ML030770366
| ML030770366 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 08/15/2002 |
| From: | Louden P NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | Lanksbury R NRC/RGN-III/DRP/RPB5 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2003-0094, IR-02-011 | |
| Download: ML030770366 (9) | |
Text
-oger Lanksbury -Point Beach ODI insq~pectior planner and document request letter Patrick Louden rdl Thu, Aug 15,2002 12:18 PM Point Beach ODI inspection planner and document request letter
- Roger, Attached for your review are the draft inspection planner and document request letter for the Point Beach ODI inspection. I took Andy Dunlop's name off the team list and left an opening for a DRS Representative. I spoke with Marty Farber about the inspection and he stated he was not aware that he was to be a participant on the inspection team. Once we iron out who the DRS inspector will be, we'll update the planner.
Contact me with any questions or comments.
Thanks From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Page 1 7ýý-,
WA -1ý
August ##, 2002 Mr. A. Cayia Acting Site Vice President Kewaunee and Point Beach Nuclear Plants Nuclear Management Company, LLC 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241
Dear Mr. Cayia:
On September 23, 2002, the NRC will begin a special followup inspection at your Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant. This inspection will be performed to determine whether or not a recently documented RED inspection finding associated with the auxiliary feedwater system meets the guidelines of an old design issue as described in NRC Manual Chapter 0305.
In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both sides, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection.
This information should be available to the Regional Office by no later than September 16, 2002.
In addition to the document request, we would also like for you to provide a presentation to the inspection team following the entrance meeting on September 23, 2002. The presentation should include an overview of the auxiliary feedwater system problem, your actions taken to date, and those actions planned for the future. The discussion on your future actions planned should include how you plan to assess the extent of condition of the auxiliary feedwater system problem against other safety related systems at the plant. The presentation should also contain a discussion on corrective action program changes and improvements over the last six years.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Patrick Louden. We understand that the regulatory contact for the inspection is Fritzie Flentje of your organization. If there are any questions about the material requested, or the inspection, please call Mr. Louden at (217) 935-9521.
A. Cayia In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http:l/www.nrc..ov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely, Roger D. Lanksbury, Chief Branch 5 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27
Enclosure:
List of Documents Requested cc w/encl:
R. Grigg, President and Chief Operating Officer, WEPCo R. Anderson, Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer T. Webb, Licensing Manager D. Weaver, Nuclear Asset Manager T. Taylor, Plant Manager A. Cayia, Site Director J. O'Neill, Jr., Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge K. Duveneck, Town Chairman Town of Two Creeks D. Graham, Director Bureau of Field Operations A. Bie, Chairperson, Wisconsin Public Service Commission S. Jenkins, Electric Division Wisconsin Public Service Commission State Liaison Officer A. Cayia In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.qov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely, Roger D. Lanksbury, Chief Branch 5 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27
Enclosure:
List of Documents Requested cc w/encl:
R. Grigg, President and Chief Operating Officer, WEPCo R. Anderson, Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer T. Webb, Licensing Manager D. Weaver, Nuclear Asset Manager T. Taylor, Plant Manager A. Cayia, Acting Site Vice President J. O'Neill, Jr., Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge K. Duveneck, Town Chairman Town of Two Creeks D. Graham, Director Bureau of Field Operations A. Bie, Chairperson, Wisconsin Public Service Commission S. Jenkins, Electric Division Wisconsin Public Service Commission State Uiaison Officer DOCUMENT NAME: PB.docjreq.wpd To receive a copy of this document, Indicate In the box "C = Copy w/o attach/encl E = Copy with attach/encl N" = No copy OFFICE RIII:DRP I
RIII:DRP Rill:
NAME MKunowski IRLanksbury DATE 08/ /02 08/ /02 08/ /02 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY A. Cayia
-3 ADAMS Distribution:
WOR DFT BAW RidsNrrDipmlipb GEG HBC PGK1 DRPIII DRSIII PLB1 JRK1
Initial Document Request The following information is requested to be provided as soon as possible, but no later than September 16, 2002.
One copy of the current plant organization charts.
One complete set of emergency operating procedures.
One copy of the latest corrective action program controlling procedure Names and phone numbers of contact personnel for technical, regulatory, and corrective action program questions.
The items requested below apply to the auxiliary feedwater system:
- 1.
One copy of the system description, training manuals, and design basis documents The design basis documents should include all revisions of the design basis for the system and individual components dating back to initial plant startup.
- 2.
One copy of the normal and abnormal operating procedures
- 3.
Two half-size copies of the piping and instrument drawings (P&IDs)
- 4.
All corrective action documents that describe or contain actions taken regarding the auxiliary feedwater system problem.
- 5.
Final reports of any self-assessments activities conducted to independently evaluate the auxiliary feedwater system issue including any assessments conducted to evaluate the adequacy of corrective actions taken to prevent recurrence.
INSPECTION PLAN OLD DESIGN ISSUE FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION Point Beach - NRC Inspection Report Number 50-266/301-2002011(DRP)
Inspection Objectives This inspection will be conducted in follow-up to the issuance of a Red inspection finding and Notice of Violation associated with the licensee's Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW)
System. The objectives of this inspection are to:
(1)
Evaluate whether or not the Point Beach AFW system Red finding as described in a letter to the licensee dated July 12, 2002, should be treated as an old design issue in accordance with Manual Chapter 0305.
(2)
Determine whether or not the licensee's current corrective action program would have identified and evaluated the significance of the AFW issue. The licensee has stated that improvements to the corrective action program have occurred since the time that the original AFW issue was identified and inappropriately dispositioned in 1997.
(3)
Determine what programmatic mechanism the licensee has established to ensure that the licensee's Probabilistic Risk Assessment continues to be updated, and that an extent of condition is conducted to ascertain whether or not potential risk significant issues similar to the AFW one exist on other plant systems.
Inspection Dates:
September 23 - 27, 2002 Exit:
TBD Applicable Inspection Procedures 95002 "Inspection for One Degraded Cornerstone or Any Three White Inputs in a Strategic Performance area" will be used as a guidance reference only.
Prepared By:
Patrick Louden, Inspection Team Leader Approved By:
Roger D. Lanksbury, Chief DRP Branch 5
INSPECTION PLAN DETAILS Inspectors:
Patrick Louden, Lead Inspector DRS Representative Zachary Dunham Detailed Inspection Schedule Inspection Preparation at Region III Offices: September 18 & 19, 2002 Onsite Inspection:
September 23 -27, 2002 Entrance Meeting:
September 23, 2002 (time:TBD)
Exit Meeting:
TBD Preparation of Inspection Report:
Input Due: October 4, 2002 Draft Completed: October 11, 2002 Management Review and Approval Completed: October 23, 2002 Inspection Report Must Be Issued Before - October 23, 2002 Ill Specific Inspection Activities Information Collection As part of the inspection advance planning preparation, the lead inspector will contact the licensee, request a selection of pertinent information, and arrange for necessary information to be sent to the Region and/or the appropriate Resident site. If, during the preparation week, additional information is determined to be necessary, the lead inspector will verbally convey additional requests to the licensee as expeditiously as possible.
Preparation Week On September 18 and 19 the team will meet in the Region III Office and review the licensee provided information, discuss detailed assignments for the onsite inspection, and identify any additional information needs. Prior to the team meeting in the Regional Office, the members should be familiar with the Auxiliary Feedwater system Red finding, review inspection report 50-266/301/01-17(DRS) that discusses the issue, and be knowledgeable of the current Agency actions taken to date.
In addition, each team member should be familiar with the Operating Reactor Assessment Program position regarding old design issues as described in Manual Chapter 0305 (section 06.06a).
Inspection
Conclusions:
The conclusions of the inspection should answer the three inspection objectives presented above. All conclusions shall be supported by relevant information which clearly forms a basis for the conclusion.
The team leader will present to Regional Management a conclusion and recommendation regarding whether or not the Red finding should be treated as an old design issue using supporting information gathered and developed by the team.
IV.
RITS and Time Charge Information Inspection Procedure 95002; Dockets 50-266/301 - or TBD Direct inspection estimates for all activities prep/doc/and inspection will be approximately 160 hours0.00185 days <br />0.0444 hours <br />2.645503e-4 weeks <br />6.088e-5 months <br />.
V.
Findings Any additional Findings identified by the team will be coordinated with the Senior Resident Inspector to determine the best mechanism to document the finding, whether it be the team's inspection report or the site's routine integrated inspection report.
VI.
Documentation Each inspector shall keep a list of all documents reviewed and provide it to the team leader with their inspection report inputs. Team members do not need to provide Inspection Scope sections. Prior to the end of the one week onsite inspection, the team will discuss those items which will be documented in the inspection report and reach a conclusion regarding the three inspection focus objectives. For those issues that will be documented in the report, each inspector, as agreed upon with the team leader, will provide an input to the Observations and Findings section in a format consistent with Manual Chapter 0612.
VII.
Interface and Coordination Meetings Team Meetings Team meetings will be held daily starting at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday. The meetings should be an hour in duration and the intent of the meeting is to gather information regarding each inspector's progress on assignments and discuss the team's overall progress in meeting the inspection objectives.
Meetings with the Licensee Daily debriefings with the licensee will start Tuesday evening. These daily meetings normally will be between the team leader and the licensee; on an as-needed basis a team member may be asked to provide specifics on a complicated issue.
2