ML031060467
| ML031060467 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 04/15/2003 |
| From: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML031060467 (94) | |
Text
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 1
IMC 0350 Meeting Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 2
Meeting Agenda Operations Restart Readiness Assessments
- Operations Mode 4 Preparation, Actions for Restart.Randy Fast
- Operations Leadership, Operability Evaluation..Bill Pearce Design Issue Resolution.....Bob Schrauder Containment Health...Randy Fast Integrated Leak Rate Test, Resolution of Significant Plant Issues....Jim Powers Safety Culture/Safety Conscious Work Environment
- Mode 5 Safety Culture AssessmentLew Myers
- Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey...Bill Pearce Major Milestones/Bulk Work
- Milestone Progress, Modifications, Work, ResourcesMike Stevens
- Restart Action Performance........Clark Price
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 3
Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Operations Mode 4 Preparation, Actions for Restart Randy Fast Plant Manager
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 4
- Actions and Preparation
- Appropriately staffed
- Completed annual requalification later 2002
- Just in time license requalification training
- Reactor Operator/Senior Reactor Operator pipeline
- Procedures ready for test plan
- INPO/industry evaluations ongoing
- Completed Safety Conscious Work Environment training for all Operations staff
- Implemented Operations Leadership Plan
- Key staff retrained on operability determination
- Implemented Standards and Expectations Operations Mode 4 Preparation, Actions for Restart
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 5
- Mode 4 and Mode 3 Tests
- Reactor Coolant System (RCS) pressure walkdown at 50 psig
- Augmented leakage test for RCS components
- Performed at 250 psig
- Normal Operating Pressure Operations Mode 4 Preparation, Actions for Restart
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 6
- Restraint Data; 4-15-03
- 429 Condition Reports Restraints
- 395 awaiting mode hold resolution approval
- 34 require resolution
- 355 Additional Testing work orders to complete (post-maintenance testing)
- 304 restraints awaiting Restart Station Review Board disposition
- 50 other (surveillances, etc.)
- Oversight of Control Room Operations Mode 4 Preparation, Actions for Restart
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 7
Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Operations Leadership and Operability Evaluation Bill Pearce Vice President - FENOC Oversight
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 8
- Operations Overview
- Operational activities
- Shift turnovers
- Clearance activities
- Standards and expectations
- Conservative decision on Decay Heat Pumps
- Procedure adherence
- Operability Determinations Operations Leadership and Operability Evaluation
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 9
Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Design Issue Resolution Bob Schrauder Director - Support Services
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 10 Design Issue Resolution High Pressure Injection Pumps
- Issue
- Fine debris in sump could result in damage to pumps during recirculation mode
- Resolution Options
- Additional filtration
- Modify existing pumps
- Test existing pumps
- Replace pumps
- Current Status
- New pumps and motors have been purchased
- License amendment being prepared to support system pressure test using existing pumps
- Developing potential testing to confirm adequacy of existing pumps
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 11 Design Issue Resolution Electrical Distribution System
- Issue
- A number of condition reports which challenge assumptions and completeness of analysis for electrical distribution system
- Resolution
- Revise analysis using updated computer software
- Evaluate results to ensure electrical distribution system has sufficient capacity and capability to accomplish plant safety functions
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 12 Design Issue Resolution Air Operated Valves
- Issue
- Several Air Operated Valves (AOVs) have design basis issues
- Resolution
- 53 demonstrate sufficient margin
- 6 to be adjusted prior to restart
- 12 to be modified prior to restart
- 12 to have margin increased post restart
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 13 Design Issue Resolution Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Loading
- Issue
- EDG load table not current
- EDG starting voltage and frequency response
- Resolution
- Revise EDG load calculation
- Prepare transient analysis for EDG voltage and frequency response
- Evaluate impact of EDG voltage and frequency response on plant safety functions
- Evaluate results to ensure EDG has sufficient capacity and capability to start and carry design basis loads
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 14 Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Containment Health Randy Fast Plant Manager
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 15 Project Scope:
- Emergency Sump
- Containment Coatings
- Decay Heat Valve Tank
- Containment Air Coolers
- Fuel Integrity
- Environmentally Qualified Equipment
- Refueling Transfer Canal
- Containment Vessel
- Boric Acid Extent of Condition Inspections, Evaluations, and Corrective Actions Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 16 Emergency Sump
Purpose:
- Ensure adequate long-term core cooling by significantly modifying the Emergency Sump and Strainers
- Status:
- Engineering Design work completed
- Increased strainer surface area from 50 ft² to approximately 1200 ft²
- Field Installation complete
- NRC inspection of the modification performed Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 17 Containment Health Access Hatch and Upper Strainer
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 18 Containment Health Lower Emergency Sump Strainer
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 19 Containment Health Debris Screen Gate
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 20 Containment Coatings
Purpose:
- Ensure adequate long-term core cooling by removing degraded and/or unqualified coatings on components in Containment
- Status:
- All targeted coatings have been removed
- Repainting with qualified coating material is near completion
- Two weeks of work remain to complete painting the dome Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 21 Containment Health Core Flood Tank
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 22 Containment Health Service Water Piping and New Tags
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 23 Containment Health Containment Dome
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 24 Decay Heat Valve Tank
Purpose:
- Ensure the integrity of the compartment without reliance on sealing compounds
- Status:
- Engineering Design work complete
- Installation nearly complete
- Electrical conduit seal welding and LOCA Seal installation is being completed Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 25 Containment Air Coolers
Purpose:
- Replace components damaged by exposure to boric acid
- Replace two fan motors due to a Part 21 issue
- Status:
- Fan motors have been replaced
- Fans, dampers, ductwork, and instrumentation have been cleaned, refurbished, and/or replaced, as appropriate
- Fan inlet plenum has been completely rebuilt
- Service water piping to cooling coils has been redesigned and replaced Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 26 Containment Air Coolers
- Status (Continued)
- Physical work nearly complete
- Piping to Containment Air Cooler # 1 is being reworked
- Air and Service Water testing to be performed Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 27 Containment Health Containment Air Cooler #3
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 28 Fuel Integrity
Purpose:
- Ensure fuel integrity during the next fuel cycle
- Status:
- Defective fuel rods from last cycle removed from service
- Fuel handling equipment and operating procedures enhanced
- Detailed visual checks during fuel movement and core load
- Two instances of spacer grid damage found and corrected
- Core reload successfully completed Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 29 Environmentally Qualified Equipment
Purpose:
- To ensure that environmentally qualified (EQ) equipment was not damaged by exposure to boric acid
- Status:
- EQ equipment was inspected for signs of boric acid intrusion
- Boric acid did not affect EQ equipment Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 30 Refuel Canal Leakage
Purpose:
- Evaluate the effect of past leakage on structures
- Identify possible leakage sources
- Status:
- Concrete samples and non-destructive testing show concrete strength is good
- Rebar samples show only minor corrosion, not affecting structural integrity
- Visual, Acoustic, and Vacuum Box testing of canal liner have revealed three potential leak flowpaths
- Corrective action post restart Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 31 Containment Health Concrete Core Bore
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 32 Containment Vessel
Purpose:
- To evaluate the integrity of the Containment liner
- Status:
- All examinations completed
- Containment is operable
- Integrated Containment Leak Test completed
- Install grout seal to close a gap between the carbon steel liner and the concrete curb Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 33 Containment Inspections
Purpose:
- Identify all components affected by boric acid
- Evaluate these conditions
- Ensure appropriate corrective actions are completed
- Document as-left condition as a base line for future inspections Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 34 Containment Inspections (Continued)
- Status:
- Discovery inspections completed
- All evaluations have been prepared
- Over 6,500 corrective actions have been identified.
Not all of these are restart issues.
- Of 2,219 Restart CAs assigned to Containment Health, 1,426 are completed
- Remaining restart work is primarily cleaning boric acid residue and reinspecting to verify cleanliness and document as-left conditions
- Steam cleaning of D-Ring areas inside Containment is in progress Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 35 Other Site Activities
- Reactor Pressure Vessel Head:
- Reactor reassembled
- Missile shields installed
- Plant is in final configuration for power operations
- Control Rod testing will be conducted during the full pressure test Containment Health
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 36
- Installation is complete
- Will connect to plant computer for remote monitoring
- Sensitivity testing during the full pressure test Containment Health
- FLUS Containment Leakage Detection System:
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 37 Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Integrated Leak Rate Test and Resolution of Significant Plant Issues Jim Powers Director - Nuclear Engineering
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 38 Integrated Leak Rate Test
- Purpose of Test
- Demonstrate leak-tight integrity of Containment at a pressure greater than could occur during an accident
- Approach
- Pressurize Containment to ~40 psig with compressors
- Hold for stabilization of conditions
- Perform leakage test measurements
- Validate test instrumentation with a known leak
- Depressurize and analyze test data
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 39 Integrated Leak Rate Test Integrated Leak Rate Test Compressors
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 40 Integrated Leak Rate Test Integrated Leak Rate Test Manifold
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 41 Integrated Leak Rate Test 13 RFO ILRT 13.000 18.000 23.000 28.000 33.000 38.000 43.000 48.000 53.000 58.000 4/7/03 18:44 4/7/03 20:44 4/7/03 22:44 4/8/03 0:44 4/8/03 2:44 4/8/03 3:50 4/8/03 5:50 4/8/03 7:50 4/8/03 9:51 4/8/03 11:51 4/8/03 13:50 4/8/03 15:00 4/8/03 17:00 4/8/03 19:00 4/8/03 20:30 4/8/03 22:30 4/9/03 0:30 4/9/03 1:48 4/9/03 3:48 4/9/03 5:48 4/9/03 7:48 4/9/03 9:41 Date Pressure (psia)
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 42 Integrated Leak Rate Test
- Safety Culture and ILRT Activities
- Demonstrated positive Safety Culture
- Attributes
- Preplanning
- Cross functional teamwork
- Contingency planning
- Previous lessons learned from D-B and industry
- Industry peer reviewer
- Resource allocation
- Solid project management
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 43 Integrated Leak Rate Test Results: Containment Continues to be Leak Tight
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 44 Resolution of Significant Plant Issues
- Significant Plant Issues Being Resolved
- Containment Emergency Sump
- Decay Heat Valve Tank
- Containment Coatings
- Valve Team Progress; 1,500 work items
- 594 valves completed
- 72 remain
- Permanent Reactor Cavity Seal
- Refueling Canal Repair
- Containment Air Cooler Rebuilds
- Containment Air Cooler Plenum Replacement
- FLUS Leakage Monitoring System
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 45 Resolution of Significant Plant Issues
- Significant Plant Issues Being Resolved (Continued)
- Reactor Vessel Internal Cleaning
- Nuclear Fuel Inspections
- Reactor Coolant System Resistance Temperature Detection Repairs
- Reactor Coolant Pump 1-1 and 1-2 Refurbishment
- Electrical System Design Basis Restoration
- Emergency Diesel Generator Material Condition Improvements
- Service Water System Cleaning
- Feedwater Heater 1-6 Retubing
- Polar Crane and Fuel Handling Crane Control Upgrades
- Thorough Containment Cleaning
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 46 Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment and Independent Safety Culture Survey Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 47 Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment Desired Outcome
- Demonstrate recent actions:
- Status safety culture review for Mode 5
- Independent review correlation
- Review safety conscious work environment survey results
- Methodology
- Business practice critique
- Two day meeting with all managers
- Criteria for groups/graded as groups
- Management team consensus
- Refined the criteria to be more objective
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 48 Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment Safety Culture Safety Culture Drive for Excellence New Individual Commitment Area Plant Management Commitment Area Policy or Corporate Level Commitment Area Goals, Roles and Teamwork Ownership and Accountability Qualification and Training Commitment to Continuous Improvement Questioning Attitude Rigorous Work Control and Prudent Approach Open Communications Statement of Safety Policies Management Value Structure Resources Self Assessment Commitment to Safety Nuclear Professionalism Independent Oversight Cross-Functional Work Management
& Communication Environment of Engagement and Commitment New
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 49 Example of Safety Culture Criteria
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 50 Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment
- Policy or Corporate Commitment Area
- Policies on Safety Culture and Safety Conscious Work Environment clearly state that safety is a core value and are understood by the organization
- Management values are clearly reflected in the Business Plan and are understood by the organization
- Resources are available or can be obtained to ensure safe, reliable operations
- Self-assessment is a tool used to monitor, assess and improve our performance
- Independent Oversight is a tool used to validate acceptable performance and identify areas for improvement or corrective action Yellow White Yellow Yellow White White
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 51 Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment Policy or Corporate Commitment Area
- Basis for Overall Rating of Yellow
- The 2003 FENOC Business Plan is not approved and distributed to employees
- Employees are unaware of the Nuclear Performance Index Incentive for 2003
- Maintenance, Radiation Protection/Chemistry, and Design Engineering are yellow based on resources availability
- Lack of appropriate section performance indicators
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 52 Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment
- Plant Management Commitment Area
- There is visible commitment to safety: nuclear, industrial, radiological, and environmental
- Goals and roles are clear and teamwork is reinforced
- Ownership and accountability is evident
- Training and qualification is valued
- Commitment to continuous improvement is evident
- Cross-functional work management and communication
- Creating and environment of engagement and commitment Yellow (improving)
White White Yellow White Yellow Yellow White
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 53 Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment Plant Management Commitment Area
- Basis for Overall Rating of Yellow Improving
- Until recently the site accepted the continual delay of corrective actions
- Identified lack of trust in several departments due to changes in organization and work hours
- Almost all employee development plans are overdue
- Contractor training qualifications are a concern
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 54 Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment
- Individual Commitment Area
- Drive for excellence-nuclear assets of people and plant are continuously improved to enhance margins of safety
- Questioning attitude - challenges are welcomed
- Rigorous work control and prudent approach -
performing activities in a quality manner is the standard
- Open communications - associates are comfortable in voicing opinions, issues and concerns
- Nuclear Professionalism - persistence and urgency in identification and resolution of problems is prevalent Yellow Yellow Green Yellow White Yellow
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 55 Mode 5 Safety Culture Assessment Individual Commitment Area
- Basis for Overall Rating of Yellow
- Overall quality of pre-job briefs is white; green for critical evolutions, yellow for lower significance work
- We are putting resources on Procedure Change Request backlog
- Rotating equipment is a major rework challenge for Maintenance
- 72 Preventive Maintenance tasks are past their due date and awaiting deferral
- Personal initiative and ownership are yellow
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 56 Correlation of Independent Safety Culture Assessment Safety Culture Safety Culture Drive for Excellence New Individual Commitment Area Plant Management Commitment Area Policy or Corporate Level Commitment Area Goals, Roles and Teamwork Ownership and Accountability Qualification and Training Commitment to Continuous Improvement Questioning Attitude Rigorous Work Control and Prudent Approach Open Communications Statement of Safety Policies Management Value Structure Resources Self Assessment Commitment to Safety Nuclear Professionalism Independent Oversight Cross-Functional Work Management
& Communication Environment of Engagement and Commitment New
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 57 Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Bill Pearce Vice President - FENOC Oversight
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 58
- Employee Survey:
- Conducted March 26 - 28, 2003
- FENOC employees and contract employees
- 1,138 responses from target population of
~1,448 (~79%)
- 36 questions
- 26 same as August 2002 survey
- Survey structured to assess four pillars Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
7 Questions 18 Questions 6
Questions 5
Questions
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 60 Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns As a nuclear worker, I am responsible for identifying problems and adverse conditions. 11 March 2003 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know 98%
99%
0%
1%
0%
2%
Disagree Disagree Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 61 1%
1%
Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns If I had a nuclear safety or quality concern, I would raise it. 3 March 2003 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know 98%
Question Not Asked Disagree Disagree Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 62 Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns Managements expectations regarding safety and quality are clearly communicated. 16 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know Disagree Disagree 55%
March 2003 89%
63%
March 2003 4%
7%
Managements expectations regarding safety and quality are reflected in performance reviews, rewards and discipline. 17 19%
26%
27%
10%
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 63 Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns My first line supervisor/foreman addresses concerns brought to his/her attention. 8 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know Disagree Disagree 61%
6%
March 2003 90%
August 2002 March 2003 82%
4%
6%
Management is willing to listen to your problems. 13 22%
17%
63%
17%
20%
12%
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 64 Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns Constructive criticism is encouraged. 14 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know Disagree Disagree 53%
March 2003 76%
August 2002 39%
March 2003 66%
8%
I believe my management cares more about identifying and resolving nuclear safety, quality and compliance issues than cost and schedule. 18 25%
22%
37%
16%
24%
19%
15%
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 65 Pillar 1: Willingness to Raise Concerns I I feel free to approach management regarding any nuclear safety or quality concern 5 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know Disagree Disagree 81%
March 2003 91%
August 2002 71%
March 2003 85%
I believe I can raise any nuclear safety or quality concern without fear of retaliation. 7 10%
9%
17%
12%
8%
7%
4%
5%
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 66 Pillar 2: Normal Problem Resolution Processes I know how to write a Condition Report and get it into the system or know who to contact to get help in initiating a Condition Report. 19 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know Disagree Disagree 2%
4%
March 2003 89%
August 2002 March 2003 94%
6%
5%
If I identified a potential nuclear safety or nuclear quality issue I would ensure that a Condition Report was written to address the issue. 20 Question Not Asked Question Not Asked Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 67 Identification of potential nuclear safety/nuclear quality issues through the Condition Report process is effective in our organization. 21 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know Disagree Disagree 57%
March 2003 80%
August 2002 45%
March 2003 74%
Resolution of potential nuclear safety and nuclear quality issues, including root cause and broader implications, through the Condition Report process is effective in our organization. 23 18%
25%
26%
14%
29%
18%
Pillar 2: Normal Problem Resolution Processes 8%
6%
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 68 I feel free to raise nuclear safety/nuclear quality concerns through the Condition Report process without fear of reprisal. 25 March 2003 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know 70%
86%
Pillar 2: Normal Problem Resolution Processes 16%
14%
Disagree Disagree 6%
8%
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 69 2%
4%
I am aware of the Employee Concerns Program and its purpose. 26 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know Disagree Disagree March 2003 94%
August 2002 March 2003 89%
If I had a nuclear safety or quality concern I would raise it through the Employee Concerns Program if I was uncomfortable raising the concern through my chain of command or in a Condition Report. 27 Pillar 3: Employee Concerns Program 4%
7%
Question Not Asked Question Not Asked Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 70 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know Disagree Disagree 7%
March 2003 77%
August 2002 March 2003 76%
4%
66%
16%
18%
17%
I believe issues reported through the Employee Concerns Program will be thoroughly investigated and objectively dispositioned. 28 I believe that the Employee Concerns Program will keep my identity confidential at my request. 31 19%
Pillar 3: Employee Concerns Program August 2002 Question Not Asked Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 71 I believe that upper management supports the Employee Concerns Program. 29 March 2003 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know 60%
80%
Pillar 3: Employee Concerns Program 25%
15%
Disagree Disagree 4%
16%
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 72 I am aware of the FENOC Safety Conscious Work Environment Policy. 32 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know Disagree Disagree March 2003 96%
August 2002 March 2003 82%
1%
3%
I am aware of the Safety Conscious Work Environment Review Team and its purpose. 34 Pillar 4: Detect and Prevent Retaliation 6%
Question Not Asked Question Not Asked 12%
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 73 I believe my work environment is free of harassment, intimidation, retaliation and discrimination (HIRD). 11 March 2003 August 2002 Agree Agree Dont Know Dont Know 67%
77%
Disagree Disagree Pillar 4: Detect and Prevent Retaliation 13%
21%
11%
12%
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 74 August 2002 March 2003 August 2002 March 2003 Yes 12%
Within the last six months, I have been subjected to HIRD for raising nuclear safety, quality or compliance concerns while working at Davis-Besse. 35 I am aware of instances that occurred within the last six months in which workers in my work group have been subjected to HIRD for raising nuclear safety, quality or compliance concerns while working at Davis-Besse. 36 Yes 15%
Pillar 4: Detect and Prevent Retaliation Yes 8%
Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey Yes 7%
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 75 Yes 9%
August 2002 March 2003 August 2002 March 2003 Yes 15%
Within the last six months, I have been subjected to HIRD for raising nuclear safety, quality or compliance concerns while working at Davis-Besse. 35 I am aware of instances that occurred within the last six months in which workers in my work group have been subjected to HIRD for raising nuclear safety, quality or compliance concerns while working at Davis-Besse. 36 Yes 10%
Pillar 4: Detect and Prevent Retaliation Yes 5%
FENOC ONLY Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 76
- Results Show Improvement from August 2002 Survey
- Significant improvement on 24 of 26 questions
- Additional Work Required
- Demonstrating management commitment to Safety Conscious Work Environment
- Improving Confidence in Corrective Action Program
- Improving Confidence in Employee Concerns Program Safety Conscious Work Environment Employee Survey
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 77 Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Milestone Progress/Bulk Work Mike Stevens Director - Maintenance
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 78 Restart Progress
- Major Milestones
- Making progress
- Preparing for Mode 4 and Mode 3 pressure test
- Integrated Schedule
- Includes all Building Block activities
- Potential schedule impact
- High Pressure Injection Pump
- Bulk Work
- Performance Indicators
- Schedule vs. forecasts
- Bulk work
- Emergent workscope
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 79 Integrated Schedule
- Making Progress
- Completed Reactor Coolant System Valve Maintenance
- Restored Containment Air Cooler #2 and #3
- Completed Reactor Coolant Pump Maintenance
- Completed Emergency Sump installation
- Decay Heat Valve Tank Modification near completion
- Filled Reactor Coolant System
- Completed FLUS Installation
- Completed Containment Pressure Test (ILRT)
- Next Milestone
- Mode 4 and Mode 3 Pressure Test
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 80 Schedule vs Forecasts Total Activities = 25,013 Completed to date = 21,363
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 81 CONTAINMENT HEALTH ASSURANCE 0
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Number of Restart CR Evaluations Add Close Tot al Closed 154 171 230 300 433 433 443 484 535 598 624 649 695 724 763 803 832 864 878 885 901 Tot al Open 573 562 607 582 451 452 442 401 354 295 276 251 215 189 151 114 93 63 53 49 35 Close 40 17 59 70 133 0
10 41 51 63 26 25 46 29 39 40 29 32 14 7
16 Add 21 6
104 45 2
1 0
0 4
4 7
0 10 3
1 3
8 2
4 3
2 11/24 12/ 1 12/ 8 12/ 15 12/ 22 12/ 29 1/5 1/ 12 1/19 1/26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 CONTAINMENT HEALTH RESTART CR EVALUATIONS Open Closed
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 82 Closed CONTAINMENT HEALTH ASSURANCE 0
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Number of Restart CAs Add Close Tot al closed 276 312 381 418 468 469 511 587 658 752 833 946 1029 1081 1201 1314 1510 1680 1765 1831 1923 Tot al Open 1127 1129 1160 1177 1204 1203 1182 1226 1311 1335 1299 1229 1187 1174 1083 1026 870 726 655 600 511 Close 40 36 69 37 50 1
42 76 71 94 81 113 83 52 120 113 196 170 85 66 92 Add 62 38 100 54 77 0
21 120 156 118 45 43 41 39 29 56 40 26 14 11 3
11/ 24 12/ 1 12/ 8 12/ 15 12/ 22 12/ 29 1/ 5 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 CONTAINMENT HEALTH RESTART CAs Open Closed
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 83 SYSTEM HEALTH ASSURANCE 0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Number of Restart CR Evaluations Add Closed Total Closed 520 548 585 671 752 791 824 852 899 947 983 1036 1086 1142 1224 1304 1346 1391 1428 1461 1470 Total Open 850 834 807 758 678 640 607 580 537 525 509 458 409 355 273 194 153 109 74 42 33 Closed 69 28 37 86 81 39 33 28 47 48 36 53 50 56 82 80 42 45 37 33 9
Add 19 12 10 37 1
1 0
1 4
36 20 2
1 2
0 1
1 1
2 1
0 11/24 12/1 12/8 12/15 12/22 12/ 29 1/5 1/12 1/19 1/26 2/2 2/ 9 2/16 2/23 3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/ 11 5/18 5/25 SYSTEM HEALTH RESTART CR EVALUATIONS Open Closed
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 84 SYSTEM HEALTH ASSURANCE SYSTEM HEALTH RESTART CAs 0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Number of Restart CAs Add Close Tot al Closed 42 70 91 103 125 131 147 170 212 251 290 354 399 476 594 650 709 766 792 826 894 Tot al Open 516 528 647 775 890 889 894 988 991 992 991 966 937 880 781 753 708 670 653 629 561 Close 7
28 21 12 22 6
16 23 42 39 39 64 45 77 118 56 59 57 26 34 68 Add 97 40 140 140 137 5
21 117 45 40 38 39 16 20 19 28 14 19 9
10 0
11/ 24 12/ 1 12/ 8 12/ 15 12/22 12/ 29 1/ 5 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 Open Closed
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 85 OPERATIONAL READINESS ON-LINE CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG 0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Open Work Orders WOs 172 193 199 220 242 239 251 257 283 293 306 294 296 290 293 286 286 294 291 290 289 285 283 275 271 263 259 C los e 31 17 9
19 12 10 9
12 10 13 3
10 10 13 6
Add 33 11 11 12 12 18 6
11 9
9 1
2 6
5 2
J AN FE B M AR AP R M AY J UN J UL AUG SE P OC T NOV DE C 1/ 05 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 Goal < 250 Good
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 86 Summary
- Making Progress
- Moving Toward Restart
- High Pressure Injection (HPI) Pump
- Electrical distribution
- Readiness meetings
- Mode 4 pressure test mid to late May
- Startup approximately one month later
- Working options to resolve HPI Pump within this timeframe
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 87 Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Restart Action Performance Clark Price Owner - Restart Action Plan
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 88
- Measuring Our Progress
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission 0350 Checklist
- Overall Restart Actions Restart Action Performance
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 89 Restart Action Performance Field Complete In Progress Hold - Plant Conditions N/A - Not Applicable Discovery Implementation 99 97 Technical Root Cause 02-0891 90 100 100 100 86 98 83 0350 Item Description 1
Adequacy of Root Cause a Penetration cracking and Reactor Pressure Vessel corrosion b Organizational, Programmatic and Human Performance Issues 2
Adequacy of Safety Significant Structures, Systems and Components a Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Replacement b Containment Vessel Restoration following RPV Head Replacement c Structures, Systems and Components Inside Containment c.1 Containment Emergency Sump d EOC of Boric Acid in Systems Outside of Containment Item No.
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 90 Restart Action Performance Field Complete In Progress Hold - Plant Conditions N/A - Not Applicable Discovery Implementation 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 95 100 75 85 60 100 0350 Item Description 3
Adequacy of Safety Significant Programs a Corrective Action Program b Operating Experience Program c.1 Quality Audits c.2 Self-Assessments of Programs d Boric Acid Corrosion Management Program e Reactor Coolant System Unidentified Leakage Monitoring Program f In-Service Inspection Program g Modification Program h Radiation Protection Program i Completeness & Accuracy of Required Records
& Submittals to NRC Item No.
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 91 Restart Action Performance Field Complete In Progress Hold - Plant Conditions N/A - Not Applicable 0350 Item Description 4 a-b 5
Readiness for Restart a Review of Licensee's Restart Action Plan b Systems Readiness for Restart b.1 Design Calculation Resolution c Operations Readiness for Restart d Test Program Development and Implementation 6 a-f Licensing Issue Resolution 7 a Confirmatory Action Letter Resolution Item No.
Adequacy of Organizational Effectiveness
& Human Performance Discovery Implementation 100 100 85 66 CAL Resolution & Restart Report Restart Readiness Reviews 100 Included in 5b 79
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 92 RESTART ACTION PLAN TOTAL RESTART CONDITION REPORT EVALUATIONS 0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Number of Restart CRs Add Close Tot al Close d 2227 2306 2459 2770 2961 3030 3112 3213 3417 3570 3694 3848 4005 4190 4473 4715 4860 5038 5160 5280 5359 Tot al Ope n 2340 2305 2293 2096 1949 1895 1821 1761 1656 1597 1560 1459 1351 1201 951 762 658 555 470 407 353 Close 185 79 153 311 191 69 82 101 204 153 124 154 157 185 283 242 145 178 122 120 79 Add 83 44 141 114 44 15 8
41 99 94 87 53 49 35 33 53 41 75 37 57 25 11/ 24 12/ 1 12/ 8 12/ 15 12/ 22 12/ 29 1/ 5 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 Open Closed Work-Off Rates Best of Last 4 Wks =
net of 103/wk Project May 11 Last 4 Wk Ave =
net of 76/wk Project May 18
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 93 RESTART ACTION PLAN TOTAL RESTART CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Number of Restart CAs Add Close Total Closed 741 825 954 1073 1183 1198 1295 1439 1599 1798 1992 2247 2439 2692 3071 3392 3746 4089 4266 4494 4762 Total Open 2608 2625 2794 2932 3091 3090 3072 3245 3416 3463 3420 3299 3213 3112 2854 2668 2409 2185 2066 1869 1610 Close 82 84 129 119 110 15 97 144 160 199 194 255 192 253 379 321 354 343 177 228 268 Add 278 101 298 257 269 14 79 317 331 246 151 134 106 152 121 135 95 119 58 31 9
11/ 24 12/ 1 12/ 8 12/ 15 12/ 22 12/ 29 1/ 5 1/ 12 1/ 19 1/ 26 2/ 2 2/ 9 2/ 16 2/ 23 3/ 2 3/ 9 3/ 16 3/ 23 3/ 30 4/ 6 4/ 13 4/ 20 4/ 27 5/ 4 5/ 11 5/ 18 5/ 25 Open Closed Work-Off Rates Best of Last 4 Wks=
net of 259/wk Project June 1 Last 4 Wk Ave =
net of 200/wk Project June 8
April 15, 2003 April 15, 2003 Davis-Besse Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Nuclear Power Station 94 Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC Closing Comments Lew Myers Chief Operating Officer - FENOC