ML16145A369

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Miscellaneous Exam Material (Folder 1)
ML16145A369
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/24/2016
From: David Silk
Operations Branch I
To: Kelly D
FitzPatrick
Shared Package
ML15195A060 List:
References
TAC U01932
Download: ML16145A369 (5)


Text

JAF 16-1 NRC Written Exam Seating Chart Classroom 1 OA I

I I

I I

Empty Desk R4 I

12 RO SRO I

I I

I R5 11 I

I R6 RO SRO RO I

I I

I I

13 R3 I

15 SRO RO SRO I

I I

I I

I R1 14 R2 RO SRO RO I

Empty Desk I I

Empty Desk I I

Proctors I

Question# Candidate candidates Question Proctors Response I]

Answer the question based on the information 40 Which pumps in RHR loop B were initially running?

lorovided.

73 13 Regarding the 8th item, should I answer based on Answer the question based on the information lauidance in Technical Specifications or EP-1?

lorovided.

Does "first unusable" mean when it should have Re-read question sentence to candidate and directed 24 R.3 tripped based on allowable setpoint range, or when lvou are well below trip setooint?

to answer based on the wording of the question.

58 R3 Why not also AOP-72A?

Answer the question based on the information lorovided.

69 R~ Is the fault isolated to the "high pressure logic"?

Directed candidate to reference the provided drawing for the exact fault.

89

r1 Do I limit my answer of "most limiting" to only TS Re-read question sentence to candidate and directed 3.3.1.1?

to answer based on the wording of the question.

James A. Fitzpatrick LOI 16-1 NRC Examination Written Examination Review In accordance with Entergy Procedure EN-TQ-105, NRC Initial License Examination, Development and Administration, and NU REG 1021, Revision 10, Sections ES-402, ES-403, and ES-501, an examination analysis was conducted on the James A. Fitzpatrick 16-1 NRC written examination. This analysis included a detailed review of each question missed by 50%

or more of the applicants. The table below summarizes the findings of this detailed question review.

James A. Fitzpatrick 16-1 NRC Written Examination Analysis - High Miss Questions

New, Higher or Percent Modified, Lower System or Question Correct Bank Cognitive Topic Analysis Three candidates chose distractor A and three candidates chose distractor D. In the case of distractor A, the candidates believed the annunciator sealed in 8

45%

New Lower IRMs like the amber light. In the case of Cognitive distractor D, the candidates believed the amber light cleared like the annunciator. The plant reference was reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Seven candidates chose distractor 8 and two candidates chose distractor C. In the case of distractor B, the candidates did not remember that a fresh air supply fan started. In the case of distractor C, the candidates did not 36 18%

New Lower Control remember that an exhaust fan Cognitive Room HVAC remained running. The plant reference was reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Seven candidates chose distractor

8. These candidates missed the Higher Condensate fact that MSIVs are closed due to 48 36%

New low Reactor water level. The plant Cognitive I Feedwater references were reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Seven candidates chose distractor D and one candidate chose Reactor distractor C. In each case, the 62 27%

New Lower Building candidates did not fully remember Cognitive Sumps what caused this alarm. The plant references were reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Four candidates chose distractor A, two candidates chose distractor 8, and one candidate chose distractor C. In each case, the candidates did 68 36%

Modified Lower Annunciator not fully remember the Cognitive Flagging administrative requirements for flagging an annunciator. The plant reference was reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Three candidates chose distractor B. The candidates did not 77 Higher remember that voltage less than 40%

New DC 128 VDC required TS 3.8. 7 entry (SRO #2)

Cognitive also. The plant reference was reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Three candidates chose distractor C. The candidates missed the fact 91 Higher that RWCU Recirc mode is still 40%

New RWCU available for Group 2 pressure (SRO #16)

Cognitive control. The plant references were reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Three candidates chose distractor D and one candidate chose distractor B. In each case, the 98 20%

New Lower Very High candidates did not remember the (SRO #23)

Cognitive Rad Areas exact approvals needed for VHRA entry. The plant reference was reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

JAF 16-1 NRC Written Exam Seating Chart Classroom 1 OA I

I I

I I

Empty Desk R4 I

12 RO SRO I

I I

I R5 11 I

I R6 RO SRO RO I

I I

I I

13 R3 I

15 SRO RO SRO I

I I

I I

I R1 14 R2 RO SRO RO I

Empty Desk I I

Empty Desk I I

Proctors I

Question# Candidate candidates Question Proctors Response I]

Answer the question based on the information 40 Which pumps in RHR loop B were initially running?

lorovided.

73 13 Regarding the 8th item, should I answer based on Answer the question based on the information lauidance in Technical Specifications or EP-1?

lorovided.

Does "first unusable" mean when it should have Re-read question sentence to candidate and directed 24 R.3 tripped based on allowable setpoint range, or when lvou are well below trip setooint?

to answer based on the wording of the question.

58 R3 Why not also AOP-72A?

Answer the question based on the information lorovided.

69 R~ Is the fault isolated to the "high pressure logic"?

Directed candidate to reference the provided drawing for the exact fault.

89

r1 Do I limit my answer of "most limiting" to only TS Re-read question sentence to candidate and directed 3.3.1.1?

to answer based on the wording of the question.

James A. Fitzpatrick LOI 16-1 NRC Examination Written Examination Review In accordance with Entergy Procedure EN-TQ-105, NRC Initial License Examination, Development and Administration, and NU REG 1021, Revision 10, Sections ES-402, ES-403, and ES-501, an examination analysis was conducted on the James A. Fitzpatrick 16-1 NRC written examination. This analysis included a detailed review of each question missed by 50%

or more of the applicants. The table below summarizes the findings of this detailed question review.

James A. Fitzpatrick 16-1 NRC Written Examination Analysis - High Miss Questions

New, Higher or Percent Modified, Lower System or Question Correct Bank Cognitive Topic Analysis Three candidates chose distractor A and three candidates chose distractor D. In the case of distractor A, the candidates believed the annunciator sealed in 8

45%

New Lower IRMs like the amber light. In the case of Cognitive distractor D, the candidates believed the amber light cleared like the annunciator. The plant reference was reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Seven candidates chose distractor 8 and two candidates chose distractor C. In the case of distractor B, the candidates did not remember that a fresh air supply fan started. In the case of distractor C, the candidates did not 36 18%

New Lower Control remember that an exhaust fan Cognitive Room HVAC remained running. The plant reference was reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Seven candidates chose distractor

8. These candidates missed the Higher Condensate fact that MSIVs are closed due to 48 36%

New low Reactor water level. The plant Cognitive I Feedwater references were reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Seven candidates chose distractor D and one candidate chose Reactor distractor C. In each case, the 62 27%

New Lower Building candidates did not fully remember Cognitive Sumps what caused this alarm. The plant references were reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Four candidates chose distractor A, two candidates chose distractor 8, and one candidate chose distractor C. In each case, the candidates did 68 36%

Modified Lower Annunciator not fully remember the Cognitive Flagging administrative requirements for flagging an annunciator. The plant reference was reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Three candidates chose distractor B. The candidates did not 77 Higher remember that voltage less than 40%

New DC 128 VDC required TS 3.8. 7 entry (SRO #2)

Cognitive also. The plant reference was reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Three candidates chose distractor C. The candidates missed the fact 91 Higher that RWCU Recirc mode is still 40%

New RWCU available for Group 2 pressure (SRO #16)

Cognitive control. The plant references were reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.

Three candidates chose distractor D and one candidate chose distractor B. In each case, the 98 20%

New Lower Very High candidates did not remember the (SRO #23)

Cognitive Rad Areas exact approvals needed for VHRA entry. The plant reference was reviewed and no discrepancies with the question were noted.