text
NRC FORM 366 (4.95)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
(See reverse for required number of digits/characters for each block)
APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150.0104 EXPIRES 04/30/96 ESTIMATED BURDEH PER
RESPONSE
TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY WFORMATION COllECTION REOUEST: 50JI HRS.
REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE WCORPORATEO W'IO THE UCENSING PROCESS AND FEO BACK TO WDUSTRY.
FORWARD COMMENTS REGAROWG BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENTBRANCH IT4I F33L US. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON. OC 205550001, ANO TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3I50.
OI04l OFFICE OF MANAGEMENTAND BUDGET WASHINGTON. OC 20503.
FAcIUTYNAMEIII Harris Nuclear Plant Unit-1 OOCKET NUMBER 12) 50-400 PAGE 13) 1 OF 3 TITLE 141 Manual reactor trip due to loss of Normal Service Water EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUMBER (6)
REPORT DATE (7)
FACIUTYNAME OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED(B)
OOCKET NUMBER MONTH OAY YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER MONTH OAY YEAR 05000 9
03 OPERATING MODE (9)
POWER LEVEL (10) 96 100%
96
018
01 08 97 FACILITYNAME 05000 DOCKET NUMBER 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a) (1) 20.2203(a)(2) (i) 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a) (2) (iii) 20.2203(a) (2) (iv) 20.2203(a) (2) (v) 20.2203(a)(3) li) 20.2203(a) (3)(ii) 20.2203(a) (4) 5O.36(c)(1) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a) (2) (i) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2) liii) 50.73(a) (2)liv) 50.73(a) (2) (v) 50.73(a) (2) (vii) 50.73(a) (2)(viii) 50.73(a)(2)(x) 73.71 OTHER Specrfy in Abstract belew or in NRC Form 366A r moro) l11)
SUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR B: (Check one o THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PUR NAME LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
TELEPHONE NUMBER Ilnerude Area Codei Michael Verrilli Sr. Analyst - Licensing (919) 362-2303 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPROS
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPROS KG P115 se
- 1 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
YES (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
X NO EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE (15)
MONTH OAY YEAR ABSTRACT (Limitto 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
On September 3, 1996 at approximately 2338 hours0.0271 days <br />0.649 hours <br />0.00387 weeks <br />8.89609e-4 months <br />, with the plant operating in mode 1 at 100% power and the "B" Normal Service Water (NSW) pump in service, operators in the main control room received numerous NSW system alarms and observed indication of zero flow and pressure in the NSW header.
The Reactor Operator manually started the standby "A" NSW pump to restore flow, but the pump tripped after running for less than two minutes.
When re-start attempts on the "A" NSW pump failed, a manual reactor trip was initiated at approximately 2342 hours0.0271 days <br />0.651 hours <br />0.00387 weeks <br />8.91131e-4 months <br />.
Plant systems responded as
- expected, including an automatic start of the Auxiliary Feedwater System and the unit was stabilized in mode 3 (Hot Standby).
The cause of this event was a mechanical failure of the "B" NSW pump and the failure of the "A" NSW to remain running once manually started.
The "B" NSW pump shaft sheared.
Additional investigation was subsequently completed to determine the cause of the "A" NSW pump trip. This investigation revealed that the torque switch on the pump's discharge valve (ISW-289) was actuating and this was preventing the valve from opening to the 10% open position, which is required for pump operation.
Corrective actions included restoring the "A" NSW pump to service, performing a secondary plant walkdown to support plant re-start and evaluating the acceptability of having only one NSW pump available during plant operation while repairs continued on the "B" NSWgpump.
Subsequent actions included restoring the "B" NSW pump, completing the failure analysis for tlie "B" NSW pump sheared shaft, and completing the additional investigation into the '" NSW pump trip that resulted in this LER revision.
This event is reportable per 10CFR50.72 and 10CFR50.73.
A 4-hour non-emergency report was made to the NRC at approximately 0207 via the emergency notification s stem.
9708200013 970807 PDR ADOCK 05000400
Q4(4-95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERj TEXT CONTINUATION U.S. NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION FACILITYNAME (I)
Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant Unit )I)1 TEXT Pl mort spore r's rer)viK vse oW(kvlsopor ol NRC Form 3664)
(17)
DOCKET 50400 LER NUMBER )6)
YEAR SEOUENHAL REYISION NUMBER NUMBER 96 018 01 PAGE I3) 2 OF 3
EVENT DESCRIPTION
On September 3, 1996 at approximately 2338 hours0.0271 days <br />0.649 hours <br />0.00387 weeks <br />8.89609e-4 months <br />, with the plant operating in mode 1 at 100% power and the "B" Normal Service Water pump (NSW, EIIS Code: KG-P) in service, operators in the main control room received numerous NSW system alarms and observed indication of zero flow and 'pressure in the NSW header.
The Reactor Operator manually started the standby "A" NSW pump to restore service water flow..Afterobserving closed indication for the "A" NSW pump breaker and indication that the "A" NSW pump discharge valve was opening, the "B" NSW pump was secured to allow the "B" discharge valve to shut.
At this time, the Reactor Operator noticed that the "A" NSW pump had tripped.
Following two unsuccessful re-start attempts on the "A" NSW pump, the Unit-Senior Control Operator directed a manual reactor and turbine trip at approximately 2342 hours0.0271 days <br />0.651 hours <br />0.00387 weeks <br />8.91131e-4 months <br />.
Prior to the reactor trip, the "A" Emergency Service Water (ESW) pump automatically started due to low header pressure.
Plant systems responded to the reactor trip signal as expected, including an automatic start of the Auxiliary Feedwater System (EIIS Code: BA) on steam generator low-low level due to Reactor Coolant System (RCS, EIIS Code: AB) shrink following the reactor trip. The unit was stabilized in mode 3 with RCS temperature at 557 degrees and pressure at 2235 psig.
Following investigation and repairs, the plant was restarted on September 9, 1996 and returned to the grid at approximately 0342 on September 10, 1996.
Delays were encountered in plant re-start due to the passage of Hurricane Fran (reference LER 96-019).
Since the forced outage exceeded 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />, hot rod drop testing was performed prior to reactor startup in accordance with Harris Plant's response to NRC Bulletin 96-01.
Reference Attachment 1 for hot rod drop testing results.
I This event is reportable per 10CFR50.72 and 10CFR50.73 as a Reactor Protection System actuation.
A 4-hour non-emergency report was made to the NRC at approximately 0207 via the emergency notification system.
CAUSE
The cause of this event was a mechanical failure in the "B" NSW pump and a malfunction resulting in the "A" NSW pump tripping after being manually started.
The "B" NSW pump experienced a sheared pump shaft.
A metallurgical analysis determined the most probable cause to be a bent pump shaft due to alignment problems, which caused the bronze bearings to heat up and fail resulting in the sheared pump shaft.
Additional investigation was subsequently completed to determine the cause of the "A" NSW pump trip. This investigation revealed that the torque switch on the pump's discharge valve (1SW-289) was actuating when high D/P conditions exist across the valve and this was preventing the valve from opening to the 10% open position, which is required for pump operation.
These high D/P conditions are present when the standby NSW pump starts with the other NSW pump not running, as in the case of the "B" NSW pump trip.
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE
There were no safety consequences as a result of this event.
The manual reactor/turbine trip was initiated per plant operating procedures to protect secondary plant components following the loss of Normal Service Water.
Plant systems responded as expected following the initiation of the manual reactor/turbine trip.
A
)4-
)
4, NRC FORM 36BA (495)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION U.S. NUClEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION FACIEITY NAME (I)
Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant
- - Unit /Il OOCKET 50400 96 018 01 lER NUMBER (6)
FEAR SEQUENTIAl REVISION NUMBER NUMBER PAGE (3) 3 OF 3
TEXT illmoro spsco r's rcrprisrl oso orrrpsotrol coper ol llRC Form 3SQI I)T)
PREVIOUS SIMILAREVENTS
Previous similar problems with the NSW pumps and discharge valves were experienced during the reactor/turbine trip that occurred on April 25, 1996, which was reported in LER 96-008.
Corrective actions for that event included adjusting the mechanical latch mechanism on the "A" NSW pump discharge valve control relay (CR1/2189) to ensure that it "latched in" properly and replacing two of the "B" NSW pump discharge valve control relays (CR4/2190 &
CR1/2190) that experienced intermittent failures.
Based on indications observed during the September 3, 1996 loss of NSW event, these corrective actions were effective since their associated functions performed as required.
LER 96-008 also contained a corrective action to perform additional NSW testing during the next refueling outage (RFO-7).
This testing was performed and the results will be included in a revision to LER 96-008.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS COMPLETED:
1.
Trouble shooting was performed which determined that a common-mode failure mechanism did not exist with the NSW pumps.
2.
The "A" NSW pump was returned to service on September 7, 1996.
3.
A safety analysis was performed on September 5, 1996, which determined the acceptability of returning the plant to service with only one NSW pump available while repairs continued on the "B" NSW pump.
This analysis, combined with the results of an engineering evaluation, concluded that repairs to the "B" NSW pump could be made on-line with the "A" NSW pump in service.
4.
A secondary plant walkdown to assess potential damage related to the loss of NSW transient was completed on September 4, 1996.
Discrepancies identified during the walkdown that would prevent plant re-start were repaired on September 4, 1996.
Repairs were completed and the "B" NSW pump was returned to service on October 29, 1996.
Additional analysis was performed to determine the failure mechanism involved in the "B" NSW pump sheared shaft and the results are provided above in the cause section.
This analysis was completed on November 15, 1996.
Additional testing and evaluation was performed to determine the cause of the "A" NSW pump trip after being manually started on September 3, 1996.
The results are described above in the cause section.
Follow-up actions to address the torque switch issue include; (1) A new discharge valve (1SW-289) was installed to improve the disc seating area and require less torque to open the valve, (2) The orientation of the valve was changed, which will result in less torque required to open the valve during high D/P conditions, (3) The stop limit switches were re-set such that the valve actuator does not drive the disc as far into the valve seat.
This will also result in the need for less torque to open the valve.
These actions were completed on May 7, 1997.
Training on the lessons learned from the loss of NSW event was incorporated into the operator training program and was covered during Licensed Operator Re-qualification session //6. This was completed on November 14, 1996.
0 P~
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000400/LER-1996-001, Ack That Corrective Actions as Implemented W/Regard to Item Deviates from Ones Which Were Described in NOV Response & Stated in LER 96-001-00 | Ack That Corrective Actions as Implemented W/Regard to Item Deviates from Ones Which Were Described in NOV Response & Stated in LER 96-001-00 | | | 05000400/LER-1996-002, :on 960117,failure to Perform Required Surveillance Testing During Planned Maint Outage in Oct 1994 Identified.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Involved in Procedure Counseled |
- on 960117,failure to Perform Required Surveillance Testing During Planned Maint Outage in Oct 1994 Identified.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Involved in Procedure Counseled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000400/LER-1996-002-01, :on 960117,failure to Perform Required Surveillance Testing During Planned Maint Outage in Oct 1994 Identified.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Involved Counseled |
- on 960117,failure to Perform Required Surveillance Testing During Planned Maint Outage in Oct 1994 Identified.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Involved Counseled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-002-04, :on 960508,failed to Properly Perform Tech Spec Surveillance Testing.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Counseled,Procedure Revised & Continued in-program Tech Spec Testing Program Review |
- on 960508,failed to Properly Perform Tech Spec Surveillance Testing.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Counseled,Procedure Revised & Continued in-program Tech Spec Testing Program Review
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-003, :on 960122,failed to Perform Core Flux Mapping Following Short Power Excursions Over 100% Power.Caused by Amend 50 Being Incorporated W/O Properly Implementing TS Action Statement.Revised Associated TS Bases |
- on 960122,failed to Perform Core Flux Mapping Following Short Power Excursions Over 100% Power.Caused by Amend 50 Being Incorporated W/O Properly Implementing TS Action Statement.Revised Associated TS Bases
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-004, :on 960205,RWST Level Transmitters Failed & Violation of TS Action Statement Occurred.Caused by Freezing of Level Transmitter Sensing Lines.Frozen Lines Thawed & Missing Insulation Replaced |
- on 960205,RWST Level Transmitters Failed & Violation of TS Action Statement Occurred.Caused by Freezing of Level Transmitter Sensing Lines.Frozen Lines Thawed & Missing Insulation Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-005-01, :on 960312,failure to Properly Test Containment Bldg Outer Personnel Air Lock Door Occurred.Caused by Personnel Error.Individual Involved Counseled.W/Undated Ltr |
- on 960312,failure to Properly Test Containment Bldg Outer Personnel Air Lock Door Occurred.Caused by Personnel Error.Individual Involved Counseled.W/Undated Ltr
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1996-006, :on 960325,separation of Valve Stem & Disk for Main FW Isolation Valve Caused Valve to Become Inoperable. Caused by Mfg Defect.Valve Stem Machined & Procedures Revised |
- on 960325,separation of Valve Stem & Disk for Main FW Isolation Valve Caused Valve to Become Inoperable. Caused by Mfg Defect.Valve Stem Machined & Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-007, :on 960425,failed to Perform Tech Spec Surveillance Testing Per Specification 4.7.6.d.3.Caused by Inadequate Procedure Development.Satisfied Differential Pressure Testing Requirement |
- on 960425,failed to Perform Tech Spec Surveillance Testing Per Specification 4.7.6.d.3.Caused by Inadequate Procedure Development.Satisfied Differential Pressure Testing Requirement
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1996-008-02, Forwards LER 96-008-02 Re Reactor Trip Due to Failure of Switchyard Breaker Disconnect Switch.Rev Repts Addl Info Pertaining to Problems Encountered W/Normal Svc Water Sys Following 960425 Reactor Trip | Forwards LER 96-008-02 Re Reactor Trip Due to Failure of Switchyard Breaker Disconnect Switch.Rev Repts Addl Info Pertaining to Problems Encountered W/Normal Svc Water Sys Following 960425 Reactor Trip | | | 05000400/LER-1996-008, :on 960425,turbine Trip/Reactor Trip Occurred. Caused by High Resistance Connection Resulting from a Phase Switch Jaw & Blade Contacts.Failed a Phase Disconnect Switch on Breaker 52-7 Replaced |
- on 960425,turbine Trip/Reactor Trip Occurred. Caused by High Resistance Connection Resulting from a Phase Switch Jaw & Blade Contacts.Failed a Phase Disconnect Switch on Breaker 52-7 Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1996-009, :on 960530,identified Deficiencies in Reactor Auxiliary Bldg Exhaust Sys.Caused by Inadequate Surveillance Test Procedures.Revised Test Procedure |
- on 960530,identified Deficiencies in Reactor Auxiliary Bldg Exhaust Sys.Caused by Inadequate Surveillance Test Procedures.Revised Test Procedure
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-010-02, :on 960628,identified Surveillance Testing Deficiencies That Caused Past Entries Into TS 3.0.3.Caused by Personnel Error.Surveillance Test Procedures OST-1008 & OST-1092 Revised |
- on 960628,identified Surveillance Testing Deficiencies That Caused Past Entries Into TS 3.0.3.Caused by Personnel Error.Surveillance Test Procedures OST-1008 & OST-1092 Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-010, :on 960628,surveillance Test Deficiencies Identified in Quarterly RHR Sys.Caused by Inadequate Test Procedures Resulting from Personnel Errors.Scheduled Tests on Administrative Hold & Procedures Revised |
- on 960628,surveillance Test Deficiencies Identified in Quarterly RHR Sys.Caused by Inadequate Test Procedures Resulting from Personnel Errors.Scheduled Tests on Administrative Hold & Procedures Revised
| | | 05000400/LER-1996-011, :on 960629,failed to Perform Surveillance of Containment Isolation Valves.Caused by Incorrect Interpretation of TS Surveillance Requirements.Issued Operations Re TS 4.6.1.1 |
- on 960629,failed to Perform Surveillance of Containment Isolation Valves.Caused by Incorrect Interpretation of TS Surveillance Requirements.Issued Operations Re TS 4.6.1.1
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1996-012, :on 960724,SIII Inverter Was Taken OOS for Repair.Caused by Faulty ferro-resonant Transformer within Inverters Internal Circuitry.Repairs & Load Testing for Siii Were Completed |
- on 960724,SIII Inverter Was Taken OOS for Repair.Caused by Faulty ferro-resonant Transformer within Inverters Internal Circuitry.Repairs & Load Testing for Siii Were Completed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-013-02, Forwards LER 96-013-02 Per 10CFR50.73.Rev Reports Results of Addl Analysis That Was Performed to Determine Safety Consequences Associated W/Potential Loss of Ccws | Forwards LER 96-013-02 Per 10CFR50.73.Rev Reports Results of Addl Analysis That Was Performed to Determine Safety Consequences Associated W/Potential Loss of Ccws | | | 05000400/LER-1996-013, :on 961028,condition Outside of Design Basis Where RWST Had Been Aligned w/non-seismically Qualified Sys Was Identified.Caused by Failure to Reconcile Operating Procedure Lineups.Established Administrative Controls |
- on 961028,condition Outside of Design Basis Where RWST Had Been Aligned w/non-seismically Qualified Sys Was Identified.Caused by Failure to Reconcile Operating Procedure Lineups.Established Administrative Controls
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-014, :on 891127,identified Condition of Two Charging/Safety Injection Pumps Connected to Same Emergency Electrical Bus.Caused by Failure to Follow Operating Procedures.Racked Out 6.9 Kv Breaker |
- on 891127,identified Condition of Two Charging/Safety Injection Pumps Connected to Same Emergency Electrical Bus.Caused by Failure to Follow Operating Procedures.Racked Out 6.9 Kv Breaker
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1996-015, :on 960812,partial ESF Actuation of Main Steam Isolation Signal Occurred During Surveillance Testing Due to Operator Error.Sta Counseled |
- on 960812,partial ESF Actuation of Main Steam Isolation Signal Occurred During Surveillance Testing Due to Operator Error.Sta Counseled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-016, :on 960814,reactor Trip Bypass Breaker Surveillance Test,Required by TSs Not Performed.Caused by Inadequate Procedures Not Ensuring Testing Done Prior to Placing Them in Svc.Procedures Revised |
- on 960814,reactor Trip Bypass Breaker Surveillance Test,Required by TSs Not Performed.Caused by Inadequate Procedures Not Ensuring Testing Done Prior to Placing Them in Svc.Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-017, :on 960805,failure to Perform Surveillance Testing Required by TS Noted.Caused by Personnel Error. Surveillance Testing Scheduling Process Has Been Developed & Implemented on Trial Basis |
- on 960805,failure to Perform Surveillance Testing Required by TS Noted.Caused by Personnel Error. Surveillance Testing Scheduling Process Has Been Developed & Implemented on Trial Basis
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-018, :on 960903,manual Reactor Trip Occurred Due to Loss of Normal Sw.Caused by Mechanical Failure of B Water Pump & a Normal SW to Remain Running Once Manually Started.Restored a Normal SW Pump to Svc |
- on 960903,manual Reactor Trip Occurred Due to Loss of Normal Sw.Caused by Mechanical Failure of B Water Pump & a Normal SW to Remain Running Once Manually Started.Restored a Normal SW Pump to Svc
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1996-018-01, Forwards LER 96-018-01 Per 10CFR50.73.Rev Provides Addl Info Related to Cause of a Normal Svc Water Pump Trip That Occurred on 960903,following Loss of Running Normal Svc Water Pump | Forwards LER 96-018-01 Per 10CFR50.73.Rev Provides Addl Info Related to Cause of a Normal Svc Water Pump Trip That Occurred on 960903,following Loss of Running Normal Svc Water Pump | | | 05000400/LER-1996-019, :on 960906,downed Power Lines & Trees Blocked Plant Access Roads Hampering Site Personnel from Accessing Plant.Caused by Passage of Hurricane Fran.Plant Roads Were Cleared on 960906 & Plant Restarted |
- on 960906,downed Power Lines & Trees Blocked Plant Access Roads Hampering Site Personnel from Accessing Plant.Caused by Passage of Hurricane Fran.Plant Roads Were Cleared on 960906 & Plant Restarted
| | | 05000400/LER-1996-020, :on 960906,inadvertent RWST Boron Dilution Event Occurred.Caused by Personnel Error.Operating Procedure Was Revised to Reflect locked-closed Designation for RWST Fill Valve 1DW-5 |
- on 960906,inadvertent RWST Boron Dilution Event Occurred.Caused by Personnel Error.Operating Procedure Was Revised to Reflect locked-closed Designation for RWST Fill Valve 1DW-5
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1996-021, :on 961107,inadequate post-maint Testing Following Repairs on Containment Isolation Valve 1SP-208 Identified.Caused by Misinterpretation of ASME Code. Procedures Revised |
- on 961107,inadequate post-maint Testing Following Repairs on Containment Isolation Valve 1SP-208 Identified.Caused by Misinterpretation of ASME Code. Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1996-022, :on 961122,wiring Discrepancy Was Found in Auxiliary Building Ventilation Sys Circuitry.Caused by Personnel Error.Training on This Event Will Also Be Performed for Appropriate Maintenance |
- on 961122,wiring Discrepancy Was Found in Auxiliary Building Ventilation Sys Circuitry.Caused by Personnel Error.Training on This Event Will Also Be Performed for Appropriate Maintenance
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-023, :on 961114,design Deficiency in EDG Protection Circuitry Was Identified.Caused by Inadequate Original Plant Design.Surveillance Test Procedures OST-1013 & OST-1073 Revised |
- on 961114,design Deficiency in EDG Protection Circuitry Was Identified.Caused by Inadequate Original Plant Design.Surveillance Test Procedures OST-1013 & OST-1073 Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1996-024, :on 961121,identified Common Mode Failure in RAB Electrical Equipment Protection Rooms Ventilation Sys. Caused by Inadequate Initial Sys Design.Will Install Plant Mod to Resolve AH-16 Single Failure |
- on 961121,identified Common Mode Failure in RAB Electrical Equipment Protection Rooms Ventilation Sys. Caused by Inadequate Initial Sys Design.Will Install Plant Mod to Resolve AH-16 Single Failure
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1996-025, :on 961218,determined Missed Surveillance Test on PORV Block Valve 1RC-115.Caused by Personnel Error.Tested 1RC-115 & Counseled Personnel Involve |
- on 961218,determined Missed Surveillance Test on PORV Block Valve 1RC-115.Caused by Personnel Error.Tested 1RC-115 & Counseled Personnel Involve
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) |
|