ML111810512
| ML111810512 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 06/30/2011 |
| From: | Diane Jackson NRC/RGN-I/DRP/PB5 |
| To: | |
| JACKSON, DONALD E | |
| References | |
| Download: ML111810512 (25) | |
Text
Pilgrim Assessment Meeting Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Safety Performance in 2010 U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1
NRC Representatives
- Jim Clifford - Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects
- Don Jackson - Branch Chief
- Max Schneider - Senior Resident Inspector
- Katrina Dunham - Acting Resident Inspector 2
Agenda
- Introduction
- Discussion of Pilgrim safety performance
- Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events
- NRC to address public questions
- Closing remarks 3
- Entergy operated Pilgrim safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
NRC Assessment Summary
- Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
- Baseline inspections planned for 2011, however a reactive inspection is currently in progress 4
- 5041 hours0.0583 days <br />1.4 hours <br />0.00833 weeks <br />0.00192 months <br /> of inspection and related activities
- 2 resident inspectors on site - residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events at any time Inspection Activities in 2010 events at any time
- 12 regional inspections
- 2 major team inspections Initial Operator Licensing Exams Emergency Preparedness Exercise Evaluation 5
- All Green Performance Indicators January 1 through December 31, 2010 Performance Indicator and Inspection Results
- 8 Green/Severity Level IV inspection findings
- No greater than green/severity level IV inspection findings 6
NRC Action Matrix Licensee
Response
Regulatory
Response
Degraded Cornerstone Multiple Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone Unacceptable Performance All Inputs are Green; Cornerstone Objectives Fully Met 1 or 2 White Inputs; Cornerstone Objectives Fully Met 2 White or 1 Yellow Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/
Moderate Multiple Yellow Inputs or 1 Red Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/
Significant Overall Unacceptable Performance; Plants not permitted to Increasing safety significance Increasing NRC inspection efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement Increasing regulatory actions Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Degradation in Safety Performance Significant Degradation in Safety Performance permitted to Operate w/in this Column; Unacceptable Margin to Safety
- Pilgrim was operated safely
- Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
- Baseline inspections planned for 2011, however ti i
ti i
tl i
2010 Pilgrim Assessment Summary a reactive inspection is currently in progress 8
Pilgrim Assessment Meeting U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9
Fukushima:
Facts We Know Today
- 9.0 Earthquake
- 4th largest in the world since 1900
- Reactors safely shutdown
- Site then hit by a ~40 foot Tsunami
- Tsunami caused a loss of all electrical power 10
Fukushima:
Facts We Know Today
- Loss of all electrical power to safety systems eventually led to fuel damage
- Secondary containment hydrogen explosions visible at Units 1 & 3 several days later
- Radiological releases 11
Emergency Planning Zones and Protective Action Recommendations
- Limited and uncertain data was available
- Significant challenges to 3 units and at least 2 spent fuel pools on site
- Potential for large offsite release existed
- Elevated dose rates on site presented challenges to crews attempting to stabilize reactor
- Limited offsite data suggested serious damage to fuel
- Winds shifting from out to sea to land 12
U.S. Considerations
- No anticipated U.S. health effects from Fukushima
- Methodical and systematic review in progress Methodical and systematic review in progress
- U.S. nuclear plants remain safe
- NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
- NRC requires a defense-in-depth approach
- NRC performs independent safety inspections
- NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements.
13
Designed for Site Specific Natural Events
- Tsunamis
- Hurricanes
- Floods
- Tornadoes 14
Pilgrim Seismic Considerations
- NRC seismic limits based on ground shaking
- Plants designed to a ground-shaking level i t f
l ti appropriate for location
- Design incorporated largest expected earthquake in region
- Design includes seismic safety margins 15
The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth
- Redundant and diverse safety systems
- Multiple physical barriers to
- Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material
- Testing and inspection of systems important to safety
- Emergency planning 16
NRC Independent Safety Inspections Reactor Oversight Program
- NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
- At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
- NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 17
NRC Requires Safety Improvements NRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:
- NRC operating experience program 18
- Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
- Post TMI Actions
- Post 9/11 Orders
- Generic Safety Issues
NRC Response to Events in Japan
- NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review
- Near-term actions (<90 days) conducting additional 19
- conducting additional inspections
- identifying near term operational issues
- Longer-term actions
NRC Near-Term Review
- Evaluate Fukushima Daiichi Events
- Domestic operating reactors and spent fuel pools
- Staff briefed the Commission in a public meeting on May 12
- Next briefing scheduled for June 16
- Final recommendations in public meeting July 19 20
NRC Long-Term Review
- Sequence of events and the status of equipment during the event
- Evaluate all technical and policy issues
- Evaluate potential interagency issues
- Applicability of lessons learned to non-operating reactor and non-reactor facilities
- Report to the Commission within 6 months from the start of the evaluation 21
NRC Actions to Date
- Information Notice 2011-05, Tohoku-Taiheiyou-Oki Earthquake Effects on Japanese Nuclear Power Plants
- Temporary Instruction (TI) 183
- TI 184
- Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies
- Task force established 22
Summary
- Safety of current facilities remains top priority
- The NRC will continue to perform a systematic p
y and methodical review of the Fukushima event
- The NRC will take action based on results of the review to ensure the continued safety of U.S. commercial nuclear power plants 23
Meeting Ground Rules
- 1. Please be respectful to the speaker - only one speaker at a time
- 2. See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.
- 3. NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 24
Questions 25