ML13066A623
| ML13066A623 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 11/16/2010 |
| From: | Wong S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Ferrante F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2012-0325 | |
| Download: ML13066A623 (28) | |
Text
Mitman, Jeffrey From:
Wong, See-Meng Sent:
Tuesday, November 16, 2010 8:27 AM To:
Ferrante, Fe6ando Cc:
Mitman, Jeffrey
Subject:
RE: Draft Presentation (with Backup Slides) for Tomorrow's Meeting Good.
A minor typo in slide#4, "from, from."
-Original Message -
---A From: Ferrante, Fernando,, B L
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 8:48 PM To: Wong, See-Meng Cc: Mitman, Jeffrey
Subject:
RE: Draft Presentation (with Backup Slides) for Tomorrow's Meeting See-Meng, Thanks. I added the changes and made some modifications.
I also moved the backup slides forward. We can discuss tomorrow.
Fernando Original Message -----
From: Wong, See-Meng Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 7:19 PM To: Ferrante, Fernando
Subject:
RE: Draft Presentation (with Backup Slides) for Tomorrow's Meeting
- Fernando, I have revised your slides to make it a more effective presentation.
I have added slide #7 entitled: "Path Forward."
For effective presentation, the thumb rule is no more than 3 bullets on each slide.
As for backup slides, I suggest moving slides 23-27 forward because DRA management is more interested in the issues you had addressed to make the new draft of IN a better product than the previous one.
Please discuss with me before the meeting.
See Meng.
Original Message -----
From: Ferrante, Fernando Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 5:36 PM To: Wong, See-Meng Cc: Mitman, Jeffrey
Subject:
Draft Presentation (with Backup Slides) for Tomorrow's Meeting See-Meng, See attached the draft presentation (with backup slides) for tomorrow's meeting with Mark and Sam. Note that the actual presentation is only 5 slides and the rest are backup slides used in a previous presentation.
I would appreciate if you could let me know of any comments you may have.
1
Thank you, Fernando 2
U.S.
N R
SS.S UntdStates N-la Reuatr Comsso U
.3 I
SE:N
`3h1 i ikv r I
-S r%
Prteti Pel an th EnvirnS E
E Purso-%,ose~~~~
ofIfrain oie(N SP E
SIno-ato Noi e
S (IN wa inene to infor industr of a
poenial n-cservtv dam falr freqenc used in exera floodinganalySis SNo-cnevte da faiur frqec esimt mayS reul in uneretmto of exera flodn 6aar
U.S.NR
%jD %'.
%jI Prtctn Pepl an tbe E S
SSown*
Backgroun Earlererso of IN wamrfe hog h
R Genri Co mncain Brnc but proes wa not~
copee duigdsusos ihNRDRPC
-~
~
Rewie fI EvlaeR S
viw fo cocrec
~ ~
~
~
~
Use less prsrpielnug rgrigfiuert
'(Q -
R QID r7 I
I)DMA-Unite Stre Nucea Reuatr Co msio sunc fI wil imrv 0ehia conistncy on extrnal evnt haar anlye acos ote 0
- Offies,
~g.,NRO RE Eforton N
daft upprtsparlle effrts (i
Geeri
c-tU.S NRC 0ý.
-- CK r
U k*mn Sttu (cntnud 0 Base on fedakfo GBan EA tf intae d
thes ~
e ato s:m Deeoe a
Se rf fI roide th ne draf ofISoA sbetmte exet fo revie an commS
- ent~
Obaie veba cocrec on ne IN drffo O@.DR subec matte exer on dam-s
U.DNR I e-"
C%
I j
.0
`V i N' 0 0 0 0*d Stue N*la euaoy omsinN Pro tetn Pepl and the nvironme
=*
M
- 0 A
Aproc use in NS0 01 Sieseii characteristics*
Dat isue (ie.
sprens an quliy Curn drf0nyidctsta a
alr frqec vaue sinfcnl loe tha 1
E-/y ar no supote by lieatr or NR ntra asesmet
UntdS tae Nula Reuatr Co msso Prtctn Pepl an t Envronen Pat Fowar Wor wit P
C fo*cnc rene n
issuance
Prtcig Pepl and the Enirnmn I M %- 1p 1 1 -
V I-.
- o
rtUS..m V L 0.i A7 UntdSttsNula egltryCm isiniNO'-
Protctin Peple nd te Eviromen
U..R j0 A~
me S I-)%/
I JU SL-
" ScennS.
Pa n
SC6 Pasngo SOther faiur vi eng0nerin assumpton0s 0~CS
-S Widnin ofdmppltoSweofiue are liste SOr a
speifi caegr (ebakmn vs.
5okfl ony Defiinga peiodrang of1940-Pesen fo
`T-.S.NR Unle6 tats Ncler Rgultoy Cmmisio EN
,,!IVE0 R
Prtctn Peopl adteEniron Scenn ofaigfiue AN assuptio of th fucioa for in NAC6 "seo NAC/0 vaue fo dam falue at ote sie
I IV~
_I-M
ý Prtctn Pepl an tb E
.6rnm FOP B
I 0
00
" Inict no0n S-cnevts in NSC Incrret rferncein URE/CR504
"~ No N
oiinonata au
-Ref0 to exetltrtr Inict al0ternatives
?)
Indcat imlctosne for awrns
IV IF UntdSare
- rRguao)
Comsso VS - !-
" Apiaiiyt10 CF Pat5,7 0
Ofica Us Onl desigatio
o-Reslt 0.8 I............
O I
NSACI6O
- Lognorm alFiti------------
0.7.-
I-06 050.4 q
0.2 F re q e n c y e...........
I--...L..
- 1010, 10 i
10-5 PMP Frequency (Iyear)
100 o 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> A 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> E 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> o 168 hours0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> cf ý a exp(b hlrn) co 0~
4 6
10 12 14
S..SNR j
A Unte Stte Nula Seu r Commission Prtctn Pepl an tS E5 nvrnmn Dam Frqu nc 03h i
eig NS C6 S
- 0 50
0, 9
-Results (since 1940)
NSAC/60 (since 1940)
C 0.8.................
- R e su lts (since 1960) 0 NSAC/60 (since 1960) 0.7...........-
Results (since 1900)
A NSAC/60 (since 1900) 0.6................................... ---------------------....
i............. i.....................
i............
0.3.-
......................................... i.............. i......
....-...i --i ---...... --,
- 0. 5.
i......
0.1...................................-
,....................,1 10.1 10S 10-4 Dam Failure Rate (/year)
c mQ USNC
'ON Prtctn Pepl an the E nvrn
-Baysa updatingB S
S-Fucioa for of Da Falr Rate
" Assumtion Pasin Falur Raes PMPD.,Seimc.tes
-Pasn ofOhrFiue PpnSeae Sceein bCosrctinPro aryFalue0Ct-f Acuac o
th Aalsi
- in 1981 as o
toda 18
j-ý
-U R
kID-It A
Malk
.0 "Realisti caclain ofte dmfiue probailit of apcii da as a fucto of extem codtin arCifcl tidih lieaue bondn caluain ar mor comon and wol b9e full acetal if bae on deesil cosrvtv moel an data.
On th ote had som dam falrsculaiyb in the ECC-g of abu EF C-I ic h
envleo h
dat bas for F.
fo al CEq(
is in th rag bewe 1vea an 10-5v 19
-ý..NCn r
0 rI
-f',
AA jk ji w-ID
%a;Iii-'C 1
N i
,[
V 1
-"AC6 Inu Daa(90*91 Da-Yar 100,000iB (1981) 20
c D
t U
.S r,
s I,1, 0
NS(/0~
Inpu Dat 01%0-91 22
2.5 x 105 2
C,)
(101.5-E 0.5 NSAC/60 IRecalculated 0
0 C',
1940 Year
(ý7,,,ý-.SN R
e=%g7 UTVF Un d
Stae Nula Reulto) CommissionS O
S Protctin Pepl and th6Svion
U..R C 7 r,
r-
. :r%
kA Unte Stte Nula ReuaoyCm iso
- rtcigP o
l n
h n
in rnnment F
-Of u
e (1
9 0
1 9
8 1
)-*~
Da Nam Bul Fale Hegh Typ Falr Description-
___________M O_1978_70_Earth__Pipingstaticliquefaction me
___(assum ed)__
_ _ _ _ _ _ i La be t TN1 6-4E rh P p n -m l ea n r a e e d n o b e c Pleasant~~~~~
~
~
~
~
Valy UT12-3Mxd Ppn hog onaio n
pa bevto ie alr ocure wihi 24ho irtntc Scfed LI 98 7,9 Erh Ppnahog eteetcak eraumn Dreser
- o.
Dam MO197 105 Mixd Ppin
Dam Nam Uiktn MO Drese No amM Ker Brter Rsevi Type Failure Description Earth Piping static liquefaction (assumed)
Earth Piping-small leak increased leading to breach Mixed Piping (REEROT)
Mixed Failure due to excessive settlement of fill.
(REER)
Earth Piping into foundation from fault movement Mixed The dam may have failed due to piping in the downstream shell.
(ERPG)
S.NRC U nit d S ate N u l ea R eg l at ry o m m ssi n Fi l ue s
- 0 0 1 0 Prtctn Peggl an1h
ýnion Da Na eBilt Fie egt Tp alr ecito Quai Crek UT 198 20 Eat Piin thog ete etcak Cedar~5 Lae OK 198 45 Eat Ppninaum tfssue nfudto 7
(asmd-i PlaatV leU 192
- 6IK
~
KSS~
l3 MixvedE(
Piping thrugh fu nda.tionIIand upmanIobserYvatio pipef iure
-~~~ccre wihi 24 h
- rnr firs noti-e*-
Da Nm Big Bay Lae MS Quai Crek UT Cea Lae OK Tu SakM Bad i
HilC Walter Bol Type Failjre Descriptio Earth Piin thog Frnhdan-fie ihn2 fosre
- seepage)-
Eat Piin thog setflem
-* cracs 0
atUiig naum n,
isrsinfudto Earth~ ~
Piin sttclq eato (aSssumed)
S-
-at Ppn-smal lea inrae leading to breachS
-