Text

Test Report 02840; Monticello Torus Phenoline 368 Wg DBA Testing Over Residual Coatings, 02/02/1992
	ML070680180
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	06/02/1992
From:	Arnold J; Carboline Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC/OGC, NRC Region 1
References
	02840
	Download: ML070680180 (66)
	v • d • e

c

~

/-

ABSTRACT

- --- REPORT 5;

L t i \\ ----

m-----

' TESTING DEPARTMEN?

TESTING PROJECT: 02840 DATE: June 2, 1992 REPORT #: One TIME: 11 1/2 Days DATE OF GRADING: 4/10/92; 4/24/92 TOTAL DESIGN TEST DURATION:

11 1/2 Days REQUESTED BY: Jerry Arnold llW: Monticello Torus Phenoline 368 WG DBA Testing Over Residual Coatings REFERENCE Mr. Scott McCalI, Northern States Power Company (Monticello); Testing Report #E2716 t

PURPOSE:

The surface preparation procedures used at Monticello left residual zinc (Carbo Zinc I1 SG) or epoxy primer (Phenofine 368 Primer) on the surface in some areas. One objective'of this test program is to evaluate maintenance coating performance over residuai, 'existing' coatings.

- SYSTEMS:

1.

Original (Prepared by Carbofine Company):

1.

2.

1 c Carbo Zinc 11 SG/I c Phenoline 368 W G IC Phenoline 368 Prirner/lc Phenoline 368 WG.

Steel panels were first blasted and coated with the original systems.

These systems were then partially removed by waterblasting (at Monticello) and then submitted to Carboline for application of the replacement systems, Phenoline 368 WG.

If.

Residual Systems:

i

1.

Panels were received from 'Monticello and they were sweepblasted to eliminate the slight flash rust

2. - -- --Panels originally-coated with IC Carbo Zinc.I 1.SG/I c-Phenoline 368 WG were sweepblasted and scraped with a hand tool to bare steel or to leave residual coatings:

a) Carbo Zinc 11 SG/Phenoline 368 WG b) Carbo Zinc 11 SG Panels originally coated with IC Phenoline 368 Prirner/fc Phenoline 368 WG were sweepblasted to bare steel or

3.

leaving residual coating Phenoline 368 Primer._

111.

Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, 11 1/2 Days June 2, 1992 Page 2 EXPOSURE Irradiation to 3 x 10' rads at Sterigenics International, followed by 281°F LOCA.

Evaluation of test specimens in the vapor phase and immersion phase of the auto cfave simulated coating exposure in the torus above and below the waterline. '

281°F LOCA Curve:

(a)

Time - Temerature - Pressure Cunre Time*

. Temoerature*

Initial to 1 sec. 100 sec.

281°F 600 sec.

190°F 21 min.

260°F 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months , 23 min.

225°F 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

225'F.

11.5 days 115°F 175°F to 281°F Pressure*

8 psig to 42 psig 27 psig 17 psig 17 psig 2 5 psig 8 Psig.

33 Pig These are theoretical values. The data for the actuaf LOCA curves are taken from the chart recording for

_ - this test

._ found on pages 162 and 163, Lab Book 370.

(b)

Water Chemistry Deionized water LOCA Gradina Procedure Grading within two hours and after 14 days following removal from the test chamber. There was no difference betyeen two hour and two week gradings. Also, there was no difference between vapor and tiquid exposures.

(ANSI N101.2-1972)

CONCLUSIONS: --

.~

Advanced Laboratory Technician Testing Department

mmary of Results:

I I

i l

1 COATING SYSTEM I

I I

i I C Carbo Zinc 11 SG/

I C Phenoline 368 WG Materblasted at Montlcello; jweepblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/

3c Phenoline 368 WG (Side A),

IC Phenoline 368 WG (Side B)'

I C Carbo Zinc 11 SG/

i I C Phenoline 368 WG Naterblasted at Monticello; I

Sweepblasted at Carboline

~ a v i n g Residual Coating3/

I

~

3c Phenoline 368 WG (Side A) '

IC Phenoline 368 WG (Side B)*

IC Carbo Zinc 11 SG/

I I

I i !

I I

I lc Phenoline 368 WG Naterblasted at Monticello; sweepblasted at Carboline xaving Residual Coating3/

3c Phenoline 368 WG (Side A)

I c Carbo Zinc 11 SG/

I C Phenoline 368 WG Sweepblasted at Carboline I

,caving Residual Coating4/

~

3c Phenolhe 368 WG (Side A) 1c Phenoline 368 WG (Side B)*

mels exhibited coating discoloration. :

1 I

I tc Phenoline 368 WG (Side B)2 Naterblasted at Monticello; I

I I

1 Results are from 12 panel sides, 281°F LOCA 2.2 - 3.1 8.8 - 11.9 24.8 - 28.4 30.0 - 33.4 2.5 - 3.0 8.8 - 9.8 9.4 - 10.3 23.1 - 23,7 29.0 - 29.7 June 2, 1992 Page 3 Date of Grading: 4/10/92; 4/24/92 2.3 - 3.1 10.4 - 11.5 2.7 - 3.5 25.1 - 25.2 31.4 - 32.2

. 2.2 - 3.1 11.4 - 11.9 2.0 - 2.9 24.9 - 26.1 31.3 - 32,4 None None

sting Project: 02840 I

port: One, 11 1/2 Days mmary of Results:

I IC Phenoline 368 Primer/

j 1

I C Phenoline 368 WG Vaterblasted at Monticello; I

Sweepblasted at Carboline to Bke Steel/

!c Phenoline 368 WG (Side A) I 3c Phenoline 368 WQ (Side B)'

I I I

I I

IC Phenoline 368 Primer/

IC Phenotine 368 WG I

Waterblasted at Monticello; sweepblasted at Carboline

.caving Residual Coating3/

!c Phenoline 368 WQ (Side A)

IC Phenoline 368 WG (Side B)l

! i i I 281T LOCA.

3.8 - 4.6 I 7.1 - 8.2 None None None None None 13.5 - 14.4 23.9 - 26.5 3.8 - 4.6 7.1 - 8.2 None None None None None 2.0 - 2.5 13.6 - 14.8 23.7 - 26.4 June 2, 1992 Page 4 Date of Grading: 4/10/92; 4/24/92 i

1 Results, are from 8 panel sides.,

1 1

nels exhibited coating discoloratlon.,

I I

i Residual Coatlng: IC Phenoline 368 Primer 1

I i

LABORATORY TEST REPORT

.~

TESTING PROJECT: 02840 DATE: June 2, 1992 REPORT #: One TIME: 11 1/2 Days DATE OF GRADING: 4/10/92; 4/24/92 TOTAL DESlGN TEST DURATION:

11 1/2 Days REQUESTED BY: Jerry Arnold c

TITLE: Monticello Torus Phenoline 368 WG DBA Testing Over Residual Coatings "4.

. i.

.. ~..

PURPOSE:

The surface preparation procedures used at Monticello left residual zinc (Carbo Zinc I1 SG) or epoxy primer (Phenoline 368 Primer) on the surface in some areas. One objective of this test program is to evaluata maintenance coating performance over residual, 'existing' coatings.

CONCLUSlONS:

See Summary of Results

~

I

~.

r Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, 11 1/2 Days June 2, 1992 Page 2 PROCEDURE:

A.

Test Coupons

==

Description:==

2' x 4' x 1/4' steel panels certified Carboline STl (See Appendix 1).

Surface Preparation:

Panels stamped 1, 2, 6, 8, 9 and 10 were coated at Carboline with IC Carbo Zinc 1 j SG/lc Phenoline 368 WG.

Panels stamped 17, 20, 21 and 22 were coated at Carboline with IC Phenoline 368 Primer/lc Phenoline 368 WG.

, All panels were shipped to Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, where they were waterblasted to partidly remove coatings.

Panels were then shipped back to Cafboline and they were sweepblasted because slight flash rusting had occurred.

Carbo zinc 11 SG/Phenoline 368 WG panels were sweepblasted and Phenoline 368 Pn'mer/Phenoline 368 WG panels were sweepblasted to bare scraped with a hand tool to bare steel or leaving residual coating.

steel or leaving residual coating.

Abrasive Medium:

(On steel panels blasted at Carboline) 50/50 mix of GFH #40 grit and S230 shot.

B.

Svstems Tested Batch Number Coating c Carbo Zinc 11 SG/

- IC, 2c, 3c,-4ci-*

Phenoline 368 WG 1 B9043M 1 F9362M Green -

_-_ Phenoline (18%)

0773 -

I F9355M II.

IC Phenoline 368 Primer/

9H9007M IC, ZC, 3c, 4c Phenoline 368 WG

-1 For actual coating D&

refer to I----

c Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, 11 1/2 Days June 2, 1992 Page 3 SYSTEM

SUMMARY

AND TOTAL DRY FILM THICKNESS Each side of coated panels after repair procedure had various areas with residual coatings and bare steel. To determine the dry film thickness of residual coatings, a mapping technique was used. Each panel side was xeroxed after repair, and then dry film thicknesses were measured over the same spot after each coating was applied. (See attached page with example of mapping).

-.-.I.-_

I__

June 2, 1992 Page 4 I

i I

ect: 02840 SYSTEM

SUMMARY

ITOTAL: DFT. MILS1 j

I.

24.8 32.5 23.6 33.4 39.0 30.1 25.0 I

32.5' I 39.1

=-I-=--

28.5 26.0.,

27.0 34.1 25.9 27.2 27.3 27.0 25.4 32.5 34.5 I 33.4

\\

\\'

c

. a 5 8

-a-

~..

Q 0

r

... 1 _ 4

..u.

.-LA-

~.-...

I I

I tin$ Project: 02840 i

I i

)art: One, J1 1/2 Days I

I i

June 2, 1992 Page 6

\\

SYSTEM

SUMMARY

VOTAL DFT, MILS) 7.u 4.6 7.2 0

I 2.5 8.8 3.8 I

8.0

! /

I,

I I '

I

Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, 11 1/2 Days June 2, 1992 Page 7 C.

Cure Schedule c

Coating Panel Side Cure Carbo Zinc 11 SG Phenoline 368 Primer P henoline 368 WG Phenoline 368 WG (Applied over Zinc Primer)

Phenolhe 368 WG (Applied over Phenoline 368 Primer) 1st Coat 2nd Coat 3rd Coat 4th Coat 5th Coat Final Cure Before and after irradiation 1

2 3

4 5

A', 6' A', B' A', 8' A2, 0' A3, B3 A', 8' A4*, B" A2, B2 A3, B3 A3*, B4*

Days @ 100°F; 100% RH Days @ Ambient Conditions Weeks @ 150°F Months Ambient Conditions 2 Days Ambient Conditions 3 Days @ 150°F 3 Days @ 150°F i 31 Days Ambient Conditions 2 Days Ambient Conditions 3 Days Ambient Conditions 35 Days Ambient Conditions t.

Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, 11 112 Days EXPOSURE:

Irradiation to 3 x.10' rads at Sterigenics LOCA.

June 2, 1992 Page 8 International, followed by 281'F c

Evaluation of test specimens in the vapor phase and immersion phase of the auto clave simulated coating exposure in the torus above and below the waterline.

281'F LOCA Curve:

(a)

Time - Temperature - Pressure Curve Time*

Initiaf to 1 sec. 100 Sec. 600, sec.

21 min.

1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months , 23 min.

4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months 11.5 days Temperature*

175°F to 281°F 281°F 190°F 260°F 225°F 225OF 1 15°F These are theoretical values. The taken from the chart recording for Lab Book 370.

@)

Water Chemistry Deionized water LOCA Gradina Procedure (ANSI N101.2-1972)

Pressure*

8 psig to 42 psig 27 psig 8 psig 33 psig 17 psig 17 psig 2.5 psig t

data for the actual LOCA culves are this test found on pages 162 and 163,

.ad-Grading within two hours and after 14 days following removal from the test chamber. There was no difference between two hour and two week gradings. Also, there was no difference between vapor and immersion exposures.

. r

..-.+

- i.

4

~

r-.

Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, 11 1/2 Days Mon t icello LOCA 300 260 200 150 100 50 0

Temperature Curve Temperature,F June 2, 1992 Page 9 i

1 0.1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 100000 Ti rn e,s e c Pressure Curve O.l-.---

loo------ 1000- - 10000 100000 --100000 - -

-r:-- * - -

I Testing Project: 02840 I

Report: One, 11 1/2 Days Results:

i I

I 281'F LOCA" I

I I

I 2.8 i

A 9.8

ado Zinc 11 SGI

'henoline 368 WG erblasted at Monticello; epblasted 'at Carboline to Bare, Steel!

henoline 368 WG I I 7.311 0.117.4 I

2.8 9.8 I

I i

A

>henoline 368 WG '

I i

I I

arblasted at Monticello; epblasted at Carboline Ang' Residual Coating'/

'henoline 368 WG !

10.3 5.4/11.5/6.2 2.5 I

l i

> d o Zinc 11 SG/

I I i B,

9.7 1

s I

I "henoline 368 WG ;

srblasted at 'Monticello; epblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/

>henoline 368 WG I

7.0/9.0/7.6/6.4 I

I

-;a&

Zinc 11 SG/'

'henoline 368 WG

~

I B

arblasted at Monticello; i

2.5 9.7 I

10.1 lepblasted,at Carboline

'henoline 368 WG 6.2/9.1/7.1/6.6 Ang Residual Coating'/

I I

exhibited coating discoloration' rbo Zinc 11 SG/Phenoline 368 WG I

'June 2, 1992

\\

Page 10 Grading Date: 4/10/92; 4/24/92.

None None None None None None None None None None None None Panel suspended in liquid phase.

Cracklng None None None None Chalklng None None None None

'Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, 11 112 Days Results:

i I

arb0 Zinc 11 SG/

i rblasted at, Monticello; ng Residual Coating'/

I i

1 2enollne: 368 WG

!pblasted at Carboline ienoline 368 WG arb; Zinc 11,SG/

1 I

ienoline 368 WG ;

rblasted at Monticello; pblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/

ienoline 368 WG '

i i

i xbo Zinc il SG/ ;

I ienoline 368 WG

blasted.at Monticello; ng Residual Coating'/

ienoline 368 WG I

I j

I I

pblasted at Carboline June 2, 1992 1

Page 11 Grading Date: 411 0192; 4/24/92 3.0 None '

A 8.8 None None None 9.7 6.91 8.618.2 2.8 B

9.4 None None None None

\\

6.9/9.3/6.5/7.9 2.8 B

9.4 None None None None 9.4 6.31 9.5r/.3/6.6 Chalking None None None

?xhibRed coating discoloration 10 Zinc 11 SGIPhenoline 368 WG Panel suspended in vapor phase.

None I

Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, 11 1/2 Days Results:

I I

8 I

281°F LOCA'

arb0 Zinc ' 11 SG/

henoline 368 WG

~

1 1 A. I 10.4 2'6 I

trblasted at Monticello; I

spblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/

henoline 368 WG I

8.9/8.5/8.6

)

I

arb0 Zinc 11 SG/

henoline 368 WG

?pblasted and Scraped at Carboline henoline 368 WG I

trblasted at Monticello; I

ing 'Residual Coating'/

I 2.6 10.4 3.4 6.9/9.2/9.0 I

2.3

~

I B.

11.4 j

art& Zinc ' 11 SG/

henoline 368 WG 1

Ipblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/,

tienoline 368 WG I

9.5/8.5/7.9/6.6 I

krblasted at 'Monticello; I

arb0 Zinc 11 SG/

~

I I henoline 368 WG j brblasted at Monticello; 3pblasted and Scraped at Carbofine '

ing Residual Coating'/

I henoline 368 WG i

1 2.3 B

11.4 2.7 9.0/7.a/7.5/7. I exhibited coating discoloration DO Zinc 11 SG/Phenoline 368 WG

- 1 1

I I

June 2, 1992

\\

Page 12 Grading Date: 4/10/92; 4/24/92

Testing Project: 02840 i

Report: One, 11 1/2 Days I

I Results:

arb0 Zinc 11 SG/

I ienoline 368 WG 1

rblasted at Monticello; ipblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/

ienoline 368 WG I

ienoline 368 WG rblasted at Monticello; I

!pblasted and Scraped at Carboline ng Residual Coating'/

ienoline 368 WG

~

I I

I arb0 Zinc 1 1 SG/

I ienoline 368 WG I

rblasted at blonticello; a

!pblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/ I I nonoline 368 WG i

I I

arbo Zinc 11 SG/

ienoline, 368 WG rbiasted' at Monticello; I

!pblasted and Scraped at Carboline '

ng Residual Coating'/ I I

henoline 368 WG I

I June 2, 1992 1

Page 13 Grading Date: 4/10/92; 4/24/92 281'F LOCA.

B exhibited coating discoloration.

i 30 Zinc 11 SG 1

I I

Panel suspended in vapor phase.

i-

..,/

Testing Project: 02840 7 Results:

i I

I I

i Report: One, 11 1/2 Days, I

I I

i i

I I

/

i

>arb0 Zinc 11 SG/

I i

'henoline 368 WG I

wblasted at Monticello; epblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/:

'henoline 368 WG I

>arb0 Zinc ' 1 I SG/

I I

'henoline 368 WG I blasted at Monticello; epblasted and Scraped at Carboline,

ring 1 Residual Coattng'/

'henoline 368 WG I

I I

. I I

j I

1 1 I

>arb0 Zinc 11 SG/

I

'henoline 368 WG xblasted at *Monticello; I

epblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/

'henoline 368 WQ I

I I

i

arb0 Zinc 11 SG/

i

'henoline 368 WG xblasted at Monticello; I

epblasted and Scraped at Carboline I

'henoline 368 WQ I

I ring Residual Coating1/

I June 2, 1992

\\

Page 14 Grading Date: 4/10/92; 4/24/92 281°F LOCA' A

11.4 None None 7 4 *Y 2.9 8.7J9.3t6.9 '

3.0 B

11.9 None None I '

I 8.211 0.0/6.3/7.5 I 8.0/9.6/6,9/6.8 I ~ I, ?

I I

I exhibited coating discoloration bo Zinc 11 SG I

.bo Zinc 11 SG/Phenoline 368 WG I

I 1

Panel suspended in vapor phase.

I

I I I

Testing Project: 02840 I Report: One, 11 1/2 Days

, Results:

I I

1 I

I t

i I

I I

I henoline 368 WG I

irblasted at Monticello; 1

henoline 368 WG I

i I

arb0 Zinc 11 SG/

henoline 368 WG j

I irblasted at Montlcello; I

I 3pblasted and Scraped at Carboline I ing Residual Coating'/

henoline 368 WG

arb0 Zinc 11 SG/

henoline 368 WG rrblasted at iMonticello; 3pblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/#

I henoline 368 WG i

arb0 Zinc 11 SG/

i rblasted at Monticello; I

3pblasted and Scraped at Carboline ing Residual Coating'/

henoline 368 WG zpblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/i I

I I!

I I

I i

I I

henoline 368 WG I

June 2, 1992 t

Page 15 Grading Date: 4/10/92; 4/24/92 281'F LOCA*

exhibited coating discoloration bo Zinc 11 SG/Phenoline 368 WG I

I Panel suspended in liquid phase.

None None I

None None

Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, 11 1/2 Days I Results:

i 1

1 281'F LOCA" I

henoline 368 Primer/

henoline 368 WG rblasted at Monticello; tpblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/;

henoline 368 WG I

I renoline 368 Primer/

renoline 368 WG I

A I

rblasted at Monticello; I

3pblasted at Carboline I

ng Residual Coating'/

I renoline 368 WQ I

2enoline 368 WG I

I i

I renoline 368 'Primer/

I rblasted at Monticello; bpblasted at Carboline to Bare Steel/\\

ienoline 368 WG B.

I I

B I

ieXoline 368 Primer/

1 ienoline 368 WG rblasted at Monticello; lpblasted at Carboline ng Residual Coating'/

7enoline 368 WG I,

I 1

/

xdbifled coating discoloration I

I

.loline 368 Primer 3.8 '

~

7*8 i

6.716.9

~

3.8 7.8 2.5 6.417.2 4.6 7.2 7.8/9.5/7.7 4.6 7.2 2.4 7.918.916.9 None None None None ' I Nane None A

June 2, 1992 Page 16 Grading Date: 4/10/92; 4/24/92 t

None None None None

" Panel suspended in liquid phase.

Craeklng None None None None Chalking None None None None I I I

I

Testing Project: 02840 I

Report: One, 11 1/2 Days 1 I

i Resutts:

1 June 2, 1992

\\

Page 17 Grading Date: 411 0192; 4/24/92 henoline 368 WG vblasted at Monticello; henoline 368 Primer/

henoline 368 WG henoline 368 PrhW/

henoline 368 WG xblasted at Monticello; apblasted at Carboline ing Residual Coating'/

'henoline 368 WG i

exhlblted coating discoloration 1

noline 368 Primer 2.2 I

a.a/i 0.716.9 I

I I

i Panel suspended in liquid phase.

Chalklng None None None None

j Testing Project: 02840

, Results:

I Report: One, 11 112 Days I

1 3

t I

X I

I I

i I

j

'henoline 368 Primer/

Jhenoline 368 WG '

erblasted at Monticello; tepblasted 'at Carboline to Bare Steel/

i i

'henoline 368 WG

~

I i

I I

'henoline 368 WG ;

i erblasted at Monticello; I

!epblasted at Carboline i

ding Residual Coating'/

I

'henoline 368 WG I

I I

>henoline 368 Primer/

I I

2henoline 368 WG erblasted at Monticello; tepblasted at Carboline to Bare. Steel/

'henoline 368 WG I

I 8

'henoline 368 Primer/

Dhenoline 368 WG '

erblasted at Monticello;

!epblasted at Carboline ving Residual Coating'/

'henoline 368 WG I

.I A

. A.

B 1

i B

June 2, 1992 Page 18 Grading Date: 4/10/92; 4/24/92,

\\

281°F LOCA' I

4.0 7.7 None 6.916.6 7.7 None 7.317.2 2*3 1

4.3 7.7 None 7.9/9.6/8.0 I

4.3 7.7 None 2*o I

. I 7,317.817.6 I

exhibited coating discoloration enoline 368 Primer I

None None None None None None None None Panel suspended in vapor phase.

None None None Chalklng None None None None None

' I

Ilheiioline 368 Primer/ ', : "

?ept Ilas :ed at Carboline Phenoline 368 WG 1 :

[

Phenoline 368 WG terblasted ai Monticello; 2epblasted at Carboline to Bare Steeil 3henoliiie 368 WG I

.erblastod at Monticello; I

ving Residual, Coating'/

Pheholine 368 Primer/

I I

Phenoline 368 WG I

i I

i i

i I

1 Pheholine 368 Primer/

Pheholine 368 WG terblasted at Monticello; I

aepblasted at Carboline

\\vir g Residual Coating'/

Pt-enoline 368 WG:

j I

I I exhibited coating discoloration I

lenoline 368 Primer I

I I

/. I I I 3.8 A '

8.2 None None None None 2.2 6.118.7 3.8 None None B :

7.2 None None 9.2/10.2/7.1 3.8 B.

7.2 None None None None 2.3 9.418.917.8 I

June 2, 1992 1

Page 19 Grading Date: 4/10/92; 4/24/92 Chalking

~

None None None None

,/'

Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, I1 1/2 Days Appendix 1 Carboline Specification ST1.

June 2, 1992 Page 20 Steel Test Specimens Panels: The size for carbon steel panels shall be 2 by 4 inches by 1/4 inch thick 2 0.1 inches with rounded edges and comers. The steel for each specimen shall meet the requirements of ASTM A36, 'Standard Specifications for Structural Steel'.

' 3

~

-.. Lzf&

?.....

.P.

..__^

.s&

.....i*

.Testing Project: 02840 Report: One, 11 1/2 Days Advanced Laboratory Technician Testing Department Jbhn Montle Vice President Technology June 2, 1992 Page 21

, Yuly Korobov Supervisor Testing Department t

~

c

..?ti..

.. -.LY.

.~

I Final. Report:

12 Days SUBJECT :

sting of Carbo1 ting ---

Systems according to the TVA S t r i d e Curve.

REFERENCE :

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Stride Curve; M r. Roger Tegtmeyer.

PURPOSE:

. according-to-ANSI-NlOl.2,--Section 4.5 as interpreted-by Carboline.

To determine-the -accepfabilify of-Carboline-Nuclear-Coating Systems when exposed t o the TVA Stride Curve and evaluated CONCLUSIONS:

PROCEDURE :

A f t e r the 1 2 days of the TVA S t r i d e Curve, the following coating systems are.acceptab3.e when evaluated according t o ANSI N101.2, Section 4.5 as interpreted by Carboline:

IC Carbo Zinc l l / l c Carboline 290 WB Finish IC Carbo Zinc l l / l c Carboline 191 HB IC Carbo Zinc 11 IC Carbo Zinc l l / l c Phenoline 368 WG Finish IC Carboline 295 W3 Surfacer/2c Carboline X2191-154 IC Carboline 295 WB Surfacer/lc Phenoline 305 Finish IC Carboline 195 Surfacer/lc Carboline 191 HB IC Carboline 295 WB Surfacer/lc Carboline 290 WB Finish (Please refer to "Results")

F A.

T e s t Coupon

1.

2" X 5" X 1/4" Sandblasted Steel Panels with Rounded Edges and Corners.

2.

2" X 5" X 1" Concrete Blocks B.

Systems Tested Dry F i l m Thickness

1.

(Sandblasted Steel)

' P l e a s e IC Carbo Zinc 11 r e f e r IC Carboline 290 WB Finish to "Results "

2.

(Sandblasted Steel)

IC Carbo Zinc 11 IC Carboline 191 HB

3.

(Sandblasted Steel)

IC Carbo Zinc 11 4.

(Sandblasted Steel)

IC Carbo Zinc 11 IC Phenoline 368 WG Finish From the carboline Research & Development Laboratory T h e technical data furnished i s true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. Hawmver, no guarantee of accuracy i s given or implied.

s

.--."I.

cIDI.,.-. CrlnL d.-.

~ -

April 14, 1976/Page ESTING PROJECT:

01418 B.

Systems Tested Dry Film Thickness-Please

. IC Carboline 295-M Surfacer refer f0

5.

(Concrete Block) rrResultstt 2c Carboline X2191-154 C.

6.

(Concrete Block)

IC Carboline 295 WB Surfacer IC Phenoline 305 Finish

7.

. (Concrete Block)

IC Carboline 195 Surfacer IC Carboline 191 HB

8.

(Concrete Block)

IC Carboline 295 WB Surfacer IC Carboline 290 WB Finish D.

Cure Schedules Carbo Zinc 11: Overnight at high humidity and looo$ (38OC).

Carboline 290 WB Finish:

Carboline 191 HB:

Phenoline 305 Finish:

Phenoline 368 WG Finish:

Carboline 295 WB Surfacer:

Carboline X2191-154:

Carboline 195 Surfacer:

2 days a t 75OF (24OC).

10 days at 75°F (24OC).

3 to 4 days at 75'F (24OC).

7 days a t 75OF (24OC).

24-firs. at 75'F '(24°C).

72 hrs. at 75'F (24OC).

72 hrs. at 75°F (24OC).

T e s t Environment Tennessee Valley Authority Stride Curve; Project 4840-P, Specification 180-01-AB.

1 From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory L

The technical data furnished i s true and occurote to the best of our knowledge. However, no guarantee of accuracy i s given or implied.

.'. '\\

~_.-

c A

14, 1976iPage 3 I. _

~

CESTING -PROJECT: -01418 X n a l Report:

12 Days I).

T e s t Environment (Continued)

1.

Time - Temperature -.Pressure Profile Time Temperature Pressure I n i t i a l I n i t i a l t o 1 Second 1 Second t o 10 Seconds - -

10 Seconds t o 7 Minutes 7 Minutes t o 108 Minutes 108 Minutes to 12 Dags

- --7S°F- (24OC) 330°F (166OC) (Steam Blast)

Decrease to-250°F- (121OC)-

Decrease t o 240°F (116OC)

Decrease t o 160°F ( 7 1 O C )

Hold at 160'F (71OC)

2.

Water Chemistry Chlorides (as C1) 0.05 ppm Boron (as BO3) 0.1 ppm PH 6 to 8 at 25OC Atmospheric

--29.7 psig. --

25.3 psig.

Atmospheric Atmospheric 38

- psigt GRADING PROCEDURE :

The test coupons were evaluated f o r performance i n th areas :

1, Material flaking off following t

2.

3.

Blistering of the topcoat Delamination between coats and/or peeling 4,

Chalking of the coating

5.

Excessive cracking Grading procedures specified i n Report N101.2-1972-6.f the Americkn National Standards Institute-Protective Coatings for Light Water Nuclear Reactor Containmen F a c i l i t i e s.

4.5 Methods of Examining & Evaluating the Exposed Text Specimens The dynamic and/or static elevated temperaturepressure and irradiation test panels s h a l l be evaluated within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months and again a f t e r 2 weeks a f t e r removal from the test chamber for the following surface defects:

delamination and/or peeling, blistering and chalking.

Subsections 4.5.1 through 4.5.4 s h a l l be dealt with as follows:

flaking, Defects l i s t e d i n From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory

\\

0 The technical dota furnished i s true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. However, no gubrantet of accuracy i s given or implied.

m"."'.--.,r.

"....e....-..

W A p r i l 14, 1976/Page 4 TESTING PROJECT:

01418- -

Final Report:

12 Days.

- _ _ 4.5.1 Flaking.

AS D772, Evaluating Degree of Resis (Scaling) of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.

19103.

Flaking s h a l l not be permitted.

4.5.2 Delamination and/or Peeling.

4. 5. 3 Blistering.. Blistering shall be limited t o a few, intact b l i s t e r s,

Size-N0.-4, ASTM-E714;Stabdard-Method-of Evaluating Degree of Blistering of Paints, Parr 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.

19103.

The number and s i z e of b l i s t e r s s h a l l b e recorded. '

4.5.4 Chalking.

t o Chalking of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society f o r Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.

19103.

Heavy chalking shall not be permitted.

Delamination and/or peeling s h a l l not be permitted.

ASTM D659, Stahdard' Method of Evaluating Degree of Resistance Any other changes i n coating properties which are not also associated with the separation, or the release, of coating from the substrate s h a l l not be a cause for rejection.

ANSI N101.2-1972 Criteria (As interpreted by Carboline)

Maximum Degree of Failure Allowable Flaking ASTM D772 10 (None)

Delamination o r Peeling

Blistering ASTM D714-56 Blister Size a2

NOTE:

A b l i s t e r is not i n t a c t when it has resulted in coating being separated from the test coupon.

None Blister Density None Few Medium

, Medium-Dense Chalking ASTM D659 8 (Light)

NOTE: Flaking, blistering and chalking are a l l evluated according to ASTM Standards, w i t h a rating of 10 indicating that no f a i l u r e was observed i n the specific grading area.

From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory

\\

d The technical data furnished i s true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. However, no guarantee of accuracy i s given or implied.

z 3% -A-?*

w r

w CT. SI UIC.I m *nu

I I

TESTING PROJECT:

01418 Final Report:

1 2 Days RESULTS :

Delamina-i Other Perf omai Flaking Pee 1 ing ing Chalking

' Characteristics E v a l u e 1

Performance Coating System Dry rion O r Blister-and Film I. D.

Thickness I

I 1A)

IC Carbo Zinc 11 Finish

IC Carboline 290 WB 3 m i l s 10 4 m i l s 7 m i l s None 10 i

Slight Coating Accep tab.

I 10 j

[ Discoloration I

I I

j i

10 1B)

IC Carbo Zinc 11 3 m i l s IC Carboline 290 WB Finish 4 m i l s 7 m i l s I One Crack i n Acceptab 1

None

6 M-B, 10 i j b l i s t e r along One s i d e

& Edges edge; s l i g h t I 1 coating discol-j I

I I oration 3 m i l s

!.Lo 2A)

IC Carbo Zinc 11 IC Carboline 191 HB*

4 m i l s 7 m i l s I

I

~

I

' Slight Coating Accep tab:

1 Discoloration None

8 M-B, 10 Scribed Side I

I I

Discoloration'

' I I

I Accep tab1 IC Carbo Zinc 11 3 m i l s 1.0 None

8 F-B, 10 1 Slight Coating 2B 1 IC Carboline 191 HB Scribed Side 4 m i l s 7 m i l s 1

TESTING PROJECT:

01418 Final Report: 12 Days RESULTS:

Delamlna-I

' Other i

I I

Performance perf oimar Evaluat i c

' Characteristics Coating System Dry and Film tion Or Blister-i i

I. D.

Thickness Flaking

. Peeling ing Chalking I

I I

1 3 mils 10 vone 10

10.

I Slight Surface Accep $ab1 I

I I Attack and 3A)

IC Carbo Zinc 11*

I I

I Discoloration I

I 3B 1 IC Carbo Zinc 11 I

! Slight Surface Accep tab:

I Attack on Zinc 3 mils 10 None 10 10

& Discoloration 4A)

I I

IC Carbo Zinc 11

/' IC Phenoline 368 WG 4 mils I

I I

3 mils

'10 None 10 10 I Slight Coating 4 m i l s l Discolorationi 4B)

IC Carbo Zinc 11 IC Phenoline 368 WG I

I Finish 7 mils I

IC Carboline 295 WB 20 m i l s 10 None 10 5A)

S ur facer 2c Carboline X2191-154*

2 milslct 24 mils i

Coating Dis-1 j coloration 1

I I

10

,Very Slight Acceptabl I

I I

10 None

4F to I/ 8 I

Panels Suspended in Chamber Perfect Performance I

ANSI N101.2-1972

8 MD (Light)

I I

TESTING PROJECT:

01418 Final Report:

' 12 Days-RESULTS :

1 Other Coating System Dry I

Perf orman Delamina-Performance Evalua E i o Blistet-Film tion O r and I Characteristics Peeling ing Chalking I. D.

Thickness Flaking I

I I

I Acceptabl 20 m i l s 10 None 10 10 Islight Coating

Discoloration 5B)

IC Carboline 295 WB 2c Carboline X2191-154 2 m i l s / c t Surf a cer I

I I

24 mils I

I I

I 6A)

IC Carboline 295 WB 20 m i l s 10 Surfacer IC Phenoline 305 4 m i l s Finish*

24 m i l s None 10 10 I

Slight Coating

, Accep tab1 D,itqcolora t ion I IC Carboline 295 WB 20 m i l s 10 None 10 10 6B)

IC Phenoline 305 4 m i l s Surfacer Finish 24 m i l s s

I IC Carboline 195 Surfacer 25 m i l s 10 None

, 10 10 Slight Coating Ac cep tab1 Discoloration I

I i

I Very Slight Acceptabli Coating D i s -

---I

& - - r l - ^

I

, CU.LUL-aL.LUl1 I

I IC Carboline 191 HB*

4 m i l s 29 mils I

1

" 7B)

IC Carboline 195 25 mils 10 IC Carboline 191 HB Surfacer 4 m i l s 29 mils None 10 10 I

I

'Slight Coating Accept ablc

Discoloration I

I I

I '

10 None

4F t o ii a I* Panels Suspended i n Chamber, Perfect Performance I

4NSI N101.2-1972

a MD (Light)

I i

I

I I

TESTING PROJECT:

01418 Final Report:

12 Days I

RESULTS :

l and I. D.

Thickness

'Characteristics Accep tab1 I

Coating Dis-

' coloration 1

10 Hone 10 10

Very Slight 20 m i l s 4 m i l s 8A)

IC Carboline 295 WB IC Carboline 290 WB I

Surfacer i

I Finish*

24 m i l s I

8B 1 IC Carboline 295 WB IC Carboline 290 WB Surfacer Finish 20 m i l s 10 4 m i l s 24 m i l s None I 10 10 I

I I, Slight Coating Acceplabl IDiscoloration I

Perfect Performance 10 None

4 to i/ 8

Panels I

Suspended I

i n Chamber I

ANSI N101.2-1972 18 MD (Light) a i

299218994 XC:

SLL/HDT/JFM/EWS/MJD/SLS/DRL/JDP/CJW/RJT/Lab Group Leaders Patrick D. Fisher Developmental Engineer Testing Department pLik hn F. Montle f

' uce-President 1

Research & Developmc I

1 I ' :

I I

I

~

I I. i

I 1

I REPORTS WRITTEN :

REPORT DATE EDITION LENGTH TO DATE TEST. 91477-1

12/16/97 0 8 ~ 2 2 FAX 314 644 6883 CARBOLINE

'r3 fgk LABORATORY TEST REPORT

--g p 7 /

4 DATE: June 10, 1993

.!- c------

c

@ 002/014 TESTIN_GPRQJECT:

02927 DATE OF GRADING:

2/25/93; 3/7 1/93; REPORTx One TIME; 14 Days 4/6/93; 411 3/93;4/20193 1 1 14 Days REQUESTED BY:

Earl Bowry I

I TITLE: RadiationlDBA Testing for Commonwealth Edison Eiyron and Braidwood Nuclear Plants.

I

REFERENCE:

Mr. Richard Nene! of Sargent and Lundy Co.; Mr. Jim Doyle of Sargent I

and Lundy Co.

PURPOSE; To evaluate maintenance systems for Byron and Braidwood Nuclear Plants.

During construction of the Commonwealth Edison Byron and Braidwood Plants, Carboline systems were applied to concrete (Carboline 195/Phenoline 305) and steel (Carbo Zinc 11 SGlPhenoline 3051 surfaces.

These original systems were primarily intended for construction conditions: abrasive blasted surfaces and spray application. Since then, it has become more important to use coatings which are conducive to operating conditions: minimal surface preparation, brush and roll application, tower solvent emission Icharcoal contamination concerns), and self-priming single coat applications for steel.

This test evaluates maintenance oriented coating systems which are more practicai for operating nuclear plants. The coatings selected for this test have properties which exhibit compatibility to existing coatings, contain less solvent than the construction products, and have application characteristlcs which can enhance productivity, reduce maintenance costs, and help lower radiation exposure of the applicators {through a single coat approach).

BACKGROUND;

. I.

. -. _c

~

Carboline 890 and 801 are two coatings which have been tested and this test Carboline 893, a solvent based epoxy primer, is used.

the best ot our knowledge.

~~

12/16/97 08:22 FAX 314 644 6883 CARBOL I hi m 0 0 3 / 0 1 4 Testing Project: 02927 Report: One, 14 Days June 10, 1993 Page 2 c

a)

Aging of exis?jng Coatings were simulated by oven baking for two weeks at 15VF.

b). Surface preparation of aged &sting coatings were simulated by hand sanding or solvent wiping.

01 Mhimal surface preparation methods, SSPC-SP3, and SSPC-SP1 1 wem used.

dl Effects of residual surfacer [I951 or residual primer (Carbo Zinc 1 t SGI were evaluated.

el Wde film thickness ranges and multiple coat applications were incwporated to give wide appliwion ranges and to consider future maintenance cycles.

R. Concrete damage and repair was.simulated by using the.Elcorneter adhesion tester.

A 100% solids floor coating was included to provide another option for solvent sensitive applications.

12/16/97 08:22 FAX 314 844 8883 CARBOLINE c

Testing Project: 02927 Report. One, 14 Days

@004/014 June 10, 1993 Page 11 lst, 2nd, 3rd coats.

C.

gxoosurg Irradiation to 2 x t P rads at Sterigenics International, Tustin, California, followed by 320F LOCA curve, vapor phase only.

A.

Time - Temperature - Pressure Conditions B.

Water Chemistry 3

Spray solution was demineralized water with 2000 ppm boric acid buffered to 12 pH by means of the addition of the necessary amount of sodium hydroxide. Spray solution was replaced after 75 minutes withthe same ium hydroxide to pH 10. --- ---

Solution circulati d when solution reached a temperamre of 250°F.

/"

4 1

I 1 I / !

i !

I.

I Testlng Project: 02927 Report: One, 14 Days pesults; Grading Date: 2125193 I

I I

320°F LOCA (STEEL PANELS)'

GROUP #I; LOCA 11: 2 HOUR GRADING I

1 i

i i

j.

2 cc)

$2 few intqct at edee.

6 few intact at edge.

tc

\\

I I

j I

1 j

/

I I I i

I -

N I-m

\\

co

-1 0

ca N

rp..

I I! I

I I

I Testmu Project; 02927 Report: One, 14 Days Results:

Page 20 320°F LOCA (STEEL PANELS)*

Grading I

Date: 2/25/93 GROUP #I:

LOCA #I; 2 HOUR GRADING I

I I l c Carbo Zinc 1 I SG/SP11 I 2.1 I

None I

None 1

None I

6 t c Carboline 890 Left 2.7 Rusted SteeVSPll Bottom None

.None 1 None

8 Left 2.7 1 c Carbo Zinc 11 SGI TOP 2.1 None None i None

6 SP2 (Wire Brush)

Rlsht IC Carboline 890 2.5 Rusted SteellSP3 Bottom IC Carboline 890 A

i I

I

.)

None None 1 None 8

/#8 7

I C Carboline 890 Right 2.7 I

w

. r )

C(

Very slight,coating.erosion.

a v)

N i

I

Tesung Project: 02927 June 1'0, 1993 1 i Report: One, 14 Days I

pesults;'

I Page 21 I

I 1

Grading Date: 2/25/93 I Rusted SteeilSPlI I

1 I

I.VI I" IC Carbo Zinc 11 SG1 TOP I

SP2 {Wire Brush)

Right l c Carboline 890 Rusted SteellSP3 Bottom 8

IC Carboline 890 l e Carbo Zinc 1 1 SGlSPll I

I I

U. a 1 #4 Few I Nnna II RD I

Nane I

I None I

M n n m I

m a I

4 1

I I

I

,."I."

TOP L. I 2c Carboline 890 Left 7.1 19.8 None

[None I

None None I Rusted Steel/SPll I

Bottom

. *A 1

I I

1 LBK I

6.611 0.8 I

1 I I None

6 1..

&I*..*

Nnnn 2c Carboline 890 B

._"I.-

SP2 (Wire Brush)

I I

i I

I IlUI IO I

2. I 1 c Carbo tine 11 SG/

f I

I i None None 6.I/11.1 None None 2c Carboline' 890 I

Rusted SteellSP3 I Zc Cerboline 890 I

i' i

I I

' $4 few inttct at edge.

(1) #4 intact at edge.

3 k

In N..

I

\\

Testing Project: 02927 Report: One, I 4 Days Pesulg:.

I I

i June 10, 1883 Page 65 I

i i

I Gredino Data: 311 1 I93 320"~

LOCA (STEEL PANELS)+

I

-9 cr)

.-I

2 few i n t p c t at edge.

16 few intact at edge.

(0 hl 00 0

I I

0 8

hl 4

-l is 9

I I

I..j

(

I I

i I

1 i

i I

j 1

i j

I

\\ '

i.' \\. -

.. i i *..,... 'i

,i(.:,

... I:,+ j ::,

'I a.' /

0 c

I- \\

0 F

A

I i

1 t

1 0

OJ N

0)..

8 i

I Tesmg Project: 02927 Report: One, 14 Days Results:

June IO, i 1993 Page 83 i

Gradinp Date: 3/11 /93,

320'F LOCA (STEEL PANELS)*

/"

Hairline cracks throughout entire area.

0 2 (1) #4 intact at edge,

I

4 few intgct at edge.

)

i 2

R 0,

N..

Go 0 I-Q) \\

(c, rl

\\

N -

\\

I b8 I

Testing Project: 02927 Report: One, 14 Days Resui ts:.

June 10, 1993 I

PaQe 84 I

I Giadine Date: 3/11 I93 '

320°F LOCA (STEEL PANELSP I

1 None None' None None 1 None IC Carboline 890 Re e

i I

I

.:c Y.,- -

@ LABORATORY c

April 9, 1973 PESTING PROJECT: 1202 pinal Report SUBJECT :

Evaluation of the Carbo Zinc ll/Phenoline 368 WG Finish coating system when exposed to LOCA test conditions specified under ANSI N101.2 and General Electric Mark If1 Containment.

REFE'RENCE :

M r. 3. R. Lopata/Mr. J. R. S a s s o, General Electric Company; ANSI N101.2-1972.

PURPOSE :

To determine if the Carbo Zinc ll/Phenoline 368 WG Finish coating system will meet the performance criteria specified for a steel containment vessel lining under ANSI N101.2-1972, when exposed to an M S i f N101.2 suppression chamber and General Electric

>Mwk XKX conteiinment temperature-pressure curve conposite.

c!QNCZU5XON; The Carbo Zinc ll/Phenoline 368 WG Finish coating system meets the performarice requirements when evaluated according to ANSI N l O l. 2-1972, Section 4.5.

L PmaPw:

A. Test Coupon 2" x 5" x 1/8" sandblasted steel.

Drv Film Thick-B. Systems Tested

. neiis (DFT)

Please refer to

'I Result s IC Carbo -Zinc 11-3.5 mils IC Phenoline 368 WG Finish C. Cure. S'cfiedule Carbo Zinc' 11: 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months at high humidity plus long

?henoline 368 WG Finish: 2 weeks at ambient.

term storage at ambient.

D.' EXpo'sUre Comvosite temperature curve following the testing criieria specified under the General Electric Mark TII containment and ANSI N101.2 suppression Demineralized Water Test Solution under dynamic The test coupons were subjected to the following temperature.

spray conditions.

ature profile :

From the-Carboline Res

- -.I__

The technlcal data furnlrhsd Is truo and occurato to tho best of our knowlodgo. However, no guorantmo of accu~acflr given or impllod.

c o\\ LABORATORY TEST REPORT -

April 9, 1973/Page 2.

PESTING PROJECT: 4-1202 Pinal Report PROCEDURE : (continued 1 D. Exposure (continued)

GRADING..

PROCEDURE i Total T i m e Lapse I n i t i a l 1 second 10 seconds 1 min.,40 see.

1 6 min.,

40 sec, 2 hrsOt 46 mfn.,

3 hrs.r 20 mfn.

27 hrs., 47 min.

End of T e s t

~.

Temperature OF 70°F 40 sec.

100°F 135OF 150'F 160°F 235OF 190°F j A J Q O F The t e s t panels w e r e immersed approximately 1 4 4 2 inches i n t o the solution inside tQ test chamber.

After being evaluated for $his I ZEntierh- &pgzt, - the test coupons were returned t o the deionized --

water solution f o r exposure a t 180OF.'-.This is ;.noLa par!

Ef-tae X5ZFZ-t5EtYcriterEG5.fi-d---is-

. - r e f erred to i n KE-I-ZfZe~i T h e test coupons w e r e evaluated for performance i n the following areas:

1) Material flaking off

2) Delamination between coats and/or peeling

3) Blistering of the toF-oat

4) Chalking of the coating

5) Excessive cracking Grqding procedures specified i n Report N101.2-1972 of the American Nzttional Standards Tnstitute-Protective Coatings f o r Light Water Nuclear Reactor Containment Facilities:

4.5 Methods of Examining and Evaluating t h e Exposed T e s t Specimens The dynamic and/or static elevated temperature-pressure and irradiation-test panels shall be evaluated within 2-hours and again after 2 weeks after removal from t h e test chamber f o r t h e following surface defects: Flaking, Delamination and/or Peeling, Blistering, and Chalking.

Defects-listed i n Subsections 4.5.1 through 4.5.4 s h a l l be d e a l t with as follows:

From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory The technical data furnished i s true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. However, no guarantee of accuracy i s given or implied.'-.- - -

@ LABORATORY TEST REPORT c

c 7

April 9, 1973/Page 3.

CESTING PROJECT: 4-1202

?ha1 Report XADING

?ROCEDURE: (continued) 4.5.1 Flaking.

Resistance to Flaking (Scaling) of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. Flaking shall not be permitted.

ASTM D772, Evaluating Degree of 4.5.2 Delamination and/or Peeling. Delamination

=$/or peeling shall not be permitted..

. 4. 5. 3 Blistering. Blistering shall be limited to a f e w, intact blisters, Size No. 4, ASTM D714, Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Blistering of Paints, Part 21, American Society or Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. The number and the size of blisters shall be recorded.

4.5.4 Chalking. ASTM D659, Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Resistance to Chalking of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society of Test-ing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. Heavy

- chalking shall not be permitted.

Any other changes in coating properties which are not also associated with the separation, or the release, of coating from the substrate shall not be a cause for rejection.

ANSI Criteria N101.2-1972

a.

Flaking ASTM D772 lo Delamination or Peeling None Blistering ASTM D714

. 4F Chalking ASTM D659 Light ( 8 )

NOTE:

Flaking is graded according to ASTM D772 with a rating of 10 indicating no flaking was observed.

From the Carboline Research & DeveIopment Laboratory

. I.

4

.. I n e rachn,.;a! data ::--.:shed i s true and accuratc-io the bast-of oucknowledge. However, no guarantee of accuracy i s given or implied.

.I.

c i' i, ESULTS :

Delamina-t-ion and/

DFT Flaking or Peeling

'anel A

arb0 Zinc 11 3.5

'hen. 368 WG Fin.

9.0 12.5 1 0 None (1)

?anel B

~

B l i s t e r - Chalk-i n g ing 10 10 o\\ LABORATORY TEST REPORT __

arb0 Zinc 11 3.5 10.0

?hen. 368 WG Fin. -

c 13.5 10 LCCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE Y101.2-1972

, 10 1 0 1 0 None None t

4F 1

8

8.

f Testing Department DRL/lf t

-OR: Testing Department xc: SLL m

HDT JFM EWS JDB GHD SLS JRL From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory

i C"

o\\ LABORATORY TEST REPORT __

April 9, 1973 TESTING REPORT: 4-1202 ADDENDUM :

The test coupons w i l l be returned t o the-immersion solution environment for 99 days a t 18O0F.

is an addition to, and not a part of, the ANSI N101.2 and General Electric Mark I11 containment exposure criteria.

This long term test exposure n

r c

Testing Department DRLflf

~

From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory The technical data furnished i s tr.2-and c-curate to the best of our knowledge. However, no guoraniee of accuracy i s given or implied.

I

.. B) Systems Tested

, /-

PBOJECT T I E I N G :

. I d

p-b /-e-4 SPECIAL RZQUESTS:

b I

.r _.,

..I

. -i :

I

u r r b o l i n m c

COPY DATE~DITZON TESTING PROJECT #

DISTRIBUTION TO/REFE RENCE APPROVAL COMMENTS REPORTS WIUTTEN :

REPORT DATE EDITION

~

__-_.__.L LeNGTH TO DATE

d.

/.:

I.

~.-i-----.-

..T&T;gi47j-l

p=i%

<63/26/1998 15: 35 314-644-6883 CARBOLINE TECH SERV r TEST1 NG DEPARTMENT @

ABSTRACT

cLcm-..-"---..r--4 REPORT wsn~o PROJECR was a

November 13. 1992 REPOAT#

mree TIME:

DATE OF GRADING: 7/23/92 TOTAL DESIGN TEST DURATlON:

REQUESTED BY: J e q AmoldEarl Bowry TITLE:

RadiationDBA Tw-ng for Clinton Power Sta-on - Unit 1 (Final Grading of Posf DBA Irradiated Panels) r

REFERENCE:

PURPOSE:

BACKGROUND:

SYSTEMS:

See reports # One and # Two of this Testing Project (02851) for a fufl description of the DBA iest and intemredlae grading of the post-LOCA irradiated panels. This report covers only the final grading of the panels after they were irradfated to one final dose of &Id rads (total.1x1@ rads).

This grading was performed at Carboline by Carl Braun, Advanced Ta'ng Technician of Carboline To evaluate maintenance systems for aged Carbo Zmc 11 SG/Cafboiine I91 HB and Carboline 195 Surfacer/Carboline 191 HB.

After the 14 day grading following the DBA exposure test it was detemlned that the pre-DBA irradiation of a l o e was not sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Clinton Power Station. A deciskn was made by Clinton personnel to have the already tested panels sent to SteriGenics and exposed to addinional gamma radlatlon so that the :mal exposure @re and post DBA accumulation) would total lxIO@. It was further determined that an intermediate grading at a dosage of 4xrd would be made (See Report

Two}. This report is of the final grading of those panels at the time of the ixio9 exposuye.

See Report # One of this test. (All coupons received an additional four month ambient cure pfior to the additional 2x10' irradiation).

EXPOSURE:

lrradiated to 6x108 rads at SteriGenics International rustin, CA). 7hfs raised the tom! accumulated dosage of these panets to 1x14 rads CONCLUSIONS See Summary of Results.

~.

.~.'.

. ;.i.

I -..:.

9

-,:cy-

' :&L, 1

' -?:-

... e;...

I

-1.

urbcrirk Researcn b'aveicg%ent LC~XIG~GC........

I I

I 1

Ncvembw 13.1992

,Testing Project 02881 Page 4 GlrinYing Daa: 7123192 Coallng %atern j

=cJ w

\\

N cJ

\\

F ID u)

W F

c" w

ul

63/26/1998 15: 35 314-644-6883 CAR80LINE TECH SEFW PAGE 64 LABORATORY TEST REPORT 1

1 REPORT # t h e 7

- 8 14 Day8 DATE OF GRADIHQ: 2/20/92 i

i TO=

DESIGN lXST DURATION; 14 Days REQDESTZD BY: Jerry Arnold i

I

-.. j -

TITIZt Radiatian/DBA Testing for C l i n t o n Power Station - Wait 1 i

j i

PURPO&E$

To evaluate maintenaaace systems for aged Carbo Zinc li SG/

i j

Carboline 131 E3 and Carboline 195 SurfacerlCarboljae 291 HB.

During constructSon of the Clinton Plant, Carbollae aysteme were applied ta eteel (Carbo Z b u 11 SGlCarbolina 191 BB) and origknal systems wese primaei3.y intended fpr cops.t;ruction conditions I abrasive blast suraca preparation and spray application.

Shce then, it hss become mora hportant to use coatings whfch reqwhe leee surface pteparatioa (i.p.v 6p3),

the% can be brushed OX rolbd, and which contain laee solvent than the original coatiaga.

BACKGROlRU):

concrate (Carboline 195/Carbal%ne 191 HB) aurfacem.

T h e m

?

1 1

5 i his test waluates mabteaance Oriented costing systeme which i

ate more practical for operating nuclear plants. The coatings teated meet the requirements for maintenance coatinge diaCU88ed above aad are campstibla w i t h the existing, aged costing epsteme.

4 i

i In d e s i g a t q this teat: series, the following were considereds a+ S%tmalated aging oE rha original ayarems

b. Surface preparation of the aged coat-ayetem

e. Surface preparetiort of cha exposed substrates de Effects of reaidual primer on surfacea on DBA performance

a. M t i g l e coat applicationa I taking into consideration Suture painting cycles

f. Simulaced concrete damage and repair

8. 100% sollds floor coatings i i The tent paremetars (radiation, LOCB pressures, LOCB t

temperatures) were provided by the cliant, Illinois Power ' a d

-its-repraeentstive,. Sargent. b -Lundy..- bny of the pmel__

preparation md PBB testing steps were monitored and witnessed by EIenry Miller of Satgent & Lundy.

coHcLusIoNs:

See Summary of Beeulcs.

-~

63/28/1998 15: 35 314-644-6883 cAp3oLINE TECH suw Tasting Project: 028.51 Report: One, 14 Day4 PAGE 85 March 19, 1992 Page 2

==

Description:==

2 x V x L/4u eteel, certified Carboline ST1 (aee Appendix 1);

2 x 2 x 4 concrete blocks conforming to Carboline Specif iCSCi.On C3Z (see Appendix 1).

Surface Preparatioai St.eal Panels Gritblasted to SSPC-SP10-82 with 8 2.0 - 3.0 m i l blast profile.

Concrete BLocks S%de A (Broom Surfwe) lightly bzwh-off blasted to SSPC-SP7-$2 t o mnn&e laitance.

Sides E, C, D lightly wirabzushud t o SSPC-SP3-82 to remove laitance.

Abreefve Medimpr Sol50 m i x of GFE f40 grit and 5230 $Sot.,

Dry Film

8.

Syatemr Tested

$tad Panels:

Bat& Huaibers ThLckneus Coat Lag Panel No. Part A Part 3 Color Thinner b l g e (#Ab)

- - - ~

IC Carbo Zinc 11 SC A l l 1H9468FI 1x74472 Gram TH#26(18%) 2.0-3.4 lc Carboline 191 HB lc, ZC, 3c Carboline 801 IC, 2c, 3c Cerbolins 890 Panela u-wt U-8A 1A-4A1 981 1 2A2 h 78-20A3 2 5 ~ - 2 8 ~ 4 5A-8A1 13A-16Aa 2 u - 2 ha3 298-3284 0300 OM9925M 5800 OG9645M l3949M 039799M mite TH#lS (16X) 6.O-7.O lJ5350M 1H94tlM Gray THp4(10%)

4.7-8.8/coat R70S OH976M LK9565M 1L9621M Gr~y =#2(12%)

3.0-9.21coat C703 189482M Top 112 of CsrbolLzie 191 BB panels eolvent wiped; bottom 112 tkei-solsGeGt--k%pea

-prior toXpplicKt3on uf Carboliiie 80 I-and Carboline 890,

_ - of Carboline 191 EB panela sanded with 80 grit sandpaper,

CARBOLINE TECH SERV PAGE 06 83/28/1998 15: 35 314-644-6883 Teeting Project: 02851 Raport: One, 14 Day8 March 19, 1992 Page 3 c

P*nslS 9h-16dZ Carbo Zirrc 11 SO panels were wsshed with tap water prior to application of Cszboline 801 and Carboline 890.

Ptanela 176-2481 Carbo Zirrc 11 513 panela ware gritblasted to 8SPC-SP6-82, leaving residual zinc ora substrate prior to application o f Carboline 801 and Carboline 890,

' P ~ a e l s 238-3283 Carbo Zinc 11 $G panels were power-tool cleaned win8 a 324 Clean-1P-Sttip unitized wheel t o SSPC-SP3-82 leaving residual z3nc on eubutrare prlor t o application of Carbolim 801 and Carboline 890.

TheoretLeal Dry Film Concrete Black Batch Ikuabe.t.8 ThiCkaeSS coating lVo.

S i d e Pazt A Part: B Color Thinper Range(W.le)

IC Carboline 199 Surf 8ccr All All' 1K939M 9M9255M White Ta#Z(lO%)

20.0 0800 1A9014M 5800 009645M IC Carboline 191 EB A l l 811 1J9497M 6J9799Y Wh5t8 "E#lS(LZX) 4.0-600 IC stargiaze zoiia WA-~ZA ~3 189851# 1G9422M Gray Vnthimad 20.0 S7A-608 P a r t C: 1P7413C 813 D2 IC Starglaze 20001 ORZ937M lL1484M Clear Unthinned 5.0 lc Starglaze 2001 538-56A A4 1R9614M lL9645M Gray Unthinned 30-0 0910 2716 IC, 2c, 3e Carboline 801 498-524 A#

135350M 1H9441M Gray TH#4(10%)

5.0-7,O fc, 2c, 3c 2, 3c 4c c,D IC705 OH9767M Carboliaa 890 S7A*60A A,B3 1R9565M 1L9621M Gray =#2 (12%)

5 7.O C?D C703 1H9482M Carboline 191 HB S3A-56A Bs 139497M 039799M White TH#lS(lZZ) 4,0-6.0 c 4 S800 0694451 A flueh avat of Carboline 195 S d a e e t was applied to eeal the p01es of the coacvrets blocks prior to B Pull coat: of Carboline 195 Surfscer.

--- &a -Elcometez adhesion test-was-performed 5.n-the-center on-Side -D of all - - -

3 concrete blocka. The bole produced ~TC)VI the adheaicn p u l l was repaired afth Scarglaze 20118,. __

The top 112 of side A on all concrete blocks was parer-tool cleaned, using a 3M elean-n-atxip unitized wheel leaving residual Carboliue 195 Surfacer. The bottom 112 of Side A was hand sanded wlth 80 grit sandpaper on block8 49A-52A and 57A-60A1 Side A was repaired w i t h Starglaze 2011s prior to application of Carboline 801 and Carboline 890.

' 83/26/1998 15: 35 314-644-6883 Teeting Project: 02851 Report: b e, 14 Day8 CClfIBw-IN TECH smv PAGE 07 March 19, 1992

\\

Page 4 C.

Cute SchedulE Carboliae 191 HB 18-88 I4 days 150.B Carbolfne 801 or Carboline 890 8 1 1.

A',

3' 2 dayr @ 7b-83'P 36-52% RH 3' days @' 150*P 17 days ambient conditions Concrete :

CarboUne 195 Sur.facer Blueh Coat All iluild Coat All

.I,

marnight @ 70-82OP 41-83% RH 3 days @ 49-83'P 28-572 arr 14 'days @ 15O"P 3 day8 e 68-83OP 35-522 m - - -

D A I S 498-528, 3 days @ 88-83OP Starglaze 20118 578-6118,

-8' 35-52% RH I

... I

83/28/1998 15:35 314-644-6883 C A P m I N E TECH SEW Testing Proj ect : 02851 Report:: One, 14 Daye Oarboline 801 os Cexboline 890 49h-SU 57A-608 Carboline 191 BB 53A-568

$targlaze 2000 Starglaze 2001 538-56A L,2,3,4 - let, 2nd, 3rd. 4th coats

Piarrl cum before aud after LOCA PAGE 88 mrch 19, 1992 Psge 5 1 day @ 69-80°F AI

,~1,

~1 E)'

42-5lX BE a2,

B 1, C',d Az*, 31',

Cz*,@*

3 days @ 150°F 24 days mnb3-t cunditiona A, Bz Cz,D2 1 day @ 69-80°PS42-512 BE 24 doye ambiaat condition8 A, B2, Cz,W 3 days.

15VP B2*, Csc,PI8 54 A*

1 day @ 69-80°F; 24 days ambjlent condition8 42-531 IUB please refer to Att8chaslent:.An procedure for preparin6 test specimens.

De Ew08UrB IrradiatAon to os rsde at Sterrlgenico hceitn8ttona~~

l!ustia, California, followed by 33OOP LOCA curver vapor phase o d y,

A.

Tlrme - Temperature - PresBure Conditions A b Time*

Temperature, *P*

fzessure, pig*

0 to 30 30 30 to 15 0 t o 1.5 eec.

1.5 to 40 aec.

330 45 sec. to 1 hr, 135 t o 330 330 to 250 1 hr. to I. day 250 1s to 5 1 t o 7 daye 250 to 100 5 t o O '

-* These sze -theorethal values.- Attached -arc graph of thaoratical and sctUd LOCA temperatuza and preeeute curves and copies of chert: recordings for this zest

-found onpagas 358, 159, 160- and 161, Lab Book #NO.

E).

Water Chemistry Deionized water.

pH for eteel psnel LOCA: 8,39 pH for concrete block LOCA: 8.77

P&GE 09

. 83/28/1998 15: 35 314-644-6883 CARBOLIE TECH SERV Teatfag Project: 02851 Report: One, l a Day@

Mer& 19, 1992 Page 6 B

b LOCB Grading Proctadurc (ANSI 8101.2-1972) c defects t hare wan no differaka between two hour and two week gradiags, except f o t concrete block 52-A, which exhibLted one hairline crack near bottom On face A at 14 day gradfng.

s <q+

........... f

....... 4%

.=

=

03/20/1998 15: 35 314-644-6883 CARBaINE TECH SERV PAGE 10 Testing Project: 02851 Reponr One, L4 Days mrch 19, 1992 Page 7 c

I Temperature 300 Theoretical ------a-Actual -

t Pressure I

I 1

1 t

.. _ ~

I 1

I

.L%-

. '7..

._7.

~.

PAGE 11

' 83/26/1398 15: 35 314-644-6883 CAPBOLINE TECH SEW T e s t h g Project: 02851 Report: m e, 14 Days

. *Ob 300 Concrete Block*

bfarch 19$ 1992 Page 8 meoretical ------

A c t u a l Temperature ao 60 1

A.

2 :

3 w

.a cc d

IC.

3.

f.loo E

a I

I I

1 I

4 104 105 106 t

I I

100 102 ii, 3

T i m (Seconds 1 10-1

-.-I.__

.?....

~ >*"......

.. i.

.~

.........

ML070680180

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

Navigation menu

ML070680180

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

Navigation menu

Search