guidance level regarding the mitigation strategies order. The NRC staff canceled proposed Regulatory Guide 1.228 to reflect the approved changes in the final rule. The NRC will oversee the licensee's implementation of communications and staffing plans which support the mitigation strategies requirements through the ROP.

The NRC staff reviewed the information provided by the licensee and determined that sufficient information was provided to be responsive to Enclosure 5 of the 50.54(f) letter. The staff acknowledges that all emergency preparedness communications and staffing activities requested by Enclosure 5 of the 50.54(f) letter have been completed for Beaver Valley. No further information related to the communications and staffing assessments is required.

Additional Industry Commitments Update and Maintain Severe Accident Management Guidelines The NRC staff provided the proposed MBDBE rule to the Commission on April 30, 2015, in SECY-15-0065, "Proposed Rulemaking: Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events (RIN 3150-AJ49)" (Reference 11.1) and the Commission issued the SRM to SECY-15-0065 on August 27, 2015 (Reference 11.2). The Commission approved publication of the proposed rule subject to removal of the proposed requirements pertaining to the SAMGs. The Commission also directed the staff to update the ROP to explicitly provide periodic oversight of industry's implementation of the SAMGs. By letter dated October 26, 2015 (Reference 11.3), NEI described the industry initiative, approved by the Nuclear Strategic Issues Advisory Committee as mandatory for all NEI members, to update and maintain the SAMGs. Specifically, each

licensee will perform timely updates of their site-specific SAMGs based on revisions to generic severe accident technical guidelines. Licensees will also ensure that SAMGs are considered within plant configuration management processes. As noted in the NEl letter, the licensee provided a letter (Reference 11.4) to establish a site-specific regulatory commitment for Beaver Valley.

In a letter to NEI dated February 23, 2016 (Reference 11.5), the staff outlined its approach for making changes to the ROP in accordance with the Commission direction. The staff engaged NEI and other stakeholders to identify the near-term and long-term changes to the ROP, consistent with the Commission direction and the licensees' near-term and long-term SAMG commitments. In November 2016, the staff revised Inspection Procedure 71111.18, "Plant Modifications" (Reference 11.6, effective January 1, 2017), to provide oversight of the initial inclusion of SAMGs within the plant configuration management processes to ensure that the SAMGs reflect changes to the facility over time. In November 2018, the staff published a revision to IP 71111.18 (Reference 11.6, effective January 1, 2019), to provide oversight of the site-specific incorporation of generic owner's groups SAMG guidance revisions.

Multiunit/Multisource Dose Assessments In COMSECY-13-0010, "Schedule and Plans for Tier 2 Order on Emergency Preparedness for Japan Lessons Learned," dated March 27, 2013 (Reference 11.13), the NRC staff requested Commission approval to implement the NTTF recommendation concerning multiunit/multisource dose assessments by having licensees document their commitment to obtain multiunit/multisource dose assessment capability by the end of 2014, rather than by issuing an order. Multiunit dose assessment capabilities would be made generically applicable through subsequent rulemaking. The Commission approved the staffs requests in the SRM to COMSECY-13-0010, dated April 30, 2013 (Reference 11.14). The licensee commitments are documented in References 11.8 through 11.11.

The NRC staff included the multiunit/multisource dose assessment requirement in the proposed MB DBE rulemaking (Reference 11.1 ). However, in response to a public comment concerning the 1 O CFR 50.109 backfitting justification for the proposed multiple source term dose assessment requirements, the NRC staff determined that this requirement did not meet the criteria for imposition under 10 CFR 50.109(a)( 4)(ii). The NRC staff also concluded that this could not be justified as a compliance backfit or as a substantial safety improvement whose costs, both direct and indirect, would be justified considering the potential safety gain.

Therefore, these requirements were removed from the draft final rule (Reference 11.16).

The licensee provided the requested information and stated that Beaver Valley will have multiunit/multisource dose assessment capabilities (Reference 11.11) by December 31, 2014.

The NRC acknowledged the licensee's submittal (Reference 11.12), verified the implementation of these dose assessment capabilities through inspection per Tl 2515/191, and issued an inspection report (Reference 11.15).

CONCLUSION The NRC staff concludes that FENOC, the licensee, has implemented the NRC-mandated safety enhancements resulting from the lessons learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident through its implementation of Orders EA-12-049 and EA-12-051. The staff further concludes that the licensee has completed its response to the 50.54(f) letter for Beaver Valley. No further regulatory decisionmaking is required for Beaver Valley related to the Fukushima lessons-learned.

A listing of the applicable correspondence related to the Fukushima lessons-learned activities for Beaver Valley is included as an enclosure to this letter.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-2621 or by e-mail at Robert. Bernardo@nrc.gov.

Docket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412

Enclosure:

Documents Related to Required

Response

cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv Sincerely,

(~ff /2---7 (J Robert J. Bernardo, Project Manager Beyond-Design-Basis Management Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Reference Documents Related to Required Response to the Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident TABLE 1 Initial Actions in Response to the Events in Japan Caused by the Great Tohoku Earthauake and Subseauent Tsunami ADAMS1 Ref Document Date Accession No.

1.1 NRG Information Notice 2011-05 March 18, 2011 ML110760432 1.2 NRG Follow-up to the Fukushima Dai-ichi Fuel Damaae Event Temooraru Instruction /Tll 2515/183 March 23, 2011 ML11077A007 NRC Tl 2515/183 Inspection Report May 13, 2011 ML111310328 2011-008 Summarv of Observations Tl-183 November 28, 2011 ML11325A020 1.3 NRG Tasking Memorandum, Staff March 23, 2011 ML110820875 Requirements Memorandum (SRM) to COMGBJ-11-0002 1.4 NRG Availability and Readiness Inspection of SAMG NRG Availability and Readiness April 29, 2011 ML11115A053 lnsoection of SAMG -Tl 2515/184 NRG Integrated Inspection Report August 2, 2011 ML112140011 2011-003 (Tl 2515/184 inspection results)

NRC Tl 2515/184 Inspection Results, May 27, 2011 ML111470361 Reaion 1 Summarv NRG Summarv of Tl 2515/184 Results June 6, 2011 ML11154A109 1.5 NRC Bulletin 2011-01, "Mitinatinn Stratenies" NRC Bulletin 2011-01 Mav 11, 2011 ML111250360 Licensee 30 day response to BL 2011-June 9, 2011 ML111640470 01 Licensee 60 day response to BL 2011-July 11, 2011 ML111930021 01 NRC Request for Additional Information November 29, 2011 MU 13260278 (RAI) regarding Licensee 60 day resoonse to BL 2011-01 Licensee response to RAI December 29, 2011 ML113640025 NRC Closeout of BL 2011-01 for June 27, 2012 ML12160A245 FENOC 1.6 NRC NTIF Reoort (SECY-11-0093\\

Julv 21, 2011 ML11186A950 1.7 NRC SECY-11-0137, Prioritization of Recommended Actions To Be Taken in Response to Fukushima Lessons Learned NRC SECY-11-0137 October 3, 2011 ML11272A111 SRM-SECY-11-0137 December 15, 2011 ML113490055 1.8 NRC Order EA-12-049 March 12, 2012 ML12054A735 1.9 NRC Order EA-12-050 March 12, 2012 ML12054A694 1 Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)

Enclosure

Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 1 Initial Actions in Response to the Events in Japan Caused by the Great Tohoku Earthouake and Subseauent Tsunami ADAMS' Ref Document Date Accession No.

1.10 NRC Order EA-12-051 March 12, 2012 ML12054A679 1.11 NRC Request for Information Under March 12, 2012 ML12053A340 10 CFR 50.54(f) (the 50.54(f) letter) 1.12 NRC Order EA-13-109 June 6, 2013 ML13143A321 1.13 NRC SECY-16-0142, "Draft Final Rule:

December 15, 2016 ML16301A005 Mitioation of Bevond-Desion-Basis Events" 1.14 SRM-M190124A: Affirmation Session-SECY-January 24, 2019 ML19023A038 16-0142: Final Rule: Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events (RIN 3150-AJ49) -

Packaqe 1.15 Final Rule: Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis August 9, 2019 ML19058A006 Events {Packaae) 1.16 Regulatory Guide 1.226, Revision 0, Flexible June 30, 2019 ML 19058AO 12 Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis Events 1.17 Regulatory Guide 1.227, Revision 0, Wide June 30, 2019 ML19058A013 Ranae Soent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation 1.18 NRC Staff Preliminary Process for Treatment February 14, 2019 ML19037A443 of Reevaluated Seismic and Flooding Hazard Information In Backfit Determinations 1.19 Category 3 Public Meeting to Discuss Staffs February 14, 2019 ML19052A511 Preliminary Process for Treatment of Reevaluated Seismic and Flooding Hazard Information in Backfit Determinations Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 2 Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Bevond-Oesian-Basis External Events - EA-12-049 ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

2.1 Guidance for Compliance with EA-12-049 -

Diverse and Flexible Cooing Strateaies (FLEX)

Industry Guidance on Diverse and August 21, 2012 ML12242A378 Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX)

NEI 12-06, Revision 0 NRG endorsement of NEI 12-06, August 29, 2012 ML12229A174 Revision O - JLD-ISG-2012-01, Revision 0 Industry Guidance on Diverse and December 2015 ML16005A625 Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX)

NEI 12-06, Revision 2 NRG endorsement of NEI 12-06, January 22, 2016 ML15357A163 Revision 2 - JLD-ISG-2012-01, Revision 1 2.2 Licensee Overall lntenrated Plan (OIP)

Licensee OIP submittal Februa" 27, 2013 ML13064A243 OIP 1st six month status reoort Auaust 26, 2013 ML13238A260 OIP 2nd six month status reoort Februan, 27, 2014 ML14058A666 OIP 3rd six month status reoort Auoust 28, 2014 ML14240A285 OIP 4th six month status report Februa'" 26, 2015 ML15057A398 OIP 5th six month status report Aunust 27, 2015 ML15239A290 OIP 6th six month status report Februarn 26, 2016 ML16057A103 OIP 7th six month status reoort Auaust 5, 2016 ML16218A279 2.3 NRG Interim Staff Evaluation of OIP Januarv 29, 2014 ML13364A166 2.4 NRC audit of EA-12-049 OIP NRG Notification of Audit of EA-12-049 Aunust 28, 2013 ML13234A503 NRG Site Snecific Audit Plan June 9, 2015 ML15152A218 NRC Audit Reoort November 2, 2015 ML15292A139 2.5 Licensee Compliance Letter for EA-12-049 and December 16, 2016 ML16351A277 Final lntenrated Plan fFIP\\

2.6 NRG Safety Evaluation of Implementation of May 18, 2017 ML17095A276 EA-12-049 2.7 NRG Inspection of Licensee Responses to EA-12-049, EA-12-051, and Emergency Prenaredness Information NRC Tl 2515/191 December 23, 2015 ML15257A188 NRG Tl 2515/191 Inspection Report May 3, 2018 ML18124A002 2018-010 2.8 Industry White Paper - National SAFER September 11, ML14259A221 Resoonse Centers (NSRC\\

2014 2.9 NRC Staff Assessment of NSRCs September 26, ML14265A107 2014 Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 2 Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Bevond-Desian-Basis External Events - EA-12-049 ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

2.10 NRC Inspection of Implementation of EA-12-049 Reaardina the use of NSRG NRG Inspection Procedure (IP) 43006 September 30, ML16273A318 2016 NRC Vendor Inspection of the Phoenix January 12, 2017 ML17012A186 NSRG Reoort No. 99901013/2016-201 NRC Vendor Inspection of the Memphis May 5, 2017 ML17117A576 NSRG Renort No. 99901013/2017-201 2.11 Addenda I and II to industry NSRC white naner Mav 24, 2018 ML18150A658 2.12 NRG Updated Staff Assessment of NSRGs September 20, ML18157A014 2018 NA NRC approval of relaxation request of the May 20, 2014 ML14120A049 schedule requirements for Order EA-12-049 for Beaver Vallev Unit 1 Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 3 Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation -

EA-12-051 ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

3.1 Guidance for Compliance with EA-12-051 -

Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI)

Industry Guidance for Compliance with August 2012 ML12240A307 EA-12-051 - NEI 12-02, Revision 1 NRC endorsement of NEI 12-02, August 29, 2012 ML12221A339 Revision 1 - JLD-ISG-2012-03, Revision 0 3.2 Licensee Overall lntearated Plan (OIP)

Licensee OIP Februaru 27, 2013 ML13059A495 OIP 1st six month status report Auaust 26, 2013 ML13238A259 OIP 2nd six month status report Februaru 27, 2014 ML14058A665 OIP 3rd six month status reoort Auaust 28, 2014 ML14240A230 OIP 4th six month status reoort Februan, 26, 2015 ML15057A396 OIP 5th six month status reoort Auaust 18, 2015 ML15230A202 3.3 NRC Interim Staff Evaluation of OIP November 19, 2013 ML13297A233 3.4 NRC Audit of EA-12-051 NRC Notification of Audit of EA-12-051 March 26, 2014 ML14083A620 NRC Audit Report of Westinghouse August 18, 2014 ML14211A346 SFPI desian soecifications NRC Site Specific Audit Plan June 9, 2015 ML15152A218 NRC Audit Report November 2, 2015 ML15292A139 3.5 Licensee Comoliance Letter for EA-12-051 December 21, 2015 ML15355A397 Unit 1 Comoliance Letter Julv 22, 2015 ML15203A101 Unit 2 Comoliance Letter December 21, 2015 ML15355A397 3.6 NRC Safety Evaluation of Implementation of May 18, 2017 ML17095A276 EA-12-051 3.7 NRC Inspection of Licensee Responses to EA-12-049, EA-12-051, and Emergency Preoaredness Information NRC Tl 2515/191 December 23, 2015 ML15257A188 NRG Tl 2515/191 Inspection Report May 3, 2018 ML18124A002 2018-010 Note: Table 4 relates to the Hardened Containment Vent System and is not applicable to Beaver Valley.

Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 5 Request for Information under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.54(f), Enclosure 1: Recommendation 2.1 Seismic Hazard Reevaluation ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

Guidance Documents 5.1 Screening, Prioritization and Implementation Details ISPID\\

Industry Guidance (SPID) -

November 2012 ML12333A170 EPRI 1025287 NRC letter endorsina SPID Februa...., 15, 2013 ML12319A074 5.2 NRC guidance for performing a Seismic November 16, 2012 ML12286A029 Margin Assessment (SMA) -

JLD-ISG-2012-04 5.3 Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process IESEP\\

Industry Letter - Proposed path April 9, 2013 ML13101A345 forward for NTTF Recommendation 2.1: Seismic Industry Guidance - Expedited April 2013 ML13102A142 Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) -

EPRI 3002000704 NRC letter endorsing the ESEP May 7, 2013 ML13106A331 approach. Extension of ESEP due date to 3/31/14 for Central and Eastern U.S. <CEUS\\ sites 5.4 lndustrv letter on relav chatter review October 3, 2013 ML13281A308 5.5 NRC letter with guidance on the content of February 20, 2014 ML14030A046 seismic reevaluation submittals (includes ooerabilitv and reoortabitity discussions) 5.6 Industry letter on seismic risk evaluations for March 12, 2014 ML14083A596 CEUS nlants 5.7 NRC background paper - Probabilistic seismic May 20, 2014 ML14140A648 hazard analvsis Seismic Hazard Screeninn Renart 5.8 Licensee Seismic Hazard Screening Report (SHSR\\

Licensee SHSR Packaoe March 31, 2014 ML14090A143 Licensee SHSR sunnlement June 29, 2015 ML15181A085 5.9 NRC Staff Assessment of Reevaluated October 5, 2015 ML15274A307 Seismic Hazard Information Screeninn and Prioritization Results 5.10 NRC Letter - Seismic screening and May 9, 2014 ML14111A147 orioritization results for CELIS olants 5.11 NRC Letter - Updated seismic screening and October 3, 2014 ML14258A043 nrioritization results Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 5 Request for Information under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.54(f}, Enclosure 1: Recommendation 2.1 Seismic Hazard Reevaluation ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

5.12 NRG letter regarding development of Seismic December 10, 2014 ML143078707 Risk Evaluations - suitability of updated seismic hazard information for further assessments 5.13 ESEP Submittal and Evaluation Licensee ESEP Submittal December 19, 2014 ML14353A059 NRC Response Letter for the ESEP August 25, 2015 ML15233A120 Submittal Additional Guidance Documents 5.14 High Frequency Program Application Guidance Industry High Frequency Application July 30, 2015 ML15223A095 Guidance - EPRI 3002004396 NRG letter endorsing High Frequency September 17, ML15218A569 Annlication Guidance 2015 5.15 Soent Fuel Pool Evaluation Guidance Industry SFP evaluation guidance -

February 23, 2016 ML16055A017 EPRI 3002007148 NRG letter endorsing SFP evaluation March 17, 2016 ML15350A158 nuidance 5.16 NRG Letter - Treatment of Seismic and September 29, ML15127A401 Flooding Hazard Reevaluations in the Design 2015 and Licensinn Basis 5.17 NRG Guidance for Regulatory September 21, ML16237A103 Decisionmaking of reevaluated flooding and 2016 seismic hazards Final Determinations of Required Seismic Evaluations 5.18 NRG Final Determination of Required Seismic October 27, 2015 ML15194A015 Evaluations 5.19 Licensee Required Seismic Evaluation Submittats Snent Fuel Pool Evaluation November 7, 2016 ML16312A311 Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Julv 27, 2017 ML17213A014 5.20 Audit nlan of seismic evaluations submittals Julv 6, 2017 ML17177A446 5.21 NRG Staff Assessment of Seismic Evaluations Snent Fuel Pool Evaluation Januan1 6,2017 ML16349A042 SPRA Response Letter June 6, 2018 ML18092A837 5.22 NRC Treatment of Reevaluated Seismic July 3, 2019 ML19140A307 Hazard Information (seismic binnina letter)

Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 6 Request for Information under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.54(f), Enclosure 2: Recommendation 2.1 Flooding Hazard Reevaluation ADAMS Ref Document Dale Accession No.

Initial Guidance Documents 6.1 NRG prioritization of plants for completing May 11, 2012 ML12097A509 flood hazard reevaluations 6.2 NRG-issued guidance for performing an November 30, 2012 ML12311A214 integrated assessment for external flooding IJLD-ISG-2012-05\\

6.3 NRG letter to industry describing when an December 3, 2012 ML12326A912 intenrated assessment is expected 6.4 NRG-issued guidance for performing a January 4, 2013 ML12314A412 tsunami, surge, or seiche hazard assessment I JLD-ISG-2012-06\\

6.5 NRC letter to industry with guidance on the March 1, 2013 ML13044A561 content of floodinn reevaluation submittals 6.6 NRG-issued guidance for assessing flooding July 29, 2013 ML13151A153 hazards due to dam failure (JLD-ISG-2013-01 \\

Flood Hazard Reevaluation Reoort 6.7 Licensee FHRR Submittal Packaae March 2, 2016 ML16063A288 6.8 FHRR Renulato..., Audit NRG FHRR Site Specific Audit Plan Anril 26, 2016 ML16105A211 NRG FHRR Audit Report (audit closed July 24, 2018 ML18158A484 out in the FHRR staff assessment) 6.9 NRC Inspection of licensee interim actions (if annlicable)

NRG Tl 2515/190, Revision 1, September 4, 2015 ML15176A790 Inspection of proposed interim actions as a result of FHRR NRG Tl 2515/190 inspection report November 8, 2016 ML16313A269 2016-003 6.10 NRC Interim Staff Response to Reevaluated February 22, 2017 ML17040A011 Flood Hazards 6.11 NRC Staff Assessment of FHRR Julv 24, 2018 ML18158A484 Modified A'""'roach to Flood Hazard Reevaluations 6.12 NRG extension of due dates for Integrated November 21, 2014 ML14303A465 Assessment renorts 6.13 NRG COMSECY-14-0037, "Integration of November 21, 2014 ML14309A256 Mitigating Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events and the Reevaluation of Floodina Hazards" 6.14 NRG SRM for COMSECY-14-0037 March 30, 2015 ML15089A236 6.15 NRC letter on second extension of due date May 26, 2015 ML15112A051 for floodinn intenrated assessment reports 6.16 NRG COMSECY-15-0019 "Closure Plan for June 30, 2015 ML15153A104 the Reevaluation of Flooding Hazards" 6.17 NRG SRM-COMSECY-15-0019 Julv 28, 2015 ML15209A682 Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 6 Request for Information under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.54(f), Enclosure 2: Recommendation 2.1 Flooding Hazard Reevaluation ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

6.18 NRG letter describing the graded approach to September 1, 2015 ML15174A257 flood hazard reevaluation directed by SRM-COMSECY-14-0037 6.19 Floodina Assessment Guidance NEI 16-05, "External Flooding April 2016 ML16165A178 Assessment Guidelines~

NRC endorsement of NEI 16 July 11, 2016 ML16162A301 JLD-ISG-2016-01 6.20 Licensee Focused Evaluation October 16, 2017 ML17290A033 6.21 NRC Staff Assessment of Focused Evaluation March 22, 2018 ML18067A112 6.22 NRC Generic FE and IA Reoulatorv Audit Plan Julv 18, 2017 ML17192A452 6.23 NRC Letter - Treatment of Seismic and September 29, ML15127A401 Flooding Hazard Reevaluations in the Design 2015 and Licensina Basis 6.24 NRC Guidance for Regulatory Decisionmaking September 21, ML16237A103 of reevaluated floodinn and seismic hazards 2016 6.25 NRC Treatment of Reevaluated Flooding August 20, 2019 ML19067A247 Hazard Information (floodina binnina letter)

NA NRC approval of relaxation of Flooding July 17, 2014 ML14171A461 Hazard Reevaluations due date Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 7 Mitiaatina Strateaies Assessments (MSA)

ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

7.1 NRG COMSECY-14-0037, Integration of November 21, 2014 ML14309A256 Mitigating Strategies with Hazard Reevaluations 7.2 NRG SRM-COMSECY-14-0037 March 30, 2015 ML15089A236 7.3 NRG COMSECY-15-0019, Closure Plan for June 30, 2015 ML15153A104 Floodina Hazard Reevaluations 7.4 NRG SRM-COMSECY-15-0019 Julv 28, 2015 ML15209A682 7.5 Process for Mitigating Strategies Assessments

/MSAl Industry Guidance for performing December 2015 ML16005A625 MSAs - NEI 12-06, Revision 2, includina Annendices E, G, & H NRC endorsement of NEI 12-06, January 22, 2016 ML15357A163 Revision 2 - JLD-ISG-2012-01, Revision 1 Industry Guidance on Diverse and December 12, 2016 ML16354B416 Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX)

NEI 12-06, Revision 4 NRC endorsement of NEI 12-06, February 8, 2017 ML17005A182 Revision 4 - JLD-ISG-2012-01, Revision 2 7.6 Licensee's MSA submittal - Flooding September 20, ML17263A122 2017 7.7 NRC Staff Assessment of MSA - Floodinn March 22, 2018 ML18071A169 7.8 Licensee's MSA submittal - Seismic October 11, 2017 ML17285A015 7.9 NRC Staff Assessment of MSA - Seismic September 7, 2018 ML18249A169 7.10 NRG MSA Audit Plan December 5, 2016 ML16259A189 Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 8 Request for Information under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.54ffl, Enclosure 3: Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

8.1 Industry Seismic Walkdown Guidance with May 31. 2012 ML12188A031 NRG endorsement letter - EPRI 1025286 8.2 NRG letter endorsinn EPRI 1025286 Mav 31. 2012 ML12145A529 8.3 Licensee Seismic Hazard Walkdown Reoort Licensee Seismic Hazard Walkdown November 27, 2012 ML130080030 Reoort Packane Licensee supplemental Seismic September 24, ML13284A030 Hazard Walkdown Reoort Packa..,e 2013 8.4 NRC lnsoection of Seismic Walkdowns NRG Tl 25151188 Julv 6, 2012 ML12156A052 NRC Integrated Inspection Report February 5. 2013 ML13036A302 2012-005 (Tl 25151188 inspection results l 8.5 Licensee Seismic Hazard Walkdown Report January 27. 2014 ML14028A263 addendum (inaccessible items reoort) 8.6 NRC Staff Assessment of Seismic Walkdown February 10, 2014 ML14009A089 Renert (includes inaccessible walkdown items)

TABLE 9 Request for Information under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.54\\ Enclosure 4: Recommendation 2.3 Floodim Walkdown ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

9.1 Industry Flooding Walkdown Guidance - NEI May 31. 2012 ML12173A215 12-07 9.2 NRG letter endorsina NEI 12-07 May 31, 2012 ML12144A142 9.3 Licensee Floodina Hazard Walkdown Reoort Floodina Hazard Walkdown Renert November 27, 2012 ML12335A341 SU'"'"'lement to Floodin.., Walkdown Februaru 25, 2014 ML14057A548 Update to Flooding Hazard Walkdown January 30, 2014 ML14030A559 Reoort APM Assessment 9.4 NRC lnsoection of Floadinn Walkdowns NRG Tl 25151187 June 27, 2012 ML12129A108 NRC Integrated Inspection Report February 5, 2013 ML13036A302 2012-005 (Tl 25151187 inspection results l 9.5 NRC Staff Assessment of Flooding Walkdown June 16, 2014 ML14156A233 Reoort Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE10 Request for Information under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.54(f), Enclosure 5: Recommendation 9.3 Emergency Preparedness Communications and Staffing ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

10.1 Guidance Documents Industry Guidance for Emergency May 2012 ML12125A412 Preparedness staffing and communications - NEI 12-01 NRG letter endorsinn NEI 12-01 May 15, 2012 ML12131A043 10.2 FENOC 60 day response and proposed May 9, 2012 ML12130A416 alternative course of action 10.3 FENOC 90 day response to communications June 11, 2012 ML12163A320 and staffino information reouests 10.4 NRC letter status of 90-dav resnonse Julv 26, 2012 ML12200A106 10.5 Licensee communications assessment and imolementation schedule Communications Assessment October 29, 2012 ML12306A131 Supplement to Communications February 22, 2013 ML13053A366 Assessment 10.6 NRC staff assessment of licensee's June 27, 2013 ML13170A334 communications assessment (Non-nublic\\

10.7 Licensee Phase 1 staffing assessment (multi-April 25, 2013 ML13126A037 unit sites onl"'

10.8 NRC response to licensee's Phase 1 staffing October 23, 2013 ML13233A183 assessment 10.9 Licensee Phase 2 staffing assessment for December 5, 2014 ML14339A672 functions related to mitigation strategies (Non-oublic\\

10.10 NRC Phase 2 staff assessment resoonse Auoust 11, 2015 ML15203A011 10.11 NRC Inspection of Licensee Responses to EA-12-049, EA-12-051, and Emergency Preoaredness Information NRC Tl 2515/191 December 23, 2015 ML15257A188 NRC Tl 2515/191 Inspection Report May 3, 2018 ML18124A002 2018-010 Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 11 Additional Licensee Commitments - SAMGs and Multisource Dose Assessments ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

Uodate and Maintain SAMGs 11.1 SEGY-15-0065: Proposed Rulemaking:

April 30, 2015 ML15049A201 Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events (RIN 3150-AJ49\\

11.2 SRM-SEGY-15-0065 Auqust 27, 2015 ML15239A767 11.3 NEI Letter describing industry initiative to October 26, 2015 ML15335A442 uodate and maintain SAMGs 11.4 Site Commitment to Maintain SAMGs November 20, 2015 ML15324A381 11.5 NRC letter to NEI describing approach to February 23, 2016 ML16032A029 SAMG oversiaht 11.6 NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.18, "Plant November 17, 2016 ML16306A185 Modifications~

11. 7 NEI 14-01, "Emergency Response February 2016 ML16224A619 Procedures and Guidelines for Extreme Events and Severe Accidents, Rev. 1 Multisource Dose Assessments 11.8 NEI Letter; Industry survey and plan for January 28, 2013 ML13028A200 multiunit dose assessments 11.9 NRC Letter to request additional information February 27, 2013 ML13029A632 from NE1 on multiunit dose assessment caoabilitv 11.10 NEI Letter: Implementation of Multiunit Dose March 14, 2013 ML13073A522 Assessment Canabilitv 11.11 Licensee Response Regarding the June 25, 2013 ML13176A410 Capability to Perform Multisource Offsite Dose Assessment 11.12 NRC Acknowledgement of Licensee Dose January 29, 2014 ML13233A205 Assessment Submittals 11.13 GOMSEGY-13-0010 March 27, 2013 ML12339A262 11.14 SRM-COMSEGY-13-0010 April 30, 2013 ML13120A339 11.15 NRC Inspection of Licensee Responses to EA-12-049, EA-12-051, and Emergency Preoaredness Information NRG Tl 2515/191 December 23, 2015 ML15257A188 NRG Tl 2515/191 Inspection Report May 3, 2018 ML18124A002 2018-010 11.16 Draft Final Rule: Mitigation of December 15, 2016 ML16301A005 Beyond-Design-Basis Events NRC SEGY-16-0142, Packaae 11.17 NEI 13-06, "Enhancements to Emergency February 2016 ML16224A618 Reponses Capabilities for Beyond Design Basis Accidents and Events, Rev. 1 Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 TABLE 12 NRC Semi-Annual Status Recorts to the Commission ADAMS Ref Document Date Accession No.

12.1 SECY-12-0025, Enclosure 8, "Proposed February 17, 2012 ML12039A103 Orders and Requests for Information in Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great T6hoku Earthquake and Tsunami" 12.2 SECY-12-0095-Enclosure 1: Six-Month July 13, 2012 ML12165A092 Status Update On Charter Activities -

Februan, 2012 - Julv 2012 12.3 SECY-13-0020 - Third 6-Month Status Update February 14, 2013 ML13031A512 On Response To Lessons Learned From Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthnuake And Subsenuent Tsunami 12.4 SECY-13-0095 - Fourth 6-Month Status September 6, 2013 ML13213A304 Update on Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthauake and Subseauent Tsunami 12.5 SECY-14-0046 - Fifth 6-Month Status Update April 17, 2014 ML14064A520 on Response to Lessons Learned From Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthnuake and Subsenuent Tsunami 12.6 SECY-14-0114-Sixth 6-Month Status Update October 21, 2014 ML14234A498 on Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthauake and Subseauent Tsunami 12.7 SECY-15-0059 - Seventh 6-Month Status April 9, 2015 ML15069A444 Update on Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthnuake and Subsenuent Tsunami 12.8 SECY-15-0128: Eighth 6-Month Status October 14, 2015 ML15245A473 Update on Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthauake and Subsenuent Tsunami

~.

12.9 SECY-16-0043: Ninth 6 Month Status Update April 5, 2016 ML16054A255 on Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthauake and Subseauent Tsunami 12.10 SECY-17-0016: Status of Implementation of January 30, 2017 ML16356A084 Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthquake and Subsenuent Tsunami

ML18302A208 OFFICE NRR/DLP/PBMB!PM NRR/DLP/PBMB/LA NRR/DLP/PBMB/BC(A)

NAME RBemardo Slent BTitus DATE 8/27/19 8/28/19 8/30/19 OFFICE NRR/DLP/PBMB/PM NAME RBemardo DATE 10/11/19