ML091480769

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Draft Ltr from R. Conte of USNRC to C. Pardee of Exelon Generation Company, Llc., Regarding Oyster Creek Generating Station - Preliminary Evaluation Results of the Primary Containment
ML091480769
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 05/06/2009
From: Conte R
Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
To: Pardee C
AmerGen Energy Co, Exelon Generation Co
References
FOIA/PA-2009-0070, IR-08-007
Download: ML091480769 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGIONI 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF-PRUSSIA, PA 19406 November X, 2008 Mr. Charles G. Pardee Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) and Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO)

AmerGen Energy Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348

SUBJECT:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION - PRELIMINARY EVALUATION RESULTS OF THE PRIMARY CONTAINMENT

Dear Mr. Pardee:

From'October 27 to November 6, 2008, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) performed a team inspection at your Oyster Creek Generating Station related to license renewal activities during the recent refueling outage. A part of the inspection involved review of primary containment (drywell) conditions and ultrasonic testing of the drywell shell thickness. In the interest of timely public disclosure, NRC has decided to issue this letter and its enclosure, which address that part of the inspection.

The enclosure to this letter provides a summary of the inspection scope and preliminary evaluation results related to the drywell. Please note that the final inspection results, including the determinations and characterization of their significance, may change based on additional-information and further review. The final inspection results will be documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000219/2008007.

For the drywell the NRC review involved a multi-week inspection of AmerGen's inservice inspection program and included an assessment of license renewal commitments for the current outage.

Based on the results of the NRC's inspection activities, the NRC concluded that there were no safety significant conditions with respect to the drywell that would prohibit plant startup, and that there is reasonable assurance that the primary containment is capable of performing its design function throughout the upcoming operating cycle.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

We appreciate your cooperation. Please contact me at (610) 337r5183 if you have any questions regarding this letter.

Sincerely, Richard J. Conte, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No.

50-219 License No.

DPR-16

Enclosure:

Summary of Drywell Inspection Scope and Preliminary Evaluation Results cc w/encl:

C. Crane, Executive Vice President, Exelon, Chief Operating Officer, Exelon Generation M. Pacilio, Chief Operating Officer, Exelon T. Rausch, Site Vice President, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station J. Randich, Plant Manager, Oyster Creek Generating Station J. Kandasamy, Regulatory Assurance Manager, Oyster Creek R. DeGregorio, Senior Vice President, Mid-Atlantic Operations K. Jury,Vice President, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs P. Cowan, Director, Licensing B. Fewell, Associate General Counsel, Exelon Correspondence Control Desk, AmerGen Mayor of Lacey Township P. Mulligan, Chief, NJ Dept of Environmental Protection R. Shadis, New England Coalition Staff E. Gbur, Chairwoman - Jersey Shore Nuclear Watch E. Zobian, Coordinator - Jersey Shore Anti Nuclear Alliance P. Baldauf, Assistant Director, NJ Radiation Protection Programs

We appreciate your cooperation. Please contact me at (610) 337-5200 if you have any questions regarding this letter.

Sincerely, IRA/

Ronald R. Bellamy, Ph.D., Chief Projects Branch 6 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No.

50-219 License No.

DPR-16

Enclosure:

Summary of Drywell Inspection Scope and Preliminary Evaluation Results Distribution w/encl: (via e-mail)

S. Collins, RA M. Dapas, DRA D. Lew, DRP J. Clifford, DRP R. Bellamy, DRP S. Barber, DRP A. Rosebrook, DRP M. Ferdas, DRP, Senior Resident Inspector J. Kulp, DRP, Resident Inspector J. DeVries, DRP, Resident OA S. Williams, RI OEDO H. Chernoff, NRR E. Miller PM, NRR T. Valentine, Backup PM (Interim), NRR ROPreports@nrc.gov (All Inspection Reports)

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

SUNSI Review Complete:

(Reviewer's Initials)

DOCUMENT NAME:

After declaring this document "An Official Agency Record" it will be released to the Public.

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C"

= Copy without attachment/enclosure E = Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copy OFFICE RI:DRS RI:DRS RI:DRS NAME JRichmond RConte MGamberoni DATE

/08

/08

/08 OtICJA R

C Pr

MEMORANDUM TO:

Richard J.. Conte, Chief Engineering Branch 1, DRS FROM:

John E. Richmond, Team Leader Engineering Branch 1, DRS

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF DRYWELL INSPECTION SCOPE AND PRELIMINARY EVALUATION RESULTS Something similar to the following from 2006 PN:

The NRC staff inspection throughout the outage focused on:

1)

Non-destructive examination results of the drywell shell and torus and related AmerGen evaluations.

2)

The condition of the inside of the drywell, including trenches in the floor, and the outside of the drywell shell in the sand bed region.

3)

Structural integrity of the concrete drywell floor and the condition of the embedded portion of the drywell shell.

4)

The potential impact from various repairs to the containment on the design and licensing bases of the drywell.

The over~ill results of the staff's observations and review are:

1)

All UT measurements are greater than the calculated minimum code required thickness for various plates that form the drywell shell.

2)

There are no adverse conditions of the epoxy coating on the outside of the drywell shell in the former sandbed region.

3)

Repairs in and around the trough within the reactor vessel pedestal area did not result in any adverse conditions.

4)

The water discovered in the drywell trenches had no adverse impact on the structural integrity of the concrete floor or the potential for corrosion of the embedded portion of the drywell shell. AmerGen has taken actions to prevent further accumulation of water in this area.

5)

There are no adverse conditions with respect to the drywell or torus structural integrity that preclude restart.

Based on a review of the technical information, the NRC staff determined that AmerGen has sufficient justification to restart Oyster Creek.