LG-93-004, Effluent Monitoring Rept for Jul-Dec 1992
| ML20044B847 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Westinghouse |
| Issue date: | 02/12/1993 |
| From: | Goodwin W WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| RA-WLG-93-004, RA-WLG-93-4, NUDOCS 9303100296 | |
| Download: ML20044B847 (2) | |
Text
70-H5/b:0. 'l lh rne ua.
c J
Copres To:
('-
~
Westinghouse Commercial Nuclear Drawm R casa em Electric ^orporation Fuel Division
$7 gasp 9 cp RA-WLG-93-004 February 12,1993 Director, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 hfarietta St, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, GA 30323
Dear Sir:
Subject:
SNhi-1107/70-1151 The following report fulfills regulatory requirements as listed in 10CFR 40.65 and 10CFR 70.59 "Efiluent hionitoring Requirements." For the six-month period July 1,1992 through December 31, 1992, the following quantities of radionuclides were released to the unrestricted area by the Westinghouse Electric Corporation's Columbia, South Carolina Commercial Nuclear Fuel Division plant:
A. Gaseous 496.5 uCi Uranium (Analyzed as gross alpha)
B. Liquid Effluent 7,606 uCi - U-234 367 uCi - U-235 1,191 uCi - U-238 Gaseous results were obtained from point source analysis of stack gas effluent, and the individual radionuclide composition can be assumed to average the same as the liquid (83 % U-234,4% U-235,13%
U-238).
Liquid values were obtained by analyzing composite proportional samples prior to discharge to the C9ngaree River and basing the activity on the calculated average enrichment.
Sincerely, WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION V W AA&u+
W. L. Goodwin, hianager Regulatory Affairs U. S. Nuclear Reg. Commission (2)
Director, (2)
ATTN: Dan haes Office of Nuclear Materis' Safety and safeguards 101 Maricus 5t, NW, Suite 2900 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conuniasion Atlanta, GA 30323 Washington. DC 20555 9303100296 930212 PDR ADOCK 07001151 C
[ O}
The Westinghouse CommercialNuclearFuelDivision - Wiineratthe 1988Malcolm Bald?19e hJtlanalQuahtyAwaro'
(
IEQ
t Westinghouse Commercial Nuclear Oraner a catumma seen ca:cona 29230 Electric Corporation fuel Division 503;776 2S10 RA-WLG-93-004 l
February 12, 1993 i
Director, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta St, NW, Suite 2900 t
Atlanta, GA 30323 I
Dear Sir:
Subject:
SNM-Il07DO-il51 The following report fulfills regulatory requirements as listed in 10CFR 40.65 and 10CFR 70.59
- Effluent Monitoring Requirements." For the six-month period July 1,1992 through December 31, i
1992, the following quantities of radionuclides were released to the unrestricted area by the Westinghouse f
Electric Corporation's Columbia, South Carolina Commercial Nuclesr Fuel Division plant i
A. Gaseous 496.5 uCi Uranium (Analyzed as gross alpha)
B. Liquid Effluent 7,606 uCi - U-234 367 uCi - U-235 1,191 uCi - U-238 Gaseous results were obtained from point source analysis of stack gas effluent, and the individual radionuclide composition can be assumed to average the same as the liquid (83 % U-234,4% U-235,13 %
j U-238).
Liquid values were obtained by analyzing composite proportional samples prior to discharge to the Congaree River and basing the activity on the calculated average enrichment.
Sincerely, WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION t
i W. L. Goodwin, Manager Regulatory Affairs U. S. Nuclear Reg. Commission (2)
Director. (2)
ATTN: Dan Jones Office of Nuclear Material safety and safeguards 10t Marietta St, NW, suite 2900 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta, GA 30323 Washington. DC 20555 t
i The Mstinghouse CommercialNuclearfue/ Division - Winnerofthe 1988Malcolm Bald 79e NahonalQuahh' Award t