ML12213A364
| ML12213A364 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 01/17/2012 |
| From: | Ann Marie Stone NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2 |
| To: | Cuadradodejesus S, Dave Hills, James Neurauter License Renewal Projects Branch 1, NRC/RGN-III |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2012-0121 | |
| Download: ML12213A364 (5) | |
Text
Murphy, Martin From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Stone, AnnMarie Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:42 PM CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel; Hills, David; Neurauter, James; Thomas, George Holmberg, Mel; Sanchez Santiago, Elba; Shaikh, Atif; Jose, Benny; Auluck, Rajender; Sheikh, Abdul; Morey, Dennis; Bozga, John; Meghani, Vijay; Murphy, Martin; Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource; Hoang, Dan; Lehman, Bryce; Auluck, Rajender RE: Davis Besse Shield Building - License Renewal image001.jpg; image002.jpg; image003.jpg
- Sam, Thursday will NOT work for Dave Hills and me.
Ann Marie From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:15 PM To: Stone, AnnMarie; Hills, David; Neurauter, James; Thomas, George Cc: Holmberg, Mel; Sanchez Santiago, Elba; Shaikh, Atif; Jose, Benny; Auluck, Rajender; Sheikh, Abdul; Morey, Dennis; Bozga, John; Meghani, Vijay; Murphy, Martin; Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource; Hoang, Dan; Lehman, Bryce; Auluck, Rajender
Subject:
RE: Davis Besse Shield Building - License Renewal Importance: High
- All, I'll schedule a meeting (probably for Thursday morning) to discuss how the Region's support is going to factor in the license renewal safety review of the shield building crack at Davis-Besse. We'll go over all the questions David listed below.
About the hearing file, I just spoke with Brian Harris from OGC and his advice is to sent to the hearing file e-mail capture any e-mail that as of now you still have and that's related to the shield building cracks in any way. Which means if you still have old e-mails back from October when the cracks were discovered and even if they're not clearly related to license renewal you'll need to send it to the rearing file e-mail capture. In conclusion, send anything related to the DB shield building cracks that's in your possession to the e-mail capture hearing file and OGC will make the final determination.. If you have any question please give me a call (301-415-2946).
- Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jesis Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus(@nrc.eov From: Stone, AnnMarie Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:37 PM To: Hills, David; Neurauter, James 8
Cc: Holmberg, Mel; Sanchez Santiago, Elba; Shaikh, Atif; Jose, Benny; CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel; Auluck, Rajender; Sheikh, Abdul; Morey, Dennis; Bozga, John; Meghani, Vijay; Murphy, Martin
Subject:
RE: Davis Besse Shield Building - License Renewal Totally agree - let's coordinate.... a call would be appropriate.
Minor issue in the big scheme of it...... I have questions on what the inspections should be charged to (if some of the decisions being made are related to monitoring into the PEO, then some hours should be charged to IMC 2516 program (IP 71002))...but that's a detail we can hammer out.
From: Hills, David Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 12:17 PM To: Neurauter, James Cc: Holmberg, Mel; Sanchez Santiago, Elba; Shaikh, Atif; Stone, AnnMarie; Jose, Benny; CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel; Auluck, Rajender; Sheikh, Abdul; Morey, Dennis; Bozga, John; Meghani, Vijay; Murphy, Martin
Subject:
Davis Besse Shield Building - License Renewal
- Jim, That does bring up a good question. Region Ill currently has two concurrent ongoing Davis Besse shield building follow-up inspection activities:
- 1. Davis Besse Shield Building Operability / Licensing Basis Inspection led by Jim Neurauter. We have completed the first part of this inspection (made a conclusion with the assistance of NRR that the building is currently operable and including issuing a Confirmatory Action Letter to address continued operabililty in the short term while awaiting completion of the root cause analysis) and the second part (does the building in its current condition meet all licensing basis requirements) is ongoing. We expect to exit on this inspection around the end of January, likely resulting in an unresolved item and associated TIA to NRR to resolve the second portion of the inspection.
- 2. Davis Besse Shield Building Root Cause & Corrective Actions led by Mel Holmberg. This inspection is ongoing and currently focused on observing and evaluating licensee in process root cause activities.
The licensee owes us a root cause report and corrective action plan (including long term monitoring program) by the end of February. Our inspection team is lined up to return to the site quickly thereafter (the week of March 12) to focus on licensee conclusions and plans going forward.
Abdul Sheikh from the Division of License Renewal was actually on our inspection team for the operability question and helped considerably, as did other structural engineers in NRR, in our reaching our current operability conclusion.
Obviously though, the above activities (especially the root cause inspection) will continue to have considerable outside interest from a license renewal aspect. In fact, what the licensee proposes with respect to long term monitoring, I think, may feed directly into license renewal, and hence, when we make a decision regarding the adequacy of corrective actions, I think the Division of License Renewal should be involved. What kind of interface should we establish with the Division of License Renewal as we progress through this? Do they want a representative on our root cause inspection team? Do they want to participate in our team's weekly status calls with the licensee's root cause team? Are there any specific aspects, the Division of License Renewal wants our inspection team to focus on? And how does this fit in with our license renewal inspection activities under the control of Ann Marie Stone? How does the Division of License Renewal plan to address this issue in the proceedings? What kind of support will they want from us?
Perhaps, a conference call might be in order to hammer this out with the various parties?
Dave 9
From: Neurauter, James I Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:23 AM To: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Cc: Hills, David; Holmberg, Mel; Sanchez Santiago, Elba; Shaikh, Atif; Stone, AnnMarie; Jose, Benny
Subject:
RE: Davis-Besse Hearing File Samuel Please clarify-what Davis-Besse emails need to be captured in Hearing File.
Region Ill has ongoing inspection related to design basis of Davis-Besse shield building.
Region IlII has inspection planned in March for review of licensee's root cause evaluation related to identified shield building laminar cracking.
Should emails for these activities be captured in Hearing File?
Also, should license renewal staff be cc'd on emails for above activities? If yes, please provide list.
Thanks Jim From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 10:02 AM To: Sheikh, Abdul; Lehman, Bryce; Buford, Angela; Rogers, Billy; Holston, William; Kichline, Michelle; KIos, John; Wise, John; Min, Seung; Yee, On; Homiack, Matthew; Ng, Ching; Sun, Robert; Kalikian, Roger; Hunt, Christopher; Obodoako, Aloysius; Karwoski, Kenneth; Wong, Emma; Sydnor, Christopher; Tsao, John; Collins, Jay; Iqbal, Naeem; Neurauter, James; Jose, Benny; Holmberg, Mel; Sanchez Santiago, Elba; Harris, Brian; Istar, Ata; Prinaris, Andrew; Doutt, Clifford; Hoang, Dan; Nguyen, Duc; Erickson, Alice; Poehler, Jeffrey; Cheruvenki, Ganesh; Sheng, Simon; Cameron, Jamnes; Kimble, Daniel; Mahoney, Michael; Fairbanks, Carolyn Cc: Morey, Dennis; Pham, Bo; Pelton, David; Auluck, Rajender; Gonzalez, Hipolito; Klein, Alex; Stone, AnnMarie; Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource
Subject:
Davis-Besse Hearing File Importance: High This request is being sent to all staff that is/has worked on the Davis-Besse LR review process. The purpose is to capture all pertinent E-mails previously sent or received by the staff, which may need to be preserved for the Hearing File.
This request applies to contractors as well. Any E-mails sent to you by the contractor count as though they were generated by the staff. To capture E-mails sent by contractors, follow the instructions below for "Option 1: E-mails previously sent or received." (This action should be completed by the staff member who received the email from the contractor directly). For contractors, E-mails sent between contractors must also be captured even if the staff did not receive the email originally. Please coordinate with contractor counterparts, to ensure that they are capturing and timely forwarding emails which may need to be preserved for the Hearing File.
Directions for Email Capture:
10
Option 1: E-mails previously sent (your "Sent" box) or received (your "Inbox"):
- 1. For single E-mails: Open E-mail and send using the "Forward as Attachment" option, which is not in the right-click drop-down menu, but can be selected from the "Other Actions" menu in Outlook.
You can also alternatively use [Ctrl+AIt+F]
Paula E. Cooper J
Proje~ct Manager U.S. Nuclear Regwlatory Cominmlion ussýRock'i2Io P,' ke l
M O M.......
PFn: (30o 05--Q43`2
-or-For multiple E-mails: Highlight the E-mails you want to send, then use the Forward as attachment command; alternatively, you may simply open a new E-mail, then drag and-drop the E-mails you wish to send to the hearing file into that new E-mail.
K) 2
+
+
MallK~
Sent
_____To..0o
&a M )
ýrAu I~p 2
- 2.
Addres to:'
be en;t i
D
.av is-,
sse<
ea ring Fie Reso
- <e(W-r+,+;o, 3.l*~ftli Th tex "< A E>+
needsl+,+
to, "be' inetdateedo the sujc line.
c: l " +
"" *:7 '
- s U r
7
+++~g*,* *+l
+:
+< t1 n~ PD+*,+*
+.
... +++....
+ +;+*++'
+++'++-s'"'
' "" :..... `j*`+`J**
+° ++` +:
'4+
U 14 1**
- <*+:
`I
- +'+ #+ +: l :; + l
)A* :*
7< L ;]i7:M~!"
+"+ *'+*::;rIII,-;::+,+:+,;*,:::
- ',*+a
. i+**
+
22;*
+,.
- ?Zl...
in:,+
t+m 1
_ __<_<'l
- +
223/4..........................:
2;>U S4 w
}>
2221d It+ m
+
I
++ + +l+ + + *.
+ C+
2 '
- i9*+"+ " <A E'l I
+,o,+,,
+"...
All+.
!+
24222*2,.2222 2.Ades obesn t s DvsBes
+arinQ+ e.R oure+nr+c nedstob isetd+t heed f.h sbjc ln.....;+,
11
u~A Subject I FW; Tie I O~.o foin*t,Tt t AlDý1
ýAd otb c PP b4 Up 4
ion*PUbhý
I---
Attache+
J.Id~i tetin.Pubilc 00 I
-77 4C
- ~Y~j fIW I
~Ia~I
~
~ ~o~mht A
~
~
1>> ~dY~10 a dIn, (tfV J, F
'nro ii etNeýuk-AE Subject Atta~
C8 ~JTtst No~n-Pubki 12K8
- 4. When sending multiple E-mails together, Limit to no more than 25 attachments per forwarding (carrier) E-mail.
- 5. Processed E-mails will end up as Official Agency Record in the appropriate ADAMS folders (they will be automatically profiled):
- 1. Main Library/STAFF HEARING FILES/Davis-Besse/OGC Not Reviewed/Publicly Available
- 2.
Main Library/STAFF HEARING FILES/Davis-Besse/OGC Not Reviewed/Non-Publicly Available Option 2: E-mails that are sent from now on:
- 1. Add the address: Davis-BesseHearinpqFile.Resourcecnrc.,ov in the cc: field of the email.
- If this step is forgotten for any emails, complete steps for "Option 1: Emails previously sent" Your time on this effort should be charged to the following TACs - ME5758
- Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jes6s Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov 12