ML030800045
| ML030800045 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 02/04/2003 |
| From: | Lanksbury R NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Skolds J Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
| References | |
| 50-254/02-301, 50-265/02-301 | |
| Download: ML030800045 (20) | |
Text
VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE QUAD CITIES EXAMINATION - DEC 2002
Facility:
Quad Cities Date of Examination:
December 3-12, 2002 Examinations Developed by:
cility) / NRC (circle one)
Target Chief Date*
Task Description / Reference Examiner's Initials
-180
- 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l.a; C.2.a & b) 14P
-120
- 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e)
-120
- 3. Facility contact briefed on security & other requirements (C.2.c)
-120
- 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
[-90]
[5. Reference material due (C.l.e; C.3.c)]
-75
- 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1.e & f; C.3.d)
-70
- 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)
-45
- 8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g & h; C.3.d)
-30
- 9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)
-14
- 10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)
-14
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
-14
- 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g)
-7
- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7
- 14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)
- 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with
-7 facility licensee and authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)
-7
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.
They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[1 ]
Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1
OUAD CITIES
(
Examinaton.Secuity Aom...mnt I U.IIIj EO-ZU I l*
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of,-z as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, e'luate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physica' security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I wi!! immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge,.I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
(
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATEN9TE
-171 Z/
NOTES:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24
/
_(
QUAD CITIES ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201 -3
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of./L/*L1.
-'as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowl.edqe, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (21 rlATlNTIZ tX.
NOTES: (Ds c,.*b -L "
c o4
(:,,
Z/3 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24
-Q U A D C I T I E S Examination Sec d A reernent F
-2 1.
P re-E xam iin a n r
/ /, I._...F orm E S -2 01
-3 V f 1 acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinadons scheduled for the w examinaffons~O scedle 0o'he w ek2 o as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner, I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as speciflcally noted below and authorized by the NRCFurthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will Immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
22§tEx aion To the best of my knowlede, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s)
-From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24 0
(4 (n
O4 01 (Ti 44 N
'
N
S.......... tiUl I
ata-24 of 24
QUAD CITIES
(
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201 -3
- 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of _____/
___as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of j,*Ž;-...
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIG ATURE (2) DATENOTE
- 2. J dF
,,4-,i I ~t, 61 L7, J/VOL4 1heZ-v
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
NOTES:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 24 of 24
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301 -3 Facility: /42 t/',-/I 0- t'4(
Date of Examination: l-?
C2A. Operatin est Number: /
Snitiial
- 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a
b C#
- a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational Importance, safety function distribution).
flr5
)
r
- b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered
.4..,
during this examination.
t4is&
- c.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).
rw &.
- d.
lOverlap with the written examination and between operating test categones is within acceptable A l
- e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B) CRITERIA
- a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
- initial conditions
- initiating cues
- references and tools, including associated procedures
- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
- specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
//'r V
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b.
The prescripted questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet the criteria in Attachment 1 of ES-301.
- c.
Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.
)",
7i
- d.
At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.
In_
mS
- 3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA
- a.
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with
)t r/
Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Printed Name I Signature Date
- a. Author 1(ml a9~'r L4&
w4--:4
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
411-Sw' le-()
01
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
//rtlOr/
t/ -- Z-I
- d. NRC Supervisor
- 2.
NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.
,,,1
-4/ i, A
411 3'f 23 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 ii
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Quad Cities Date of Exam: 12-02-02 Scenario Numbers:
1/ 2 / 3 / 4 Operating Test No.: 1 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
M9?IS~
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
A0
- 3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew p4A15
,7 the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.,k,"
/45
- 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
/V-.5
- 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are
/27y, )/s given.
- 8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
_Yf M5_
ow
- 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
E,
- 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301.
/'//'
- 11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
W S_
- 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events L
specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
j14 P
TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 / 8 / 6 / 7 j,
- 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 / 1 / 2 / 1
- 3.
Abnormal events (2-4) 4 / 4 / 4/4 J/4
/29y1
- 4.
Major transients (1-2) 2 / 2 / 22 /
124%*
- 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 M
- 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 2 / 1 / 1 /2
/
X
- 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) 2 / 3 / 3 3
24 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 OQ ',Q/7 F-J ED\\\\1 R C_ý
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 OPERATING TEST NO.:1 Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number Type Type Number 1
2 3
4 Spare RO/BOP Reactivity 1
3/-
6/-
2/-
2/
Normal 1
-/2
-/1
-/1
-/1 Instrument 4
1,6 2,4 3,4 3,6 Component
?_/4,5
/3,5
/5,8
/4,5 7Major 7,8 6,7 7,8 Reactivity 1
3 6
2 2
Normal 0
As RO Instrument/
2 1,6 2,4 3,4 3,6 Component 3"
Major 1
Z" 7,8 6,7 7,8 SRO-l Reactivity 0
Normal 1
2 1
1 1
As SRO Instrument /
2 1,4,5 2-5 3-5, 3-6 Component F_.6 8
Major 1
7,9 7,8 6,7 7,8 Reactivity 0
Normal 1
2 1
1 1
SRO-U Instrument /
2 1,4,5 2-5 3-5, 3-6 Component
?'.6 8
Major 1
7,8 6,7 7,8 Instructions:
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
(Vr (1)
Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-. event numbers for each evolution type.
(2)
Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D4.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(3)
Whenever ractical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provi~de insight to the applicant's competenceunt towa the minimum requirement.
,A r-C-Cr-.'
IJ0-3 25 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 Cýý 0
1, Pý
ý\\
ID
,10L~
1W/I, I Ni J Tý\\- C
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 RO BOP SRO Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1,5-2,4, 4-7 Understand and Interpret 8
1 6-8 2,3, 4,5, 3,5-5-8 1,4, 1,4-2-8 4-8 1-8 Annunciators and Alarms 6-8 7, 8 8
5, 7, 8
Diagnose Events 1-8 2-8 2-8 2,3 1-8 1-8 1,5-1,2,4, 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 and Conditions 5-8 8
5,7, Understand Plant 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 and System Response Comply With and 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 Use Procedures (1) 1 1
1 1
1 1
Operate Control 1,3, 2,4, 2-7 2,3, 2,4, 1,3, 1,5-1,4, N/A N/A N/A N/A 3oards (2) 5-8 6-8 6-8 5,7, 5-8 8
5, 7,
___8 8
Communicate and 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 Interact With the Crew Demonstrate Supervisory N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 Ability (3) 1 1
11 Comply With and N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.6 2,5 3,4 2,5 Use Tech. Specs. (3) 1 1
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency f rfevery applicant.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 26 of 26 RA
-57r F'I!
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 12-02-02 Examination Level (circle one): RO Operating Test Number: 1 Administrative Describe method of evaluation:
Topic/Subject
- 2. TWO Administrative Questions A.1 Ability to perform
- 1. Review printout of Thermal Limits Conditions procedures during all modes of plant operation.
2.1.19-3.0 Knowledge of
- 1. Evaluate license maintenance requirements.
operator responsibilities during all modes of plant operation.
2.1.2-3.0 A.2 Knowledge of
- 1. Perform QCOS 0202-06 Jet Pump Test for Dual Loop Operation surveillance (faulted jet pump operability surveillance).
procedures.
2.2.12-3.0 A.3 Ability to perform
- 1. Determine Radiation Exposure.
procedures to guard against personnel exposure.
2.3.10-2.9 A.4 Knowledge of
- 1. Activate ERDS.
emergency communications sýyste -m s a nd techniques.
2.4.43 - 2.8 21 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 NRC Copy #1
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 12-02-02 Examination Level (circle one): SRO Operating Test Number: 1 Administrative Describe method of evaluation:
Topic/Subject
- 2. TWO Administrative Questions A. 1 Ability to
- 1. Determine Isolation Points for Reported System Leakage and Technical recognize Specification Determination indications for systems which are entry-level conditions for tech specs.
2.1.33-4.0 Knowledge of
- 1. Evaluate operator working hours and authorize overtime in shift staffing accordance with GL 82-12 requirements.
requirements.
2.1.4-3.4 A.2 Knowledge of
- 1. Review a faulted Jet Pump operability surveillance.
E surveillance procedures.
2.2.12-3.4 A.3 Knowledge of
- 1. Perform verification calculations for discharge permit.
the requirements for reviewing and approving discharge permits.
2.3.6-3.1 A.4 Knowledge of
emergency plan protective action requirements.
2.4.44 -4.0 21 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 NRC Copy #1
ES-301 Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-Through Test Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 12-02-02 Exam Level (circle one): RO/SRO (I)
Operating Test Number: 1 B.1. Control Room Systems System / JPM Title Type Safety Code*
Function
- a. Reactor Building Ventilation / Bypass Reactor Building Ventilation D, S, L 9
Isolations. 288000 A2.01 3.3/3.4
- b.
RCIC / RCIC Manual Initiation (Hardcard) with a turbine trip and N, A, S, L 4
recovery.(Important PRA task) 217000 A2.02 3.8/3.7
- c. A.C. Electrical Distribution / Supply Bus 14-1 from Bus 24-1.
N, S, L 6
(Important PRA task SOER 83-6) 262001 A4.01 3.4/3.7
- d. Reactor Protection System / Perform a manual scram functional M, A, S 7
test with rod drifts requiring a reactor scram.
212000 A4.01 4.6/4.6
- e. Core Spray / Monthly Core Spray surveillance with failure of the D, A, S 2
minimum flow valve. 209001 A4.04 2.9/2.9
- f.
Containment / Vent primary Containment due to high H2 with a N, A, S, L 5
failure of the Torus 2" vent to open. 500000 EA1.03 3.4/3.2
- g.
Main Steam / Pressurize main Steam Lines.
D, S, L 3
239001 A4.01 4.2/4.0 B.2 Facility Walk-Through
- a. Service Water / Align SSMP Room Cooler to Fire Header D, R, L 8
APE 295018 AA1.01 3.3/3.4
- b. Control Rod Hydraulic / Depressurize the Scram Air Header D, R 1
EPE 295037 EA1.05 3.9/4.0
- c. Residual Heat Removal Shutdown Cooling / Perform the Auxiliary D, L 4
Electric Room actions to start SDC.(Important PRA task)
APE 295021 AA1.02 3.5/3.5
- Type Codes: (D)irect from bank, (M)odified from bank, (N)ew, (A)lternate path, (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, (L)ow Power, (R)CA 22 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 NRC Copy #1
ES-301 Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-Through Test Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Quad Cities Date of Examination: 12-02-02 Exam Level (circle one): SRO (U)
Operating Test Number: 1 B.1 Control Room Systems System / JPM Title Type Safety Code*
Function
- a.
- b.
C.
- d. Reactor Protection System / Perform a manual scram functional M, A, S 7
test with rod drifts requiring a reactor scram.
212000 A4.01 4.6/4.6
- e.
- f.
Containment / Vent primary Containment due to high H2 with a N, A, S, L 5
failure of the Torus 2" vent to open. 500000 EA1.03 3.4/3.2
- g. Main Steam / Pressurize main Steam Lines.
D, S, L 3
239001 A4.01 4.2/4.0 B.2 Facility Walk-Through
- a. Service Water / Align SSMP Room Cooler to Fire Header D, R, L 8
APE 295018 AA1.01 3.3/3.4
- b.
- c. Residual Heat Removal Shutdown Cooling / Perform the Auxiliary D, L 4
Electric Room actions to start SDC.(Important PRA task)
APE 295021 AA1.02 3.5/3.5
- Type Codes: (D)irect from bank, (M)odified from bank, (N)ew, (A)lternate path, (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, (L)ow Power, (R)CA 22 of 26 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement I NRC Copy #1
ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility:
Date of Exam: i2-*_O Exam Level: RO Initial Item Description a
b*
c#
- 1.
Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility
/4ii mns
- 2.
- a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions
- b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available
.Lf
,71
- 3.
RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401
)-- 7 A'4S
- 4.
Question section and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process.
- 5.
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or
__ the examinations were developed independently; or
__ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)
- 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, 44 11 45 and the rest modified); enter the actual
/(4)/ i/s question distribution at right
- 7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual question distribution at right
- 8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers
)
- 9.
Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified
- 10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines
- 11.
The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and yj agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. Author C'
O_¢ 4
n
/
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
C 5_,e_
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
" /*6&MM&u1 61;-6C,.
112
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor
./
/
Note:
- The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46 c
j
/V
[ii gL7
, Me 7
ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-7 Quality Checklist Facility:
Oil
(;fl'**-
Date of Exam: jQ,>09 Exam Level: SRO Initial Item Description a
b*
c#
- 1.
Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility 40,__ 06P
- 2.
- a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions
- b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available
/67I5 5
- 3.
RO/SRO overlap is no more than 75 percent, and SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401
ýns
- 4.
Question section and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process.
- 5.
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
X the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or P/
,4S 45 j
__ the examinations were developed independently; or
__ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
- other (explain)
- 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, 34 9
57
,v and the rest modified); enter the actual Q46*
question distribution at right
- 7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on Memory C/A the exam (including 10 new questions) are AP written at the comprehension/analysis level; 4--
Pt-M/5 enter the actual question distribution at right
- 8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers 44 rd]S
- 9.
Question content conforms with specific KJA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are
,y J] o assigned; deviations are justified
- 10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines
- 11.
The exam contains 100, one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and L
agrees with value on cover sheet
- _--__,/
Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. Author rt f
,,2 *
- 1.
/4" V'
)*//..
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
,./-//-oz
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
11-6-49
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor
,.-/
Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 42 of 46 F]
I FJ L
U7 -
JI/i!/ P t
CPQ,010 v1
(
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-10 Tier / Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection SRO 1 / 1 500000 2.1.33 Not applicable at Quad Cities. Randomly replaced by 295023 A2.02 BOTH 1 / 2 295033 EA1.06 Performed by Radiation Protection at Quad Cities. Randomly replaced by 295034 A2.02 RO 2 / 3 233000 K2.02 Double Jeopardy with 203000 K2.01. Randomly replaced by 234000 K3.03 SRO 1 / 2 600000 2.2.25 Will use Administrative Technical Requirements (ATRs) instead of Technical Specifications (TS) since requirements were moved from TS to ATR.
BOTH G 2.1.17 K & A replaced during NRC Exam review to reflect a more operationally significant K & A. Replaced GENERIC by G 2.1.11.
RO 1 /2 600000 AA2.10 Original question deemed not appropriate for RO. New question has higher K & A and is more operationally significant per the NRC exam review. New K & A 600000 AA2.17 1
1
- 1
- 1 I
4 1
1 1
4 I
4 1
t I
t I
I
- 1
+
1 I
NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 I
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:
L, Date of Exam: L,. 2*
7 Exam LevA."R.1RO Initials Item Description a
b, c
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors
,.,/.
(reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
)'i
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail
)I 49
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are iustified
//
/7
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of 42 questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
-)- os-.
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
,.fr/
1,
z_
- d. NRC Supervisor(*)
Lto
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 I
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: C2
,Q,4 (/.,r Date of Exam: /,,2--2.
Exam Level: R O
Initials Item Description a
b_
c
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before qradinQ zk
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
Mir I/
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in detail Ape
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades
- 1.
/
are justified
________________.~
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of
..,/I.}_f questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
.]A
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) /1/17O1W i
%-1-k
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
-,0.h
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1 I
ES-501 Post-Examination Check Sheet Form ES-501-1 (R8, SI)
Facility:
Quad Cities Examination Date:
December 3-12, 2002 Task Description Date Complete
- 1.
Facility written exam comments or graded exams received and Exam Comments:
verified complete Dated 12/20/02; but verified Rcv'd dated 12/27/02
- 2.
Facility written exam comments reviewed and incorporated and 12/29/02 NRC grading completed, if necessary
- 3.
Operating tests graded by NRC examiners 01/10/03
- 4.
NRC Chief examiner review of written exam and operating test 01/10/03 grading completed
- 5.
Responsible supervisor review completed 9
7
- 6.
Management (licensing official) review completed 0 1 / 28 / 03
- 7.
License and denial letters mailed 01/28/03
- 8.
Facility notified of results 0 1/28/03
- 9.
Examination report issued (refer to N RC MC 0610) 02/04/03
- 10.
Reference material returned after final resolution of any N/A appeals